If you set out to design a fire and rescue service for Scotland, it is unlikely that you would come up with the current model of eight bodies, based roughly on the now defunct regional councils. In The Herald yesterday, Her Majesty's chief inspector of constabulary, Paddy Tomkins, set out his vision for a single police force for Scotland. Today, Brian Sweeney, chief officer of Strathclyde Fire and Rescue, suggests that a single national fire service would save many lives and a lot of money.
Similar ideas have been mooted before and rejected, but times change. The current financial crisis is driving radical restructuring in many private companies and inevitably the desire to maintain levels of service with static or shrinking budgets is informing the debate about public-sector reform.
When lives are at stake, caution must be the watchword and incremental change may be the best way. In Wales, fire services were reduced 10 years ago from eight to three to improve efficiency. In an emergency, local knowledge can be the difference between life and death.
It follows that there may be more enthusiasm for pooling management teams, finance departments and the like than eliminating the current regional network of control rooms. In fact, sometimes there may be a more coherent argument for sharing facilities between the different emergency services than between geographical areas. Such changes may be the logical extension of the increased sharing of equipment and expertise between existing services. If such reforms are the best way of keeping or increasing numbers working on the front line, they merit serious consideration.
Click here to comment on this story...
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article