News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Mile End recreation ground could be used for a new school


POPULAR playing fields could become the site of a new secondary school in north Colchester.

Planners say the Mile End recreation ground, off Ford’s Lane, would be big enough for a major new school.

The school could be among plans to build 2,200 homes in Mile End.

The 10 hectares of land is made up of football and cricket pitches used by teams from across the borough, as well as a pavilion, a play area and a car park.

A proposal would see the pitches transferred to land north of the A12, and the recreation ground turned into a facility aimed exclusively at Mile End residents.

Robert Johnstone, a resident and Myland Parish Council member, said community facilities promised to Mile End in the past had not materialised.

He added: “Until they put right the mistakes made in the past, I wouldn’t contemplate anything new.

“I wouldn’t like to see the secondary school taking away some of the few sports facilities we have left.

“If they were to build a secondary school on this site, then there would have to be a reduction in the number of houses.”

A “core strategy” for Colchester already states the whole area will see some 2,200 homes built by 2021.

The 100 hectares have been named the “North Growth Area Urban Extension”.

The “extension” would also see a neighbourhood centre and at least one primary school built. Chesterwell Woods would be retained.

The scheme is on top of 1,500 homes due to be built at Severalls Hospital and other ongoing developments at Turner Village and Braiswick Park.

But thoughts are being canvassed on whether the area needs another secondary school, and whether the Mile End playing fields should be altered.

Martin Goss, a councillor representing Mile End, said he had yet to make up his mind on either idea, but said the rapidly growing area needed its own secondary school.

He said: “I think people want a school. They realise that Gilberd or St Helena schools will be oversubscribed.

“I think people would welcome a school, but I’m just not sure if they would welcome it on that location.

“I’m looking forward to seeing what people think of that idea at the consultation.”

Earlier this year, Essex County Council asked for land to be reserved on the site for a secondary school, as a precautionary measure.

Separately, County Hall is closing Alderman Blaxill and Thomas Lord Audley schools as part of a £130million reorganisation of education in Colchester.

Colchester Council spokesman Laura Welham said no decisions had been made on whether a secondary school would be built in Mile End or how the Mile End playing fields would be used.

Comments(13)

Boris says...
3:03am Fri 1 Jan 10

Why can't Martin Goss make up his mind? Is he going to sell Mile End down the river, the way his colleagues in cabinet sold us down the river over the Philip Morant access road?
Playing fields should be absolutely sacrosanct, especially where they are close to people's houses so that most young people can walk there. North of the A12 is not good enough.
This proposal is of course yet another consequence of Lord Bonkers's hatred of Colchester. First he destroys two improving schools in south Colchester, then as a direct consequence of that he finds it necessary to destroy playing fields in north Colchester.
Of course he would not be able to do that if it were not for the contemptible collaboration of the Labour group and the so-called High Woods Independents, all of whom have conspired with the Tories to bully the feeble Lib Dems into caving in to the mad lord's demands.

Voter99 says...
8:44am Fri 1 Jan 10

I agree with Boris 100% on the above points.

Voter99 says...
8:55am Fri 1 Jan 10

By the way any news on the new Colchester Independent Party? Has it started?

totallyfootball says...
10:31am Fri 1 Jan 10

Spot on Boris, why is it always green belt with playing fields that get desecrated for housing and local authority ventures. We complain about the youth (oops another PC error) of today loitering and making a nuisance of themselves and then we remove there amenities. To even think about north of the A12 is ridiculous.

It's sad to think that you will never see the words brains and councils in the same sentence that would be just too much to expect. Would someone be kind enough to give that moron Goss a job that he can do (probably limited I know) rather than let him screw up this town even more.

The Rooster says...
11:03am Fri 1 Jan 10

Illogical. Severalls and all of the land beyond Mill Road was a blank canvas so why take away a facility to build a school. The school should have been part of the original drawings not just houses and more houses. And all this whilst we are closing existing schools. It's going me be a mess and our children will be the losers.

hughie-s says...
1:44pm Fri 1 Jan 10

Many of the existing buildings on the Severalls site would, having been hospital wards, been ideal to convert into a school?

But would a new school be needed if pupils from south of the town going to Charles Lucas, Gilberd and St Helena were sent instead to TLA & Blaxill as that would free up space for those from the north of town.

.

Sdapeze says...
4:02pm Fri 1 Jan 10

Of course this is an unpopular idea. A school is needed and it must be put somewhere. There is a lot of land available in the area and a new recreation area could easily be provided. What is important is that we retain the recreation ground as a local amenity. But isn't this just a smokescreen to draw attention away from the closing of two schools in the Shrub End area of town, against public wishes, against children's needs, with the land that is given up going for building cheap and crammed, gardenless rabbit hutches. No recreation space will be provided in Shrub End with the closing of these schools. This is yet another of Chelmsford's attacks on Colchester at the expense of Colchester people.

crosby says...
11:59pm Fri 1 Jan 10

The building of a school on any open space in Mile End must be compensated by the provision of an equal amount of open space nearby. Contrary to what Boris says I thought that is exactly what was happening re Philip Morant School. The Green has been preserved and the school is handing over open space in exchange for a road through some scrubland. I don't think the decision was feeble - I think it was a brilliant compromise which saved The Green as local people wanted in their petition.

Sdapeze says...
10:31am Sat 2 Jan 10

A brilliant compromise! What a joke. No compromise was wanted. This was a sell-out, against the wishes of the people. Nobody had the balls to oppose Chelmsford. The people who are behind this whole school closing thing send their children to private schools.

Voter99 says...
11:07am Sat 2 Jan 10

So how can Colchester fight back? My feeling is that the people of Colchester lack the brains and the bottle to fight back against Chelmsford's misrule. People will huff and puff, write to the paper, but at the end of the day Lord Bonker's and his supporters will get his way.

crosby says...
12:46pm Sat 2 Jan 10

Sorry Sdapeze, I can't agree totally. Living very locally to where this road will be I have followed everything in the papers and been to listen to meetings. Firstly I don't believe the road across The Green, which my children played on, was ever needed, but thanks to a planning Inspector 10 years ago the school has a legitimate planning permission which I was totally opposed to at the time, but which I can't wish away. I don't believe the Borough could have done anything to stop the road being built or schools being shut as the county, however wrong Bokers is, has a legal right to do what it's doing and is determined to do it, so determined that compulsory purchase would have come next which would have meant the road going slap bang up the middle of The Green. Realistic politics is about compromise and that is what the Borough has achieved while protecting residents from being in the proximity of a road. Where the road is going no resident will be affected any more than they are now. The place to put a stop to Bonkers is by Parliamentary pressure and I have sufficient faith in Bob Russell to believe he will do what he can to stop his Lordship. If the money doesn't come the road won't be built - if the money does come it will be in a much more harmless place. The council could have looked great by saying 'no' knowing full well that the inbuilt Con-Lab-Ind backbench (as opposed to Cabinet) majority would have meant a 'yes' answer in the end. The Cabinet from where I stand as a local resident put up a good fight, but finally had to choose to be realistic and sought an honest compromise which protects The Green so my grandchildren can play on it, and gains a new piece of open space, while giving away a much less useful piece of land. Carrying on opposing Chelmsford for the sake of it would have produced a result no-one except the school wanted.

Of course the true answer to doing away with his Lordship is for Colchester to become a unitary authority. That's why politicians of some colours go pale at the thought.

Voter99 says...
2:53pm Sat 2 Jan 10

Colchester hasn't the brains or the balls to run itself. It's all blah! blah! blah! - if you don't like what the Tories, Labour, LibDems and Highwoods Indies are doing - why don't you put your name on the ballot paper?

crosby says...
3:13pm Sat 2 Jan 10

I await you doing so with keen interest - personally I can't afford to get all those leaflets printed and at my age I'd have trouble delivering them as well. Without them you'll be lucky to muster 50 votes, but please do try.


On the map – the possible site for a new secondary school in north Colchester On the map – the possible site for a new secondary school in north Colchester

Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses