UPDATED: Mother jailed for nightclub attack

Leanne Bloomfield

Leanne Bloomfield

First published in News
Last updated

A MOTHER from Colchester has been jailed for five years after slashing a woman's neck at a nightclub in London.

Leanne Bloomfield, 29, of Berkley Close, Highwoods, denied using glass to slash the neck of Natalie Walsh, 22, the daughter of Ground Force star Tommy Walsh but was found guilty following the attack last February.

Judge Peter Susman QC said: "Quite why your attack on her was so violent remains unclear to me."

The mother-of-two will serve two-and-a-half years after being sentenced for wounding with intent, serving the rest of the sentence on licence.

Supported by members of her family at court earlier today she sobbed throughout.

The court heard the attack on February 3 last year left Ms Walsh with a 5cm cut on her neck and a severed tendon in her thumb.

She required stitches and later underwent cosmetic surgery on her injuries.

Bloomfield had texted a friend after the attack to say she had had a "massive punch up with some girl", adding: "ha ha, b****, she got me good in the nose through", the court heard.

Bloomfield went on to say: "Me and my sister did a number on her, she was in a heap. They didn't catch me, ha ha."

Judge Susman said Ms Walsh's feeling of safety had been "much affected" following the attack.

He told Bloomfield she remains "in denial" as she continues to protest her innocence.

He said: "You were very tearful in the witness box.

"I form the impression it wasn't because you were sorry but because you were caught."

 

Comments (181)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

12:50pm Fri 7 Feb 14

Say It As It Is OK? says...

Think herself lucky that she will only serve Two and a years. She has time now to think she could well have been looking at a life sentence if she had murdered her victim. I'm sure many will sleep easy knowing she has been locked up.
Think herself lucky that she will only serve Two and a years. She has time now to think she could well have been looking at a life sentence if she had murdered her victim. I'm sure many will sleep easy knowing she has been locked up. Say It As It Is OK?
  • Score: 61

3:25pm Fri 7 Feb 14

HARRY438 says...

The text added: "Me and my sister did a number on her, she was in a heap. They didn't catch me, ha ha."..........? Says all I want to know about it.
The text added: "Me and my sister did a number on her, she was in a heap. They didn't catch me, ha ha."..........? Says all I want to know about it. HARRY438
  • Score: 55

4:04pm Fri 7 Feb 14

mirokou says...

Aggressive little CHAV..Enjoy Christmas
Aggressive little CHAV..Enjoy Christmas mirokou
  • Score: 44

5:08pm Fri 7 Feb 14

creditcrunch2010 says...

Millimetres from a LIFE sentence, should be Thankful for only getting 2 1/2 years
Millimetres from a LIFE sentence, should be Thankful for only getting 2 1/2 years creditcrunch2010
  • Score: 38

5:44pm Fri 7 Feb 14

Citizen 139 says...

Filthy scum, enjoy prison although I suspect it's not the last time you'll be there.
Filthy scum, enjoy prison although I suspect it's not the last time you'll be there. Citizen 139
  • Score: 40

6:40pm Fri 7 Feb 14

Kelfamily says...

I've known lei years, she hasn't don't this and there is CCTV to prove this and to show there is no justice, seems money will get you anything though, my heart goes out to her, her family and children.
I hope lies eat away at the girl who told them knowing what she has done to a innocent young intelligent lady! 😢
I've known lei years, she hasn't don't this and there is CCTV to prove this and to show there is no justice, seems money will get you anything though, my heart goes out to her, her family and children. I hope lies eat away at the girl who told them knowing what she has done to a innocent young intelligent lady! 😢 Kelfamily
  • Score: -64

6:48pm Fri 7 Feb 14

creditcrunch2010 says...

Kelfamily wrote:
I've known lei years, she hasn't don't this and there is CCTV to prove this and to show there is no justice, seems money will get you anything though, my heart goes out to her, her family and children.
I hope lies eat away at the girl who told them knowing what she has done to a innocent young intelligent lady! 😢
If she is innocent who was the texts referring to?
[quote][p][bold]Kelfamily[/bold] wrote: I've known lei years, she hasn't don't this and there is CCTV to prove this and to show there is no justice, seems money will get you anything though, my heart goes out to her, her family and children. I hope lies eat away at the girl who told them knowing what she has done to a innocent young intelligent lady! 😢[/p][/quote]If she is innocent who was the texts referring to? creditcrunch2010
  • Score: 46

7:56pm Fri 7 Feb 14

angus_mcoat_up says...

creditcrunch2010 wrote:
Kelfamily wrote:
I've known lei years, she hasn't don't this and there is CCTV to prove this and to show there is no justice, seems money will get you anything though, my heart goes out to her, her family and children.
I hope lies eat away at the girl who told them knowing what she has done to a innocent young intelligent lady! 😢
If she is innocent who was the texts referring to?
There's people I've known for years too who've done things in drink that are completely out of character but that doesn't make them innocent does it?
I've no interest either way in this case but if, as stated, there was CCTV evidence to prove her innocence, then was it shown to the jury? If it was, then it wasn't quite as convincing to a non partial group as it was to her friends. If it wasn't shown, then why not?
As creditcrunch states, if she was so innocent, then who were the texts referring to?
kelfamily says she's an " innocent young intelligent lady", well, judging by the text messages, she seems neither "intelligent" nor a"lady"!
[quote][p][bold]creditcrunch2010[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Kelfamily[/bold] wrote: I've known lei years, she hasn't don't this and there is CCTV to prove this and to show there is no justice, seems money will get you anything though, my heart goes out to her, her family and children. I hope lies eat away at the girl who told them knowing what she has done to a innocent young intelligent lady! 😢[/p][/quote]If she is innocent who was the texts referring to?[/p][/quote]There's people I've known for years too who've done things in drink that are completely out of character but that doesn't make them innocent does it? I've no interest either way in this case but if, as stated, there was CCTV evidence to prove her innocence, then was it shown to the jury? If it was, then it wasn't quite as convincing to a non partial group as it was to her friends. If it wasn't shown, then why not? As creditcrunch states, if she was so innocent, then who were the texts referring to? kelfamily says she's an " innocent young intelligent lady", well, judging by the text messages, she seems neither "intelligent" nor a"lady"! angus_mcoat_up
  • Score: 45

9:19pm Fri 7 Feb 14

Boo boo 2 says...

Even if this young girl did do this there are still so many unanswered questions. like where the glass came from ? Why is the sister and friend not being prosecuted and why did this happen .And has no one else never been on a night out and things got out of hand, this young girl as spent a year with this hanging over her head and not only has she received a prison term but she has lost her children. Her poor babies life has been turned up side down would the centance of been so high if the victim dad wasn't famous ? And did the victim actually need plastic surgery ? I just wonder if two children really needed to lose a mother over a stupid drunken night out.
Even if this young girl did do this there are still so many unanswered questions. like where the glass came from ? Why is the sister and friend not being prosecuted and why did this happen .And has no one else never been on a night out and things got out of hand, this young girl as spent a year with this hanging over her head and not only has she received a prison term but she has lost her children. Her poor babies life has been turned up side down would the centance of been so high if the victim dad wasn't famous ? And did the victim actually need plastic surgery ? I just wonder if two children really needed to lose a mother over a stupid drunken night out. Boo boo 2
  • Score: -30

9:47pm Fri 7 Feb 14

HARRY438 says...

Boo boo 2 wrote:
Even if this young girl did do this there are still so many unanswered questions. like where the glass came from ? Why is the sister and friend not being prosecuted and why did this happen .And has no one else never been on a night out and things got out of hand, this young girl as spent a year with this hanging over her head and not only has she received a prison term but she has lost her children. Her poor babies life has been turned up side down would the centance of been so high if the victim dad wasn't famous ? And did the victim actually need plastic surgery ? I just wonder if two children really needed to lose a mother over a stupid drunken night out.
That slash photo spoke volumes........
[quote][p][bold]Boo boo 2[/bold] wrote: Even if this young girl did do this there are still so many unanswered questions. like where the glass came from ? Why is the sister and friend not being prosecuted and why did this happen .And has no one else never been on a night out and things got out of hand, this young girl as spent a year with this hanging over her head and not only has she received a prison term but she has lost her children. Her poor babies life has been turned up side down would the centance of been so high if the victim dad wasn't famous ? And did the victim actually need plastic surgery ? I just wonder if two children really needed to lose a mother over a stupid drunken night out.[/p][/quote]That slash photo spoke volumes........ HARRY438
  • Score: 24

10:18pm Fri 7 Feb 14

Suffolkcommuter says...

Kelfamily wrote:
I've known lei years, she hasn't don't this and there is CCTV to prove this and to show there is no justice, seems money will get you anything though, my heart goes out to her, her family and children.
I hope lies eat away at the girl who told them knowing what she has done to a innocent young intelligent lady! 😢
She has done this. The court have made their decision. Simple.
[quote][p][bold]Kelfamily[/bold] wrote: I've known lei years, she hasn't don't this and there is CCTV to prove this and to show there is no justice, seems money will get you anything though, my heart goes out to her, her family and children. I hope lies eat away at the girl who told them knowing what she has done to a innocent young intelligent lady! 😢[/p][/quote]She has done this. The court have made their decision. Simple. Suffolkcommuter
  • Score: 28

10:19pm Fri 7 Feb 14

Route88 says...

Two women were involved in a fight. One of the women received a life threatening injury to her throat. The other woman sent a text, part of which read "Me and my sister did a number on her, she was in a heap. They didn't catch me, ha ha."..........?. Is any further comment really necessary?
Two women were involved in a fight. One of the women received a life threatening injury to her throat. The other woman sent a text, part of which read "Me and my sister did a number on her, she was in a heap. They didn't catch me, ha ha."..........?. Is any further comment really necessary? Route88
  • Score: 33

10:45pm Fri 7 Feb 14

Thegirlwithavoice says...

I have always been taught there is two sides to every story. Yet the gazette only print one, the side that has money on there side. So dont this case just prove that money saved the day. And yet readers are believing everything they read, has any of you even considered the fact, that yeah she had a fight with a girl that comes from money, have you even considered the fact that this rich kid could be lying out of her back teeth, no what you read you believe. While your all slagging this young girl off, theres her children that have to go bed every night without there mummy, which seriously if it was two normal people having a fight do you think she would of got such a harsh sentence i think noti do believe there are alot more to this case than what the papers print. And the truth will come out. I am sure.
I have always been taught there is two sides to every story. Yet the gazette only print one, the side that has money on there side. So dont this case just prove that money saved the day. And yet readers are believing everything they read, has any of you even considered the fact, that yeah she had a fight with a girl that comes from money, have you even considered the fact that this rich kid could be lying out of her back teeth, no what you read you believe. While your all slagging this young girl off, theres her children that have to go bed every night without there mummy, which seriously if it was two normal people having a fight do you think she would of got such a harsh sentence i think noti do believe there are alot more to this case than what the papers print. And the truth will come out. I am sure. Thegirlwithavoice
  • Score: -39

12:22am Sat 8 Feb 14

Assimilation says...

The only reason the children will now go to bed without their mummy is because "Their mummy" thinks it OK to leave them and go all the way to London to get p***** out her thick skull instead of staying at home with them. Mummies fault. And I would not call the Walsh family a money family. And turning on the water works to try and make them feel sorry for her, it reminds me of that Tracy whatever that stabbed her boyfriend and blamed it on a road rage attack, she turned on all the tears, pure evil. She deserves everything she gets, and more.
The only reason the children will now go to bed without their mummy is because "Their mummy" thinks it OK to leave them and go all the way to London to get p***** out her thick skull instead of staying at home with them. Mummies fault. And I would not call the Walsh family a money family. And turning on the water works to try and make them feel sorry for her, it reminds me of that Tracy whatever that stabbed her boyfriend and blamed it on a road rage attack, she turned on all the tears, pure evil. She deserves everything she gets, and more. Assimilation
  • Score: 34

12:31am Sat 8 Feb 14

Snowscreen says...

So what is the other side of the story?

Are you saying that she cut herself open?
Or that someone else did but instead of using 'her money' to go after the real attacker she's decided to blame it on Leanne?

There are various posts on this story saying its not true & that it's all lies yet there are then no explanations given for the injuries received.
So what is the other side of the story? Are you saying that she cut herself open? Or that someone else did but instead of using 'her money' to go after the real attacker she's decided to blame it on Leanne? There are various posts on this story saying its not true & that it's all lies yet there are then no explanations given for the injuries received. Snowscreen
  • Score: 31

1:52am Sat 8 Feb 14

Thegirlwithavoice says...

Is there also any proof of the girls injurys part from hear say!! And you cant say that you have n ever left your children with a babysitter to go and have a night out!!
Is there also any proof of the girls injurys part from hear say!! And you cant say that you have n ever left your children with a babysitter to go and have a night out!! Thegirlwithavoice
  • Score: -30

5:33am Sat 8 Feb 14

HARRY438 says...

Thegirlwithavoice wrote:
Is there also any proof of the girls injurys part from hear say!! And you cant say that you have n ever left your children with a babysitter to go and have a night out!!
Not hear say,more look see?
[quote][p][bold]Thegirlwithavoice[/bold] wrote: Is there also any proof of the girls injurys part from hear say!! And you cant say that you have n ever left your children with a babysitter to go and have a night out!![/p][/quote]Not hear say,more look see? HARRY438
  • Score: 17

6:21am Sat 8 Feb 14

Snowscreen says...

I'm sorry but that can't be the other side of the story that others refer to.
There are pictures of the injury on various news websites and no doubt medical records that back up when it was treated, http://www.irishmirr
or.ie/clubber-leanne
-bloomfield-jailed-s
litting-3121241

As you'll see it's a lot more than a scratch.
I'm sorry but that can't be the other side of the story that others refer to. There are pictures of the injury on various news websites and no doubt medical records that back up when it was treated, http://www.irishmirr or.ie/clubber-leanne -bloomfield-jailed-s litting-3121241 As you'll see it's a lot more than a scratch. Snowscreen
  • Score: 17

7:26am Sat 8 Feb 14

Dug says...

I don't understand comments about the sentence being harsh because of a famous parent.

She was convicted of wounding with intent, which means grievous bodily harm with intent. This is a very serious crime. Looking at the sentencing guidelines, this seems to indicate a minimum 3 year sentence, with a maximum of life.

https://www.cps.gov.
uk/legal/s_to_u/sent
encing_manual/woundi
ng_or_inflicting_gri
evous_bodily_harm_wi
th_intent/
I don't understand comments about the sentence being harsh because of a famous parent. She was convicted of wounding with intent, which means grievous bodily harm with intent. This is a very serious crime. Looking at the sentencing guidelines, this seems to indicate a minimum 3 year sentence, with a maximum of life. https://www.cps.gov. uk/legal/s_to_u/sent encing_manual/woundi ng_or_inflicting_gri evous_bodily_harm_wi th_intent/ Dug
  • Score: 21

9:57am Sat 8 Feb 14

wardyt says...

Boo boo 2 wrote:
Even if this young girl did do this there are still so many unanswered questions. like where the glass came from ? Why is the sister and friend not being prosecuted and why did this happen .And has no one else never been on a night out and things got out of hand, this young girl as spent a year with this hanging over her head and not only has she received a prison term but she has lost her children. Her poor babies life has been turned up side down would the centance of been so high if the victim dad wasn't famous ? And did the victim actually need plastic surgery ? I just wonder if two children really needed to lose a mother over a stupid drunken night out.
What utter crap you are talking.

This has nothing to do with the victim being famous.

The victim had her throat cut, that is serious, regardless off whether she needed plastic surgery. That is irrelevant.

Leanne is clearly scrum.

The fact that she has children, shouldn't affect the sentence.

Leanne brought this on her children. She is lucky they aren't taken away.
[quote][p][bold]Boo boo 2[/bold] wrote: Even if this young girl did do this there are still so many unanswered questions. like where the glass came from ? Why is the sister and friend not being prosecuted and why did this happen .And has no one else never been on a night out and things got out of hand, this young girl as spent a year with this hanging over her head and not only has she received a prison term but she has lost her children. Her poor babies life has been turned up side down would the centance of been so high if the victim dad wasn't famous ? And did the victim actually need plastic surgery ? I just wonder if two children really needed to lose a mother over a stupid drunken night out.[/p][/quote]What utter crap you are talking. This has nothing to do with the victim being famous. The victim had her throat cut, that is serious, regardless off whether she needed plastic surgery. That is irrelevant. Leanne is clearly scrum. The fact that she has children, shouldn't affect the sentence. Leanne brought this on her children. She is lucky they aren't taken away. wardyt
  • Score: 20

10:03am Sat 8 Feb 14

HIF1907olympia says...

Kelfamily wrote:
I've known lei years, she hasn't don't this and there is CCTV to prove this and to show there is no justice, seems money will get you anything though, my heart goes out to her, her family and children.
I hope lies eat away at the girl who told them knowing what she has done to a innocent young intelligent lady! 😢
Shut up ... just shut up you idiotic fool. She is a vicious, nasty thug that has been caught. Thankfully her victim isn't dead . The text messages aren't proof of her crime ? Enjoy prison scum !!!!
[quote][p][bold]Kelfamily[/bold] wrote: I've known lei years, she hasn't don't this and there is CCTV to prove this and to show there is no justice, seems money will get you anything though, my heart goes out to her, her family and children. I hope lies eat away at the girl who told them knowing what she has done to a innocent young intelligent lady! 😢[/p][/quote]Shut up ... just shut up you idiotic fool. She is a vicious, nasty thug that has been caught. Thankfully her victim isn't dead . The text messages aren't proof of her crime ? Enjoy prison scum !!!! HIF1907olympia
  • Score: 22

10:44am Sat 8 Feb 14

pixiebell87 says...

poor kids having a mother like that!
poor kids having a mother like that! pixiebell87
  • Score: 19

12:17pm Sat 8 Feb 14

Sheenie says...

The CCTV shows Ms Walsh hitting Ms Bloomfield in the face first. Ms Walsh yet why is Walsh no considered a thug? The CCTV was slowed down frame by frame in court and did not show Ms Bloomfield cut this girls neck or have any weapon at any time. Ms Walsh claims her hair was pulled back and her neck was slashed unprovoked. The CCTV proves Ms Walsh as a lier. So what where the grounds of Ms Bloomfield being convicted of this crime??? A text message. Ms Walsh had 2 other altercations on this night. Who's to say she didn't upset someone else. I had the lovely opportunity to witness Mr and Mrs Walsh bullying behaviour at the plea hearing. They nearly got asked to leave. That's probably where there ' lovely daughter' gets it from.
The CCTV shows Ms Walsh hitting Ms Bloomfield in the face first. Ms Walsh yet why is Walsh no considered a thug? The CCTV was slowed down frame by frame in court and did not show Ms Bloomfield cut this girls neck or have any weapon at any time. Ms Walsh claims her hair was pulled back and her neck was slashed unprovoked. The CCTV proves Ms Walsh as a lier. So what where the grounds of Ms Bloomfield being convicted of this crime??? A text message. Ms Walsh had 2 other altercations on this night. Who's to say she didn't upset someone else. I had the lovely opportunity to witness Mr and Mrs Walsh bullying behaviour at the plea hearing. They nearly got asked to leave. That's probably where there ' lovely daughter' gets it from. Sheenie
  • Score: -21

12:35pm Sat 8 Feb 14

pixiebell87 says...

Sheenie wrote:
The CCTV shows Ms Walsh hitting Ms Bloomfield in the face first. Ms Walsh yet why is Walsh no considered a thug? The CCTV was slowed down frame by frame in court and did not show Ms Bloomfield cut this girls neck or have any weapon at any time. Ms Walsh claims her hair was pulled back and her neck was slashed unprovoked. The CCTV proves Ms Walsh as a lier. So what where the grounds of Ms Bloomfield being convicted of this crime??? A text message. Ms Walsh had 2 other altercations on this night. Who's to say she didn't upset someone else. I had the lovely opportunity to witness Mr and Mrs Walsh bullying behaviour at the plea hearing. They nearly got asked to leave. That's probably where there ' lovely daughter' gets it from.
if cctv shows she didnt do it , why was she found guilty?
[quote][p][bold]Sheenie[/bold] wrote: The CCTV shows Ms Walsh hitting Ms Bloomfield in the face first. Ms Walsh yet why is Walsh no considered a thug? The CCTV was slowed down frame by frame in court and did not show Ms Bloomfield cut this girls neck or have any weapon at any time. Ms Walsh claims her hair was pulled back and her neck was slashed unprovoked. The CCTV proves Ms Walsh as a lier. So what where the grounds of Ms Bloomfield being convicted of this crime??? A text message. Ms Walsh had 2 other altercations on this night. Who's to say she didn't upset someone else. I had the lovely opportunity to witness Mr and Mrs Walsh bullying behaviour at the plea hearing. They nearly got asked to leave. That's probably where there ' lovely daughter' gets it from.[/p][/quote]if cctv shows she didnt do it , why was she found guilty? pixiebell87
  • Score: 14

12:45pm Sat 8 Feb 14

Sheenie says...

Exactly pixiebell87!!! How can they find someone guilty with no real evidence! That's why everyone is getting on websites like this to point that out! Leanne's sister Is going to release the CCTV for everyone to see that! Why would we bother seriously! Leanne has been taken away from her children for 2.5 years.
Exactly pixiebell87!!! How can they find someone guilty with no real evidence! That's why everyone is getting on websites like this to point that out! Leanne's sister Is going to release the CCTV for everyone to see that! Why would we bother seriously! Leanne has been taken away from her children for 2.5 years. Sheenie
  • Score: -18

1:09pm Sat 8 Feb 14

pixiebell87 says...

THERE IS NO WAY SHE WOULD OF BEEN FOUND GUILTY IF CCTV PROVED SHE DIDNT DO ANYTHING. A COURT WOULDNT IGNORE THAT SO MY GUESS IS SHE DID DO IT. WAS FOUND GUILTY. END OF . MAYBE SHE SHOULD OF THOUGHT ABOUT HER KIDS BEFORE GOING OUT & BEHAVING LIKE A COMPLETE THUG. SHE GOT WHAT SHE DESERVED. JUST A SHAME SHE DIDNT GET LONGER!!
THERE IS NO WAY SHE WOULD OF BEEN FOUND GUILTY IF CCTV PROVED SHE DIDNT DO ANYTHING. A COURT WOULDNT IGNORE THAT SO MY GUESS IS SHE DID DO IT. WAS FOUND GUILTY. END OF . MAYBE SHE SHOULD OF THOUGHT ABOUT HER KIDS BEFORE GOING OUT & BEHAVING LIKE A COMPLETE THUG. SHE GOT WHAT SHE DESERVED. JUST A SHAME SHE DIDNT GET LONGER!! pixiebell87
  • Score: 18

1:38pm Sat 8 Feb 14

Sheenie says...

Well if we can get it posted on here we will and you will be eating them words won't you. But I'm sure youwill still say different you silly troll as that's why you are on here. Lol why do you think the CCTV isn't mentioned in the papers! Because it wouldn't paint Ms walsh's image in the same light.
Well if we can get it posted on here we will and you will be eating them words won't you. But I'm sure youwill still say different you silly troll as that's why you are on here. Lol why do you think the CCTV isn't mentioned in the papers! Because it wouldn't paint Ms walsh's image in the same light. Sheenie
  • Score: -13

1:44pm Sat 8 Feb 14

angus_mcoat_up says...

Why does everyone keep referring to her as "young" this & "young" that? She's 29 not 15!
Why does everyone keep referring to her as "young" this & "young" that? She's 29 not 15! angus_mcoat_up
  • Score: 18

1:50pm Sat 8 Feb 14

pixiebell87 says...

Sheenie wrote:
Well if we can get it posted on here we will and you will be eating them words won't you. But I'm sure youwill still say different you silly troll as that's why you are on here. Lol why do you think the CCTV isn't mentioned in the papers! Because it wouldn't paint Ms walsh's image in the same light.
if thats what u need to tell yourself thats fine. i wont be losing any sleep over it.
[quote][p][bold]Sheenie[/bold] wrote: Well if we can get it posted on here we will and you will be eating them words won't you. But I'm sure youwill still say different you silly troll as that's why you are on here. Lol why do you think the CCTV isn't mentioned in the papers! Because it wouldn't paint Ms walsh's image in the same light.[/p][/quote]if thats what u need to tell yourself thats fine. i wont be losing any sleep over it. pixiebell87
  • Score: 3

1:56pm Sat 8 Feb 14

Sheenie says...

Aww you can't argue with facts! Hey pixie
Aww you can't argue with facts! Hey pixie Sheenie
  • Score: -12

2:05pm Sat 8 Feb 14

pixiebell87 says...

cant be bothered end of day her friends & family will defend her that only natural. fact still remains she was found guilty so obviously there is something in evidence used to suggest that that is the case. if indeed she is not guilty i hope that can be proved as ofc its wrong for her to in prison if she didnt do anything.
cant be bothered end of day her friends & family will defend her that only natural. fact still remains she was found guilty so obviously there is something in evidence used to suggest that that is the case. if indeed she is not guilty i hope that can be proved as ofc its wrong for her to in prison if she didnt do anything. pixiebell87
  • Score: 8

2:43pm Sat 8 Feb 14

Snowscreen says...

The facts are that someone slashed her neck.....

If it wasn't Leanne then who was it?
Why if someone else did it would she blame Leanne?
The facts are that someone slashed her neck..... If it wasn't Leanne then who was it? Why if someone else did it would she blame Leanne? Snowscreen
  • Score: 6

3:07pm Sat 8 Feb 14

Sheenie says...

She didn't even do a line up to pick leanne out. It was because they had a fight. Ms Walsh had 2 other altercations that night. The CCTV shows her without a slashed neck. So when did it happen?
She didn't even do a line up to pick leanne out. It was because they had a fight. Ms Walsh had 2 other altercations that night. The CCTV shows her without a slashed neck. So when did it happen? Sheenie
  • Score: -3

3:13pm Sat 8 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

wardyt wrote:
Boo boo 2 wrote:
Even if this young girl did do this there are still so many unanswered questions. like where the glass came from ? Why is the sister and friend not being prosecuted and why did this happen .And has no one else never been on a night out and things got out of hand, this young girl as spent a year with this hanging over her head and not only has she received a prison term but she has lost her children. Her poor babies life has been turned up side down would the centance of been so high if the victim dad wasn't famous ? And did the victim actually need plastic surgery ? I just wonder if two children really needed to lose a mother over a stupid drunken night out.
What utter crap you are talking.

This has nothing to do with the victim being famous.

The victim had her throat cut, that is serious, regardless off whether she needed plastic surgery. That is irrelevant.

Leanne is clearly scrum.

The fact that she has children, shouldn't affect the sentence.

Leanne brought this on her children. She is lucky they aren't taken away.
Scrum !!! What that's then what you are!
[quote][p][bold]wardyt[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Boo boo 2[/bold] wrote: Even if this young girl did do this there are still so many unanswered questions. like where the glass came from ? Why is the sister and friend not being prosecuted and why did this happen .And has no one else never been on a night out and things got out of hand, this young girl as spent a year with this hanging over her head and not only has she received a prison term but she has lost her children. Her poor babies life has been turned up side down would the centance of been so high if the victim dad wasn't famous ? And did the victim actually need plastic surgery ? I just wonder if two children really needed to lose a mother over a stupid drunken night out.[/p][/quote]What utter crap you are talking. This has nothing to do with the victim being famous. The victim had her throat cut, that is serious, regardless off whether she needed plastic surgery. That is irrelevant. Leanne is clearly scrum. The fact that she has children, shouldn't affect the sentence. Leanne brought this on her children. She is lucky they aren't taken away.[/p][/quote]Scrum !!! What that's then what you are! I tell the truth
  • Score: -10

3:20pm Sat 8 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

She only saw leanne the day of the trial , she didn't pick her out in a line -up , she had a fight with her so assumed it was bloomfield ,no medical examination proved that cut was done with a glass , as thee was no report . just assumption .re read the story again no true facts they have just printed a one sided version of events .people on here are the nasty vile scum not leanne !!! Miscarriage of justice completely .
She only saw leanne the day of the trial , she didn't pick her out in a line -up , she had a fight with her so assumed it was bloomfield ,no medical examination proved that cut was done with a glass , as thee was no report . just assumption .re read the story again no true facts they have just printed a one sided version of events .people on here are the nasty vile scum not leanne !!! Miscarriage of justice completely . I tell the truth
  • Score: -11

3:44pm Sat 8 Feb 14

Say It As It Is OK? says...

I tell the truth wrote:
She only saw leanne the day of the trial , she didn't pick her out in a line -up , she had a fight with her so assumed it was bloomfield ,no medical examination proved that cut was done with a glass , as thee was no report . just assumption .re read the story again no true facts they have just printed a one sided version of events .people on here are the nasty vile scum not leanne !!! Miscarriage of justice completely .
Whatever you and your misguided friends believe Bloomfield was found guilty, as charged. She was lucky to get such a short sentence.

And, as you know so much please enlighten everyone and tell us who sent the text....."Me and my sister did a number on her, she was in a heap. They didn't catch me, ha ha."..........?

Clearly, those are not the actions of a good, caring person and for that reason alone her children are most probably better off now without her bad influence.
[quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: She only saw leanne the day of the trial , she didn't pick her out in a line -up , she had a fight with her so assumed it was bloomfield ,no medical examination proved that cut was done with a glass , as thee was no report . just assumption .re read the story again no true facts they have just printed a one sided version of events .people on here are the nasty vile scum not leanne !!! Miscarriage of justice completely .[/p][/quote]Whatever you and your misguided friends believe Bloomfield was found guilty, as charged. She was lucky to get such a short sentence. And, as you know so much please enlighten everyone and tell us who sent the text....."Me and my sister did a number on her, she was in a heap. They didn't catch me, ha ha."..........? Clearly, those are not the actions of a good, caring person and for that reason alone her children are most probably better off now without her bad influence. Say It As It Is OK?
  • Score: 17

4:11pm Sat 8 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

Say It As It Is OK? wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
She only saw leanne the day of the trial , she didn't pick her out in a line -up , she had a fight with her so assumed it was bloomfield ,no medical examination proved that cut was done with a glass , as thee was no report . just assumption .re read the story again no true facts they have just printed a one sided version of events .people on here are the nasty vile scum not leanne !!! Miscarriage of justice completely .
Whatever you and your misguided friends believe Bloomfield was found guilty, as charged. She was lucky to get such a short sentence.

And, as you know so much please enlighten everyone and tell us who sent the text....."Me and my sister did a number on her, she was in a heap. They didn't catch me, ha ha."..........?

Clearly, those are not the actions of a good, caring person and for that reason alone her children are most probably better off now without her bad influence.
You again !your opinion does not bother me in the slightest , you comment on everything GO AWAY AND GET A LIFE!!!! Instead of loving on the Gazzette website tut !!
[quote][p][bold]Say It As It Is OK?[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: She only saw leanne the day of the trial , she didn't pick her out in a line -up , she had a fight with her so assumed it was bloomfield ,no medical examination proved that cut was done with a glass , as thee was no report . just assumption .re read the story again no true facts they have just printed a one sided version of events .people on here are the nasty vile scum not leanne !!! Miscarriage of justice completely .[/p][/quote]Whatever you and your misguided friends believe Bloomfield was found guilty, as charged. She was lucky to get such a short sentence. And, as you know so much please enlighten everyone and tell us who sent the text....."Me and my sister did a number on her, she was in a heap. They didn't catch me, ha ha."..........? Clearly, those are not the actions of a good, caring person and for that reason alone her children are most probably better off now without her bad influence.[/p][/quote]You again !your opinion does not bother me in the slightest , you comment on everything GO AWAY AND GET A LIFE!!!! Instead of loving on the Gazzette website tut !! I tell the truth
  • Score: -14

4:29pm Sat 8 Feb 14

pixiebell87 says...

I tell the truth wrote:
Say It As It Is OK? wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
She only saw leanne the day of the trial , she didn't pick her out in a line -up , she had a fight with her so assumed it was bloomfield ,no medical examination proved that cut was done with a glass , as thee was no report . just assumption .re read the story again no true facts they have just printed a one sided version of events .people on here are the nasty vile scum not leanne !!! Miscarriage of justice completely .
Whatever you and your misguided friends believe Bloomfield was found guilty, as charged. She was lucky to get such a short sentence.

And, as you know so much please enlighten everyone and tell us who sent the text....."Me and my sister did a number on her, she was in a heap. They didn't catch me, ha ha."..........?

Clearly, those are not the actions of a good, caring person and for that reason alone her children are most probably better off now without her bad influence.
You again !your opinion does not bother me in the slightest , you comment on everything GO AWAY AND GET A LIFE!!!! Instead of loving on the Gazzette website tut !!
obviously the opinions do bother you thats clear from the way you reacted to it!!
[quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Say It As It Is OK?[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: She only saw leanne the day of the trial , she didn't pick her out in a line -up , she had a fight with her so assumed it was bloomfield ,no medical examination proved that cut was done with a glass , as thee was no report . just assumption .re read the story again no true facts they have just printed a one sided version of events .people on here are the nasty vile scum not leanne !!! Miscarriage of justice completely .[/p][/quote]Whatever you and your misguided friends believe Bloomfield was found guilty, as charged. She was lucky to get such a short sentence. And, as you know so much please enlighten everyone and tell us who sent the text....."Me and my sister did a number on her, she was in a heap. They didn't catch me, ha ha."..........? Clearly, those are not the actions of a good, caring person and for that reason alone her children are most probably better off now without her bad influence.[/p][/quote]You again !your opinion does not bother me in the slightest , you comment on everything GO AWAY AND GET A LIFE!!!! Instead of loving on the Gazzette website tut !![/p][/quote]obviously the opinions do bother you thats clear from the way you reacted to it!! pixiebell87
  • Score: 10

4:33pm Sat 8 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

mirokou wrote:
Aggressive little CHAV..Enjoy Christmas
Who even uses the word CHAV anymore !!!!!
[quote][p][bold]mirokou[/bold] wrote: Aggressive little CHAV..Enjoy Christmas[/p][/quote]Who even uses the word CHAV anymore !!!!! I tell the truth
  • Score: -15

4:40pm Sat 8 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

pixiebell87 wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
Say It As It Is OK? wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
She only saw leanne the day of the trial , she didn't pick her out in a line -up , she had a fight with her so assumed it was bloomfield ,no medical examination proved that cut was done with a glass , as thee was no report . just assumption .re read the story again no true facts they have just printed a one sided version of events .people on here are the nasty vile scum not leanne !!! Miscarriage of justice completely .
Whatever you and your misguided friends believe Bloomfield was found guilty, as charged. She was lucky to get such a short sentence.

And, as you know so much please enlighten everyone and tell us who sent the text....."Me and my sister did a number on her, she was in a heap. They didn't catch me, ha ha."..........?

Clearly, those are not the actions of a good, caring person and for that reason alone her children are most probably better off now without her bad influence.
You again !your opinion does not bother me in the slightest , you comment on everything GO AWAY AND GET A LIFE!!!! Instead of loving on the Gazzette website tut !!
obviously the opinions do bother you thats clear from the way you reacted to it!!
Yeah you as well !!! Yawn !
[quote][p][bold]pixiebell87[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Say It As It Is OK?[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: She only saw leanne the day of the trial , she didn't pick her out in a line -up , she had a fight with her so assumed it was bloomfield ,no medical examination proved that cut was done with a glass , as thee was no report . just assumption .re read the story again no true facts they have just printed a one sided version of events .people on here are the nasty vile scum not leanne !!! Miscarriage of justice completely .[/p][/quote]Whatever you and your misguided friends believe Bloomfield was found guilty, as charged. She was lucky to get such a short sentence. And, as you know so much please enlighten everyone and tell us who sent the text....."Me and my sister did a number on her, she was in a heap. They didn't catch me, ha ha."..........? Clearly, those are not the actions of a good, caring person and for that reason alone her children are most probably better off now without her bad influence.[/p][/quote]You again !your opinion does not bother me in the slightest , you comment on everything GO AWAY AND GET A LIFE!!!! Instead of loving on the Gazzette website tut !![/p][/quote]obviously the opinions do bother you thats clear from the way you reacted to it!![/p][/quote]Yeah you as well !!! Yawn ! I tell the truth
  • Score: -12

5:09pm Sat 8 Feb 14

UndergroundOverground says...

Tried by a jury of her peers who saw far more evidence than any of us.

I thought the likes of "I tell the truth" and the otjer people leaping to her defence were all planning to present overwhelming evidence that a miscarriage of justice had occured before the sentencing, what happened to that?
Tried by a jury of her peers who saw far more evidence than any of us. I thought the likes of "I tell the truth" and the otjer people leaping to her defence were all planning to present overwhelming evidence that a miscarriage of justice had occured before the sentencing, what happened to that? UndergroundOverground
  • Score: 12

5:10pm Sat 8 Feb 14

Say It As It Is OK? says...

I just love it when a plan comes together!
I just love it when a plan comes together! Say It As It Is OK?
  • Score: 5

6:42pm Sat 8 Feb 14

co2 says...

Kelfamily wrote:
I've known lei years, she hasn't don't this and there is CCTV to prove this and to show there is no justice, seems money will get you anything though, my heart goes out to her, her family and children. I hope lies eat away at the girl who told them knowing what she has done to a innocent young intelligent lady! 😢
probably a blessing for the children that this psychopath who goes clubbing leaving them at home is in prison,i have seen the pictures of the damages she inflicted,she is fortunate it was not a murder,the bragging via text message shows she had no regrets about the attack,prison is the right place for her.
[quote][p][bold]Kelfamily[/bold] wrote: I've known lei years, she hasn't don't this and there is CCTV to prove this and to show there is no justice, seems money will get you anything though, my heart goes out to her, her family and children. I hope lies eat away at the girl who told them knowing what she has done to a innocent young intelligent lady! 😢[/p][/quote]probably a blessing for the children that this psychopath who goes clubbing leaving them at home is in prison,i have seen the pictures of the damages she inflicted,she is fortunate it was not a murder,the bragging via text message shows she had no regrets about the attack,prison is the right place for her. co2
  • Score: 17

9:11pm Sat 8 Feb 14

mirokou says...

I tell the truth wrote:
Say It As It Is OK? wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
She only saw leanne the day of the trial , she didn't pick her out in a line -up , she had a fight with her so assumed it was bloomfield ,no medical examination proved that cut was done with a glass , as thee was no report . just assumption .re read the story again no true facts they have just printed a one sided version of events .people on here are the nasty vile scum not leanne !!! Miscarriage of justice completely .
Whatever you and your misguided friends believe Bloomfield was found guilty, as charged. She was lucky to get such a short sentence.

And, as you know so much please enlighten everyone and tell us who sent the text....."Me and my sister did a number on her, she was in a heap. They didn't catch me, ha ha."..........?

Clearly, those are not the actions of a good, caring person and for that reason alone her children are most probably better off now without her bad influence.
You again !your opinion does not bother me in the slightest , you comment on everything GO AWAY AND GET A LIFE!!!! Instead of loving on the Gazzette website tut !!
Council house and violent
[quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Say It As It Is OK?[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: She only saw leanne the day of the trial , she didn't pick her out in a line -up , she had a fight with her so assumed it was bloomfield ,no medical examination proved that cut was done with a glass , as thee was no report . just assumption .re read the story again no true facts they have just printed a one sided version of events .people on here are the nasty vile scum not leanne !!! Miscarriage of justice completely .[/p][/quote]Whatever you and your misguided friends believe Bloomfield was found guilty, as charged. She was lucky to get such a short sentence. And, as you know so much please enlighten everyone and tell us who sent the text....."Me and my sister did a number on her, she was in a heap. They didn't catch me, ha ha."..........? Clearly, those are not the actions of a good, caring person and for that reason alone her children are most probably better off now without her bad influence.[/p][/quote]You again !your opinion does not bother me in the slightest , you comment on everything GO AWAY AND GET A LIFE!!!! Instead of loving on the Gazzette website tut !![/p][/quote]Council house and violent mirokou
  • Score: 10

10:17pm Sat 8 Feb 14

Assimilation says...

Kelfamily wrote:
I've known lei years, she hasn't don't this and there is CCTV to prove this and to show there is no justice, seems money will get you anything though, my heart goes out to her, her family and children.
I hope lies eat away at the girl who told them knowing what she has done to a innocent young intelligent lady! 😢
Well, there are three lies here for a start "Innocent", "Young", "Lady" She has been cautioned in the past for things similar. So I think you should change your way of thinking to "Guilty" "Middle aged" and "Slapper". Also a good producer of crocodile tears. And where is/are the father/fathers of the children?
[quote][p][bold]Kelfamily[/bold] wrote: I've known lei years, she hasn't don't this and there is CCTV to prove this and to show there is no justice, seems money will get you anything though, my heart goes out to her, her family and children. I hope lies eat away at the girl who told them knowing what she has done to a innocent young intelligent lady! 😢[/p][/quote]Well, there are three lies here for a start "Innocent", "Young", "Lady" She has been cautioned in the past for things similar. So I think you should change your way of thinking to "Guilty" "Middle aged" and "Slapper". Also a good producer of crocodile tears. And where is/are the father/fathers of the children? Assimilation
  • Score: 19

10:43pm Sat 8 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

These people are weird 😂😂😂 seriously you all live on these sites !!!!
These people are weird 😂😂😂 seriously you all live on these sites !!!! I tell the truth
  • Score: -12

12:32am Sun 9 Feb 14

Assimilation says...

I tell the truth wrote:
She only saw leanne the day of the trial , she didn't pick her out in a line -up , she had a fight with her so assumed it was bloomfield ,no medical examination proved that cut was done with a glass , as thee was no report . just assumption .re read the story again no true facts they have just printed a one sided version of events .people on here are the nasty vile scum not leanne !!! Miscarriage of justice completely .
It seems you are master at telling porkies as well. You make a good pair, perhaps you could go and keep her company and plan who you both could attack when you come out.
[quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: She only saw leanne the day of the trial , she didn't pick her out in a line -up , she had a fight with her so assumed it was bloomfield ,no medical examination proved that cut was done with a glass , as thee was no report . just assumption .re read the story again no true facts they have just printed a one sided version of events .people on here are the nasty vile scum not leanne !!! Miscarriage of justice completely .[/p][/quote]It seems you are master at telling porkies as well. You make a good pair, perhaps you could go and keep her company and plan who you both could attack when you come out. Assimilation
  • Score: 11

8:50am Sun 9 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

Assimilation wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
She only saw leanne the day of the trial , she didn't pick her out in a line -up , she had a fight with her so assumed it was bloomfield ,no medical examination proved that cut was done with a glass , as thee was no report . just assumption .re read the story again no true facts they have just printed a one sided version of events .people on here are the nasty vile scum not leanne !!! Miscarriage of justice completely .
It seems you are master at telling porkies as well. You make a good pair, perhaps you could go and keep her company and plan who you both could attack when you come out.
Half 12 at night and still commenting on this ,like I said before very weird !! 😂
[quote][p][bold]Assimilation[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: She only saw leanne the day of the trial , she didn't pick her out in a line -up , she had a fight with her so assumed it was bloomfield ,no medical examination proved that cut was done with a glass , as thee was no report . just assumption .re read the story again no true facts they have just printed a one sided version of events .people on here are the nasty vile scum not leanne !!! Miscarriage of justice completely .[/p][/quote]It seems you are master at telling porkies as well. You make a good pair, perhaps you could go and keep her company and plan who you both could attack when you come out.[/p][/quote]Half 12 at night and still commenting on this ,like I said before very weird !! 😂 I tell the truth
  • Score: -13

6:32pm Sun 9 Feb 14

UndergroundOverground says...

I tell the truth wrote:
Assimilation wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
She only saw leanne the day of the trial , she didn't pick her out in a line -up , she had a fight with her so assumed it was bloomfield ,no medical examination proved that cut was done with a glass , as thee was no report . just assumption .re read the story again no true facts they have just printed a one sided version of events .people on here are the nasty vile scum not leanne !!! Miscarriage of justice completely .
It seems you are master at telling porkies as well. You make a good pair, perhaps you could go and keep her company and plan who you both could attack when you come out.
Half 12 at night and still commenting on this ,like I said before very weird !! 😂
Says the person with nothing better to do at 10 to 9 on a Sunday than to come back and check the comments.
[quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Assimilation[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: She only saw leanne the day of the trial , she didn't pick her out in a line -up , she had a fight with her so assumed it was bloomfield ,no medical examination proved that cut was done with a glass , as thee was no report . just assumption .re read the story again no true facts they have just printed a one sided version of events .people on here are the nasty vile scum not leanne !!! Miscarriage of justice completely .[/p][/quote]It seems you are master at telling porkies as well. You make a good pair, perhaps you could go and keep her company and plan who you both could attack when you come out.[/p][/quote]Half 12 at night and still commenting on this ,like I said before very weird !! 😂[/p][/quote]Says the person with nothing better to do at 10 to 9 on a Sunday than to come back and check the comments. UndergroundOverground
  • Score: 11

6:32am Mon 10 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

Well this lady is part of my family so yes I would come back to defend her ! Unlike all of the trolls on here that make comments on every news article on the Gazzette !! You are vile humans who haven't got anything better to do with there time !! Now overground underground do yourself a favour and go get some friends !!!!!!! Weird
Well this lady is part of my family so yes I would come back to defend her ! Unlike all of the trolls on here that make comments on every news article on the Gazzette !! You are vile humans who haven't got anything better to do with there time !! Now overground underground do yourself a favour and go get some friends !!!!!!! Weird I tell the truth
  • Score: -13

7:01am Mon 10 Feb 14

UndergroundOverground says...

I tell the truth wrote:
Well this lady is part of my family so yes I would come back to defend her ! Unlike all of the trolls on here that make comments on every news article on the Gazzette !! You are vile humans who haven't got anything better to do with there time !! Now overground underground do yourself a favour and go get some friends !!!!!!! Weird
Sorry you seem confused. Vile humans attack people with broken glass and them send text messages bragging about it.

As for weird I'd suggest claiming to have evidence that the trial of a family member was flawed and then doing nothing with it.

I'm sure the sentence passed was devastating especially if the woman had muppets like you telling her she was going to get off all through the trial
[quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: Well this lady is part of my family so yes I would come back to defend her ! Unlike all of the trolls on here that make comments on every news article on the Gazzette !! You are vile humans who haven't got anything better to do with there time !! Now overground underground do yourself a favour and go get some friends !!!!!!! Weird[/p][/quote]Sorry you seem confused. Vile humans attack people with broken glass and them send text messages bragging about it. As for weird I'd suggest claiming to have evidence that the trial of a family member was flawed and then doing nothing with it. I'm sure the sentence passed was devastating especially if the woman had muppets like you telling her she was going to get off all through the trial UndergroundOverground
  • Score: 14

7:14am Mon 10 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

UndergroundOvergroun
d
wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
Well this lady is part of my family so yes I would come back to defend her ! Unlike all of the trolls on here that make comments on every news article on the Gazzette !! You are vile humans who haven't got anything better to do with there time !! Now overground underground do yourself a favour and go get some friends !!!!!!! Weird
Sorry you seem confused. Vile humans attack people with broken glass and them send text messages bragging about it.

As for weird I'd suggest claiming to have evidence that the trial of a family member was flawed and then doing nothing with it.

I'm sure the sentence passed was devastating especially if the woman had muppets like you telling her she was going to get off all through the trial
No medical evidence was found that this was with a glass ! Just assumption (what the papers wrote)

You are a troll .
Run along now more news articles to comment on !
Sad lonely human !!
[quote][p][bold]UndergroundOvergroun d[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: Well this lady is part of my family so yes I would come back to defend her ! Unlike all of the trolls on here that make comments on every news article on the Gazzette !! You are vile humans who haven't got anything better to do with there time !! Now overground underground do yourself a favour and go get some friends !!!!!!! Weird[/p][/quote]Sorry you seem confused. Vile humans attack people with broken glass and them send text messages bragging about it. As for weird I'd suggest claiming to have evidence that the trial of a family member was flawed and then doing nothing with it. I'm sure the sentence passed was devastating especially if the woman had muppets like you telling her she was going to get off all through the trial[/p][/quote]No medical evidence was found that this was with a glass ! Just assumption (what the papers wrote) You are a troll . Run along now more news articles to comment on ! Sad lonely human !! I tell the truth
  • Score: -12

1:15pm Mon 10 Feb 14

wardyt says...

I tell the truth wrote:
wardyt wrote:
Boo boo 2 wrote: Even if this young girl did do this there are still so many unanswered questions. like where the glass came from ? Why is the sister and friend not being prosecuted and why did this happen .And has no one else never been on a night out and things got out of hand, this young girl as spent a year with this hanging over her head and not only has she received a prison term but she has lost her children. Her poor babies life has been turned up side down would the centance of been so high if the victim dad wasn't famous ? And did the victim actually need plastic surgery ? I just wonder if two children really needed to lose a mother over a stupid drunken night out.
What utter crap you are talking. This has nothing to do with the victim being famous. The victim had her throat cut, that is serious, regardless off whether she needed plastic surgery. That is irrelevant. Leanne is clearly scrum. The fact that she has children, shouldn't affect the sentence. Leanne brought this on her children. She is lucky they aren't taken away.
Scrum !!! What that's then what you are!
Great riposte. It's nearly a sentence as well.
[quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]wardyt[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Boo boo 2[/bold] wrote: Even if this young girl did do this there are still so many unanswered questions. like where the glass came from ? Why is the sister and friend not being prosecuted and why did this happen .And has no one else never been on a night out and things got out of hand, this young girl as spent a year with this hanging over her head and not only has she received a prison term but she has lost her children. Her poor babies life has been turned up side down would the centance of been so high if the victim dad wasn't famous ? And did the victim actually need plastic surgery ? I just wonder if two children really needed to lose a mother over a stupid drunken night out.[/p][/quote]What utter crap you are talking. This has nothing to do with the victim being famous. The victim had her throat cut, that is serious, regardless off whether she needed plastic surgery. That is irrelevant. Leanne is clearly scrum. The fact that she has children, shouldn't affect the sentence. Leanne brought this on her children. She is lucky they aren't taken away.[/p][/quote]Scrum !!! What that's then what you are![/p][/quote]Great riposte. It's nearly a sentence as well. wardyt
  • Score: 7

1:54pm Mon 10 Feb 14

karen f says...

Facts about glass crime in the UK are this:

Glass bottles/glasses are the most common weapon used in violent assaults in the UK.
80,000 glass & bottle attacks in the UK per year, accounting for 4% of all violent crime.
1.2 million incidents of alcohol related violence are recorded each year.
40% of A&E admissions are alcohol related, rising to 70% between midnight and 5am Friday to Monday.
£1.7 billion in costs to the NHS alone.
Over a quarter of victims of facial wounds experience serious post-traumatic stress reaction, requiring long-term follow up.
Glass is not just a convenient weapon. A survey of bar workers indicated 40% had sustained accidental glass related injuries. One third needed A&E treatment.

I don't think anybody commenting on this thread can deny that the sooner we get glass out of late-night pubs and clubs, the better!

The sentences that are given for this crime are nowhere near long enough!
Facts about glass crime in the UK are this: Glass bottles/glasses are the most common weapon used in violent assaults in the UK. 80,000 glass & bottle attacks in the UK per year, accounting for 4% of all violent crime. 1.2 million incidents of alcohol related violence are recorded each year. 40% of A&E admissions are alcohol related, rising to 70% between midnight and 5am Friday to Monday. £1.7 billion in costs to the NHS alone. Over a quarter of victims of facial wounds experience serious post-traumatic stress reaction, requiring long-term follow up. Glass is not just a convenient weapon. A survey of bar workers indicated 40% had sustained accidental glass related injuries. One third needed A&E treatment. I don't think anybody commenting on this thread can deny that the sooner we get glass out of late-night pubs and clubs, the better! The sentences that are given for this crime are nowhere near long enough! karen f
  • Score: 14

2:09pm Mon 10 Feb 14

wardyt says...

karen f wrote:
Facts about glass crime in the UK are this: Glass bottles/glasses are the most common weapon used in violent assaults in the UK. 80,000 glass & bottle attacks in the UK per year, accounting for 4% of all violent crime. 1.2 million incidents of alcohol related violence are recorded each year. 40% of A&E admissions are alcohol related, rising to 70% between midnight and 5am Friday to Monday. £1.7 billion in costs to the NHS alone. Over a quarter of victims of facial wounds experience serious post-traumatic stress reaction, requiring long-term follow up. Glass is not just a convenient weapon. A survey of bar workers indicated 40% had sustained accidental glass related injuries. One third needed A&E treatment. I don't think anybody commenting on this thread can deny that the sooner we get glass out of late-night pubs and clubs, the better! The sentences that are given for this crime are nowhere near long enough!
Agreed
[quote][p][bold]karen f[/bold] wrote: Facts about glass crime in the UK are this: Glass bottles/glasses are the most common weapon used in violent assaults in the UK. 80,000 glass & bottle attacks in the UK per year, accounting for 4% of all violent crime. 1.2 million incidents of alcohol related violence are recorded each year. 40% of A&E admissions are alcohol related, rising to 70% between midnight and 5am Friday to Monday. £1.7 billion in costs to the NHS alone. Over a quarter of victims of facial wounds experience serious post-traumatic stress reaction, requiring long-term follow up. Glass is not just a convenient weapon. A survey of bar workers indicated 40% had sustained accidental glass related injuries. One third needed A&E treatment. I don't think anybody commenting on this thread can deny that the sooner we get glass out of late-night pubs and clubs, the better! The sentences that are given for this crime are nowhere near long enough![/p][/quote]Agreed wardyt
  • Score: 8

6:56pm Mon 10 Feb 14

Charlienic says...

If she is innocent as her friends and family say then I hope they are doing everything to get an appeal going-however all the evidence as presented suggests the guilty verdict is correct.
Feel sorry for her children as they appear now to have been separated which hardly suggest a stable home life in the first instance.
If she is innocent as her friends and family say then I hope they are doing everything to get an appeal going-however all the evidence as presented suggests the guilty verdict is correct. Feel sorry for her children as they appear now to have been separated which hardly suggest a stable home life in the first instance. Charlienic
  • Score: 8

1:08am Tue 11 Feb 14

Assimilation says...

I tell the truth wrote:
Well this lady is part of my family so yes I would come back to defend her ! Unlike all of the trolls on here that make comments on every news article on the Gazzette !! You are vile humans who haven't got anything better to do with there time !! Now overground underground do yourself a favour and go get some friends !!!!!!! Weird
It seems from your comments on here that you are as bad as THAT part of your family if not worse with the insults you are throwing about. It is also so sad that the things said on here that you dont like (THE TRUTH) you come out with the word troll. The instant fix for everything. If it’s not troll its one of the discriminations. If as you say there is CCTV to show it was someone else and the weapon was not glass, then why was this not bought up at the trial?. I suggest that you go and pour some more alcohol down your throat, pop some more pills, get another fix, smoke another joint, calm down and re-look through the evidence again then you might just see some sense like the jury did. Weird ennit
[quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: Well this lady is part of my family so yes I would come back to defend her ! Unlike all of the trolls on here that make comments on every news article on the Gazzette !! You are vile humans who haven't got anything better to do with there time !! Now overground underground do yourself a favour and go get some friends !!!!!!! Weird[/p][/quote]It seems from your comments on here that you are as bad as THAT part of your family if not worse with the insults you are throwing about. It is also so sad that the things said on here that you dont like (THE TRUTH) you come out with the word troll. The instant fix for everything. If it’s not troll its one of the discriminations. If as you say there is CCTV to show it was someone else and the weapon was not glass, then why was this not bought up at the trial?. I suggest that you go and pour some more alcohol down your throat, pop some more pills, get another fix, smoke another joint, calm down and re-look through the evidence again then you might just see some sense like the jury did. Weird ennit Assimilation
  • Score: 8

10:49am Tue 11 Feb 14

haveanopinion2 says...

I see the photo of this gash and I thought she had cut her own neck until I read story.there is more to this story than what the papers have printed
I see the photo of this gash and I thought she had cut her own neck until I read story.there is more to this story than what the papers have printed haveanopinion2
  • Score: -9

12:37pm Tue 11 Feb 14

karen f says...

Seriously!!! You have obviously never known a victim of glass crime? It completely ruins their life! I actually despair at some people's complete ignorance to a nasty, vile crime that happens way too often because people cannot control themselves when they've had one too many. Look up pictures of glassing victims on google and let me know if you think any of them did it to themselves! No wonder I feel like I am banging my head against a brick wall in trying to get glass out of late-night pubs and clubs when I see comments like this!
Seriously!!! You have obviously never known a victim of glass crime? It completely ruins their life! I actually despair at some people's complete ignorance to a nasty, vile crime that happens way too often because people cannot control themselves when they've had one too many. Look up pictures of glassing victims on google and let me know if you think any of them did it to themselves! No wonder I feel like I am banging my head against a brick wall in trying to get glass out of late-night pubs and clubs when I see comments like this! karen f
  • Score: 7

1:32pm Tue 11 Feb 14

essex_jim says...

Assimilation wrote:
I tell the truth wrote: Well this lady is part of my family so yes I would come back to defend her ! Unlike all of the trolls on here that make comments on every news article on the Gazzette !! You are vile humans who haven't got anything better to do with there time !! Now overground underground do yourself a favour and go get some friends !!!!!!! Weird
It seems from your comments on here that you are as bad as THAT part of your family if not worse with the insults you are throwing about. It is also so sad that the things said on here that you dont like (THE TRUTH) you come out with the word troll. The instant fix for everything. If it’s not troll its one of the discriminations. If as you say there is CCTV to show it was someone else and the weapon was not glass, then why was this not bought up at the trial?. I suggest that you go and pour some more alcohol down your throat, pop some more pills, get another fix, smoke another joint, calm down and re-look through the evidence again then you might just see some sense like the jury did. Weird ennit
You've kind of shown how you like to make assumptions and generalise by assuming this person drinks, does drugs etc.. I hate the way this country has become with people like you. I actually pity them. Sat on your pedestal, acting all high and mighty. But that's the way the media have turned people such as yourself, you probably used to be a good person capable of not judging others you know little about.

I hope one day you take you're head out your arse and get better mate.
[quote][p][bold]Assimilation[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: Well this lady is part of my family so yes I would come back to defend her ! Unlike all of the trolls on here that make comments on every news article on the Gazzette !! You are vile humans who haven't got anything better to do with there time !! Now overground underground do yourself a favour and go get some friends !!!!!!! Weird[/p][/quote]It seems from your comments on here that you are as bad as THAT part of your family if not worse with the insults you are throwing about. It is also so sad that the things said on here that you dont like (THE TRUTH) you come out with the word troll. The instant fix for everything. If it’s not troll its one of the discriminations. If as you say there is CCTV to show it was someone else and the weapon was not glass, then why was this not bought up at the trial?. I suggest that you go and pour some more alcohol down your throat, pop some more pills, get another fix, smoke another joint, calm down and re-look through the evidence again then you might just see some sense like the jury did. Weird ennit[/p][/quote]You've kind of shown how you like to make assumptions and generalise by assuming this person drinks, does drugs etc.. I hate the way this country has become with people like you. I actually pity them. Sat on your pedestal, acting all high and mighty. But that's the way the media have turned people such as yourself, you probably used to be a good person capable of not judging others you know little about. I hope one day you take you're head out your arse and get better mate. essex_jim
  • Score: -8

3:51pm Tue 11 Feb 14

creditcrunch2010 says...

essex_jim wrote:
Assimilation wrote:
I tell the truth wrote: Well this lady is part of my family so yes I would come back to defend her ! Unlike all of the trolls on here that make comments on every news article on the Gazzette !! You are vile humans who haven't got anything better to do with there time !! Now overground underground do yourself a favour and go get some friends !!!!!!! Weird
It seems from your comments on here that you are as bad as THAT part of your family if not worse with the insults you are throwing about. It is also so sad that the things said on here that you dont like (THE TRUTH) you come out with the word troll. The instant fix for everything. If it’s not troll its one of the discriminations. If as you say there is CCTV to show it was someone else and the weapon was not glass, then why was this not bought up at the trial?. I suggest that you go and pour some more alcohol down your throat, pop some more pills, get another fix, smoke another joint, calm down and re-look through the evidence again then you might just see some sense like the jury did. Weird ennit
You've kind of shown how you like to make assumptions and generalise by assuming this person drinks, does drugs etc.. I hate the way this country has become with people like you. I actually pity them. Sat on your pedestal, acting all high and mighty. But that's the way the media have turned people such as yourself, you probably used to be a good person capable of not judging others you know little about.

I hope one day you take you're head out your arse and get better mate.
Essex_jim you need to hate the country and what it has become, not Assimilation.. It is not an assumption or generalisation, nearly all violent crime in this country is related to drink and/or drugs. I do not know in this case but one thing is for sure you don't get many stone cold sober people going out on a night out and ending up in prison. This is a sad story for everyone involved.
[quote][p][bold]essex_jim[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Assimilation[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: Well this lady is part of my family so yes I would come back to defend her ! Unlike all of the trolls on here that make comments on every news article on the Gazzette !! You are vile humans who haven't got anything better to do with there time !! Now overground underground do yourself a favour and go get some friends !!!!!!! Weird[/p][/quote]It seems from your comments on here that you are as bad as THAT part of your family if not worse with the insults you are throwing about. It is also so sad that the things said on here that you dont like (THE TRUTH) you come out with the word troll. The instant fix for everything. If it’s not troll its one of the discriminations. If as you say there is CCTV to show it was someone else and the weapon was not glass, then why was this not bought up at the trial?. I suggest that you go and pour some more alcohol down your throat, pop some more pills, get another fix, smoke another joint, calm down and re-look through the evidence again then you might just see some sense like the jury did. Weird ennit[/p][/quote]You've kind of shown how you like to make assumptions and generalise by assuming this person drinks, does drugs etc.. I hate the way this country has become with people like you. I actually pity them. Sat on your pedestal, acting all high and mighty. But that's the way the media have turned people such as yourself, you probably used to be a good person capable of not judging others you know little about. I hope one day you take you're head out your arse and get better mate.[/p][/quote]Essex_jim you need to hate the country and what it has become, not Assimilation.. It is not an assumption or generalisation, nearly all violent crime in this country is related to drink and/or drugs. I do not know in this case but one thing is for sure you don't get many stone cold sober people going out on a night out and ending up in prison. This is a sad story for everyone involved. creditcrunch2010
  • Score: 7

4:01pm Tue 11 Feb 14

Assimilation says...

essex_jim.......Well well well, the person in question who was found guilty did not let a drop of alcohol pass her lips, she just done it for a laugh? If that is right then it shows even more what a sort of person she really is. The way this Country has become, is because of people like her and her family, and people like you,"The I can change everyone and everything" and " We are right and the rest of you are wrong" type of persons.
Might I suggest that if the truth hurts you that much, you are in denial and you better seek help fast.
Also I do not believe everything I see in the press, but whatever happened, where, when and for what reason, she done it and has now to pay the price whatever others may think or say.
So I suggest to you, make sure your membership to the B.H.B is up to date and go back to reading you Guardian.
P.S. I`m no mate of yours, thank goodness.
essex_jim.......Well well well, the person in question who was found guilty did not let a drop of alcohol pass her lips, she just done it for a laugh? If that is right then it shows even more what a sort of person she really is. The way this Country has become, is because of people like her and her family, and people like you,"The I can change everyone and everything" and " We are right and the rest of you are wrong" type of persons. Might I suggest that if the truth hurts you that much, you are in denial and you better seek help fast. Also I do not believe everything I see in the press, but whatever happened, where, when and for what reason, she done it and has now to pay the price whatever others may think or say. So I suggest to you, make sure your membership to the B.H.B is up to date and go back to reading you Guardian. P.S. I`m no mate of yours, thank goodness. Assimilation
  • Score: 6

5:31pm Tue 11 Feb 14

haveanopinion2 says...

Commenting that leanne is scum,do you personally know her then.or is it just from what you read in papers.it amazes me that you beleive everything thats written in a paper as gospel truth.... lol get a life
Commenting that leanne is scum,do you personally know her then.or is it just from what you read in papers.it amazes me that you beleive everything thats written in a paper as gospel truth.... lol get a life haveanopinion2
  • Score: -13

10:43pm Tue 11 Feb 14

Assimilation says...

haveanopinion2 wrote:
Commenting that leanne is scum,do you personally know her then.or is it just from what you read in papers.it amazes me that you beleive everything thats written in a paper as gospel truth.... lol get a life
Now you are sounding like a brainless relative of "essex_jim" and "I tell the truth." Are you saying that she is not guilty and has been sent down for a crime that she did not commit and that the press and TV are lying? Sorry about that, now we can all rest and believe you. Why don't you start a petition and march on Downing Street. What a burk you are. She was there, she started it, she done it and now has to pay the price. The only loosers are her kids.
[quote][p][bold]haveanopinion2[/bold] wrote: Commenting that leanne is scum,do you personally know her then.or is it just from what you read in papers.it amazes me that you beleive everything thats written in a paper as gospel truth.... lol get a life[/p][/quote]Now you are sounding like a brainless relative of "essex_jim" and "I tell the truth." Are you saying that she is not guilty and has been sent down for a crime that she did not commit and that the press and TV are lying? Sorry about that, now we can all rest and believe you. Why don't you start a petition and march on Downing Street. What a burk you are. She was there, she started it, she done it and now has to pay the price. The only loosers are her kids. Assimilation
  • Score: 9

12:24pm Wed 12 Feb 14

Sheenie says...

Em she started it???? NO Ms Walsh punched Ms Bloomfield in the face. You say eviedance proves she did it? Please can you explain to us all what evidence there is against her?
Em she started it???? NO Ms Walsh punched Ms Bloomfield in the face. You say eviedance proves she did it? Please can you explain to us all what evidence there is against her? Sheenie
  • Score: -10

12:35pm Wed 12 Feb 14

wardyt says...

Sheenie wrote:
Em she started it???? NO Ms Walsh punched Ms Bloomfield in the face. You say eviedance proves she did it? Please can you explain to us all what evidence there is against her?
She certainly finished it................by slashing someones throat. What a lovely person she must be.
[quote][p][bold]Sheenie[/bold] wrote: Em she started it???? NO Ms Walsh punched Ms Bloomfield in the face. You say eviedance proves she did it? Please can you explain to us all what evidence there is against her?[/p][/quote]She certainly finished it................by slashing someones throat. What a lovely person she must be. wardyt
  • Score: 16

12:42pm Wed 12 Feb 14

Sheenie says...

Oh look your reply shows you know nothing about this case so pipe down.
Oh look your reply shows you know nothing about this case so pipe down. Sheenie
  • Score: -12

12:50pm Wed 12 Feb 14

creditcrunch2010 says...

Sheenie wrote:
Em she started it???? NO Ms Walsh punched Ms Bloomfield in the face. You say eviedance proves she did it? Please can you explain to us all what evidence there is against her?
Sheenie, can you explain if Ms Bloomfield did not start it , why did Ms Walsh punch her in the face?
[quote][p][bold]Sheenie[/bold] wrote: Em she started it???? NO Ms Walsh punched Ms Bloomfield in the face. You say eviedance proves she did it? Please can you explain to us all what evidence there is against her?[/p][/quote]Sheenie, can you explain if Ms Bloomfield did not start it , why did Ms Walsh punch her in the face? creditcrunch2010
  • Score: 7

12:50pm Wed 12 Feb 14

wardyt says...

Sheenie wrote:
Oh look your reply shows you know nothing about this case so pipe down.
Did she not cut someones throat then?
[quote][p][bold]Sheenie[/bold] wrote: Oh look your reply shows you know nothing about this case so pipe down.[/p][/quote]Did she not cut someones throat then? wardyt
  • Score: 10

3:25pm Wed 12 Feb 14

Say It As It Is OK? says...

After the verdict was read out, Bloomfield, of Highwoods, in Colchester, Essex, turned to the jury and said: "I didn't do it", before breaking down in tears. As she continued to protest her innocence, Judge Peter Susman QC told the defendant "please be quiet".

He adjourned sentencing to February 7, adding he had "no choice but to impose a prison sentence". Turning to Bloomfield, Mr Susman said: "You will be granted bail until February 7.

"You must make arrangements for your children's welfare on the basis you are going to prison."

The court heard that Bloomfield had been previously cautioned by police in August 2004 for common assault after a fight with a woman in a street.

Investigating officer Detective Constable Will Richards, of the Metropolitan Police said: "Leanne Bloomfield's actions on February 3 2013 demonstrated a shocking disregard for the potentially life-threatening consequences of such a vicious attack.

"In fact, both Leanne Bloomfield and Natalie Walsh are, in my opinion, very lucky that the injuries sustained were not very much more serious.

"The text messages sent by Bloomfield in the hours following this incident reveal a disturbing level of pride and satisfaction in her violence. Bloomfield has refused to accept her guilt throughout and, as a result, Natalie has had to wait nearly a year for this result.
After the verdict was read out, Bloomfield, of Highwoods, in Colchester, Essex, turned to the jury and said: "I didn't do it", before breaking down in tears. As she continued to protest her innocence, Judge Peter Susman QC told the defendant "please be quiet". He adjourned sentencing to February 7, adding he had "no choice but to impose a prison sentence". Turning to Bloomfield, Mr Susman said: "You will be granted bail until February 7. "You must make arrangements for your children's welfare on the basis you are going to prison." The court heard that Bloomfield had been previously cautioned by police in August 2004 for common assault after a fight with a woman in a street. Investigating officer Detective Constable Will Richards, of the Metropolitan Police said: "Leanne Bloomfield's actions on February 3 2013 demonstrated a shocking disregard for the potentially life-threatening consequences of such a vicious attack. "In fact, both Leanne Bloomfield and Natalie Walsh are, in my opinion, very lucky that the injuries sustained were not very much more serious. "The text messages sent by Bloomfield in the hours following this incident reveal a disturbing level of pride and satisfaction in her violence. Bloomfield has refused to accept her guilt throughout and, as a result, Natalie has had to wait nearly a year for this result. Say It As It Is OK?
  • Score: 7

4:18pm Wed 12 Feb 14

Assimilation says...

Sheenie wrote:
Em she started it???? NO Ms Walsh punched Ms Bloomfield in the face. You say eviedance proves she did it? Please can you explain to us all what evidence there is against her?
I dont have to prove any evidence, all the evidence was proved in court so it does not matter how much you rant on and on about it so just shut up and except it. GUILTY end of story.If you dont like it, try and sort it, BUT NOT ON HERE, GO AWAY!!!!
[quote][p][bold]Sheenie[/bold] wrote: Em she started it???? NO Ms Walsh punched Ms Bloomfield in the face. You say eviedance proves she did it? Please can you explain to us all what evidence there is against her?[/p][/quote]I dont have to prove any evidence, all the evidence was proved in court so it does not matter how much you rant on and on about it so just shut up and except it. GUILTY end of story.If you dont like it, try and sort it, BUT NOT ON HERE, GO AWAY!!!! Assimilation
  • Score: 6

4:25pm Wed 12 Feb 14

Assimilation says...

Say It As It Is OK? wrote:
After the verdict was read out, Bloomfield, of Highwoods, in Colchester, Essex, turned to the jury and said: "I didn't do it", before breaking down in tears. As she continued to protest her innocence, Judge Peter Susman QC told the defendant "please be quiet".

He adjourned sentencing to February 7, adding he had "no choice but to impose a prison sentence". Turning to Bloomfield, Mr Susman said: "You will be granted bail until February 7.

"You must make arrangements for your children's welfare on the basis you are going to prison."

The court heard that Bloomfield had been previously cautioned by police in August 2004 for common assault after a fight with a woman in a street.

Investigating officer Detective Constable Will Richards, of the Metropolitan Police said: "Leanne Bloomfield's actions on February 3 2013 demonstrated a shocking disregard for the potentially life-threatening consequences of such a vicious attack.

"In fact, both Leanne Bloomfield and Natalie Walsh are, in my opinion, very lucky that the injuries sustained were not very much more serious.

"The text messages sent by Bloomfield in the hours following this incident reveal a disturbing level of pride and satisfaction in her violence. Bloomfield has refused to accept her guilt throughout and, as a result, Natalie has had to wait nearly a year for this result.
Why have you put quotes from the press on here ? Certain people on here are saying we must not believe what we see in the press and it was all a setup.
[quote][p][bold]Say It As It Is OK?[/bold] wrote: After the verdict was read out, Bloomfield, of Highwoods, in Colchester, Essex, turned to the jury and said: "I didn't do it", before breaking down in tears. As she continued to protest her innocence, Judge Peter Susman QC told the defendant "please be quiet". He adjourned sentencing to February 7, adding he had "no choice but to impose a prison sentence". Turning to Bloomfield, Mr Susman said: "You will be granted bail until February 7. "You must make arrangements for your children's welfare on the basis you are going to prison." The court heard that Bloomfield had been previously cautioned by police in August 2004 for common assault after a fight with a woman in a street. Investigating officer Detective Constable Will Richards, of the Metropolitan Police said: "Leanne Bloomfield's actions on February 3 2013 demonstrated a shocking disregard for the potentially life-threatening consequences of such a vicious attack. "In fact, both Leanne Bloomfield and Natalie Walsh are, in my opinion, very lucky that the injuries sustained were not very much more serious. "The text messages sent by Bloomfield in the hours following this incident reveal a disturbing level of pride and satisfaction in her violence. Bloomfield has refused to accept her guilt throughout and, as a result, Natalie has had to wait nearly a year for this result.[/p][/quote]Why have you put quotes from the press on here ? Certain people on here are saying we must not believe what we see in the press and it was all a setup. Assimilation
  • Score: 0

4:34pm Wed 12 Feb 14

billygoatgruff says...

I'm a bit confused as to who would stand to gain anything if this was a set up??
I'm a bit confused as to who would stand to gain anything if this was a set up?? billygoatgruff
  • Score: 8

8:31pm Wed 12 Feb 14

Sheenie says...

Assimilation your a bit irate! I'm making a point that you know nothing about it! Which you clearly don't other wise you could state the evidence against her. How do you know it's not being sorted? The paper have printed a one sided story. I have freedom of speech so I can say what i like. Don't make a fool of yourself and go and comment on something else on the gazzette if you don't like what I have to say.
Assimilation your a bit irate! I'm making a point that you know nothing about it! Which you clearly don't other wise you could state the evidence against her. How do you know it's not being sorted? The paper have printed a one sided story. I have freedom of speech so I can say what i like. Don't make a fool of yourself and go and comment on something else on the gazzette if you don't like what I have to say. Sheenie
  • Score: -6

9:28pm Wed 12 Feb 14

wardyt says...

Sheenie wrote:
Assimilation your a bit irate! I'm making a point that you know nothing about it! Which you clearly don't other wise you could state the evidence against her. How do you know it's not being sorted? The paper have printed a one sided story. I have freedom of speech so I can say what i like. Don't make a fool of yourself and go and comment on something else on the gazzette if you don't like what I have to say.
You're not your. Gazette had one T
[quote][p][bold]Sheenie[/bold] wrote: Assimilation your a bit irate! I'm making a point that you know nothing about it! Which you clearly don't other wise you could state the evidence against her. How do you know it's not being sorted? The paper have printed a one sided story. I have freedom of speech so I can say what i like. Don't make a fool of yourself and go and comment on something else on the gazzette if you don't like what I have to say.[/p][/quote]You're not your. Gazette had one T wardyt
  • Score: -9

10:32pm Wed 12 Feb 14

Assimilation says...

Sheenie wrote:
Assimilation your a bit irate! I'm making a point that you know nothing about it! Which you clearly don't other wise you could state the evidence against her. How do you know it's not being sorted? The paper have printed a one sided story. I have freedom of speech so I can say what i like. Don't make a fool of yourself and go and comment on something else on the gazzette if you don't like what I have to say.
If your so **** sure that the evidence you say you have proves that she did not do it and is not guilty and everyone on here does not know what they are talking about, and only you do, then why was you not called as a witness to prove her innocence? As you say you are the only one that knows what happened, then I suggest you got to the police with a solicitor and get this matter sorted out. But of course if you did we would know nothing about it because the media and TV would have it all wrong AGAIN. Better still go on the Jeremy Kyle show, you would fit in well, you could f and blind, rant and rave and shout your big gob off to your hearts content and make a right ***** of yourself, like you are/ have on here.
[quote][p][bold]Sheenie[/bold] wrote: Assimilation your a bit irate! I'm making a point that you know nothing about it! Which you clearly don't other wise you could state the evidence against her. How do you know it's not being sorted? The paper have printed a one sided story. I have freedom of speech so I can say what i like. Don't make a fool of yourself and go and comment on something else on the gazzette if you don't like what I have to say.[/p][/quote]If your so **** sure that the evidence you say you have proves that she did not do it and is not guilty and everyone on here does not know what they are talking about, and only you do, then why was you not called as a witness to prove her innocence? As you say you are the only one that knows what happened, then I suggest you got to the police with a solicitor and get this matter sorted out. But of course if you did we would know nothing about it because the media and TV would have it all wrong AGAIN. Better still go on the Jeremy Kyle show, you would fit in well, you could f and blind, rant and rave and shout your big gob off to your hearts content and make a right ***** of yourself, like you are/ have on here. Assimilation
  • Score: 4

11:19pm Wed 12 Feb 14

Sheenie says...

I'm not the one swearing or irate. I've only ever wrote facts like all the other people on here that are on Leanne's side. To say I have a big gob or would fit in on Jeremy kylie is funny because indeed you are acting like the sort of person who would be on that show. You know nothing about me and I find your assumptions quite funny. You need to calm Down and except I'm going to back a very dear friend. I've not posted to have abuse thrown at me just put my friends side across which the paper has not printed. I'm not the one making a fool of myself. What you say or think about the situation makes no difference to me. You make me laugh but I'm not interested in talking to you any longer.
I'm not the one swearing or irate. I've only ever wrote facts like all the other people on here that are on Leanne's side. To say I have a big gob or would fit in on Jeremy kylie is funny because indeed you are acting like the sort of person who would be on that show. You know nothing about me and I find your assumptions quite funny. You need to calm Down and except I'm going to back a very dear friend. I've not posted to have abuse thrown at me just put my friends side across which the paper has not printed. I'm not the one making a fool of myself. What you say or think about the situation makes no difference to me. You make me laugh but I'm not interested in talking to you any longer. Sheenie
  • Score: -2

12:37am Thu 13 Feb 14

Assimilation says...

Sheenie wrote:
I'm not the one swearing or irate. I've only ever wrote facts like all the other people on here that are on Leanne's side. To say I have a big gob or would fit in on Jeremy kylie is funny because indeed you are acting like the sort of person who would be on that show. You know nothing about me and I find your assumptions quite funny. You need to calm Down and except I'm going to back a very dear friend. I've not posted to have abuse thrown at me just put my friends side across which the paper has not printed. I'm not the one making a fool of myself. What you say or think about the situation makes no difference to me. You make me laugh but I'm not interested in talking to you any longer.
It does not matter what you think you know. She has been sent down for something she has done, FACT. I am very much NOT irate I am just trying to make you to pull yourself together and face up to those facts. Tell me what facts you have got that was not put before the court, were you there? did you see what happened? Even if the other party hit her first, there was no need to cut her. I challenge you to put all the facts that you say you have on here. You are the one that is getting hyper, no, then go back and read your comments. If, as you say, what others say makes no difference to your way of thinking, then I suggest you get off of here and put all your efforts into funding her appeal defence.
And by the way, it`s spelt Kyle not Kylie. You have a good night
[quote][p][bold]Sheenie[/bold] wrote: I'm not the one swearing or irate. I've only ever wrote facts like all the other people on here that are on Leanne's side. To say I have a big gob or would fit in on Jeremy kylie is funny because indeed you are acting like the sort of person who would be on that show. You know nothing about me and I find your assumptions quite funny. You need to calm Down and except I'm going to back a very dear friend. I've not posted to have abuse thrown at me just put my friends side across which the paper has not printed. I'm not the one making a fool of myself. What you say or think about the situation makes no difference to me. You make me laugh but I'm not interested in talking to you any longer.[/p][/quote]It does not matter what you think you know. She has been sent down for something she has done, FACT. I am very much NOT irate I am just trying to make you to pull yourself together and face up to those facts. Tell me what facts you have got that was not put before the court, were you there? did you see what happened? Even if the other party hit her first, there was no need to cut her. I challenge you to put all the facts that you say you have on here. You are the one that is getting hyper, no, then go back and read your comments. If, as you say, what others say makes no difference to your way of thinking, then I suggest you get off of here and put all your efforts into funding her appeal defence. And by the way, it`s spelt Kyle not Kylie. You have a good night Assimilation
  • Score: 0

6:28am Thu 13 Feb 14

HIF1907olympia says...

I love how people are still trying to justify that this convicted scum is innocent and its a travesty of justice !!!! Too many jumped up little thugs like her think they're untouchable when out at night but this proves that false !! Lets hope this thug has dropped this attitude of thinking they're so tough !!! Now eat your porridge !!!!!
I love how people are still trying to justify that this convicted scum is innocent and its a travesty of justice !!!! Too many jumped up little thugs like her think they're untouchable when out at night but this proves that false !! Lets hope this thug has dropped this attitude of thinking they're so tough !!! Now eat your porridge !!!!! HIF1907olympia
  • Score: 8

7:06am Thu 13 Feb 14

HIF1907olympia says...

Sheenie says...

Em she started it???? NO Ms Walsh punched Ms Bloomfield in the face. You say eviedance proves she did it? Please can you explain to us all what evidence there is against her?

You are an example of why this country is out of control !!! Just listen to yourself trying to uphold this charade that the thug is somehow innocent !! I think you need a few lessons in the justice system and how evidence works !
Sheenie says... Em she started it???? NO Ms Walsh punched Ms Bloomfield in the face. You say eviedance proves she did it? Please can you explain to us all what evidence there is against her? You are an example of why this country is out of control !!! Just listen to yourself trying to uphold this charade that the thug is somehow innocent !! I think you need a few lessons in the justice system and how evidence works ! HIF1907olympia
  • Score: 7

8:27am Thu 13 Feb 14

Say It As It Is OK? says...

Assimilation wrote:
Say It As It Is OK? wrote:
After the verdict was read out, Bloomfield, of Highwoods, in Colchester, Essex, turned to the jury and said: "I didn't do it", before breaking down in tears. As she continued to protest her innocence, Judge Peter Susman QC told the defendant "please be quiet".

He adjourned sentencing to February 7, adding he had "no choice but to impose a prison sentence". Turning to Bloomfield, Mr Susman said: "You will be granted bail until February 7.

"You must make arrangements for your children's welfare on the basis you are going to prison."

The court heard that Bloomfield had been previously cautioned by police in August 2004 for common assault after a fight with a woman in a street.

Investigating officer Detective Constable Will Richards, of the Metropolitan Police said: "Leanne Bloomfield's actions on February 3 2013 demonstrated a shocking disregard for the potentially life-threatening consequences of such a vicious attack.

"In fact, both Leanne Bloomfield and Natalie Walsh are, in my opinion, very lucky that the injuries sustained were not very much more serious.

"The text messages sent by Bloomfield in the hours following this incident reveal a disturbing level of pride and satisfaction in her violence. Bloomfield has refused to accept her guilt throughout and, as a result, Natalie has had to wait nearly a year for this result.
Why have you put quotes from the press on here ? Certain people on here are saying we must not believe what we see in the press and it was all a setup.
I thought that these misguided souls hadn't got a grasp of what really happened so I thought, as a caring soul, it would be good to remind them so they can read what was quoted in court by the judge.

I know our Free press don't always get their story right and they look for sensational reporting to sell papers, however in this case Bloomfield dug herself in too deep by texting and bragging about what she did, which was not disputed and in itself, if nothing else, it shows her lack of intelligence.

Her supporters are fighting a losing battle because the evidence of her guilt is overwhelming and is there for all to see, that is except for those who are blinded by some form of misguided friendship for a violent and dangerous person.
[quote][p][bold]Assimilation[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Say It As It Is OK?[/bold] wrote: After the verdict was read out, Bloomfield, of Highwoods, in Colchester, Essex, turned to the jury and said: "I didn't do it", before breaking down in tears. As she continued to protest her innocence, Judge Peter Susman QC told the defendant "please be quiet". He adjourned sentencing to February 7, adding he had "no choice but to impose a prison sentence". Turning to Bloomfield, Mr Susman said: "You will be granted bail until February 7. "You must make arrangements for your children's welfare on the basis you are going to prison." The court heard that Bloomfield had been previously cautioned by police in August 2004 for common assault after a fight with a woman in a street. Investigating officer Detective Constable Will Richards, of the Metropolitan Police said: "Leanne Bloomfield's actions on February 3 2013 demonstrated a shocking disregard for the potentially life-threatening consequences of such a vicious attack. "In fact, both Leanne Bloomfield and Natalie Walsh are, in my opinion, very lucky that the injuries sustained were not very much more serious. "The text messages sent by Bloomfield in the hours following this incident reveal a disturbing level of pride and satisfaction in her violence. Bloomfield has refused to accept her guilt throughout and, as a result, Natalie has had to wait nearly a year for this result.[/p][/quote]Why have you put quotes from the press on here ? Certain people on here are saying we must not believe what we see in the press and it was all a setup.[/p][/quote]I thought that these misguided souls hadn't got a grasp of what really happened so I thought, as a caring soul, it would be good to remind them so they can read what was quoted in court by the judge. I know our Free press don't always get their story right and they look for sensational reporting to sell papers, however in this case Bloomfield dug herself in too deep by texting and bragging about what she did, which was not disputed and in itself, if nothing else, it shows her lack of intelligence. Her supporters are fighting a losing battle because the evidence of her guilt is overwhelming and is there for all to see, that is except for those who are blinded by some form of misguided friendship for a violent and dangerous person. Say It As It Is OK?
  • Score: 7

9:32am Thu 13 Feb 14

creditcrunch2010 says...

Sheenie wrote:
Em she started it???? NO Ms Walsh punched Ms Bloomfield in the face. You say eviedance proves she did it? Please can you explain to us all what evidence there is against her?
Sheenie you failed to answer.... Why did Ms Walsh punch Ms Bloomfield in the face???
[quote][p][bold]Sheenie[/bold] wrote: Em she started it???? NO Ms Walsh punched Ms Bloomfield in the face. You say eviedance proves she did it? Please can you explain to us all what evidence there is against her?[/p][/quote]Sheenie you failed to answer.... Why did Ms Walsh punch Ms Bloomfield in the face??? creditcrunch2010
  • Score: 6

12:39pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Assimilation says...

All has gone quiet on the Sheenie, sorry, western front
All has gone quiet on the Sheenie, sorry, western front Assimilation
  • Score: 6

12:40pm Thu 13 Feb 14

essex_jim says...

Assimilation wrote:
essex_jim.......Well well well, the person in question who was found guilty did not let a drop of alcohol pass her lips, she just done it for a laugh? If that is right then it shows even more what a sort of person she really is. The way this Country has become, is because of people like her and her family, and people like you,"The I can change everyone and everything" and " We are right and the rest of you are wrong" type of persons. Might I suggest that if the truth hurts you that much, you are in denial and you better seek help fast. Also I do not believe everything I see in the press, but whatever happened, where, when and for what reason, she done it and has now to pay the price whatever others may think or say. So I suggest to you, make sure your membership to the B.H.B is up to date and go back to reading you Guardian. P.S. I`m no mate of yours, thank goodness.
I was clearly referring to the person you were replying to, you made an assumption on them..you know, I tell the truth on here? Keep up.
[quote][p][bold]Assimilation[/bold] wrote: essex_jim.......Well well well, the person in question who was found guilty did not let a drop of alcohol pass her lips, she just done it for a laugh? If that is right then it shows even more what a sort of person she really is. The way this Country has become, is because of people like her and her family, and people like you,"The I can change everyone and everything" and " We are right and the rest of you are wrong" type of persons. Might I suggest that if the truth hurts you that much, you are in denial and you better seek help fast. Also I do not believe everything I see in the press, but whatever happened, where, when and for what reason, she done it and has now to pay the price whatever others may think or say. So I suggest to you, make sure your membership to the B.H.B is up to date and go back to reading you Guardian. P.S. I`m no mate of yours, thank goodness.[/p][/quote]I was clearly referring to the person you were replying to, you made an assumption on them..you know, I tell the truth on here? Keep up. essex_jim
  • Score: -1

2:07pm Thu 13 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

Leannes barrister showed CCTV footage of the night club, which had been digitally enhanced and slowed down. During the footage, it is clear that an altercation occurs (which in real time lasted for approximately 12 seconds). Leanne is seen to lunge backwards and the victim grabs at leannes face. In this section of the video, it can clearly be seen that She has a clutch handbag beneath leannes right arm and that both of leanne hands are empty (hence why her defence barrister was so keen to show the footage). Despite the club dance floor being very busy at the time of the altercation and alleged crime, the prosecution could produce only one witness...Mr. Ahmed Kurda. Mr. Kurda stated that he had seen leanne slash the victims throat with a broken glass...yet the CCTV footage shows that her hands are empty. The witness also told the court that Leanne was wearing a black mini dress, which yet again is completely inaccurate (She was in fact wearing a black top covered in silver sequins and black trousers...both items were taken as evidence by Officer Rook at the time of my arrest).
• Mr. Kurda also told the court that Leanne pulled the victim to the ground and repeatedly punched her in the head (which is also not shown on the video as this did not take place). There were also many inconsistencies between what Mr. Kurda stated in court and his original statement.
• The CPS confirmed that after forensically analysing the clothing and footwear that She wore on the evening of 3rd February 2013, none of Miss. Walsh’s DNA/blood was found (yet She had allegedly slashed her throat with a broken glass).
• All items of possible evidence (such as broken glass, etc) were retrieved from the crime scene and forensically analysed. The results of which showed that none of leannes fingerprints or DNA could be found.
• When the court returned after a 2 day adjournment, a member of the jury passed a note to the judge, which he proceeded to read. He then passed the letter to leannes barrister and the prosecution. The letter stated that the jury member felt he was taking part in an unfair trial as people were making things up to work out how it happened .as there was no evidence she had commited this crime .
Leannes barrister showed CCTV footage of the night club, which had been digitally enhanced and slowed down. During the footage, it is clear that an altercation occurs (which in real time lasted for approximately 12 seconds). Leanne is seen to lunge backwards and the victim grabs at leannes face. In this section of the video, it can clearly be seen that She has a clutch handbag beneath leannes right arm and that both of leanne hands are empty (hence why her defence barrister was so keen to show the footage). Despite the club dance floor being very busy at the time of the altercation and alleged crime, the prosecution could produce only one witness...Mr. Ahmed Kurda. Mr. Kurda stated that he had seen leanne slash the victims throat with a broken glass...yet the CCTV footage shows that her hands are empty. The witness also told the court that Leanne was wearing a black mini dress, which yet again is completely inaccurate (She was in fact wearing a black top covered in silver sequins and black trousers...both items were taken as evidence by Officer Rook at the time of my arrest). • Mr. Kurda also told the court that Leanne pulled the victim to the ground and repeatedly punched her in the head (which is also not shown on the video as this did not take place). There were also many inconsistencies between what Mr. Kurda stated in court and his original statement. • The CPS confirmed that after forensically analysing the clothing and footwear that She wore on the evening of 3rd February 2013, none of Miss. Walsh’s DNA/blood was found (yet She had allegedly slashed her throat with a broken glass). • All items of possible evidence (such as broken glass, etc) were retrieved from the crime scene and forensically analysed. The results of which showed that none of leannes fingerprints or DNA could be found. • When the court returned after a 2 day adjournment, a member of the jury passed a note to the judge, which he proceeded to read. He then passed the letter to leannes barrister and the prosecution. The letter stated that the jury member felt he was taking part in an unfair trial as people were making things up to work out how it happened .as there was no evidence she had commited this crime . I tell the truth
  • Score: 0

2:30pm Thu 13 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

HIF1907olympia wrote:
I love how people are still trying to justify that this convicted scum is innocent and its a travesty of justice !!!! Too many jumped up little thugs like her think they're untouchable when out at night but this proves that false !! Lets hope this thug has dropped this attitude of thinking they're so tough !!! Now eat your porridge !!!!!
Actually I've heard the foods really nice in there ! And what's wrong with porridge ?!!
[quote][p][bold]HIF1907olympia[/bold] wrote: I love how people are still trying to justify that this convicted scum is innocent and its a travesty of justice !!!! Too many jumped up little thugs like her think they're untouchable when out at night but this proves that false !! Lets hope this thug has dropped this attitude of thinking they're so tough !!! Now eat your porridge !!!!![/p][/quote]Actually I've heard the foods really nice in there ! And what's wrong with porridge ?!! I tell the truth
  • Score: -1

2:31pm Thu 13 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

Say It As It Is OK? wrote:
Assimilation wrote:
Say It As It Is OK? wrote:
After the verdict was read out, Bloomfield, of Highwoods, in Colchester, Essex, turned to the jury and said: "I didn't do it", before breaking down in tears. As she continued to protest her innocence, Judge Peter Susman QC told the defendant "please be quiet".

He adjourned sentencing to February 7, adding he had "no choice but to impose a prison sentence". Turning to Bloomfield, Mr Susman said: "You will be granted bail until February 7.

"You must make arrangements for your children's welfare on the basis you are going to prison."

The court heard that Bloomfield had been previously cautioned by police in August 2004 for common assault after a fight with a woman in a street.

Investigating officer Detective Constable Will Richards, of the Metropolitan Police said: "Leanne Bloomfield's actions on February 3 2013 demonstrated a shocking disregard for the potentially life-threatening consequences of such a vicious attack.

"In fact, both Leanne Bloomfield and Natalie Walsh are, in my opinion, very lucky that the injuries sustained were not very much more serious.

"The text messages sent by Bloomfield in the hours following this incident reveal a disturbing level of pride and satisfaction in her violence. Bloomfield has refused to accept her guilt throughout and, as a result, Natalie has had to wait nearly a year for this result.
Why have you put quotes from the press on here ? Certain people on here are saying we must not believe what we see in the press and it was all a setup.
I thought that these misguided souls hadn't got a grasp of what really happened so I thought, as a caring soul, it would be good to remind them so they can read what was quoted in court by the judge.

I know our Free press don't always get their story right and they look for sensational reporting to sell papers, however in this case Bloomfield dug herself in too deep by texting and bragging about what she did, which was not disputed and in itself, if nothing else, it shows her lack of intelligence.

Her supporters are fighting a losing battle because the evidence of her guilt is overwhelming and is there for all to see, that is except for those who are blinded by some form of misguided friendship for a violent and dangerous person.
She wasn't bragging about slashing someone's neck was she ?!!!
[quote][p][bold]Say It As It Is OK?[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Assimilation[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Say It As It Is OK?[/bold] wrote: After the verdict was read out, Bloomfield, of Highwoods, in Colchester, Essex, turned to the jury and said: "I didn't do it", before breaking down in tears. As she continued to protest her innocence, Judge Peter Susman QC told the defendant "please be quiet". He adjourned sentencing to February 7, adding he had "no choice but to impose a prison sentence". Turning to Bloomfield, Mr Susman said: "You will be granted bail until February 7. "You must make arrangements for your children's welfare on the basis you are going to prison." The court heard that Bloomfield had been previously cautioned by police in August 2004 for common assault after a fight with a woman in a street. Investigating officer Detective Constable Will Richards, of the Metropolitan Police said: "Leanne Bloomfield's actions on February 3 2013 demonstrated a shocking disregard for the potentially life-threatening consequences of such a vicious attack. "In fact, both Leanne Bloomfield and Natalie Walsh are, in my opinion, very lucky that the injuries sustained were not very much more serious. "The text messages sent by Bloomfield in the hours following this incident reveal a disturbing level of pride and satisfaction in her violence. Bloomfield has refused to accept her guilt throughout and, as a result, Natalie has had to wait nearly a year for this result.[/p][/quote]Why have you put quotes from the press on here ? Certain people on here are saying we must not believe what we see in the press and it was all a setup.[/p][/quote]I thought that these misguided souls hadn't got a grasp of what really happened so I thought, as a caring soul, it would be good to remind them so they can read what was quoted in court by the judge. I know our Free press don't always get their story right and they look for sensational reporting to sell papers, however in this case Bloomfield dug herself in too deep by texting and bragging about what she did, which was not disputed and in itself, if nothing else, it shows her lack of intelligence. Her supporters are fighting a losing battle because the evidence of her guilt is overwhelming and is there for all to see, that is except for those who are blinded by some form of misguided friendship for a violent and dangerous person.[/p][/quote]She wasn't bragging about slashing someone's neck was she ?!!! I tell the truth
  • Score: -2

2:31pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Lanely88 says...

I used to work in a bar in Colchester town centre and Leanne attacked me at work twice. The first time I was actually on duty and glass collecting where she pushed me off a stage for no reason, making me land on broken glass. I was new to the establishment at the time and was really shore at that random aggressive behaviour. I reported the incident to the bouncers, but she scarpered before she could be removed.
A few months later in the same bar, I was on a night out and she cornered me in the toilets. She held me by the throat, holding a glass bottle in her hand and looked ready to strike but the toilet attention raised the alarm, literally and she disappeared in a panic.
I never knew this girl or why she was randomly trying to attack people. A couple of weeks later I discovered we had a mutual friend on Facebook, so I finally had a name behind the face. She came in several times over the years but I would refuse to serve her and my boss at the time insisted on her being barred for threatening behaviour. The last time I saw her was whilst I was working in the same bar, and she managed to slipped through on a busy night because we had new door staff. I never saw her at the bar but I did see her being dragged out by a bouncer for fighting on the dancefloor.
I wasn't remotely surprised seeing her face in the paper. This woman is a violent, mentally unstable thug who appears to go round randomly attacking people for her own entertainment. She should have got much longer in prison and her poor kids should be taken off her.
I used to work in a bar in Colchester town centre and Leanne attacked me at work twice. The first time I was actually on duty and glass collecting where she pushed me off a stage for no reason, making me land on broken glass. I was new to the establishment at the time and was really shore at that random aggressive behaviour. I reported the incident to the bouncers, but she scarpered before she could be removed. A few months later in the same bar, I was on a night out and she cornered me in the toilets. She held me by the throat, holding a glass bottle in her hand and looked ready to strike but the toilet attention raised the alarm, literally and she disappeared in a panic. I never knew this girl or why she was randomly trying to attack people. A couple of weeks later I discovered we had a mutual friend on Facebook, so I finally had a name behind the face. She came in several times over the years but I would refuse to serve her and my boss at the time insisted on her being barred for threatening behaviour. The last time I saw her was whilst I was working in the same bar, and she managed to slipped through on a busy night because we had new door staff. I never saw her at the bar but I did see her being dragged out by a bouncer for fighting on the dancefloor. I wasn't remotely surprised seeing her face in the paper. This woman is a violent, mentally unstable thug who appears to go round randomly attacking people for her own entertainment. She should have got much longer in prison and her poor kids should be taken off her. Lanely88
  • Score: 5

2:49pm Thu 13 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

Lanely88 wrote:
I used to work in a bar in Colchester town centre and Leanne attacked me at work twice. The first time I was actually on duty and glass collecting where she pushed me off a stage for no reason, making me land on broken glass. I was new to the establishment at the time and was really shore at that random aggressive behaviour. I reported the incident to the bouncers, but she scarpered before she could be removed.
A few months later in the same bar, I was on a night out and she cornered me in the toilets. She held me by the throat, holding a glass bottle in her hand and looked ready to strike but the toilet attention raised the alarm, literally and she disappeared in a panic.
I never knew this girl or why she was randomly trying to attack people. A couple of weeks later I discovered we had a mutual friend on Facebook, so I finally had a name behind the face. She came in several times over the years but I would refuse to serve her and my boss at the time insisted on her being barred for threatening behaviour. The last time I saw her was whilst I was working in the same bar, and she managed to slipped through on a busy night because we had new door staff. I never saw her at the bar but I did see her being dragged out by a bouncer for fighting on the dancefloor.
I wasn't remotely surprised seeing her face in the paper. This woman is a violent, mentally unstable thug who appears to go round randomly attacking people for her own entertainment. She should have got much longer in prison and her poor kids should be taken off her.
What a load of utter crap your talking .and complete lies
[quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: I used to work in a bar in Colchester town centre and Leanne attacked me at work twice. The first time I was actually on duty and glass collecting where she pushed me off a stage for no reason, making me land on broken glass. I was new to the establishment at the time and was really shore at that random aggressive behaviour. I reported the incident to the bouncers, but she scarpered before she could be removed. A few months later in the same bar, I was on a night out and she cornered me in the toilets. She held me by the throat, holding a glass bottle in her hand and looked ready to strike but the toilet attention raised the alarm, literally and she disappeared in a panic. I never knew this girl or why she was randomly trying to attack people. A couple of weeks later I discovered we had a mutual friend on Facebook, so I finally had a name behind the face. She came in several times over the years but I would refuse to serve her and my boss at the time insisted on her being barred for threatening behaviour. The last time I saw her was whilst I was working in the same bar, and she managed to slipped through on a busy night because we had new door staff. I never saw her at the bar but I did see her being dragged out by a bouncer for fighting on the dancefloor. I wasn't remotely surprised seeing her face in the paper. This woman is a violent, mentally unstable thug who appears to go round randomly attacking people for her own entertainment. She should have got much longer in prison and her poor kids should be taken off her.[/p][/quote]What a load of utter crap your talking .and complete lies I tell the truth
  • Score: -9

2:56pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Lanely88 says...

I tell the truth wrote:
Lanely88 wrote:
I used to work in a bar in Colchester town centre and Leanne attacked me at work twice. The first time I was actually on duty and glass collecting where she pushed me off a stage for no reason, making me land on broken glass. I was new to the establishment at the time and was really shore at that random aggressive behaviour. I reported the incident to the bouncers, but she scarpered before she could be removed.
A few months later in the same bar, I was on a night out and she cornered me in the toilets. She held me by the throat, holding a glass bottle in her hand and looked ready to strike but the toilet attention raised the alarm, literally and she disappeared in a panic.
I never knew this girl or why she was randomly trying to attack people. A couple of weeks later I discovered we had a mutual friend on Facebook, so I finally had a name behind the face. She came in several times over the years but I would refuse to serve her and my boss at the time insisted on her being barred for threatening behaviour. The last time I saw her was whilst I was working in the same bar, and she managed to slipped through on a busy night because we had new door staff. I never saw her at the bar but I did see her being dragged out by a bouncer for fighting on the dancefloor.
I wasn't remotely surprised seeing her face in the paper. This woman is a violent, mentally unstable thug who appears to go round randomly attacking people for her own entertainment. She should have got much longer in prison and her poor kids should be taken off her.
What a load of utter crap your talking .and complete lies
How do you know, were you there?!
The first attack she had two blonde female friends with her who thought it was funny.
The second attack she appeared to be on her own.
I have no idea who she was with when she was fighting someone on the dancefloor.
This was well over 5 years ago and I think she was blonde at the time. But I remember her and so does my former manager. God knows how many other bars she terrorised and how many other women she attacked.
[quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: I used to work in a bar in Colchester town centre and Leanne attacked me at work twice. The first time I was actually on duty and glass collecting where she pushed me off a stage for no reason, making me land on broken glass. I was new to the establishment at the time and was really shore at that random aggressive behaviour. I reported the incident to the bouncers, but she scarpered before she could be removed. A few months later in the same bar, I was on a night out and she cornered me in the toilets. She held me by the throat, holding a glass bottle in her hand and looked ready to strike but the toilet attention raised the alarm, literally and she disappeared in a panic. I never knew this girl or why she was randomly trying to attack people. A couple of weeks later I discovered we had a mutual friend on Facebook, so I finally had a name behind the face. She came in several times over the years but I would refuse to serve her and my boss at the time insisted on her being barred for threatening behaviour. The last time I saw her was whilst I was working in the same bar, and she managed to slipped through on a busy night because we had new door staff. I never saw her at the bar but I did see her being dragged out by a bouncer for fighting on the dancefloor. I wasn't remotely surprised seeing her face in the paper. This woman is a violent, mentally unstable thug who appears to go round randomly attacking people for her own entertainment. She should have got much longer in prison and her poor kids should be taken off her.[/p][/quote]What a load of utter crap your talking .and complete lies[/p][/quote]How do you know, were you there?! The first attack she had two blonde female friends with her who thought it was funny. The second attack she appeared to be on her own. I have no idea who she was with when she was fighting someone on the dancefloor. This was well over 5 years ago and I think she was blonde at the time. But I remember her and so does my former manager. God knows how many other bars she terrorised and how many other women she attacked. Lanely88
  • Score: 6

2:58pm Thu 13 Feb 14

karen f says...

Lanely88 wrote:
I used to work in a bar in Colchester town centre and Leanne attacked me at work twice. The first time I was actually on duty and glass collecting where she pushed me off a stage for no reason, making me land on broken glass. I was new to the establishment at the time and was really shore at that random aggressive behaviour. I reported the incident to the bouncers, but she scarpered before she could be removed.
A few months later in the same bar, I was on a night out and she cornered me in the toilets. She held me by the throat, holding a glass bottle in her hand and looked ready to strike but the toilet attention raised the alarm, literally and she disappeared in a panic.
I never knew this girl or why she was randomly trying to attack people. A couple of weeks later I discovered we had a mutual friend on Facebook, so I finally had a name behind the face. She came in several times over the years but I would refuse to serve her and my boss at the time insisted on her being barred for threatening behaviour. The last time I saw her was whilst I was working in the same bar, and she managed to slipped through on a busy night because we had new door staff. I never saw her at the bar but I did see her being dragged out by a bouncer for fighting on the dancefloor.
I wasn't remotely surprised seeing her face in the paper. This woman is a violent, mentally unstable thug who appears to go round randomly attacking people for her own entertainment. She should have got much longer in prison and her poor kids should be taken off her.
I think the above sums it up. Sorry to hear you had to suffer at her hands too Lanely88. Here endeth the discussion ... thank god!
[quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: I used to work in a bar in Colchester town centre and Leanne attacked me at work twice. The first time I was actually on duty and glass collecting where she pushed me off a stage for no reason, making me land on broken glass. I was new to the establishment at the time and was really shore at that random aggressive behaviour. I reported the incident to the bouncers, but she scarpered before she could be removed. A few months later in the same bar, I was on a night out and she cornered me in the toilets. She held me by the throat, holding a glass bottle in her hand and looked ready to strike but the toilet attention raised the alarm, literally and she disappeared in a panic. I never knew this girl or why she was randomly trying to attack people. A couple of weeks later I discovered we had a mutual friend on Facebook, so I finally had a name behind the face. She came in several times over the years but I would refuse to serve her and my boss at the time insisted on her being barred for threatening behaviour. The last time I saw her was whilst I was working in the same bar, and she managed to slipped through on a busy night because we had new door staff. I never saw her at the bar but I did see her being dragged out by a bouncer for fighting on the dancefloor. I wasn't remotely surprised seeing her face in the paper. This woman is a violent, mentally unstable thug who appears to go round randomly attacking people for her own entertainment. She should have got much longer in prison and her poor kids should be taken off her.[/p][/quote]I think the above sums it up. Sorry to hear you had to suffer at her hands too Lanely88. Here endeth the discussion ... thank god! karen f
  • Score: 8

3:18pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Lanely88 says...

karen f wrote:
Lanely88 wrote:
I used to work in a bar in Colchester town centre and Leanne attacked me at work twice. The first time I was actually on duty and glass collecting where she pushed me off a stage for no reason, making me land on broken glass. I was new to the establishment at the time and was really shore at that random aggressive behaviour. I reported the incident to the bouncers, but she scarpered before she could be removed.
A few months later in the same bar, I was on a night out and she cornered me in the toilets. She held me by the throat, holding a glass bottle in her hand and looked ready to strike but the toilet attention raised the alarm, literally and she disappeared in a panic.
I never knew this girl or why she was randomly trying to attack people. A couple of weeks later I discovered we had a mutual friend on Facebook, so I finally had a name behind the face. She came in several times over the years but I would refuse to serve her and my boss at the time insisted on her being barred for threatening behaviour. The last time I saw her was whilst I was working in the same bar, and she managed to slipped through on a busy night because we had new door staff. I never saw her at the bar but I did see her being dragged out by a bouncer for fighting on the dancefloor.
I wasn't remotely surprised seeing her face in the paper. This woman is a violent, mentally unstable thug who appears to go round randomly attacking people for her own entertainment. She should have got much longer in prison and her poor kids should be taken off her.
I think the above sums it up. Sorry to hear you had to suffer at her hands too Lanely88. Here endeth the discussion ... thank god!
It's fine, I was just a skinny teenager at the time and easy pickings I guess. She wouldn't dare start on me now. I forgot all about it until I saw her face in the paper and remembered her and the incidents. I thought she was just a bully, I had no idea she was capable of actually slashing someone's throat!
[quote][p][bold]karen f[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: I used to work in a bar in Colchester town centre and Leanne attacked me at work twice. The first time I was actually on duty and glass collecting where she pushed me off a stage for no reason, making me land on broken glass. I was new to the establishment at the time and was really shore at that random aggressive behaviour. I reported the incident to the bouncers, but she scarpered before she could be removed. A few months later in the same bar, I was on a night out and she cornered me in the toilets. She held me by the throat, holding a glass bottle in her hand and looked ready to strike but the toilet attention raised the alarm, literally and she disappeared in a panic. I never knew this girl or why she was randomly trying to attack people. A couple of weeks later I discovered we had a mutual friend on Facebook, so I finally had a name behind the face. She came in several times over the years but I would refuse to serve her and my boss at the time insisted on her being barred for threatening behaviour. The last time I saw her was whilst I was working in the same bar, and she managed to slipped through on a busy night because we had new door staff. I never saw her at the bar but I did see her being dragged out by a bouncer for fighting on the dancefloor. I wasn't remotely surprised seeing her face in the paper. This woman is a violent, mentally unstable thug who appears to go round randomly attacking people for her own entertainment. She should have got much longer in prison and her poor kids should be taken off her.[/p][/quote]I think the above sums it up. Sorry to hear you had to suffer at her hands too Lanely88. Here endeth the discussion ... thank god![/p][/quote]It's fine, I was just a skinny teenager at the time and easy pickings I guess. She wouldn't dare start on me now. I forgot all about it until I saw her face in the paper and remembered her and the incidents. I thought she was just a bully, I had no idea she was capable of actually slashing someone's throat! Lanely88
  • Score: 5

3:27pm Thu 13 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

Lanely88 wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
Lanely88 wrote:
I used to work in a bar in Colchester town centre and Leanne attacked me at work twice. The first time I was actually on duty and glass collecting where she pushed me off a stage for no reason, making me land on broken glass. I was new to the establishment at the time and was really shore at that random aggressive behaviour. I reported the incident to the bouncers, but she scarpered before she could be removed.
A few months later in the same bar, I was on a night out and she cornered me in the toilets. She held me by the throat, holding a glass bottle in her hand and looked ready to strike but the toilet attention raised the alarm, literally and she disappeared in a panic.
I never knew this girl or why she was randomly trying to attack people. A couple of weeks later I discovered we had a mutual friend on Facebook, so I finally had a name behind the face. She came in several times over the years but I would refuse to serve her and my boss at the time insisted on her being barred for threatening behaviour. The last time I saw her was whilst I was working in the same bar, and she managed to slipped through on a busy night because we had new door staff. I never saw her at the bar but I did see her being dragged out by a bouncer for fighting on the dancefloor.
I wasn't remotely surprised seeing her face in the paper. This woman is a violent, mentally unstable thug who appears to go round randomly attacking people for her own entertainment. She should have got much longer in prison and her poor kids should be taken off her.
What a load of utter crap your talking .and complete lies
How do you know, were you there?!
The first attack she had two blonde female friends with her who thought it was funny.
The second attack she appeared to be on her own.
I have no idea who she was with when she was fighting someone on the dancefloor.
This was well over 5 years ago and I think she was blonde at the time. But I remember her and so does my former manager. God knows how many other bars she terrorised and how many other women she attacked.
Well she's never been blonde in her life and everyone knows that !!! Think you've her mistaken for someone else , or as I said complete lies !
[quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: I used to work in a bar in Colchester town centre and Leanne attacked me at work twice. The first time I was actually on duty and glass collecting where she pushed me off a stage for no reason, making me land on broken glass. I was new to the establishment at the time and was really shore at that random aggressive behaviour. I reported the incident to the bouncers, but she scarpered before she could be removed. A few months later in the same bar, I was on a night out and she cornered me in the toilets. She held me by the throat, holding a glass bottle in her hand and looked ready to strike but the toilet attention raised the alarm, literally and she disappeared in a panic. I never knew this girl or why she was randomly trying to attack people. A couple of weeks later I discovered we had a mutual friend on Facebook, so I finally had a name behind the face. She came in several times over the years but I would refuse to serve her and my boss at the time insisted on her being barred for threatening behaviour. The last time I saw her was whilst I was working in the same bar, and she managed to slipped through on a busy night because we had new door staff. I never saw her at the bar but I did see her being dragged out by a bouncer for fighting on the dancefloor. I wasn't remotely surprised seeing her face in the paper. This woman is a violent, mentally unstable thug who appears to go round randomly attacking people for her own entertainment. She should have got much longer in prison and her poor kids should be taken off her.[/p][/quote]What a load of utter crap your talking .and complete lies[/p][/quote]How do you know, were you there?! The first attack she had two blonde female friends with her who thought it was funny. The second attack she appeared to be on her own. I have no idea who she was with when she was fighting someone on the dancefloor. This was well over 5 years ago and I think she was blonde at the time. But I remember her and so does my former manager. God knows how many other bars she terrorised and how many other women she attacked.[/p][/quote]Well she's never been blonde in her life and everyone knows that !!! Think you've her mistaken for someone else , or as I said complete lies ! I tell the truth
  • Score: -4

3:31pm Thu 13 Feb 14

karen f says...

It's not fine! It's never fine and it seems you have been extremely lucky.

Most glassing incidents are spur of the moment over something trivial but alcohol/drugs take over and you think you are invincible and can do what the hell you like. Most attackers will at least show some remorse in the cold light of day but the victim's life is NEVER the same again, even with counselling.

It's really hard to make people understand just how life-changing a glass attack is for both parties involved and I'm so glad you didn't become a victim too.
It's not fine! It's never fine and it seems you have been extremely lucky. Most glassing incidents are spur of the moment over something trivial but alcohol/drugs take over and you think you are invincible and can do what the hell you like. Most attackers will at least show some remorse in the cold light of day but the victim's life is NEVER the same again, even with counselling. It's really hard to make people understand just how life-changing a glass attack is for both parties involved and I'm so glad you didn't become a victim too. karen f
  • Score: 7

3:38pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Sheenie says...

She has never had blonde hair. What a load of ****!
She has never had blonde hair. What a load of ****! Sheenie
  • Score: -4

3:40pm Thu 13 Feb 14

pixiebell87 says...

Sheenie wrote:
She has never had blonde hair. What a load of ****!
her friends/family would say that!
[quote][p][bold]Sheenie[/bold] wrote: She has never had blonde hair. What a load of ****![/p][/quote]her friends/family would say that! pixiebell87
  • Score: 5

3:41pm Thu 13 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

Sheenie wrote:
She has never had blonde hair. What a load of ****!
Exactly sheenie , never has she ever had blonde hair ! EVERYONE knows that , just proves people lie !!
[quote][p][bold]Sheenie[/bold] wrote: She has never had blonde hair. What a load of ****![/p][/quote]Exactly sheenie , never has she ever had blonde hair ! EVERYONE knows that , just proves people lie !! I tell the truth
  • Score: -2

3:43pm Thu 13 Feb 14

creditcrunch2010 says...

Sheenie....why did Ms Walsh punch Ms Bloomfield in the face???
Sheenie....why did Ms Walsh punch Ms Bloomfield in the face??? creditcrunch2010
  • Score: 6

3:43pm Thu 13 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

pixiebell87 wrote:
Sheenie wrote:
She has never had blonde hair. What a load of ****!
her friends/family would say that!
Yes we would because we KNOW she never has ever had blonde hair ! Anyone who sees that comment will laugh cause it's complete rubbish ! Oh my god some people , grow up pixie bell !!
[quote][p][bold]pixiebell87[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sheenie[/bold] wrote: She has never had blonde hair. What a load of ****![/p][/quote]her friends/family would say that![/p][/quote]Yes we would because we KNOW she never has ever had blonde hair ! Anyone who sees that comment will laugh cause it's complete rubbish ! Oh my god some people , grow up pixie bell !! I tell the truth
  • Score: -7

3:47pm Thu 13 Feb 14

essex_jim says...

Lanely88 I'd think carefully about what you're saying on a public forum. You could well land yourself in trouble for those comments.
Lanely88 I'd think carefully about what you're saying on a public forum. You could well land yourself in trouble for those comments. essex_jim
  • Score: -7

3:49pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Sheenie says...

All gone quiet? That would be because I have a job and a child. I don't live on here. Read the evidence I tell the truth has posted on here. Your boring me trying to argue with me. Your more immature than my 3 year old.
All gone quiet? That would be because I have a job and a child. I don't live on here. Read the evidence I tell the truth has posted on here. Your boring me trying to argue with me. Your more immature than my 3 year old. Sheenie
  • Score: -5

3:54pm Thu 13 Feb 14

essex_jim says...

creditcrunch2010 wrote:
Sheenie....why did Ms Walsh punch Ms Bloomfield in the face???
Who knows? It could've been a spilt drink, a stare. Girls get into rows all the time in clubs. That much has never been disputed (But the media have almost presented it as an unprovoked attack which nothing suggests in the evidence it was that way). Miss Walsh gave it out, Leanne gave it back as the CCTV shows and the texts messages prove. HOWEVER, the crime was the actual glassing. What most on here have failed to seperate is the difference between the intial argument and the actual glassing. You can't just assume that both go hand in hand. Trust me, if there were more than 1 witness and CCTV, DNA evidence etc.. do you think Leanne would've pleaded not guilty? Why was there only 1 witness? So much of this is based on assumptions. The jury, with what they've been given in front of them have decided that Leanne was guilty, because, as many others have said on here there is no other alledged suspect. I can 100% see why people would think that and I respect that judgement. However, think outside the box a little bit here. That's all I ask.
[quote][p][bold]creditcrunch2010[/bold] wrote: Sheenie....why did Ms Walsh punch Ms Bloomfield in the face???[/p][/quote]Who knows? It could've been a spilt drink, a stare. Girls get into rows all the time in clubs. That much has never been disputed (But the media have almost presented it as an unprovoked attack which nothing suggests in the evidence it was that way). Miss Walsh gave it out, Leanne gave it back as the CCTV shows and the texts messages prove. HOWEVER, the crime was the actual glassing. What most on here have failed to seperate is the difference between the intial argument and the actual glassing. You can't just assume that both go hand in hand. Trust me, if there were more than 1 witness and CCTV, DNA evidence etc.. do you think Leanne would've pleaded not guilty? Why was there only 1 witness? So much of this is based on assumptions. The jury, with what they've been given in front of them have decided that Leanne was guilty, because, as many others have said on here there is no other alledged suspect. I can 100% see why people would think that and I respect that judgement. However, think outside the box a little bit here. That's all I ask. essex_jim
  • Score: -3

3:58pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Lanely88 says...

I tell the truth wrote:
pixiebell87 wrote:
Sheenie wrote:
She has never had blonde hair. What a load of ****!
her friends/family would say that!
Yes we would because we KNOW she never has ever had blonde hair ! Anyone who sees that comment will laugh cause it's complete rubbish ! Oh my god some people , grow up pixie bell !!
I said I think she had blonde hair at the tim. However I've had another look through my friends facebook photos just in case it is mistake identity and it's not. It's definitely her, no doubt.
[quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]pixiebell87[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sheenie[/bold] wrote: She has never had blonde hair. What a load of ****![/p][/quote]her friends/family would say that![/p][/quote]Yes we would because we KNOW she never has ever had blonde hair ! Anyone who sees that comment will laugh cause it's complete rubbish ! Oh my god some people , grow up pixie bell !![/p][/quote]I said I think she had blonde hair at the tim. However I've had another look through my friends facebook photos just in case it is mistake identity and it's not. It's definitely her, no doubt. Lanely88
  • Score: 6

4:00pm Thu 13 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

Oh dear !! I think lanley88 just made up a load of ballshit there !! Probably the other way around !!
Oh dear !! I think lanley88 just made up a load of ballshit there !! Probably the other way around !! I tell the truth
  • Score: -7

4:00pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Lanely88 says...

essex_jim wrote:
Lanely88 I'd think carefully about what you're saying on a public forum. You could well land yourself in trouble for those comments.
I'm sure I could if I were lying or trolling but I'm not. I'm just sharing an experience I had with the guilty party.
[quote][p][bold]essex_jim[/bold] wrote: Lanely88 I'd think carefully about what you're saying on a public forum. You could well land yourself in trouble for those comments.[/p][/quote]I'm sure I could if I were lying or trolling but I'm not. I'm just sharing an experience I had with the guilty party. Lanely88
  • Score: 6

4:02pm Thu 13 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

Lanely88 wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
pixiebell87 wrote:
Sheenie wrote:
She has never had blonde hair. What a load of ****!
her friends/family would say that!
Yes we would because we KNOW she never has ever had blonde hair ! Anyone who sees that comment will laugh cause it's complete rubbish ! Oh my god some people , grow up pixie bell !!
I said I think she had blonde hair at the tim. However I've had another look through my friends facebook photos just in case it is mistake identity and it's not. It's definitely her, no doubt.
Why would you "think" she had blonde hair !! Bit of a big difference blonde to dark brown isant it?!! Lier !!!!!! She's not on Facebook so that's another lie !!!!!
[quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]pixiebell87[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sheenie[/bold] wrote: She has never had blonde hair. What a load of ****![/p][/quote]her friends/family would say that![/p][/quote]Yes we would because we KNOW she never has ever had blonde hair ! Anyone who sees that comment will laugh cause it's complete rubbish ! Oh my god some people , grow up pixie bell !![/p][/quote]I said I think she had blonde hair at the tim. However I've had another look through my friends facebook photos just in case it is mistake identity and it's not. It's definitely her, no doubt.[/p][/quote]Why would you "think" she had blonde hair !! Bit of a big difference blonde to dark brown isant it?!! Lier !!!!!! She's not on Facebook so that's another lie !!!!! I tell the truth
  • Score: -6

4:03pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Lanely88 says...

I tell the truth wrote:
Oh dear !! I think lanley88 just made up a load of ballshit there !! Probably the other way around !!
If I was attacking people at my place of work then I wouldn't have worked there as long as I did. Plus she wouldn't keep coming back without making a complaint. Unfortunately these situations are common but I guess the reason why she stuck in joy memory is because she was the first person of that nature that I experienced in that bar.
[quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: Oh dear !! I think lanley88 just made up a load of ballshit there !! Probably the other way around !![/p][/quote]If I was attacking people at my place of work then I wouldn't have worked there as long as I did. Plus she wouldn't keep coming back without making a complaint. Unfortunately these situations are common but I guess the reason why she stuck in joy memory is because she was the first person of that nature that I experienced in that bar. Lanely88
  • Score: 5

4:04pm Thu 13 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

I tell the truth wrote:
Lanely88 wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
pixiebell87 wrote:
Sheenie wrote:
She has never had blonde hair. What a load of ****!
her friends/family would say that!
Yes we would because we KNOW she never has ever had blonde hair ! Anyone who sees that comment will laugh cause it's complete rubbish ! Oh my god some people , grow up pixie bell !!
I said I think she had blonde hair at the tim. However I've had another look through my friends facebook photos just in case it is mistake identity and it's not. It's definitely her, no doubt.
Why would you "think" she had blonde hair !! Bit of a big difference blonde to dark brown isant it?!! Lier !!!!!! She's not on Facebook so that's another lie !!!!!
* liar (incase my spelling is not up to the trolls standards)
[quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]pixiebell87[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sheenie[/bold] wrote: She has never had blonde hair. What a load of ****![/p][/quote]her friends/family would say that![/p][/quote]Yes we would because we KNOW she never has ever had blonde hair ! Anyone who sees that comment will laugh cause it's complete rubbish ! Oh my god some people , grow up pixie bell !![/p][/quote]I said I think she had blonde hair at the tim. However I've had another look through my friends facebook photos just in case it is mistake identity and it's not. It's definitely her, no doubt.[/p][/quote]Why would you "think" she had blonde hair !! Bit of a big difference blonde to dark brown isant it?!! Lier !!!!!! She's not on Facebook so that's another lie !!!!![/p][/quote]* liar (incase my spelling is not up to the trolls standards) I tell the truth
  • Score: -4

4:04pm Thu 13 Feb 14

creditcrunch2010 says...

Thank you essex_jim , I appreciate your explanation and there seems to be unanswered questions. One thing you can say for sure is whatever happened there are no winners in this case.
Thank you essex_jim , I appreciate your explanation and there seems to be unanswered questions. One thing you can say for sure is whatever happened there are no winners in this case. creditcrunch2010
  • Score: 3

4:07pm Thu 13 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

Lanely88 wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
Oh dear !! I think lanley88 just made up a load of ballshit there !! Probably the other way around !!
If I was attacking people at my place of work then I wouldn't have worked there as long as I did. Plus she wouldn't keep coming back without making a complaint. Unfortunately these situations are common but I guess the reason why she stuck in joy memory is because she was the first person of that nature that I experienced in that bar.
You've made up complete lies
She is not on FB so don't know who this mutual friend is ?!!

Never has she had blonde hair / or light brown hair always been dark
[quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: Oh dear !! I think lanley88 just made up a load of ballshit there !! Probably the other way around !![/p][/quote]If I was attacking people at my place of work then I wouldn't have worked there as long as I did. Plus she wouldn't keep coming back without making a complaint. Unfortunately these situations are common but I guess the reason why she stuck in joy memory is because she was the first person of that nature that I experienced in that bar.[/p][/quote]You've made up complete lies She is not on FB so don't know who this mutual friend is ?!! Never has she had blonde hair / or light brown hair always been dark I tell the truth
  • Score: -6

4:07pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Lanely88 says...

I tell the truth wrote:
Lanely88 wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
pixiebell87 wrote:
Sheenie wrote:
She has never had blonde hair. What a load of ****!
her friends/family would say that!
Yes we would because we KNOW she never has ever had blonde hair ! Anyone who sees that comment will laugh cause it's complete rubbish ! Oh my god some people , grow up pixie bell !!
I said I think she had blonde hair at the tim. However I've had another look through my friends facebook photos just in case it is mistake identity and it's not. It's definitely her, no doubt.
Why would you "think" she had blonde hair !! Bit of a big difference blonde to dark brown isant it?!! Lier !!!!!! She's not on Facebook so that's another lie !!!!!
There's photos of her on my friends facebook. I've just seen them, plus I saw a photo of her with my friend just after the incident with me. I never said I saw her Facebook.
I've literally just had another look and there were a few from my friends hen do. Go and have a look!
[quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]pixiebell87[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sheenie[/bold] wrote: She has never had blonde hair. What a load of ****![/p][/quote]her friends/family would say that![/p][/quote]Yes we would because we KNOW she never has ever had blonde hair ! Anyone who sees that comment will laugh cause it's complete rubbish ! Oh my god some people , grow up pixie bell !![/p][/quote]I said I think she had blonde hair at the tim. However I've had another look through my friends facebook photos just in case it is mistake identity and it's not. It's definitely her, no doubt.[/p][/quote]Why would you "think" she had blonde hair !! Bit of a big difference blonde to dark brown isant it?!! Lier !!!!!! She's not on Facebook so that's another lie !!!!![/p][/quote]There's photos of her on my friends facebook. I've just seen them, plus I saw a photo of her with my friend just after the incident with me. I never said I saw her Facebook. I've literally just had another look and there were a few from my friends hen do. Go and have a look! Lanely88
  • Score: 5

4:09pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Lanely88 says...

I tell the truth wrote:
Lanely88 wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
Oh dear !! I think lanley88 just made up a load of ballshit there !! Probably the other way around !!
If I was attacking people at my place of work then I wouldn't have worked there as long as I did. Plus she wouldn't keep coming back without making a complaint. Unfortunately these situations are common but I guess the reason why she stuck in joy memory is because she was the first person of that nature that I experienced in that bar.
You've made up complete lies
She is not on FB so don't know who this mutual friend is ?!!

Never has she had blonde hair / or light brown hair always been dark
You don't need to be on Facebook to have a photo of someone be put on there do you?
[quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: Oh dear !! I think lanley88 just made up a load of ballshit there !! Probably the other way around !![/p][/quote]If I was attacking people at my place of work then I wouldn't have worked there as long as I did. Plus she wouldn't keep coming back without making a complaint. Unfortunately these situations are common but I guess the reason why she stuck in joy memory is because she was the first person of that nature that I experienced in that bar.[/p][/quote]You've made up complete lies She is not on FB so don't know who this mutual friend is ?!! Never has she had blonde hair / or light brown hair always been dark[/p][/quote]You don't need to be on Facebook to have a photo of someone be put on there do you? Lanely88
  • Score: 4

4:11pm Thu 13 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

Lanely88 wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
Lanely88 wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
pixiebell87 wrote:
Sheenie wrote:
She has never had blonde hair. What a load of ****!
her friends/family would say that!
Yes we would because we KNOW she never has ever had blonde hair ! Anyone who sees that comment will laugh cause it's complete rubbish ! Oh my god some people , grow up pixie bell !!
I said I think she had blonde hair at the tim. However I've had another look through my friends facebook photos just in case it is mistake identity and it's not. It's definitely her, no doubt.
Why would you "think" she had blonde hair !! Bit of a big difference blonde to dark brown isant it?!! Lier !!!!!! She's not on Facebook so that's another lie !!!!!
There's photos of her on my friends facebook. I've just seen them, plus I saw a photo of her with my friend just after the incident with me. I never said I saw her Facebook.
I've literally just had another look and there were a few from my friends hen do. Go and have a look!
Well who's the friend ? And I will !!!
[quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]pixiebell87[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sheenie[/bold] wrote: She has never had blonde hair. What a load of ****![/p][/quote]her friends/family would say that![/p][/quote]Yes we would because we KNOW she never has ever had blonde hair ! Anyone who sees that comment will laugh cause it's complete rubbish ! Oh my god some people , grow up pixie bell !![/p][/quote]I said I think she had blonde hair at the tim. However I've had another look through my friends facebook photos just in case it is mistake identity and it's not. It's definitely her, no doubt.[/p][/quote]Why would you "think" she had blonde hair !! Bit of a big difference blonde to dark brown isant it?!! Lier !!!!!! She's not on Facebook so that's another lie !!!!![/p][/quote]There's photos of her on my friends facebook. I've just seen them, plus I saw a photo of her with my friend just after the incident with me. I never said I saw her Facebook. I've literally just had another look and there were a few from my friends hen do. Go and have a look![/p][/quote]Well who's the friend ? And I will !!! I tell the truth
  • Score: -6

4:13pm Thu 13 Feb 14

essex_jim says...

creditcrunch2010 wrote:
Thank you essex_jim , I appreciate your explanation and there seems to be unanswered questions. One thing you can say for sure is whatever happened there are no winners in this case.
I absolutely agree and look, I'm friends with Leanne as you're probably aware but I do feel sympathy for Miss Walsh of course. Absolutely no one has come out of this well and someone could've died. All we want is the absolute truth to come out, and essentially what it boils down to is that yes Leanne had an altercation which was seen by many on CCTV, but only 1 person actually confirmed the glassing...that 1 person confirmed the clothes she was wearing incorrectly, no fingerprint, no DNA (Heck of a cut, you'd think some blood would've reached Leanne?).

It just doesn't add up IMO. Thanks for a much more considered response than some of the others on here.
[quote][p][bold]creditcrunch2010[/bold] wrote: Thank you essex_jim , I appreciate your explanation and there seems to be unanswered questions. One thing you can say for sure is whatever happened there are no winners in this case.[/p][/quote]I absolutely agree and look, I'm friends with Leanne as you're probably aware but I do feel sympathy for Miss Walsh of course. Absolutely no one has come out of this well and someone could've died. All we want is the absolute truth to come out, and essentially what it boils down to is that yes Leanne had an altercation which was seen by many on CCTV, but only 1 person actually confirmed the glassing...that 1 person confirmed the clothes she was wearing incorrectly, no fingerprint, no DNA (Heck of a cut, you'd think some blood would've reached Leanne?). It just doesn't add up IMO. Thanks for a much more considered response than some of the others on here. essex_jim
  • Score: -6

4:15pm Thu 13 Feb 14

essex_jim says...

Lanely88 wrote:
essex_jim wrote: Lanely88 I'd think carefully about what you're saying on a public forum. You could well land yourself in trouble for those comments.
I'm sure I could if I were lying or trolling but I'm not. I'm just sharing an experience I had with the guilty party.
And you didn't think once to tell the police of this?
[quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]essex_jim[/bold] wrote: Lanely88 I'd think carefully about what you're saying on a public forum. You could well land yourself in trouble for those comments.[/p][/quote]I'm sure I could if I were lying or trolling but I'm not. I'm just sharing an experience I had with the guilty party.[/p][/quote]And you didn't think once to tell the police of this? essex_jim
  • Score: -5

4:20pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Lanely88 says...

I tell the truth wrote:
Lanely88 wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
Lanely88 wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
pixiebell87 wrote:
Sheenie wrote:
She has never had blonde hair. What a load of ****!
her friends/family would say that!
Yes we would because we KNOW she never has ever had blonde hair ! Anyone who sees that comment will laugh cause it's complete rubbish ! Oh my god some people , grow up pixie bell !!
I said I think she had blonde hair at the tim. However I've had another look through my friends facebook photos just in case it is mistake identity and it's not. It's definitely her, no doubt.
Why would you "think" she had blonde hair !! Bit of a big difference blonde to dark brown isant it?!! Lier !!!!!! She's not on Facebook so that's another lie !!!!!
There's photos of her on my friends facebook. I've just seen them, plus I saw a photo of her with my friend just after the incident with me. I never said I saw her Facebook.
I've literally just had another look and there were a few from my friends hen do. Go and have a look!
Well who's the friend ? And I will !!!
I'm not stupid enough to give out an innocent persons name on a public forum. All I will say is that there are several photos, although none recent and in particular photos from a hen do a few years ago.
[quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]pixiebell87[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sheenie[/bold] wrote: She has never had blonde hair. What a load of ****![/p][/quote]her friends/family would say that![/p][/quote]Yes we would because we KNOW she never has ever had blonde hair ! Anyone who sees that comment will laugh cause it's complete rubbish ! Oh my god some people , grow up pixie bell !![/p][/quote]I said I think she had blonde hair at the tim. However I've had another look through my friends facebook photos just in case it is mistake identity and it's not. It's definitely her, no doubt.[/p][/quote]Why would you "think" she had blonde hair !! Bit of a big difference blonde to dark brown isant it?!! Lier !!!!!! She's not on Facebook so that's another lie !!!!![/p][/quote]There's photos of her on my friends facebook. I've just seen them, plus I saw a photo of her with my friend just after the incident with me. I never said I saw her Facebook. I've literally just had another look and there were a few from my friends hen do. Go and have a look![/p][/quote]Well who's the friend ? And I will !!![/p][/quote]I'm not stupid enough to give out an innocent persons name on a public forum. All I will say is that there are several photos, although none recent and in particular photos from a hen do a few years ago. Lanely88
  • Score: 9

4:22pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Lanely88 says...

essex_jim wrote:
Lanely88 wrote:
essex_jim wrote: Lanely88 I'd think carefully about what you're saying on a public forum. You could well land yourself in trouble for those comments.
I'm sure I could if I were lying or trolling but I'm not. I'm just sharing an experience I had with the guilty party.
And you didn't think once to tell the police of this?
In hindsight I wish I had, maybe she would have learnt her lesson. But I didn't think it warranted police involvement at the time. It was dealt with internally, the management were aware of her and after the incident on the dancefloor I never saw her again.
[quote][p][bold]essex_jim[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]essex_jim[/bold] wrote: Lanely88 I'd think carefully about what you're saying on a public forum. You could well land yourself in trouble for those comments.[/p][/quote]I'm sure I could if I were lying or trolling but I'm not. I'm just sharing an experience I had with the guilty party.[/p][/quote]And you didn't think once to tell the police of this?[/p][/quote]In hindsight I wish I had, maybe she would have learnt her lesson. But I didn't think it warranted police involvement at the time. It was dealt with internally, the management were aware of her and after the incident on the dancefloor I never saw her again. Lanely88
  • Score: 5

4:23pm Thu 13 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

I tell the truth wrote:
Lanely88 wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
Lanely88 wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
pixiebell87 wrote:
Sheenie wrote:
She has never had blonde hair. What a load of ****!
her friends/family would say that!
Yes we would because we KNOW she never has ever had blonde hair ! Anyone who sees that comment will laugh cause it's complete rubbish ! Oh my god some people , grow up pixie bell !!
I said I think she had blonde hair at the tim. However I've had another look through my friends facebook photos just in case it is mistake identity and it's not. It's definitely her, no doubt.
Why would you "think" she had blonde hair !! Bit of a big difference blonde to dark brown isant it?!! Lier !!!!!! She's not on Facebook so that's another lie !!!!!
There's photos of her on my friends facebook. I've just seen them, plus I saw a photo of her with my friend just after the incident with me. I never said I saw her Facebook.
I've literally just had another look and there were a few from my friends hen do. Go and have a look!
Well who's the friend ? And I will !!!
Just still wondering where the "I think she had blonde hair " came from if you were so sure it was her

Also why would your "friend " be inviting her on her hen due if she had done such terrible things to you ?!!!

Maybe you wanna think about deleting that "friend "

Stop telling lies ! 🐖
[quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]pixiebell87[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sheenie[/bold] wrote: She has never had blonde hair. What a load of ****![/p][/quote]her friends/family would say that![/p][/quote]Yes we would because we KNOW she never has ever had blonde hair ! Anyone who sees that comment will laugh cause it's complete rubbish ! Oh my god some people , grow up pixie bell !![/p][/quote]I said I think she had blonde hair at the tim. However I've had another look through my friends facebook photos just in case it is mistake identity and it's not. It's definitely her, no doubt.[/p][/quote]Why would you "think" she had blonde hair !! Bit of a big difference blonde to dark brown isant it?!! Lier !!!!!! She's not on Facebook so that's another lie !!!!![/p][/quote]There's photos of her on my friends facebook. I've just seen them, plus I saw a photo of her with my friend just after the incident with me. I never said I saw her Facebook. I've literally just had another look and there were a few from my friends hen do. Go and have a look![/p][/quote]Well who's the friend ? And I will !!![/p][/quote]Just still wondering where the "I think she had blonde hair " came from if you were so sure it was her Also why would your "friend " be inviting her on her hen due if she had done such terrible things to you ?!!! Maybe you wanna think about deleting that "friend " Stop telling lies ! 🐖 I tell the truth
  • Score: -3

4:24pm Thu 13 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

Lanely88 wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
Lanely88 wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
Lanely88 wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
pixiebell87 wrote:
Sheenie wrote:
She has never had blonde hair. What a load of ****!
her friends/family would say that!
Yes we would because we KNOW she never has ever had blonde hair ! Anyone who sees that comment will laugh cause it's complete rubbish ! Oh my god some people , grow up pixie bell !!
I said I think she had blonde hair at the tim. However I've had another look through my friends facebook photos just in case it is mistake identity and it's not. It's definitely her, no doubt.
Why would you "think" she had blonde hair !! Bit of a big difference blonde to dark brown isant it?!! Lier !!!!!! She's not on Facebook so that's another lie !!!!!
There's photos of her on my friends facebook. I've just seen them, plus I saw a photo of her with my friend just after the incident with me. I never said I saw her Facebook.
I've literally just had another look and there were a few from my friends hen do. Go and have a look!
Well who's the friend ? And I will !!!
I'm not stupid enough to give out an innocent persons name on a public forum. All I will say is that there are several photos, although none recent and in particular photos from a hen do a few years ago.
Well why say go have a look then !!!! Yawn liar
[quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]pixiebell87[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sheenie[/bold] wrote: She has never had blonde hair. What a load of ****![/p][/quote]her friends/family would say that![/p][/quote]Yes we would because we KNOW she never has ever had blonde hair ! Anyone who sees that comment will laugh cause it's complete rubbish ! Oh my god some people , grow up pixie bell !![/p][/quote]I said I think she had blonde hair at the tim. However I've had another look through my friends facebook photos just in case it is mistake identity and it's not. It's definitely her, no doubt.[/p][/quote]Why would you "think" she had blonde hair !! Bit of a big difference blonde to dark brown isant it?!! Lier !!!!!! She's not on Facebook so that's another lie !!!!![/p][/quote]There's photos of her on my friends facebook. I've just seen them, plus I saw a photo of her with my friend just after the incident with me. I never said I saw her Facebook. I've literally just had another look and there were a few from my friends hen do. Go and have a look![/p][/quote]Well who's the friend ? And I will !!![/p][/quote]I'm not stupid enough to give out an innocent persons name on a public forum. All I will say is that there are several photos, although none recent and in particular photos from a hen do a few years ago.[/p][/quote]Well why say go have a look then !!!! Yawn liar I tell the truth
  • Score: -3

4:25pm Thu 13 Feb 14

essex_jim says...

Lanely88 wrote:
essex_jim wrote:
Lanely88 wrote:
essex_jim wrote: Lanely88 I'd think carefully about what you're saying on a public forum. You could well land yourself in trouble for those comments.
I'm sure I could if I were lying or trolling but I'm not. I'm just sharing an experience I had with the guilty party.
And you didn't think once to tell the police of this?
In hindsight I wish I had, maybe she would have learnt her lesson. But I didn't think it warranted police involvement at the time. It was dealt with internally, the management were aware of her and after the incident on the dancefloor I never saw her again.
You were threatened with a glass to the face but didn't think it warranted police attention?
Rightio.
[quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]essex_jim[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]essex_jim[/bold] wrote: Lanely88 I'd think carefully about what you're saying on a public forum. You could well land yourself in trouble for those comments.[/p][/quote]I'm sure I could if I were lying or trolling but I'm not. I'm just sharing an experience I had with the guilty party.[/p][/quote]And you didn't think once to tell the police of this?[/p][/quote]In hindsight I wish I had, maybe she would have learnt her lesson. But I didn't think it warranted police involvement at the time. It was dealt with internally, the management were aware of her and after the incident on the dancefloor I never saw her again.[/p][/quote]You were threatened with a glass to the face but didn't think it warranted police attention? Rightio. essex_jim
  • Score: -2

4:27pm Thu 13 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

Leannes barrister showed CCTV footage of the night club, which had been digitally enhanced and slowed down. During the footage, it is clear that an altercation occurs (which in real time lasted for approximately 12 seconds). Leanne is seen to lunge backwards and the victim grabs at leannes face. In this section of the video, it can clearly be seen that She has a clutch handbag beneath leannes right arm and that both of leanne hands are empty (hence why her defence barrister was so keen to show the footage). Despite the club dance floor being very busy at the time of the altercation and alleged crime, the prosecution could produce only one witness...Mr. Ahmed Kurda. Mr. Kurda stated that he had seen leanne slash the victims throat with a broken glass...yet the CCTV footage shows that her hands are empty. The witness also told the court that Leanne was wearing a black mini dress, which yet again is completely inaccurate (She was in fact wearing a black top covered in silver sequins and black trousers...both items were taken as evidence by Officer Rook at the time of her arrest).
• Mr. Kurda also told the court that Leanne pulled the victim to the ground and repeatedly punched her in the head (which is also not shown on the video as this did not take place). There were also many inconsistencies between what Mr. Kurda stated in court and his original statement.
• The CPS confirmed that after forensically analysing the clothing and footwear that She wore on the evening of 3rd February 2013, none of Miss. Walsh’s DNA/blood was found (yet She had allegedly slashed her throat with a broken glass).
• All items of possible evidence (such as broken glass, etc) were retrieved from the crime scene and forensically analysed. The results of which showed that none of leannes fingerprints or DNA could be found.
• When the court returned after a 2 day adjournment, a member of the jury passed a note to the judge, which he proceeded to read. He then passed the letter to leannes barrister and the prosecution. The letter stated that the jury member felt he was taking part in an unfair trial as people were making things up to work out how it happened .as there was no evidence she had commited this crime .
Leannes barrister showed CCTV footage of the night club, which had been digitally enhanced and slowed down. During the footage, it is clear that an altercation occurs (which in real time lasted for approximately 12 seconds). Leanne is seen to lunge backwards and the victim grabs at leannes face. In this section of the video, it can clearly be seen that She has a clutch handbag beneath leannes right arm and that both of leanne hands are empty (hence why her defence barrister was so keen to show the footage). Despite the club dance floor being very busy at the time of the altercation and alleged crime, the prosecution could produce only one witness...Mr. Ahmed Kurda. Mr. Kurda stated that he had seen leanne slash the victims throat with a broken glass...yet the CCTV footage shows that her hands are empty. The witness also told the court that Leanne was wearing a black mini dress, which yet again is completely inaccurate (She was in fact wearing a black top covered in silver sequins and black trousers...both items were taken as evidence by Officer Rook at the time of her arrest). • Mr. Kurda also told the court that Leanne pulled the victim to the ground and repeatedly punched her in the head (which is also not shown on the video as this did not take place). There were also many inconsistencies between what Mr. Kurda stated in court and his original statement. • The CPS confirmed that after forensically analysing the clothing and footwear that She wore on the evening of 3rd February 2013, none of Miss. Walsh’s DNA/blood was found (yet She had allegedly slashed her throat with a broken glass). • All items of possible evidence (such as broken glass, etc) were retrieved from the crime scene and forensically analysed. The results of which showed that none of leannes fingerprints or DNA could be found. • When the court returned after a 2 day adjournment, a member of the jury passed a note to the judge, which he proceeded to read. He then passed the letter to leannes barrister and the prosecution. The letter stated that the jury member felt he was taking part in an unfair trial as people were making things up to work out how it happened .as there was no evidence she had commited this crime . I tell the truth
  • Score: -1

4:41pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Lanely88 says...

essex_jim wrote:
Lanely88 wrote:
essex_jim wrote:
Lanely88 wrote:
essex_jim wrote: Lanely88 I'd think carefully about what you're saying on a public forum. You could well land yourself in trouble for those comments.
I'm sure I could if I were lying or trolling but I'm not. I'm just sharing an experience I had with the guilty party.
And you didn't think once to tell the police of this?
In hindsight I wish I had, maybe she would have learnt her lesson. But I didn't think it warranted police involvement at the time. It was dealt with internally, the management were aware of her and after the incident on the dancefloor I never saw her again.
You were threatened with a glass to the face but didn't think it warranted police attention?
Rightio.
I was 18 and pretty young and naive. I worked for a rough bar that already had a bad reputation and my boss didn't want anymore negative attention drawn to the place. My mother was furious and wanted me straight out of there but I was still fairly new and didn't want to rock the boat. I'm sure many have felt this way in the workplace before.
[quote][p][bold]essex_jim[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]essex_jim[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]essex_jim[/bold] wrote: Lanely88 I'd think carefully about what you're saying on a public forum. You could well land yourself in trouble for those comments.[/p][/quote]I'm sure I could if I were lying or trolling but I'm not. I'm just sharing an experience I had with the guilty party.[/p][/quote]And you didn't think once to tell the police of this?[/p][/quote]In hindsight I wish I had, maybe she would have learnt her lesson. But I didn't think it warranted police involvement at the time. It was dealt with internally, the management were aware of her and after the incident on the dancefloor I never saw her again.[/p][/quote]You were threatened with a glass to the face but didn't think it warranted police attention? Rightio.[/p][/quote]I was 18 and pretty young and naive. I worked for a rough bar that already had a bad reputation and my boss didn't want anymore negative attention drawn to the place. My mother was furious and wanted me straight out of there but I was still fairly new and didn't want to rock the boat. I'm sure many have felt this way in the workplace before. Lanely88
  • Score: 4

4:45pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Lanely88 says...

I tell the truth wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
Lanely88 wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
Lanely88 wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
pixiebell87 wrote:
Sheenie wrote:
She has never had blonde hair. What a load of ****!
her friends/family would say that!
Yes we would because we KNOW she never has ever had blonde hair ! Anyone who sees that comment will laugh cause it's complete rubbish ! Oh my god some people , grow up pixie bell !!
I said I think she had blonde hair at the tim. However I've had another look through my friends facebook photos just in case it is mistake identity and it's not. It's definitely her, no doubt.
Why would you "think" she had blonde hair !! Bit of a big difference blonde to dark brown isant it?!! Lier !!!!!! She's not on Facebook so that's another lie !!!!!
There's photos of her on my friends facebook. I've just seen them, plus I saw a photo of her with my friend just after the incident with me. I never said I saw her Facebook.
I've literally just had another look and there were a few from my friends hen do. Go and have a look!
Well who's the friend ? And I will !!!
Just still wondering where the "I think she had blonde hair " came from if you were so sure it was her

Also why would your "friend " be inviting her on her hen due if she had done such terrible things to you ?!!!

Maybe you wanna think about deleting that "friend "

Stop telling lies ! 🐖
I'm not going to delete a nice girl who I've known for half my life because she happens to be friends with the wrong person. It's hardly surprising you're acting in an abusive manner, all I did was speak out about something. I'm not the one who commited a very serious crime! Tell yourself I'm a liar if it makes you feel better but it doesn't change the fact that someone got their throat slashed.
[quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]pixiebell87[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sheenie[/bold] wrote: She has never had blonde hair. What a load of ****![/p][/quote]her friends/family would say that![/p][/quote]Yes we would because we KNOW she never has ever had blonde hair ! Anyone who sees that comment will laugh cause it's complete rubbish ! Oh my god some people , grow up pixie bell !![/p][/quote]I said I think she had blonde hair at the tim. However I've had another look through my friends facebook photos just in case it is mistake identity and it's not. It's definitely her, no doubt.[/p][/quote]Why would you "think" she had blonde hair !! Bit of a big difference blonde to dark brown isant it?!! Lier !!!!!! She's not on Facebook so that's another lie !!!!![/p][/quote]There's photos of her on my friends facebook. I've just seen them, plus I saw a photo of her with my friend just after the incident with me. I never said I saw her Facebook. I've literally just had another look and there were a few from my friends hen do. Go and have a look![/p][/quote]Well who's the friend ? And I will !!![/p][/quote]Just still wondering where the "I think she had blonde hair " came from if you were so sure it was her Also why would your "friend " be inviting her on her hen due if she had done such terrible things to you ?!!! Maybe you wanna think about deleting that "friend " Stop telling lies ! 🐖[/p][/quote]I'm not going to delete a nice girl who I've known for half my life because she happens to be friends with the wrong person. It's hardly surprising you're acting in an abusive manner, all I did was speak out about something. I'm not the one who commited a very serious crime! Tell yourself I'm a liar if it makes you feel better but it doesn't change the fact that someone got their throat slashed. Lanely88
  • Score: 6

4:47pm Thu 13 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

Lanely88 wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
Lanely88 wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
Lanely88 wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
pixiebell87 wrote:
Sheenie wrote:
She has never had blonde hair. What a load of ****!
her friends/family would say that!
Yes we would because we KNOW she never has ever had blonde hair ! Anyone who sees that comment will laugh cause it's complete rubbish ! Oh my god some people , grow up pixie bell !!
I said I think she had blonde hair at the tim. However I've had another look through my friends facebook photos just in case it is mistake identity and it's not. It's definitely her, no doubt.
Why would you "think" she had blonde hair !! Bit of a big difference blonde to dark brown isant it?!! Lier !!!!!! She's not on Facebook so that's another lie !!!!!
There's photos of her on my friends facebook. I've just seen them, plus I saw a photo of her with my friend just after the incident with me. I never said I saw her Facebook.
I've literally just had another look and there were a few from my friends hen do. Go and have a look!
Well who's the friend ? And I will !!!
Just still wondering where the "I think she had blonde hair " came from if you were so sure it was her

Also why would your "friend " be inviting her on her hen due if she had done such terrible things to you ?!!!

Maybe you wanna think about deleting that "friend "

Stop telling lies ! 🐖
I'm not going to delete a nice girl who I've known for half my life because she happens to be friends with the wrong person. It's hardly surprising you're acting in an abusive manner, all I did was speak out about something. I'm not the one who commited a very serious crime! Tell yourself I'm a liar if it makes you feel better but it doesn't change the fact that someone got their throat slashed.
Leannes barrister showed CCTV footage of the night club, which had been digitally enhanced and slowed down. During the footage, it is clear that an altercation occurs (which in real time lasted for approximately 12 seconds). Leanne is seen to lunge backwards and the victim grabs at leannes face. In this section of the video, it can clearly be seen that She has a clutch handbag beneath leannes right arm and that both of leanne hands are empty (hence why her defence barrister was so keen to show the footage). Despite the club dance floor being very busy at the time of the altercation and alleged crime, the prosecution could produce only one witness...Mr. Ahmed Kurda. Mr. Kurda stated that he had seen leanne slash the victims throat with a broken glass...yet the CCTV footage shows that her hands are empty. The witness also told the court that Leanne was wearing a black mini dress, which yet again is completely inaccurate (She was in fact wearing a black top covered in silver sequins and black trousers...both items were taken as evidence by Officer Rook at the time of my arrest).
• Mr. Kurda also told the court that Leanne pulled the victim to the ground and repeatedly punched her in the head (which is also not shown on the video as this did not take place). There were also many inconsistencies between what Mr. Kurda stated in court and his original statement.
• The CPS confirmed that after forensically analysing the clothing and footwear that She wore on the evening of 3rd February 2013, none of Miss. Walsh’s DNA/blood was found (yet She had allegedly slashed her throat with a broken glass).
• All items of possible evidence (such as broken glass, etc) were retrieved from the crime scene and forensically analysed. The results of which showed that none of leannes fingerprints or DNA could be found.
• When the court returned after a 2 day adjournment, a member of the jury passed a note to the judge, which he proceeded to read. He then passed the letter to leannes barrister and the prosecution. The letter stated that the jury member felt he was taking part in an unfair trial as people were making things up to work out how it happened .as there was no evidence she had commited this crime .
[quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]pixiebell87[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sheenie[/bold] wrote: She has never had blonde hair. What a load of ****![/p][/quote]her friends/family would say that![/p][/quote]Yes we would because we KNOW she never has ever had blonde hair ! Anyone who sees that comment will laugh cause it's complete rubbish ! Oh my god some people , grow up pixie bell !![/p][/quote]I said I think she had blonde hair at the tim. However I've had another look through my friends facebook photos just in case it is mistake identity and it's not. It's definitely her, no doubt.[/p][/quote]Why would you "think" she had blonde hair !! Bit of a big difference blonde to dark brown isant it?!! Lier !!!!!! She's not on Facebook so that's another lie !!!!![/p][/quote]There's photos of her on my friends facebook. I've just seen them, plus I saw a photo of her with my friend just after the incident with me. I never said I saw her Facebook. I've literally just had another look and there were a few from my friends hen do. Go and have a look![/p][/quote]Well who's the friend ? And I will !!![/p][/quote]Just still wondering where the "I think she had blonde hair " came from if you were so sure it was her Also why would your "friend " be inviting her on her hen due if she had done such terrible things to you ?!!! Maybe you wanna think about deleting that "friend " Stop telling lies ! 🐖[/p][/quote]I'm not going to delete a nice girl who I've known for half my life because she happens to be friends with the wrong person. It's hardly surprising you're acting in an abusive manner, all I did was speak out about something. I'm not the one who commited a very serious crime! Tell yourself I'm a liar if it makes you feel better but it doesn't change the fact that someone got their throat slashed.[/p][/quote]Leannes barrister showed CCTV footage of the night club, which had been digitally enhanced and slowed down. During the footage, it is clear that an altercation occurs (which in real time lasted for approximately 12 seconds). Leanne is seen to lunge backwards and the victim grabs at leannes face. In this section of the video, it can clearly be seen that She has a clutch handbag beneath leannes right arm and that both of leanne hands are empty (hence why her defence barrister was so keen to show the footage). Despite the club dance floor being very busy at the time of the altercation and alleged crime, the prosecution could produce only one witness...Mr. Ahmed Kurda. Mr. Kurda stated that he had seen leanne slash the victims throat with a broken glass...yet the CCTV footage shows that her hands are empty. The witness also told the court that Leanne was wearing a black mini dress, which yet again is completely inaccurate (She was in fact wearing a black top covered in silver sequins and black trousers...both items were taken as evidence by Officer Rook at the time of my arrest). • Mr. Kurda also told the court that Leanne pulled the victim to the ground and repeatedly punched her in the head (which is also not shown on the video as this did not take place). There were also many inconsistencies between what Mr. Kurda stated in court and his original statement. • The CPS confirmed that after forensically analysing the clothing and footwear that She wore on the evening of 3rd February 2013, none of Miss. Walsh’s DNA/blood was found (yet She had allegedly slashed her throat with a broken glass). • All items of possible evidence (such as broken glass, etc) were retrieved from the crime scene and forensically analysed. The results of which showed that none of leannes fingerprints or DNA could be found. • When the court returned after a 2 day adjournment, a member of the jury passed a note to the judge, which he proceeded to read. He then passed the letter to leannes barrister and the prosecution. The letter stated that the jury member felt he was taking part in an unfair trial as people were making things up to work out how it happened .as there was no evidence she had commited this crime . I tell the truth
  • Score: 1

4:50pm Thu 13 Feb 14

DavePH says...

I've read through all of this. I don't think I know Laney and I don't know what bar you worked at, but I worked in a bar and saw Leanne attacking my girlfriend. It was 6 years ago and whilst I was working I saw her go for my girlfriend who was on a night out. I know for a fact it was Leanne because my older sister went to school with her. My girlfriend chose not to go to the police, although I begged her to. Its obvious that she is a troubled girl who turns violent when she drinks. She's now where she belongs.
I've read through all of this. I don't think I know Laney and I don't know what bar you worked at, but I worked in a bar and saw Leanne attacking my girlfriend. It was 6 years ago and whilst I was working I saw her go for my girlfriend who was on a night out. I know for a fact it was Leanne because my older sister went to school with her. My girlfriend chose not to go to the police, although I begged her to. Its obvious that she is a troubled girl who turns violent when she drinks. She's now where she belongs. DavePH
  • Score: 7

4:54pm Thu 13 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

I tell the truth wrote:
Lanely88 wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
Lanely88 wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
Lanely88 wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
pixiebell87 wrote:
Sheenie wrote:
She has never had blonde hair. What a load of ****!
her friends/family would say that!
Yes we would because we KNOW she never has ever had blonde hair ! Anyone who sees that comment will laugh cause it's complete rubbish ! Oh my god some people , grow up pixie bell !!
I said I think she had blonde hair at the tim. However I've had another look through my friends facebook photos just in case it is mistake identity and it's not. It's definitely her, no doubt.
Why would you "think" she had blonde hair !! Bit of a big difference blonde to dark brown isant it?!! Lier !!!!!! She's not on Facebook so that's another lie !!!!!
There's photos of her on my friends facebook. I've just seen them, plus I saw a photo of her with my friend just after the incident with me. I never said I saw her Facebook.
I've literally just had another look and there were a few from my friends hen do. Go and have a look!
Well who's the friend ? And I will !!!
Just still wondering where the "I think she had blonde hair " came from if you were so sure it was her

Also why would your "friend " be inviting her on her hen due if she had done such terrible things to you ?!!!

Maybe you wanna think about deleting that "friend "

Stop telling lies ! 🐖
I'm not going to delete a nice girl who I've known for half my life because she happens to be friends with the wrong person. It's hardly surprising you're acting in an abusive manner, all I did was speak out about something. I'm not the one who commited a very serious crime! Tell yourself I'm a liar if it makes you feel better but it doesn't change the fact that someone got their throat slashed.
Leannes barrister showed CCTV footage of the night club, which had been digitally enhanced and slowed down. During the footage, it is clear that an altercation occurs (which in real time lasted for approximately 12 seconds). Leanne is seen to lunge backwards and the victim grabs at leannes face. In this section of the video, it can clearly be seen that She has a clutch handbag beneath leannes right arm and that both of leanne hands are empty (hence why her defence barrister was so keen to show the footage). Despite the club dance floor being very busy at the time of the altercation and alleged crime, the prosecution could produce only one witness...Mr. Ahmed Kurda. Mr. Kurda stated that he had seen leanne slash the victims throat with a broken glass...yet the CCTV footage shows that her hands are empty. The witness also told the court that Leanne was wearing a black mini dress, which yet again is completely inaccurate (She was in fact wearing a black top covered in silver sequins and black trousers...both items were taken as evidence by Officer Rook at the time of my arrest).
• Mr. Kurda also told the court that Leanne pulled the victim to the ground and repeatedly punched her in the head (which is also not shown on the video as this did not take place). There were also many inconsistencies between what Mr. Kurda stated in court and his original statement.
• The CPS confirmed that after forensically analysing the clothing and footwear that She wore on the evening of 3rd February 2013, none of Miss. Walsh’s DNA/blood was found (yet She had allegedly slashed her throat with a broken glass).
• All items of possible evidence (such as broken glass, etc) were retrieved from the crime scene and forensically analysed. The results of which showed that none of leannes fingerprints or DNA could be found.
• When the court returned after a 2 day adjournment, a member of the jury passed a note to the judge, which he proceeded to read. He then passed the letter to leannes barrister and the prosecution. The letter stated that the jury member felt he was taking part in an unfair trial as people were making things up to work out how it happened .as there was no evidence she had commited this crime .
I do believe 5 years ago leanne was pregnant and breast fed her baby for six months , so never drank in this time are you saying five years ago this pregnant /mother was out drinking in pubs pushing young girls off bars ?!!! And threatening them with bottles hummmm !!!
[quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]pixiebell87[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sheenie[/bold] wrote: She has never had blonde hair. What a load of ****![/p][/quote]her friends/family would say that![/p][/quote]Yes we would because we KNOW she never has ever had blonde hair ! Anyone who sees that comment will laugh cause it's complete rubbish ! Oh my god some people , grow up pixie bell !![/p][/quote]I said I think she had blonde hair at the tim. However I've had another look through my friends facebook photos just in case it is mistake identity and it's not. It's definitely her, no doubt.[/p][/quote]Why would you "think" she had blonde hair !! Bit of a big difference blonde to dark brown isant it?!! Lier !!!!!! She's not on Facebook so that's another lie !!!!![/p][/quote]There's photos of her on my friends facebook. I've just seen them, plus I saw a photo of her with my friend just after the incident with me. I never said I saw her Facebook. I've literally just had another look and there were a few from my friends hen do. Go and have a look![/p][/quote]Well who's the friend ? And I will !!![/p][/quote]Just still wondering where the "I think she had blonde hair " came from if you were so sure it was her Also why would your "friend " be inviting her on her hen due if she had done such terrible things to you ?!!! Maybe you wanna think about deleting that "friend " Stop telling lies ! 🐖[/p][/quote]I'm not going to delete a nice girl who I've known for half my life because she happens to be friends with the wrong person. It's hardly surprising you're acting in an abusive manner, all I did was speak out about something. I'm not the one who commited a very serious crime! Tell yourself I'm a liar if it makes you feel better but it doesn't change the fact that someone got their throat slashed.[/p][/quote]Leannes barrister showed CCTV footage of the night club, which had been digitally enhanced and slowed down. During the footage, it is clear that an altercation occurs (which in real time lasted for approximately 12 seconds). Leanne is seen to lunge backwards and the victim grabs at leannes face. In this section of the video, it can clearly be seen that She has a clutch handbag beneath leannes right arm and that both of leanne hands are empty (hence why her defence barrister was so keen to show the footage). Despite the club dance floor being very busy at the time of the altercation and alleged crime, the prosecution could produce only one witness...Mr. Ahmed Kurda. Mr. Kurda stated that he had seen leanne slash the victims throat with a broken glass...yet the CCTV footage shows that her hands are empty. The witness also told the court that Leanne was wearing a black mini dress, which yet again is completely inaccurate (She was in fact wearing a black top covered in silver sequins and black trousers...both items were taken as evidence by Officer Rook at the time of my arrest). • Mr. Kurda also told the court that Leanne pulled the victim to the ground and repeatedly punched her in the head (which is also not shown on the video as this did not take place). There were also many inconsistencies between what Mr. Kurda stated in court and his original statement. • The CPS confirmed that after forensically analysing the clothing and footwear that She wore on the evening of 3rd February 2013, none of Miss. Walsh’s DNA/blood was found (yet She had allegedly slashed her throat with a broken glass). • All items of possible evidence (such as broken glass, etc) were retrieved from the crime scene and forensically analysed. The results of which showed that none of leannes fingerprints or DNA could be found. • When the court returned after a 2 day adjournment, a member of the jury passed a note to the judge, which he proceeded to read. He then passed the letter to leannes barrister and the prosecution. The letter stated that the jury member felt he was taking part in an unfair trial as people were making things up to work out how it happened .as there was no evidence she had commited this crime .[/p][/quote]I do believe 5 years ago leanne was pregnant and breast fed her baby for six months , so never drank in this time are you saying five years ago this pregnant /mother was out drinking in pubs pushing young girls off bars ?!!! And threatening them with bottles hummmm !!! I tell the truth
  • Score: -7

4:57pm Thu 13 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

DavePH wrote:
I've read through all of this. I don't think I know Laney and I don't know what bar you worked at, but I worked in a bar and saw Leanne attacking my girlfriend. It was 6 years ago and whilst I was working I saw her go for my girlfriend who was on a night out. I know for a fact it was Leanne because my older sister went to school with her. My girlfriend chose not to go to the police, although I begged her to. Its obvious that she is a troubled girl who turns violent when she drinks. She's now where she belongs.
Cause you don't know lanley88 (eyes rolling ) or did Lanley just make another gazette account !!!!
[quote][p][bold]DavePH[/bold] wrote: I've read through all of this. I don't think I know Laney and I don't know what bar you worked at, but I worked in a bar and saw Leanne attacking my girlfriend. It was 6 years ago and whilst I was working I saw her go for my girlfriend who was on a night out. I know for a fact it was Leanne because my older sister went to school with her. My girlfriend chose not to go to the police, although I begged her to. Its obvious that she is a troubled girl who turns violent when she drinks. She's now where she belongs.[/p][/quote]Cause you don't know lanley88 (eyes rolling ) or did Lanley just make another gazette account !!!! I tell the truth
  • Score: -7

4:57pm Thu 13 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

DavePH wrote:
I've read through all of this. I don't think I know Laney and I don't know what bar you worked at, but I worked in a bar and saw Leanne attacking my girlfriend. It was 6 years ago and whilst I was working I saw her go for my girlfriend who was on a night out. I know for a fact it was Leanne because my older sister went to school with her. My girlfriend chose not to go to the police, although I begged her to. Its obvious that she is a troubled girl who turns violent when she drinks. She's now where she belongs.
Cause you don't know lanley88 (eyes rolling ) or did Lanley just make another gazette account !!!!
[quote][p][bold]DavePH[/bold] wrote: I've read through all of this. I don't think I know Laney and I don't know what bar you worked at, but I worked in a bar and saw Leanne attacking my girlfriend. It was 6 years ago and whilst I was working I saw her go for my girlfriend who was on a night out. I know for a fact it was Leanne because my older sister went to school with her. My girlfriend chose not to go to the police, although I begged her to. Its obvious that she is a troubled girl who turns violent when she drinks. She's now where she belongs.[/p][/quote]Cause you don't know lanley88 (eyes rolling ) or did Lanley just make another gazette account !!!! I tell the truth
  • Score: -6

4:58pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Lanely88 says...

I said 'well over 5 years ago'. If you're going to quote me, do it right.
I said 'well over 5 years ago'. If you're going to quote me, do it right. Lanely88
  • Score: 5

5:04pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Sheenie says...

Well lanely when was it? And what bar did you work in? So what is your name?
Well lanely when was it? And what bar did you work in? So what is your name? Sheenie
  • Score: -4

5:05pm Thu 13 Feb 14

DavePH says...

I tell the truth wrote:
DavePH wrote:
I've read through all of this. I don't think I know Laney and I don't know what bar you worked at, but I worked in a bar and saw Leanne attacking my girlfriend. It was 6 years ago and whilst I was working I saw her go for my girlfriend who was on a night out. I know for a fact it was Leanne because my older sister went to school with her. My girlfriend chose not to go to the police, although I begged her to. Its obvious that she is a troubled girl who turns violent when she drinks. She's now where she belongs.
Cause you don't know lanley88 (eyes rolling ) or did Lanley just make another gazette account !!!!
Listen love, I ain't getting into some silly little internet row with some idiot that cant accept that she is a no good rotten thug. I couldn't care less about proving my argument to the likes of you. She attacked MY girlfriend and I'm glad she's in now prison. So you can spam me with all your rubbish all you want, I don't care cos as far as I'm concerned a criminal is banged up. The end.
[quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]DavePH[/bold] wrote: I've read through all of this. I don't think I know Laney and I don't know what bar you worked at, but I worked in a bar and saw Leanne attacking my girlfriend. It was 6 years ago and whilst I was working I saw her go for my girlfriend who was on a night out. I know for a fact it was Leanne because my older sister went to school with her. My girlfriend chose not to go to the police, although I begged her to. Its obvious that she is a troubled girl who turns violent when she drinks. She's now where she belongs.[/p][/quote]Cause you don't know lanley88 (eyes rolling ) or did Lanley just make another gazette account !!!![/p][/quote]Listen love, I ain't getting into some silly little internet row with some idiot that cant accept that she is a no good rotten thug. I couldn't care less about proving my argument to the likes of you. She attacked MY girlfriend and I'm glad she's in now prison. So you can spam me with all your rubbish all you want, I don't care cos as far as I'm concerned a criminal is banged up. The end. DavePH
  • Score: 6

5:09pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Lanely88 says...

Sheenie wrote:
Well lanely when was it? And what bar did you work in? So what is your name?
Why would I tell you that?!
[quote][p][bold]Sheenie[/bold] wrote: Well lanely when was it? And what bar did you work in? So what is your name?[/p][/quote]Why would I tell you that?! Lanely88
  • Score: 6

5:10pm Thu 13 Feb 14

karen f says...

Ok I'm really confused now. A month ago, all the supporters of Leanne were saying that the jury had been bullied into making their decision and that the judge ignored a letter given to him by a jury member.

On this thread two of you have conflicting stories relating to how the jury came about their decision.

'essex_jim' is saying " The jury, with what they've been given in front of them have decided that Leanne was guilty, because, as many others have said on here there is no other alledged suspect. I can 100% see why people would think that and I respect that judgement."

'I tell the truth' is quoting "When the court returned after a 2 day adjournment, a member of the jury passed a note to the judge, which he proceeded to read. He then passed the letter to leannes barrister and the prosecution. The letter stated that the jury member felt he was taking part in an unfair trial as people were making things up to work out how it happened .as there was no evidence she had commited this crime ."

So which was it? Were the jury allowed to come to their decision on the evidence given or were they bullied? The letter wasn't ignored if it was read by the Judge, then passed to both Leanne's barrister and the prosecution and if the Judge did read such a letter, then why did he not adjourn the case and call a meeting with both parties' legal teams?

Something really doesn't add up does it?
Ok I'm really confused now. A month ago, all the supporters of Leanne were saying that the jury had been bullied into making their decision and that the judge ignored a letter given to him by a jury member. On this thread two of you have conflicting stories relating to how the jury came about their decision. 'essex_jim' is saying " The jury, with what they've been given in front of them have decided that Leanne was guilty, because, as many others have said on here there is no other alledged suspect. I can 100% see why people would think that and I respect that judgement." 'I tell the truth' is quoting "When the court returned after a 2 day adjournment, a member of the jury passed a note to the judge, which he proceeded to read. He then passed the letter to leannes barrister and the prosecution. The letter stated that the jury member felt he was taking part in an unfair trial as people were making things up to work out how it happened .as there was no evidence she had commited this crime ." So which was it? Were the jury allowed to come to their decision on the evidence given or were they bullied? The letter wasn't ignored if it was read by the Judge, then passed to both Leanne's barrister and the prosecution and if the Judge did read such a letter, then why did he not adjourn the case and call a meeting with both parties' legal teams? Something really doesn't add up does it? karen f
  • Score: 5

5:26pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Sheenie says...

Because lanely you said your not a liar? You won't give out any facts and the ones you have said are all false proving you a liar
Because lanely you said your not a liar? You won't give out any facts and the ones you have said are all false proving you a liar Sheenie
  • Score: -7

5:34pm Thu 13 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

karen f wrote:
Ok I'm really confused now. A month ago, all the supporters of Leanne were saying that the jury had been bullied into making their decision and that the judge ignored a letter given to him by a jury member.

On this thread two of you have conflicting stories relating to how the jury came about their decision.

'essex_jim' is saying " The jury, with what they've been given in front of them have decided that Leanne was guilty, because, as many others have said on here there is no other alledged suspect. I can 100% see why people would think that and I respect that judgement."

'I tell the truth' is quoting "When the court returned after a 2 day adjournment, a member of the jury passed a note to the judge, which he proceeded to read. He then passed the letter to leannes barrister and the prosecution. The letter stated that the jury member felt he was taking part in an unfair trial as people were making things up to work out how it happened .as there was no evidence she had commited this crime ."

So which was it? Were the jury allowed to come to their decision on the evidence given or were they bullied? The letter wasn't ignored if it was read by the Judge, then passed to both Leanne's barrister and the prosecution and if the Judge did read such a letter, then why did he not adjourn the case and call a meeting with both parties' legal teams?

Something really doesn't add up does it?
Exactly ,to the last paragraph you wrote
[quote][p][bold]karen f[/bold] wrote: Ok I'm really confused now. A month ago, all the supporters of Leanne were saying that the jury had been bullied into making their decision and that the judge ignored a letter given to him by a jury member. On this thread two of you have conflicting stories relating to how the jury came about their decision. 'essex_jim' is saying " The jury, with what they've been given in front of them have decided that Leanne was guilty, because, as many others have said on here there is no other alledged suspect. I can 100% see why people would think that and I respect that judgement." 'I tell the truth' is quoting "When the court returned after a 2 day adjournment, a member of the jury passed a note to the judge, which he proceeded to read. He then passed the letter to leannes barrister and the prosecution. The letter stated that the jury member felt he was taking part in an unfair trial as people were making things up to work out how it happened .as there was no evidence she had commited this crime ." So which was it? Were the jury allowed to come to their decision on the evidence given or were they bullied? The letter wasn't ignored if it was read by the Judge, then passed to both Leanne's barrister and the prosecution and if the Judge did read such a letter, then why did he not adjourn the case and call a meeting with both parties' legal teams? Something really doesn't add up does it?[/p][/quote]Exactly ,to the last paragraph you wrote I tell the truth
  • Score: -6

5:36pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Lanely88 says...

Sheenie wrote:
Because lanely you said your not a liar? You won't give out any facts and the ones you have said are all false proving you a liar
I'm not stupid enough to give out personal details to people I don't know who are obviously angry and unaccepting that she has done any wrong doing. I know what happened and that I'm not lying and so do a few others who were involved at the time. And although I didn't take it further karma has prevailed and she is now in prison. Like I said, I haven't committed the crime here. I don't need to prove myself to you. Hopefully I'll never have the misfortune of seeing this horrible woman again. :-)
[quote][p][bold]Sheenie[/bold] wrote: Because lanely you said your not a liar? You won't give out any facts and the ones you have said are all false proving you a liar[/p][/quote]I'm not stupid enough to give out personal details to people I don't know who are obviously angry and unaccepting that she has done any wrong doing. I know what happened and that I'm not lying and so do a few others who were involved at the time. And although I didn't take it further karma has prevailed and she is now in prison. Like I said, I haven't committed the crime here. I don't need to prove myself to you. Hopefully I'll never have the misfortune of seeing this horrible woman again. :-) Lanely88
  • Score: 4

5:37pm Thu 13 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

DavePH wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
DavePH wrote:
I've read through all of this. I don't think I know Laney and I don't know what bar you worked at, but I worked in a bar and saw Leanne attacking my girlfriend. It was 6 years ago and whilst I was working I saw her go for my girlfriend who was on a night out. I know for a fact it was Leanne because my older sister went to school with her. My girlfriend chose not to go to the police, although I begged her to. Its obvious that she is a troubled girl who turns violent when she drinks. She's now where she belongs.
Cause you don't know lanley88 (eyes rolling ) or did Lanley just make another gazette account !!!!
Listen love, I ain't getting into some silly little internet row with some idiot that cant accept that she is a no good rotten thug. I couldn't care less about proving my argument to the likes of you. She attacked MY girlfriend and I'm glad she's in now prison. So you can spam me with all your rubbish all you want, I don't care cos as far as I'm concerned a criminal is banged up. The end.
so she had a fight with your girlfriend (which means your girlfriend would of retaliated ) yeah ? Sounds like your girlfriend is a bit of a thug as well !!!
[quote][p][bold]DavePH[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]DavePH[/bold] wrote: I've read through all of this. I don't think I know Laney and I don't know what bar you worked at, but I worked in a bar and saw Leanne attacking my girlfriend. It was 6 years ago and whilst I was working I saw her go for my girlfriend who was on a night out. I know for a fact it was Leanne because my older sister went to school with her. My girlfriend chose not to go to the police, although I begged her to. Its obvious that she is a troubled girl who turns violent when she drinks. She's now where she belongs.[/p][/quote]Cause you don't know lanley88 (eyes rolling ) or did Lanley just make another gazette account !!!![/p][/quote]Listen love, I ain't getting into some silly little internet row with some idiot that cant accept that she is a no good rotten thug. I couldn't care less about proving my argument to the likes of you. She attacked MY girlfriend and I'm glad she's in now prison. So you can spam me with all your rubbish all you want, I don't care cos as far as I'm concerned a criminal is banged up. The end.[/p][/quote]so she had a fight with your girlfriend (which means your girlfriend would of retaliated ) yeah ? Sounds like your girlfriend is a bit of a thug as well !!! I tell the truth
  • Score: -6

5:40pm Thu 13 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

DavePH wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
DavePH wrote:
I've read through all of this. I don't think I know Laney and I don't know what bar you worked at, but I worked in a bar and saw Leanne attacking my girlfriend. It was 6 years ago and whilst I was working I saw her go for my girlfriend who was on a night out. I know for a fact it was Leanne because my older sister went to school with her. My girlfriend chose not to go to the police, although I begged her to. Its obvious that she is a troubled girl who turns violent when she drinks. She's now where she belongs.
Cause you don't know lanley88 (eyes rolling ) or did Lanley just make another gazette account !!!!
Listen love, I ain't getting into some silly little internet row with some idiot that cant accept that she is a no good rotten thug. I couldn't care less about proving my argument to the likes of you. She attacked MY girlfriend and I'm glad she's in now prison. So you can spam me with all your rubbish all you want, I don't care cos as far as I'm concerned a criminal is banged up. The end.
Leannes barrister showed CCTV footage of the night club, which had been digitally enhanced and slowed down. During the footage, it is clear that an altercation occurs (which in real time lasted for approximately 12 seconds). Leanne is seen to lunge backwards and the victim grabs at leannes face. In this section of the video, it can clearly be seen that She has a clutch handbag beneath leannes right arm and that both of leanne hands are empty (hence why her defence barrister was so keen to show the footage). Despite the club dance floor being very busy at the time of the altercation and alleged crime, the prosecution could produce only one witness...Mr. Ahmed Kurda. Mr. Kurda stated that he had seen leanne slash the victims throat with a broken glass...yet the CCTV footage shows that her hands are empty. The witness also told the court that Leanne was wearing a black mini dress, which yet again is completely inaccurate (She was in fact wearing a black top covered in silver sequins and black trousers...both items were taken as evidence by Officer Rook at the time of my arrest).
• Mr. Kurda also told the court that Leanne pulled the victim to the ground and repeatedly punched her in the head (which is also not shown on the video as this did not take place). There were also many inconsistencies between what Mr. Kurda stated in court and his original statement.
• The CPS confirmed that after forensically analysing the clothing and footwear that She wore on the evening of 3rd February 2013, none of Miss. Walsh’s DNA/blood was found (yet She had allegedly slashed her throat with a broken glass).
• All items of possible evidence (such as broken glass, etc) were retrieved from the crime scene and forensically analysed. The results of which showed that none of leannes fingerprints or DNA could be found.
• When the court returned after a 2 day adjournment, a member of the jury passed a note to the judge, which he proceeded to read. He then passed the letter to leannes barrister and the prosecution. The letter stated that the jury member felt he was taking part in an unfair trial as people were making things up to work out how it happened .as there was no evidence she had commited this crime .
[quote][p][bold]DavePH[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]DavePH[/bold] wrote: I've read through all of this. I don't think I know Laney and I don't know what bar you worked at, but I worked in a bar and saw Leanne attacking my girlfriend. It was 6 years ago and whilst I was working I saw her go for my girlfriend who was on a night out. I know for a fact it was Leanne because my older sister went to school with her. My girlfriend chose not to go to the police, although I begged her to. Its obvious that she is a troubled girl who turns violent when she drinks. She's now where she belongs.[/p][/quote]Cause you don't know lanley88 (eyes rolling ) or did Lanley just make another gazette account !!!![/p][/quote]Listen love, I ain't getting into some silly little internet row with some idiot that cant accept that she is a no good rotten thug. I couldn't care less about proving my argument to the likes of you. She attacked MY girlfriend and I'm glad she's in now prison. So you can spam me with all your rubbish all you want, I don't care cos as far as I'm concerned a criminal is banged up. The end.[/p][/quote]Leannes barrister showed CCTV footage of the night club, which had been digitally enhanced and slowed down. During the footage, it is clear that an altercation occurs (which in real time lasted for approximately 12 seconds). Leanne is seen to lunge backwards and the victim grabs at leannes face. In this section of the video, it can clearly be seen that She has a clutch handbag beneath leannes right arm and that both of leanne hands are empty (hence why her defence barrister was so keen to show the footage). Despite the club dance floor being very busy at the time of the altercation and alleged crime, the prosecution could produce only one witness...Mr. Ahmed Kurda. Mr. Kurda stated that he had seen leanne slash the victims throat with a broken glass...yet the CCTV footage shows that her hands are empty. The witness also told the court that Leanne was wearing a black mini dress, which yet again is completely inaccurate (She was in fact wearing a black top covered in silver sequins and black trousers...both items were taken as evidence by Officer Rook at the time of my arrest). • Mr. Kurda also told the court that Leanne pulled the victim to the ground and repeatedly punched her in the head (which is also not shown on the video as this did not take place). There were also many inconsistencies between what Mr. Kurda stated in court and his original statement. • The CPS confirmed that after forensically analysing the clothing and footwear that She wore on the evening of 3rd February 2013, none of Miss. Walsh’s DNA/blood was found (yet She had allegedly slashed her throat with a broken glass). • All items of possible evidence (such as broken glass, etc) were retrieved from the crime scene and forensically analysed. The results of which showed that none of leannes fingerprints or DNA could be found. • When the court returned after a 2 day adjournment, a member of the jury passed a note to the judge, which he proceeded to read. He then passed the letter to leannes barrister and the prosecution. The letter stated that the jury member felt he was taking part in an unfair trial as people were making things up to work out how it happened .as there was no evidence she had commited this crime . I tell the truth
  • Score: -3

5:46pm Thu 13 Feb 14

DavePH says...

I tell the truth wrote:
DavePH wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
DavePH wrote:
I've read through all of this. I don't think I know Laney and I don't know what bar you worked at, but I worked in a bar and saw Leanne attacking my girlfriend. It was 6 years ago and whilst I was working I saw her go for my girlfriend who was on a night out. I know for a fact it was Leanne because my older sister went to school with her. My girlfriend chose not to go to the police, although I begged her to. Its obvious that she is a troubled girl who turns violent when she drinks. She's now where she belongs.
Cause you don't know lanley88 (eyes rolling ) or did Lanley just make another gazette account !!!!
Listen love, I ain't getting into some silly little internet row with some idiot that cant accept that she is a no good rotten thug. I couldn't care less about proving my argument to the likes of you. She attacked MY girlfriend and I'm glad she's in now prison. So you can spam me with all your rubbish all you want, I don't care cos as far as I'm concerned a criminal is banged up. The end.
so she had a fight with your girlfriend (which means your girlfriend would of retaliated ) yeah ? Sounds like your girlfriend is a bit of a thug as well !!!
She attacked ATTACKED my girlfriend who was pregnant at the time by the way, and not drinking and did not retaliate.
Is that how you think? If someone was attacked it's their fault, and they're a thug?!
So if a woman get's raped in theory it's their fault and they're rapists themselves?
You make me sick. You're as bad as her. She deserves everything she gets.
[quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]DavePH[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]DavePH[/bold] wrote: I've read through all of this. I don't think I know Laney and I don't know what bar you worked at, but I worked in a bar and saw Leanne attacking my girlfriend. It was 6 years ago and whilst I was working I saw her go for my girlfriend who was on a night out. I know for a fact it was Leanne because my older sister went to school with her. My girlfriend chose not to go to the police, although I begged her to. Its obvious that she is a troubled girl who turns violent when she drinks. She's now where she belongs.[/p][/quote]Cause you don't know lanley88 (eyes rolling ) or did Lanley just make another gazette account !!!![/p][/quote]Listen love, I ain't getting into some silly little internet row with some idiot that cant accept that she is a no good rotten thug. I couldn't care less about proving my argument to the likes of you. She attacked MY girlfriend and I'm glad she's in now prison. So you can spam me with all your rubbish all you want, I don't care cos as far as I'm concerned a criminal is banged up. The end.[/p][/quote]so she had a fight with your girlfriend (which means your girlfriend would of retaliated ) yeah ? Sounds like your girlfriend is a bit of a thug as well !!![/p][/quote]She attacked ATTACKED my girlfriend who was pregnant at the time by the way, and not drinking and did not retaliate. Is that how you think? If someone was attacked it's their fault, and they're a thug?! So if a woman get's raped in theory it's their fault and they're rapists themselves? You make me sick. You're as bad as her. She deserves everything she gets. DavePH
  • Score: 7

5:52pm Thu 13 Feb 14

DavePH says...

I'm commenting anymore because it's upsetting my girlfriend. I've said my piece and justice has prevailed.
I'm commenting anymore because it's upsetting my girlfriend. I've said my piece and justice has prevailed. DavePH
  • Score: 7

5:54pm Thu 13 Feb 14

karen f says...

I tell the truth wrote:
karen f wrote:
Ok I'm really confused now. A month ago, all the supporters of Leanne were saying that the jury had been bullied into making their decision and that the judge ignored a letter given to him by a jury member.

On this thread two of you have conflicting stories relating to how the jury came about their decision.

'essex_jim' is saying " The jury, with what they've been given in front of them have decided that Leanne was guilty, because, as many others have said on here there is no other alledged suspect. I can 100% see why people would think that and I respect that judgement."

'I tell the truth' is quoting "When the court returned after a 2 day adjournment, a member of the jury passed a note to the judge, which he proceeded to read. He then passed the letter to leannes barrister and the prosecution. The letter stated that the jury member felt he was taking part in an unfair trial as people were making things up to work out how it happened .as there was no evidence she had commited this crime ."

So which was it? Were the jury allowed to come to their decision on the evidence given or were they bullied? The letter wasn't ignored if it was read by the Judge, then passed to both Leanne's barrister and the prosecution and if the Judge did read such a letter, then why did he not adjourn the case and call a meeting with both parties' legal teams?

Something really doesn't add up does it?
Exactly ,to the last paragraph you wrote
Just to clarify, when I say "something really dosn't add up does it?" I am referring to yours (I tell the truth) and essex_jim's versions of how the jury were allowed to reach their decision.
[quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]karen f[/bold] wrote: Ok I'm really confused now. A month ago, all the supporters of Leanne were saying that the jury had been bullied into making their decision and that the judge ignored a letter given to him by a jury member. On this thread two of you have conflicting stories relating to how the jury came about their decision. 'essex_jim' is saying " The jury, with what they've been given in front of them have decided that Leanne was guilty, because, as many others have said on here there is no other alledged suspect. I can 100% see why people would think that and I respect that judgement." 'I tell the truth' is quoting "When the court returned after a 2 day adjournment, a member of the jury passed a note to the judge, which he proceeded to read. He then passed the letter to leannes barrister and the prosecution. The letter stated that the jury member felt he was taking part in an unfair trial as people were making things up to work out how it happened .as there was no evidence she had commited this crime ." So which was it? Were the jury allowed to come to their decision on the evidence given or were they bullied? The letter wasn't ignored if it was read by the Judge, then passed to both Leanne's barrister and the prosecution and if the Judge did read such a letter, then why did he not adjourn the case and call a meeting with both parties' legal teams? Something really doesn't add up does it?[/p][/quote]Exactly ,to the last paragraph you wrote[/p][/quote]Just to clarify, when I say "something really dosn't add up does it?" I am referring to yours (I tell the truth) and essex_jim's versions of how the jury were allowed to reach their decision. karen f
  • Score: 4

6:01pm Thu 13 Feb 14

essex_jim says...

Karen what are you going on about? I simply said I respected their decision even though I think it's wrong. The jury has guessed because they don't have hard evidence. That much we know is true.
Karen what are you going on about? I simply said I respected their decision even though I think it's wrong. The jury has guessed because they don't have hard evidence. That much we know is true. essex_jim
  • Score: -6

6:04pm Thu 13 Feb 14

essex_jim says...

DavePH wrote:
I'm commenting anymore because it's upsetting my girlfriend. I've said my piece and justice has prevailed.
Of course it is. Your imaginary girlfriend is upset.

If any of these allegations were real does anyone think they might've brought it up whilst the trial was happening? Because if they were then it surely would've strengthened Walshs case would it not? Or was nothing said because they're not real. Funny how you've no issue plastering it all over the gazettes comments page but wouldn't go to the police.
[quote][p][bold]DavePH[/bold] wrote: I'm commenting anymore because it's upsetting my girlfriend. I've said my piece and justice has prevailed.[/p][/quote]Of course it is. Your imaginary girlfriend is upset. If any of these allegations were real does anyone think they might've brought it up whilst the trial was happening? Because if they were then it surely would've strengthened Walshs case would it not? Or was nothing said because they're not real. Funny how you've no issue plastering it all over the gazettes comments page but wouldn't go to the police. essex_jim
  • Score: -4

6:04pm Thu 13 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

DavePH wrote:
I'm commenting anymore because it's upsetting my girlfriend. I've said my piece and justice has prevailed.
Bye dave
[quote][p][bold]DavePH[/bold] wrote: I'm commenting anymore because it's upsetting my girlfriend. I've said my piece and justice has prevailed.[/p][/quote]Bye dave I tell the truth
  • Score: -5

6:20pm Thu 13 Feb 14

DavePH says...

essex_jim wrote:
DavePH wrote:
I'm commenting anymore because it's upsetting my girlfriend. I've said my piece and justice has prevailed.
Of course it is. Your imaginary girlfriend is upset.

If any of these allegations were real does anyone think they might've brought it up whilst the trial was happening? Because if they were then it surely would've strengthened Walshs case would it not? Or was nothing said because they're not real. Funny how you've no issue plastering it all over the gazettes comments page but wouldn't go to the police.
It was HER choice not to go to the police. I really wanted her too, and I saw it and told her there would be CCTV evidence but she didn't want the stress because she was pregnant and high risk pregnancies run in her family. She just chose not to go into town again. What should I have done, dragged her to the police station against her will? We are not all monsters who slash throats and attack people. Don't judge me by your standards, mate! Just cos you're defending a criminal doesn't make the rest of us bad.
And I had no idea about this whole trial until my sister sent me a link to this site last week cos she saw Leanne's mug in the paper. I didn't cos I don't live in colchester anymore. I've commented because I have no problem with people finding out what a scumbag she is and I'm glad she cant hurt anyone anymore.
Now I'm going to respect my girlfriend's wishes and leave this page definitely.
[quote][p][bold]essex_jim[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]DavePH[/bold] wrote: I'm commenting anymore because it's upsetting my girlfriend. I've said my piece and justice has prevailed.[/p][/quote]Of course it is. Your imaginary girlfriend is upset. If any of these allegations were real does anyone think they might've brought it up whilst the trial was happening? Because if they were then it surely would've strengthened Walshs case would it not? Or was nothing said because they're not real. Funny how you've no issue plastering it all over the gazettes comments page but wouldn't go to the police.[/p][/quote]It was HER choice not to go to the police. I really wanted her too, and I saw it and told her there would be CCTV evidence but she didn't want the stress because she was pregnant and high risk pregnancies run in her family. She just chose not to go into town again. What should I have done, dragged her to the police station against her will? We are not all monsters who slash throats and attack people. Don't judge me by your standards, mate! Just cos you're defending a criminal doesn't make the rest of us bad. And I had no idea about this whole trial until my sister sent me a link to this site last week cos she saw Leanne's mug in the paper. I didn't cos I don't live in colchester anymore. I've commented because I have no problem with people finding out what a scumbag she is and I'm glad she cant hurt anyone anymore. Now I'm going to respect my girlfriend's wishes and leave this page definitely. DavePH
  • Score: 9

6:53pm Thu 13 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

DavePH wrote:
essex_jim wrote:
DavePH wrote:
I'm commenting anymore because it's upsetting my girlfriend. I've said my piece and justice has prevailed.
Of course it is. Your imaginary girlfriend is upset.

If any of these allegations were real does anyone think they might've brought it up whilst the trial was happening? Because if they were then it surely would've strengthened Walshs case would it not? Or was nothing said because they're not real. Funny how you've no issue plastering it all over the gazettes comments page but wouldn't go to the police.
It was HER choice not to go to the police. I really wanted her too, and I saw it and told her there would be CCTV evidence but she didn't want the stress because she was pregnant and high risk pregnancies run in her family. She just chose not to go into town again. What should I have done, dragged her to the police station against her will? We are not all monsters who slash throats and attack people. Don't judge me by your standards, mate! Just cos you're defending a criminal doesn't make the rest of us bad.
And I had no idea about this whole trial until my sister sent me a link to this site last week cos she saw Leanne's mug in the paper. I didn't cos I don't live in colchester anymore. I've commented because I have no problem with people finding out what a scumbag she is and I'm glad she cant hurt anyone anymore.
Now I'm going to respect my girlfriend's wishes and leave this page definitely.
Bye liar dave !!!
[quote][p][bold]DavePH[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]essex_jim[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]DavePH[/bold] wrote: I'm commenting anymore because it's upsetting my girlfriend. I've said my piece and justice has prevailed.[/p][/quote]Of course it is. Your imaginary girlfriend is upset. If any of these allegations were real does anyone think they might've brought it up whilst the trial was happening? Because if they were then it surely would've strengthened Walshs case would it not? Or was nothing said because they're not real. Funny how you've no issue plastering it all over the gazettes comments page but wouldn't go to the police.[/p][/quote]It was HER choice not to go to the police. I really wanted her too, and I saw it and told her there would be CCTV evidence but she didn't want the stress because she was pregnant and high risk pregnancies run in her family. She just chose not to go into town again. What should I have done, dragged her to the police station against her will? We are not all monsters who slash throats and attack people. Don't judge me by your standards, mate! Just cos you're defending a criminal doesn't make the rest of us bad. And I had no idea about this whole trial until my sister sent me a link to this site last week cos she saw Leanne's mug in the paper. I didn't cos I don't live in colchester anymore. I've commented because I have no problem with people finding out what a scumbag she is and I'm glad she cant hurt anyone anymore. Now I'm going to respect my girlfriend's wishes and leave this page definitely.[/p][/quote]Bye liar dave !!! I tell the truth
  • Score: -3

6:56pm Thu 13 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

karen f wrote:
I tell the truth wrote:
karen f wrote:
Ok I'm really confused now. A month ago, all the supporters of Leanne were saying that the jury had been bullied into making their decision and that the judge ignored a letter given to him by a jury member.

On this thread two of you have conflicting stories relating to how the jury came about their decision.

'essex_jim' is saying " The jury, with what they've been given in front of them have decided that Leanne was guilty, because, as many others have said on here there is no other alledged suspect. I can 100% see why people would think that and I respect that judgement."

'I tell the truth' is quoting "When the court returned after a 2 day adjournment, a member of the jury passed a note to the judge, which he proceeded to read. He then passed the letter to leannes barrister and the prosecution. The letter stated that the jury member felt he was taking part in an unfair trial as people were making things up to work out how it happened .as there was no evidence she had commited this crime ."

So which was it? Were the jury allowed to come to their decision on the evidence given or were they bullied? The letter wasn't ignored if it was read by the Judge, then passed to both Leanne's barrister and the prosecution and if the Judge did read such a letter, then why did he not adjourn the case and call a meeting with both parties' legal teams?

Something really doesn't add up does it?
Exactly ,to the last paragraph you wrote
Just to clarify, when I say "something really dosn't add up does it?" I am referring to yours (I tell the truth) and essex_jim's versions of how the jury were allowed to reach their decision.
That's what the judge should of done , but didn't, why I don't know corrupt a little !
[quote][p][bold]karen f[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]karen f[/bold] wrote: Ok I'm really confused now. A month ago, all the supporters of Leanne were saying that the jury had been bullied into making their decision and that the judge ignored a letter given to him by a jury member. On this thread two of you have conflicting stories relating to how the jury came about their decision. 'essex_jim' is saying " The jury, with what they've been given in front of them have decided that Leanne was guilty, because, as many others have said on here there is no other alledged suspect. I can 100% see why people would think that and I respect that judgement." 'I tell the truth' is quoting "When the court returned after a 2 day adjournment, a member of the jury passed a note to the judge, which he proceeded to read. He then passed the letter to leannes barrister and the prosecution. The letter stated that the jury member felt he was taking part in an unfair trial as people were making things up to work out how it happened .as there was no evidence she had commited this crime ." So which was it? Were the jury allowed to come to their decision on the evidence given or were they bullied? The letter wasn't ignored if it was read by the Judge, then passed to both Leanne's barrister and the prosecution and if the Judge did read such a letter, then why did he not adjourn the case and call a meeting with both parties' legal teams? Something really doesn't add up does it?[/p][/quote]Exactly ,to the last paragraph you wrote[/p][/quote]Just to clarify, when I say "something really dosn't add up does it?" I am referring to yours (I tell the truth) and essex_jim's versions of how the jury were allowed to reach their decision.[/p][/quote]That's what the judge should of done , but didn't, why I don't know corrupt a little ! I tell the truth
  • Score: -3

7:16pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Sheenie says...

Dave you where ok with your girlfriend going on a night out when she's a high risk pregnancy??? What great parenting. There's a massive risk on a night out with fights, that your girlfriend got into or people around her fighting or falling over.
Dave you where ok with your girlfriend going on a night out when she's a high risk pregnancy??? What great parenting. There's a massive risk on a night out with fights, that your girlfriend got into or people around her fighting or falling over. Sheenie
  • Score: -5

7:23pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Lanely88 says...

Sheenie wrote:
Dave you where ok with your girlfriend going on a night out when she's a high risk pregnancy??? What great parenting. There's a massive risk on a night out with fights, that your girlfriend got into or people around her fighting or falling over.
I don't think you're really in the best position to past judgement on anyone whilst you're defending someone that slashed someone's neck. This whole blaming the victim angle is really quite disturbing. People should be able to have a night out regardless of their condition without being attacked. Simple.
[quote][p][bold]Sheenie[/bold] wrote: Dave you where ok with your girlfriend going on a night out when she's a high risk pregnancy??? What great parenting. There's a massive risk on a night out with fights, that your girlfriend got into or people around her fighting or falling over.[/p][/quote]I don't think you're really in the best position to past judgement on anyone whilst you're defending someone that slashed someone's neck. This whole blaming the victim angle is really quite disturbing. People should be able to have a night out regardless of their condition without being attacked. Simple. Lanely88
  • Score: 6

7:29pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Sheenie says...

Lanely you obviously don't have children or had a high risk pregnancy. I have! You would not even consider going out being serounded by drunk people and wet floors! You obviously haven't read what I wrote! If you read the summary of court maybe you could get you small mind around what people are saying.
Lanely you obviously don't have children or had a high risk pregnancy. I have! You would not even consider going out being serounded by drunk people and wet floors! You obviously haven't read what I wrote! If you read the summary of court maybe you could get you small mind around what people are saying. Sheenie
  • Score: -3

7:38pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Lanely88 says...

Sheenie wrote:
Lanely you obviously don't have children or had a high risk pregnancy. I have! You would not even consider going out being serounded by drunk people and wet floors! You obviously haven't read what I wrote! If you read the summary of court maybe you could get you small mind around what people are saying.
But what's does her having a high risk pregnancy have to do with the fact that she got attacked in a club? You're trying to divert the unjust attack by pointing fingers and calling someone a bad parent. Which is hilarious because judging by what Dave said his girlfriend sing the parent in prison is she?
[quote][p][bold]Sheenie[/bold] wrote: Lanely you obviously don't have children or had a high risk pregnancy. I have! You would not even consider going out being serounded by drunk people and wet floors! You obviously haven't read what I wrote! If you read the summary of court maybe you could get you small mind around what people are saying.[/p][/quote]But what's does her having a high risk pregnancy have to do with the fact that she got attacked in a club? You're trying to divert the unjust attack by pointing fingers and calling someone a bad parent. Which is hilarious because judging by what Dave said his girlfriend sing the parent in prison is she? Lanely88
  • Score: 4

7:41pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Lanely88 says...

Lanely88 wrote:
Sheenie wrote:
Lanely you obviously don't have children or had a high risk pregnancy. I have! You would not even consider going out being serounded by drunk people and wet floors! You obviously haven't read what I wrote! If you read the summary of court maybe you could get you small mind around what people are saying.
But what's does her having a high risk pregnancy have to do with the fact that she got attacked in a club? You're trying to divert the unjust attack by pointing fingers and calling someone a bad parent. Which is hilarious because judging by what Dave said his girlfriend sing the parent in prison is she?
*isn't the parent in prison I mean
[quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sheenie[/bold] wrote: Lanely you obviously don't have children or had a high risk pregnancy. I have! You would not even consider going out being serounded by drunk people and wet floors! You obviously haven't read what I wrote! If you read the summary of court maybe you could get you small mind around what people are saying.[/p][/quote]But what's does her having a high risk pregnancy have to do with the fact that she got attacked in a club? You're trying to divert the unjust attack by pointing fingers and calling someone a bad parent. Which is hilarious because judging by what Dave said his girlfriend sing the parent in prison is she?[/p][/quote]*isn't the parent in prison I mean Lanely88
  • Score: 4

7:54pm Thu 13 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

Lanely88 wrote:
Lanely88 wrote:
Sheenie wrote:
Lanely you obviously don't have children or had a high risk pregnancy. I have! You would not even consider going out being serounded by drunk people and wet floors! You obviously haven't read what I wrote! If you read the summary of court maybe you could get you small mind around what people are saying.
But what's does her having a high risk pregnancy have to do with the fact that she got attacked in a club? You're trying to divert the unjust attack by pointing fingers and calling someone a bad parent. Which is hilarious because judging by what Dave said his girlfriend sing the parent in prison is she?
*isn't the parent in prison I mean
Because it's crap , why are you writing this now when leanne is not here to defend herself , we all know your a liar by saying she had blonde hair five years ago !!! Oh when she was pregnant and breastfeeding and didn't go out for a year and a half ! What a complete liar you are
[quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sheenie[/bold] wrote: Lanely you obviously don't have children or had a high risk pregnancy. I have! You would not even consider going out being serounded by drunk people and wet floors! You obviously haven't read what I wrote! If you read the summary of court maybe you could get you small mind around what people are saying.[/p][/quote]But what's does her having a high risk pregnancy have to do with the fact that she got attacked in a club? You're trying to divert the unjust attack by pointing fingers and calling someone a bad parent. Which is hilarious because judging by what Dave said his girlfriend sing the parent in prison is she?[/p][/quote]*isn't the parent in prison I mean[/p][/quote]Because it's crap , why are you writing this now when leanne is not here to defend herself , we all know your a liar by saying she had blonde hair five years ago !!! Oh when she was pregnant and breastfeeding and didn't go out for a year and a half ! What a complete liar you are I tell the truth
  • Score: -5

8:04pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Lanely88 says...

I tell the truth wrote:
Lanely88 wrote:
Lanely88 wrote:
Sheenie wrote:
Lanely you obviously don't have children or had a high risk pregnancy. I have! You would not even consider going out being serounded by drunk people and wet floors! You obviously haven't read what I wrote! If you read the summary of court maybe you could get you small mind around what people are saying.
But what's does her having a high risk pregnancy have to do with the fact that she got attacked in a club? You're trying to divert the unjust attack by pointing fingers and calling someone a bad parent. Which is hilarious because judging by what Dave said his girlfriend sing the parent in prison is she?
*isn't the parent in prison I mean
Because it's crap , why are you writing this now when leanne is not here to defend herself , we all know your a liar by saying she had blonde hair five years ago !!! Oh when she was pregnant and breastfeeding and didn't go out for a year and a half ! What a complete liar you are
Your selective reading is tedious. Well over 5 years ago is what I said. You can point fingers and live in denial all you want, whatever makes you happy. Good luck to you!
[quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Lanely88[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sheenie[/bold] wrote: Lanely you obviously don't have children or had a high risk pregnancy. I have! You would not even consider going out being serounded by drunk people and wet floors! You obviously haven't read what I wrote! If you read the summary of court maybe you could get you small mind around what people are saying.[/p][/quote]But what's does her having a high risk pregnancy have to do with the fact that she got attacked in a club? You're trying to divert the unjust attack by pointing fingers and calling someone a bad parent. Which is hilarious because judging by what Dave said his girlfriend sing the parent in prison is she?[/p][/quote]*isn't the parent in prison I mean[/p][/quote]Because it's crap , why are you writing this now when leanne is not here to defend herself , we all know your a liar by saying she had blonde hair five years ago !!! Oh when she was pregnant and breastfeeding and didn't go out for a year and a half ! What a complete liar you are[/p][/quote]Your selective reading is tedious. Well over 5 years ago is what I said. You can point fingers and live in denial all you want, whatever makes you happy. Good luck to you! Lanely88
  • Score: 4

8:11pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Assimilation says...

It`s about time the Gazette closed this thread down, but before they do......

karen f says...
When the court returned after a 2 day adjournment, a member of the jury passed a note to the judge, which he proceeded to read. He then passed the letter to leannes barrister and the prosecution. The letter stated that the jury member felt he was taking part in an unfair trial as people were making things up to work out how it happened .as there was no evidence she had committed this crime .

essex-jim says...
If any of these allegations were real does anyone think they might've brought it up whilst the trial was happening? Because if they were then it surely would've strengthened Walshs case would it not? Or was nothing said because they're not real. Funny how you've no issue plastering it all over the gazettes comments page but wouldn't go to the police.

Sheenie says...
Dave you where ok with your girlfriend going on a night out when she's a high risk pregnancy??? What great parenting. There's a massive risk on a night out with fights, that your girlfriend got into or people around her fighting or falling over.

karen f..... Where did you get this information? Notes passed between Jury's, Judges, Barristers and the Judge are all confidential and are not made public knowledge, even after trials, so someone is/was in contempt of court.

Essex-jim....When someone stands trial they do not bring up past occurrence's in case it sways the jury, thats why her other assault warning was not disclosed in the press till after the trial had finished.

Sheenie.......Dont go on about "Great Parenting" when your so called friend did not think of her kids when she did what she did. And why do you insist on calling everyone a lire? You keep on saying everybody knows she never had blond hair, I dont so why do you insist, could it be that you are the lire, but you will not except it.
It`s about time the Gazette closed this thread down, but before they do...... karen f says... When the court returned after a 2 day adjournment, a member of the jury passed a note to the judge, which he proceeded to read. He then passed the letter to leannes barrister and the prosecution. The letter stated that the jury member felt he was taking part in an unfair trial as people were making things up to work out how it happened .as there was no evidence she had committed this crime . essex-jim says... If any of these allegations were real does anyone think they might've brought it up whilst the trial was happening? Because if they were then it surely would've strengthened Walshs case would it not? Or was nothing said because they're not real. Funny how you've no issue plastering it all over the gazettes comments page but wouldn't go to the police. Sheenie says... Dave you where ok with your girlfriend going on a night out when she's a high risk pregnancy??? What great parenting. There's a massive risk on a night out with fights, that your girlfriend got into or people around her fighting or falling over. karen f..... Where did you get this information? Notes passed between Jury's, Judges, Barristers and the Judge are all confidential and are not made public knowledge, even after trials, so someone is/was in contempt of court. Essex-jim....When someone stands trial they do not bring up past occurrence's in case it sways the jury, thats why her other assault warning was not disclosed in the press till after the trial had finished. Sheenie.......Dont go on about "Great Parenting" when your so called friend did not think of her kids when she did what she did. And why do you insist on calling everyone a lire? You keep on saying everybody knows she never had blond hair, I dont so why do you insist, could it be that you are the lire, but you will not except it. Assimilation
  • Score: 3

8:12pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Sheenie says...

Because I can point it out. As you are trying to point something out about a case you know nothing about! You know no facts or the points we have been putting across. Your talking about a load of **** 5 years ago. Which like dave and his girlfriends bad parenting has nothing to do with this court case.
Because I can point it out. As you are trying to point something out about a case you know nothing about! You know no facts or the points we have been putting across. Your talking about a load of **** 5 years ago. Which like dave and his girlfriends bad parenting has nothing to do with this court case. Sheenie
  • Score: -7

8:19pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Sheenie says...

Oh go away! Lol. I'm talking about everyone that knows here. What has that conversation got to do with you! Go back and spend your days watching Jeremy KYLE ( thanks I didn't know as I don't watch it) and keep refreshing the gazette website to make your troll comments.
Oh go away! Lol. I'm talking about everyone that knows here. What has that conversation got to do with you! Go back and spend your days watching Jeremy KYLE ( thanks I didn't know as I don't watch it) and keep refreshing the gazette website to make your troll comments. Sheenie
  • Score: -7

8:20pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Suffolkcommuter says...

Do we not have this debate every time someone gets sent down?

Family will always stick up for family....blood is thicker than water so to speak, what mother, sister, brother will admit that their offspring is capable of such a crime? They NEVER do!!!! I work in the system, and the amount of times I have seen friends and not accepting that a loved one has done something wrong, is incredible! On the flipside, victims of course want justice.

We have one of the best judicial systems in the world, one that we should (generally) be proud of, and yes its not perfect - but this lady has been found guilty. Until she wins an appeal, she needs to remain in jail.

As the Meercats say, Simples
Do we not have this debate every time someone gets sent down? Family will always stick up for family....blood is thicker than water so to speak, what mother, sister, brother will admit that their offspring is capable of such a crime? They NEVER do!!!! I work in the system, and the amount of times I have seen friends and not accepting that a loved one has done something wrong, is incredible! On the flipside, victims of course want justice. We have one of the best judicial systems in the world, one that we should (generally) be proud of, and yes its not perfect - but this lady has been found guilty. Until she wins an appeal, she needs to remain in jail. As the Meercats say, Simples Suffolkcommuter
  • Score: 8

8:27pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Suffolkcommuter says...

And even if Leanne admitted it - the family would say she had been coerced.

This debate will never be settled. Time to let it rest?
And even if Leanne admitted it - the family would say she had been coerced. This debate will never be settled. Time to let it rest? Suffolkcommuter
  • Score: 8

8:51pm Thu 13 Feb 14

karen f says...

Assimilation wrote:
It`s about time the Gazette closed this thread down, but before they do......

karen f says...
When the court returned after a 2 day adjournment, a member of the jury passed a note to the judge, which he proceeded to read. He then passed the letter to leannes barrister and the prosecution. The letter stated that the jury member felt he was taking part in an unfair trial as people were making things up to work out how it happened .as there was no evidence she had committed this crime .

essex-jim says...
If any of these allegations were real does anyone think they might've brought it up whilst the trial was happening? Because if they were then it surely would've strengthened Walshs case would it not? Or was nothing said because they're not real. Funny how you've no issue plastering it all over the gazettes comments page but wouldn't go to the police.

Sheenie says...
Dave you where ok with your girlfriend going on a night out when she's a high risk pregnancy??? What great parenting. There's a massive risk on a night out with fights, that your girlfriend got into or people around her fighting or falling over.

karen f..... Where did you get this information? Notes passed between Jury's, Judges, Barristers and the Judge are all confidential and are not made public knowledge, even after trials, so someone is/was in contempt of court.

Essex-jim....When someone stands trial they do not bring up past occurrence's in case it sways the jury, thats why her other assault warning was not disclosed in the press till after the trial had finished.

Sheenie.......Dont go on about "Great Parenting" when your so called friend did not think of her kids when she did what she did. And why do you insist on calling everyone a lire? You keep on saying everybody knows she never had blond hair, I dont so why do you insist, could it be that you are the lire, but you will not except it.
Assimilation it came from one of 'I talk the truth's' comments as I stated. My point was exactly what you are trying to say. If it happened, which I very much doubt, then it wouldn't have been passed about in court, the Judge would have adjourned the case and asked to see both sets of barrister's in his Chambers surely?

Whilst we are all expected to accept what Leanne's family and friends say, they are not willing to see that there are discrepancies in their own versions of what happened. This was the point I tried to make way up there but my questions were never answered.

This was my original comment:

"Ok I'm really confused now. A month ago, all the supporters of Leanne were saying that the jury had been bullied into making their decision and that the judge ignored a letter given to him by a jury member.

On this thread two of you have conflicting stories relating to how the jury came about their decision.

'essex_jim' is saying " The jury, with what they've been given in front of them have decided that Leanne was guilty, because, as many others have said on here there is no other alledged suspect. I can 100% see why people would think that and I respect that judgement."

'I tell the truth' is quoting "When the court returned after a 2 day adjournment, a member of the jury passed a note to the judge, which he proceeded to read. He then passed the letter to leannes barrister and the prosecution. The letter stated that the jury member felt he was taking part in an unfair trial as people were making things up to work out how it happened .as there was no evidence she had commited this crime ."

So which was it? Were the jury allowed to come to their decision on the evidence given or were they bullied? The letter wasn't ignored if it was read by the Judge, then passed to both Leanne's barrister and the prosecution and if the Judge did read such a letter, then why did he not adjourn the case and call a meeting with both parties' legal teams?

Something really doesn't add up does it?"

I thought it was pretty clear what I was trying to say, sorry for any confusion.
[quote][p][bold]Assimilation[/bold] wrote: It`s about time the Gazette closed this thread down, but before they do...... karen f says... When the court returned after a 2 day adjournment, a member of the jury passed a note to the judge, which he proceeded to read. He then passed the letter to leannes barrister and the prosecution. The letter stated that the jury member felt he was taking part in an unfair trial as people were making things up to work out how it happened .as there was no evidence she had committed this crime . essex-jim says... If any of these allegations were real does anyone think they might've brought it up whilst the trial was happening? Because if they were then it surely would've strengthened Walshs case would it not? Or was nothing said because they're not real. Funny how you've no issue plastering it all over the gazettes comments page but wouldn't go to the police. Sheenie says... Dave you where ok with your girlfriend going on a night out when she's a high risk pregnancy??? What great parenting. There's a massive risk on a night out with fights, that your girlfriend got into or people around her fighting or falling over. karen f..... Where did you get this information? Notes passed between Jury's, Judges, Barristers and the Judge are all confidential and are not made public knowledge, even after trials, so someone is/was in contempt of court. Essex-jim....When someone stands trial they do not bring up past occurrence's in case it sways the jury, thats why her other assault warning was not disclosed in the press till after the trial had finished. Sheenie.......Dont go on about "Great Parenting" when your so called friend did not think of her kids when she did what she did. And why do you insist on calling everyone a lire? You keep on saying everybody knows she never had blond hair, I dont so why do you insist, could it be that you are the lire, but you will not except it.[/p][/quote]Assimilation it came from one of 'I talk the truth's' comments as I stated. My point was exactly what you are trying to say. If it happened, which I very much doubt, then it wouldn't have been passed about in court, the Judge would have adjourned the case and asked to see both sets of barrister's in his Chambers surely? Whilst we are all expected to accept what Leanne's family and friends say, they are not willing to see that there are discrepancies in their own versions of what happened. This was the point I tried to make way up there but my questions were never answered. This was my original comment: "Ok I'm really confused now. A month ago, all the supporters of Leanne were saying that the jury had been bullied into making their decision and that the judge ignored a letter given to him by a jury member. On this thread two of you have conflicting stories relating to how the jury came about their decision. 'essex_jim' is saying " The jury, with what they've been given in front of them have decided that Leanne was guilty, because, as many others have said on here there is no other alledged suspect. I can 100% see why people would think that and I respect that judgement." 'I tell the truth' is quoting "When the court returned after a 2 day adjournment, a member of the jury passed a note to the judge, which he proceeded to read. He then passed the letter to leannes barrister and the prosecution. The letter stated that the jury member felt he was taking part in an unfair trial as people were making things up to work out how it happened .as there was no evidence she had commited this crime ." So which was it? Were the jury allowed to come to their decision on the evidence given or were they bullied? The letter wasn't ignored if it was read by the Judge, then passed to both Leanne's barrister and the prosecution and if the Judge did read such a letter, then why did he not adjourn the case and call a meeting with both parties' legal teams? Something really doesn't add up does it?" I thought it was pretty clear what I was trying to say, sorry for any confusion. karen f
  • Score: 3

8:56pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Suffolkcommuter says...

karen f wrote:
Assimilation wrote:
It`s about time the Gazette closed this thread down, but before they do......

karen f says...
When the court returned after a 2 day adjournment, a member of the jury passed a note to the judge, which he proceeded to read. He then passed the letter to leannes barrister and the prosecution. The letter stated that the jury member felt he was taking part in an unfair trial as people were making things up to work out how it happened .as there was no evidence she had committed this crime .

essex-jim says...
If any of these allegations were real does anyone think they might've brought it up whilst the trial was happening? Because if they were then it surely would've strengthened Walshs case would it not? Or was nothing said because they're not real. Funny how you've no issue plastering it all over the gazettes comments page but wouldn't go to the police.

Sheenie says...
Dave you where ok with your girlfriend going on a night out when she's a high risk pregnancy??? What great parenting. There's a massive risk on a night out with fights, that your girlfriend got into or people around her fighting or falling over.

karen f..... Where did you get this information? Notes passed between Jury's, Judges, Barristers and the Judge are all confidential and are not made public knowledge, even after trials, so someone is/was in contempt of court.

Essex-jim....When someone stands trial they do not bring up past occurrence's in case it sways the jury, thats why her other assault warning was not disclosed in the press till after the trial had finished.

Sheenie.......Dont go on about "Great Parenting" when your so called friend did not think of her kids when she did what she did. And why do you insist on calling everyone a lire? You keep on saying everybody knows she never had blond hair, I dont so why do you insist, could it be that you are the lire, but you will not except it.
Assimilation it came from one of 'I talk the truth's' comments as I stated. My point was exactly what you are trying to say. If it happened, which I very much doubt, then it wouldn't have been passed about in court, the Judge would have adjourned the case and asked to see both sets of barrister's in his Chambers surely?

Whilst we are all expected to accept what Leanne's family and friends say, they are not willing to see that there are discrepancies in their own versions of what happened. This was the point I tried to make way up there but my questions were never answered.

This was my original comment:

"Ok I'm really confused now. A month ago, all the supporters of Leanne were saying that the jury had been bullied into making their decision and that the judge ignored a letter given to him by a jury member.

On this thread two of you have conflicting stories relating to how the jury came about their decision.

'essex_jim' is saying " The jury, with what they've been given in front of them have decided that Leanne was guilty, because, as many others have said on here there is no other alledged suspect. I can 100% see why people would think that and I respect that judgement."

'I tell the truth' is quoting "When the court returned after a 2 day adjournment, a member of the jury passed a note to the judge, which he proceeded to read. He then passed the letter to leannes barrister and the prosecution. The letter stated that the jury member felt he was taking part in an unfair trial as people were making things up to work out how it happened .as there was no evidence she had commited this crime ."

So which was it? Were the jury allowed to come to their decision on the evidence given or were they bullied? The letter wasn't ignored if it was read by the Judge, then passed to both Leanne's barrister and the prosecution and if the Judge did read such a letter, then why did he not adjourn the case and call a meeting with both parties' legal teams?

Something really doesn't add up does it?"

I thought it was pretty clear what I was trying to say, sorry for any confusion.
Karen F - stop it!! did you not read my post or don't wish to respond?
[quote][p][bold]karen f[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Assimilation[/bold] wrote: It`s about time the Gazette closed this thread down, but before they do...... karen f says... When the court returned after a 2 day adjournment, a member of the jury passed a note to the judge, which he proceeded to read. He then passed the letter to leannes barrister and the prosecution. The letter stated that the jury member felt he was taking part in an unfair trial as people were making things up to work out how it happened .as there was no evidence she had committed this crime . essex-jim says... If any of these allegations were real does anyone think they might've brought it up whilst the trial was happening? Because if they were then it surely would've strengthened Walshs case would it not? Or was nothing said because they're not real. Funny how you've no issue plastering it all over the gazettes comments page but wouldn't go to the police. Sheenie says... Dave you where ok with your girlfriend going on a night out when she's a high risk pregnancy??? What great parenting. There's a massive risk on a night out with fights, that your girlfriend got into or people around her fighting or falling over. karen f..... Where did you get this information? Notes passed between Jury's, Judges, Barristers and the Judge are all confidential and are not made public knowledge, even after trials, so someone is/was in contempt of court. Essex-jim....When someone stands trial they do not bring up past occurrence's in case it sways the jury, thats why her other assault warning was not disclosed in the press till after the trial had finished. Sheenie.......Dont go on about "Great Parenting" when your so called friend did not think of her kids when she did what she did. And why do you insist on calling everyone a lire? You keep on saying everybody knows she never had blond hair, I dont so why do you insist, could it be that you are the lire, but you will not except it.[/p][/quote]Assimilation it came from one of 'I talk the truth's' comments as I stated. My point was exactly what you are trying to say. If it happened, which I very much doubt, then it wouldn't have been passed about in court, the Judge would have adjourned the case and asked to see both sets of barrister's in his Chambers surely? Whilst we are all expected to accept what Leanne's family and friends say, they are not willing to see that there are discrepancies in their own versions of what happened. This was the point I tried to make way up there but my questions were never answered. This was my original comment: "Ok I'm really confused now. A month ago, all the supporters of Leanne were saying that the jury had been bullied into making their decision and that the judge ignored a letter given to him by a jury member. On this thread two of you have conflicting stories relating to how the jury came about their decision. 'essex_jim' is saying " The jury, with what they've been given in front of them have decided that Leanne was guilty, because, as many others have said on here there is no other alledged suspect. I can 100% see why people would think that and I respect that judgement." 'I tell the truth' is quoting "When the court returned after a 2 day adjournment, a member of the jury passed a note to the judge, which he proceeded to read. He then passed the letter to leannes barrister and the prosecution. The letter stated that the jury member felt he was taking part in an unfair trial as people were making things up to work out how it happened .as there was no evidence she had commited this crime ." So which was it? Were the jury allowed to come to their decision on the evidence given or were they bullied? The letter wasn't ignored if it was read by the Judge, then passed to both Leanne's barrister and the prosecution and if the Judge did read such a letter, then why did he not adjourn the case and call a meeting with both parties' legal teams? Something really doesn't add up does it?" I thought it was pretty clear what I was trying to say, sorry for any confusion.[/p][/quote]Karen F - stop it!! did you not read my post or don't wish to respond? Suffolkcommuter
  • Score: -5

8:59pm Thu 13 Feb 14

karen f says...

Suffolkcommuter I did read your comments but I was only responding to a direct question from Assimilation.
Suffolkcommuter I did read your comments but I was only responding to a direct question from Assimilation. karen f
  • Score: 1

9:37pm Thu 13 Feb 14

wardyt says...

So in summary : Leanne is scum and so are all her mates / family who are on here trying to defend her. Thank you and good night.
So in summary : Leanne is scum and so are all her mates / family who are on here trying to defend her. Thank you and good night. wardyt
  • Score: 10

9:48pm Thu 13 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

wardyt wrote:
So in summary : Leanne is scum and so are all her mates / family who are on here trying to defend her. Thank you and good night.
In summary : you are a low life troll with nothing better to do ! Bye bye ! Prat
[quote][p][bold]wardyt[/bold] wrote: So in summary : Leanne is scum and so are all her mates / family who are on here trying to defend her. Thank you and good night.[/p][/quote]In summary : you are a low life troll with nothing better to do ! Bye bye ! Prat I tell the truth
  • Score: -12

9:50pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Assimilation says...

Sheenie wrote:
Oh go away! Lol. I'm talking about everyone that knows here. What has that conversation got to do with you! Go back and spend your days watching Jeremy KYLE ( thanks I didn't know as I don't watch it) and keep refreshing the gazette website to make your troll comments.
What a very stupid female you are making your self look. You are beginning to sound like a parrot, the same things over again. No hang on there a minute, parrots have more intelligence. You just can not think of anything new to say . Oh, and who is coming out with some choice language now? All the conversations on here are to do with me and everyone else for that matter to put our points over, even if YOU do not like it because what ever people say on here is the result of what they know or read. Spit your dummy out all you like it will make no difference, so climb back into your pram.
[quote][p][bold]Sheenie[/bold] wrote: Oh go away! Lol. I'm talking about everyone that knows here. What has that conversation got to do with you! Go back and spend your days watching Jeremy KYLE ( thanks I didn't know as I don't watch it) and keep refreshing the gazette website to make your troll comments.[/p][/quote]What a very stupid female you are making your self look. You are beginning to sound like a parrot, the same things over again. No hang on there a minute, parrots have more intelligence. You just can not think of anything new to say . Oh, and who is coming out with some choice language now? All the conversations on here are to do with me and everyone else for that matter to put our points over, even if YOU do not like it because what ever people say on here is the result of what they know or read. Spit your dummy out all you like it will make no difference, so climb back into your pram. Assimilation
  • Score: 6

10:02pm Thu 13 Feb 14

essex_jim says...

Karen I can't speak on the jury's behalf, I wasn't there. Please appreciate (unlike some others on here I suspect) that myself and Sheenie are 2 different people. Sheenie appears closer to the evidence than I was. I said I respected the juries decision even though I think it was wrong. They've made a call on what they've been presented with and that call is an opinion as there wasn't sufficient evidence. I respect the British judicial system but IMO it has many flaws, the way we pick juries for example is poor compared to that of the US. I've purposefully kept quiet about the jury bullying as I wasn't there and simply can't comment on something I didn't see. It's not rocket science, but you try and go all detective on us if it makes you feel better.
Karen I can't speak on the jury's behalf, I wasn't there. Please appreciate (unlike some others on here I suspect) that myself and Sheenie are 2 different people. Sheenie appears closer to the evidence than I was. I said I respected the juries decision even though I think it was wrong. They've made a call on what they've been presented with and that call is an opinion as there wasn't sufficient evidence. I respect the British judicial system but IMO it has many flaws, the way we pick juries for example is poor compared to that of the US. I've purposefully kept quiet about the jury bullying as I wasn't there and simply can't comment on something I didn't see. It's not rocket science, but you try and go all detective on us if it makes you feel better. essex_jim
  • Score: 0

10:05pm Thu 13 Feb 14

essex_jim says...

Not Sheenie, apologies. I meant I tell the truth.
Not Sheenie, apologies. I meant I tell the truth. essex_jim
  • Score: -1

10:16pm Thu 13 Feb 14

karen f says...

essex_jim wrote:
Karen I can't speak on the jury's behalf, I wasn't there. Please appreciate (unlike some others on here I suspect) that myself and Sheenie are 2 different people. Sheenie appears closer to the evidence than I was. I said I respected the juries decision even though I think it was wrong. They've made a call on what they've been presented with and that call is an opinion as there wasn't sufficient evidence. I respect the British judicial system but IMO it has many flaws, the way we pick juries for example is poor compared to that of the US. I've purposefully kept quiet about the jury bullying as I wasn't there and simply can't comment on something I didn't see. It's not rocket science, but you try and go all detective on us if it makes you feel better.
No it's not rocket science that you give two completely different angles on how the verdict was reached and I wasn't trying to go all detective on you both, it was just something I noticed and appreciate your answer. Thank you.
[quote][p][bold]essex_jim[/bold] wrote: Karen I can't speak on the jury's behalf, I wasn't there. Please appreciate (unlike some others on here I suspect) that myself and Sheenie are 2 different people. Sheenie appears closer to the evidence than I was. I said I respected the juries decision even though I think it was wrong. They've made a call on what they've been presented with and that call is an opinion as there wasn't sufficient evidence. I respect the British judicial system but IMO it has many flaws, the way we pick juries for example is poor compared to that of the US. I've purposefully kept quiet about the jury bullying as I wasn't there and simply can't comment on something I didn't see. It's not rocket science, but you try and go all detective on us if it makes you feel better.[/p][/quote]No it's not rocket science that you give two completely different angles on how the verdict was reached and I wasn't trying to go all detective on you both, it was just something I noticed and appreciate your answer. Thank you. karen f
  • Score: 5

10:18pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Assimilation says...

Come on Gazette shut this thread down, enough is enough because everyone has their own thoughts on this subject even though some will not believe and don't like what has happened.
Come on Gazette shut this thread down, enough is enough because everyone has their own thoughts on this subject even though some will not believe and don't like what has happened. Assimilation
  • Score: -2

10:23pm Thu 13 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

Assimilation wrote:
Come on Gazette shut this thread down, enough is enough because everyone has their own thoughts on this subject even though some will not believe and don't like what has happened.
Why ? Why don't you just leave and not comment anymore ? If it's annoying you so much bye !
[quote][p][bold]Assimilation[/bold] wrote: Come on Gazette shut this thread down, enough is enough because everyone has their own thoughts on this subject even though some will not believe and don't like what has happened.[/p][/quote]Why ? Why don't you just leave and not comment anymore ? If it's annoying you so much bye ! I tell the truth
  • Score: -8

11:34pm Thu 13 Feb 14

Assimilation says...

I tell the truth wrote:
Assimilation wrote:
Come on Gazette shut this thread down, enough is enough because everyone has their own thoughts on this subject even though some will not believe and don't like what has happened.
Why ? Why don't you just leave and not comment anymore ? If it's annoying you so much bye !
I can carry on, I have no problem like some on here, like the ones that are saying "You don't know what you are talking about" or "You don't know anything about it" or "You don't know the facts" or "I know her too well for her to have done that" or "Its nothing to do with you" The only facts are, she was found guilty and imprisoned. That's it, no matter if people don't like it, its happened If whats been said. that the jury and evidence was fixed.Then why was nothing said or done then instead of it coming out now? Or was the judge on the take as well ?
[quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Assimilation[/bold] wrote: Come on Gazette shut this thread down, enough is enough because everyone has their own thoughts on this subject even though some will not believe and don't like what has happened.[/p][/quote]Why ? Why don't you just leave and not comment anymore ? If it's annoying you so much bye ![/p][/quote]I can carry on, I have no problem like some on here, like the ones that are saying "You don't know what you are talking about" or "You don't know anything about it" or "You don't know the facts" or "I know her too well for her to have done that" or "Its nothing to do with you" The only facts are, she was found guilty and imprisoned. That's it, no matter if people don't like it, its happened If whats been said. that the jury and evidence was fixed.Then why was nothing said or done then instead of it coming out now? Or was the judge on the take as well ? Assimilation
  • Score: 13

1:23pm Fri 14 Feb 14

lilypad says...

essex_jim wrote:
DavePH wrote:
I'm commenting anymore because it's upsetting my girlfriend. I've said my piece and justice has prevailed.
Of course it is. Your imaginary girlfriend is upset.

If any of these allegations were real does anyone think they might've brought it up whilst the trial was happening? Because if they were then it surely would've strengthened Walshs case would it not? Or was nothing said because they're not real. Funny how you've no issue plastering it all over the gazettes comments page but wouldn't go to the police.
Good God, you, sheenie and Itellthetruth are totally and absolutely deluded - and bordering on bullying with your aggressive attitudes. Accept the fact that your friend/relative, whatever she is to you is a thug. Putting aside the glassing of Miss Walsh, the fact that Bloomfield felt she had to brag to a friend by sending them a text that she had a "fight" makes my mind up about the sort of person she is - if I was set upon by a total stranger (ie Miss Walsh) that is the last thing I would do, and I am sure any other level headed, sensible adult wouldn't want to either. You are making fools of Bloomfield now with these daft comments, let it lie and let her do her time
[quote][p][bold]essex_jim[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]DavePH[/bold] wrote: I'm commenting anymore because it's upsetting my girlfriend. I've said my piece and justice has prevailed.[/p][/quote]Of course it is. Your imaginary girlfriend is upset. If any of these allegations were real does anyone think they might've brought it up whilst the trial was happening? Because if they were then it surely would've strengthened Walshs case would it not? Or was nothing said because they're not real. Funny how you've no issue plastering it all over the gazettes comments page but wouldn't go to the police.[/p][/quote]Good God, you, sheenie and Itellthetruth are totally and absolutely deluded - and bordering on bullying with your aggressive attitudes. Accept the fact that your friend/relative, whatever she is to you is a thug. Putting aside the glassing of Miss Walsh, the fact that Bloomfield felt she had to brag to a friend by sending them a text that she had a "fight" makes my mind up about the sort of person she is - if I was set upon by a total stranger (ie Miss Walsh) that is the last thing I would do, and I am sure any other level headed, sensible adult wouldn't want to either. You are making fools of Bloomfield now with these daft comments, let it lie and let her do her time lilypad
  • Score: 5

2:19pm Fri 14 Feb 14

Jue_uk says...

lilypad wrote:
essex_jim wrote:
DavePH wrote:
I'm commenting anymore because it's upsetting my girlfriend. I've said my piece and justice has prevailed.
Of course it is. Your imaginary girlfriend is upset.

If any of these allegations were real does anyone think they might've brought it up whilst the trial was happening? Because if they were then it surely would've strengthened Walshs case would it not? Or was nothing said because they're not real. Funny how you've no issue plastering it all over the gazettes comments page but wouldn't go to the police.
Good God, you, sheenie and Itellthetruth are totally and absolutely deluded - and bordering on bullying with your aggressive attitudes. Accept the fact that your friend/relative, whatever she is to you is a thug. Putting aside the glassing of Miss Walsh, the fact that Bloomfield felt she had to brag to a friend by sending them a text that she had a "fight" makes my mind up about the sort of person she is - if I was set upon by a total stranger (ie Miss Walsh) that is the last thing I would do, and I am sure any other level headed, sensible adult wouldn't want to either. You are making fools of Bloomfield now with these daft comments, let it lie and let her do her time
I have just read all of this thread and am too amazed at some of the comments. I appreciate that everyone is entitled to their own opinion but surely Bloomfield is the only one that knows what went on that night and if she feels she's not guilty then it is down to her and her family & friends to talk to her legal team not put it on here.
[quote][p][bold]lilypad[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]essex_jim[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]DavePH[/bold] wrote: I'm commenting anymore because it's upsetting my girlfriend. I've said my piece and justice has prevailed.[/p][/quote]Of course it is. Your imaginary girlfriend is upset. If any of these allegations were real does anyone think they might've brought it up whilst the trial was happening? Because if they were then it surely would've strengthened Walshs case would it not? Or was nothing said because they're not real. Funny how you've no issue plastering it all over the gazettes comments page but wouldn't go to the police.[/p][/quote]Good God, you, sheenie and Itellthetruth are totally and absolutely deluded - and bordering on bullying with your aggressive attitudes. Accept the fact that your friend/relative, whatever she is to you is a thug. Putting aside the glassing of Miss Walsh, the fact that Bloomfield felt she had to brag to a friend by sending them a text that she had a "fight" makes my mind up about the sort of person she is - if I was set upon by a total stranger (ie Miss Walsh) that is the last thing I would do, and I am sure any other level headed, sensible adult wouldn't want to either. You are making fools of Bloomfield now with these daft comments, let it lie and let her do her time[/p][/quote]I have just read all of this thread and am too amazed at some of the comments. I appreciate that everyone is entitled to their own opinion but surely Bloomfield is the only one that knows what went on that night and if she feels she's not guilty then it is down to her and her family & friends to talk to her legal team not put it on here. Jue_uk
  • Score: 5

2:22pm Fri 14 Feb 14

Jue_uk says...

My last post was not aimed at you personally 'Lilypad", I just agree with your post about the comments etc.
My last post was not aimed at you personally 'Lilypad", I just agree with your post about the comments etc. Jue_uk
  • Score: -1

4:24pm Fri 14 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

Jue_uk wrote:
lilypad wrote:
essex_jim wrote:
DavePH wrote:
I'm commenting anymore because it's upsetting my girlfriend. I've said my piece and justice has prevailed.
Of course it is. Your imaginary girlfriend is upset.

If any of these allegations were real does anyone think they might've brought it up whilst the trial was happening? Because if they were then it surely would've strengthened Walshs case would it not? Or was nothing said because they're not real. Funny how you've no issue plastering it all over the gazettes comments page but wouldn't go to the police.
Good God, you, sheenie and Itellthetruth are totally and absolutely deluded - and bordering on bullying with your aggressive attitudes. Accept the fact that your friend/relative, whatever she is to you is a thug. Putting aside the glassing of Miss Walsh, the fact that Bloomfield felt she had to brag to a friend by sending them a text that she had a "fight" makes my mind up about the sort of person she is - if I was set upon by a total stranger (ie Miss Walsh) that is the last thing I would do, and I am sure any other level headed, sensible adult wouldn't want to either. You are making fools of Bloomfield now with these daft comments, let it lie and let her do her time
I have just read all of this thread and am too amazed at some of the comments. I appreciate that everyone is entitled to their own opinion but surely Bloomfield is the only one that knows what went on that night and if she feels she's not guilty then it is down to her and her family & friends to talk to her legal team not put it on here.
And you and the others on here are doing the same lily pad !!
[quote][p][bold]Jue_uk[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lilypad[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]essex_jim[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]DavePH[/bold] wrote: I'm commenting anymore because it's upsetting my girlfriend. I've said my piece and justice has prevailed.[/p][/quote]Of course it is. Your imaginary girlfriend is upset. If any of these allegations were real does anyone think they might've brought it up whilst the trial was happening? Because if they were then it surely would've strengthened Walshs case would it not? Or was nothing said because they're not real. Funny how you've no issue plastering it all over the gazettes comments page but wouldn't go to the police.[/p][/quote]Good God, you, sheenie and Itellthetruth are totally and absolutely deluded - and bordering on bullying with your aggressive attitudes. Accept the fact that your friend/relative, whatever she is to you is a thug. Putting aside the glassing of Miss Walsh, the fact that Bloomfield felt she had to brag to a friend by sending them a text that she had a "fight" makes my mind up about the sort of person she is - if I was set upon by a total stranger (ie Miss Walsh) that is the last thing I would do, and I am sure any other level headed, sensible adult wouldn't want to either. You are making fools of Bloomfield now with these daft comments, let it lie and let her do her time[/p][/quote]I have just read all of this thread and am too amazed at some of the comments. I appreciate that everyone is entitled to their own opinion but surely Bloomfield is the only one that knows what went on that night and if she feels she's not guilty then it is down to her and her family & friends to talk to her legal team not put it on here.[/p][/quote]And you and the others on here are doing the same lily pad !! I tell the truth
  • Score: -2

4:29pm Fri 14 Feb 14

I tell the truth says...

So just an example of how the "justice system " is unfair
Vicky Patterson from Geordie shore goes and hits a girl round the face with a stiletto heel on a night out , leaves the girl needing stitches on her face

She was given community service and had to pay compensation !

She has no children

She has admitted to committing the crime

And you people say her "celeb" status has nothing to do with the confiction/ sentencing !
This just proves that money and status has a lot to do with what happens in the court !!!
So just an example of how the "justice system " is unfair Vicky Patterson from Geordie shore goes and hits a girl round the face with a stiletto heel on a night out , leaves the girl needing stitches on her face She was given community service and had to pay compensation ! She has no children She has admitted to committing the crime And you people say her "celeb" status has nothing to do with the confiction/ sentencing ! This just proves that money and status has a lot to do with what happens in the court !!! I tell the truth
  • Score: -2

4:46pm Fri 14 Feb 14

creditcrunch2010 says...

I tell the truth wrote:
So just an example of how the "justice system " is unfair
Vicky Patterson from Geordie shore goes and hits a girl round the face with a stiletto heel on a night out , leaves the girl needing stitches on her face

She was given community service and had to pay compensation !

She has no children

She has admitted to committing the crime

And you people say her "celeb" status has nothing to do with the confiction/ sentencing !
This just proves that money and status has a lot to do with what happens in the court !!!
Hitting someone round the face with a stiletto, leaving them needing stitches is a serious assault , totally agreed.

Cutting someone's throat with glass is millimetres between spending 2 1/2yrs in prison to 25 years in prison

That is the difference, nothing to do with "celeb status"
[quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: So just an example of how the "justice system " is unfair Vicky Patterson from Geordie shore goes and hits a girl round the face with a stiletto heel on a night out , leaves the girl needing stitches on her face She was given community service and had to pay compensation ! She has no children She has admitted to committing the crime And you people say her "celeb" status has nothing to do with the confiction/ sentencing ! This just proves that money and status has a lot to do with what happens in the court !!![/p][/quote]Hitting someone round the face with a stiletto, leaving them needing stitches is a serious assault , totally agreed. Cutting someone's throat with glass is millimetres between spending 2 1/2yrs in prison to 25 years in prison That is the difference, nothing to do with "celeb status" creditcrunch2010
  • Score: 5

4:59pm Fri 14 Feb 14

wardyt says...

I tell the truth wrote:
So just an example of how the "justice system " is unfair Vicky Patterson from Geordie shore goes and hits a girl round the face with a stiletto heel on a night out , leaves the girl needing stitches on her face She was given community service and had to pay compensation ! She has no children She has admitted to committing the crime And you people say her "celeb" status has nothing to do with the confiction/ sentencing ! This just proves that money and status has a lot to do with what happens in the court !!!
The argument is already lost, when you refer to Georgie Shores.
[quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: So just an example of how the "justice system " is unfair Vicky Patterson from Geordie shore goes and hits a girl round the face with a stiletto heel on a night out , leaves the girl needing stitches on her face She was given community service and had to pay compensation ! She has no children She has admitted to committing the crime And you people say her "celeb" status has nothing to do with the confiction/ sentencing ! This just proves that money and status has a lot to do with what happens in the court !!![/p][/quote]The argument is already lost, when you refer to Georgie Shores. wardyt
  • Score: 2

6:49pm Fri 14 Feb 14

UndergroundOverground says...

I tell the truth wrote:
So just an example of how the "justice system " is unfair
Vicky Patterson from Geordie shore goes and hits a girl round the face with a stiletto heel on a night out , leaves the girl needing stitches on her face

She was given community service and had to pay compensation !

She has no children

She has admitted to committing the crime

And you people say her "celeb" status has nothing to do with the confiction/ sentencing !
This just proves that money and status has a lot to do with what happens in the court !!!
Oh you really are as stupid as your past posts suggest.

So you are now claiming that hitting someone with a shoe causing them to need stitches and admitting what you have done is somehow the same as slashing someone across the throat causing them to require surgery, sending a text bragging about it and then denying
everything causing the case to go to trial.
[quote][p][bold]I tell the truth[/bold] wrote: So just an example of how the "justice system " is unfair Vicky Patterson from Geordie shore goes and hits a girl round the face with a stiletto heel on a night out , leaves the girl needing stitches on her face She was given community service and had to pay compensation ! She has no children She has admitted to committing the crime And you people say her "celeb" status has nothing to do with the confiction/ sentencing ! This just proves that money and status has a lot to do with what happens in the court !!![/p][/quote]Oh you really are as stupid as your past posts suggest. So you are now claiming that hitting someone with a shoe causing them to need stitches and admitting what you have done is somehow the same as slashing someone across the throat causing them to require surgery, sending a text bragging about it and then denying everything causing the case to go to trial. UndergroundOverground
  • Score: 4

7:39pm Fri 14 Feb 14

karen f says...

And there was me thinking this had all been laid to rest at last!

If Leanne was completely innocent, then why hasn't she asked local and national newspapers to print her side of the story? Why hasn't she been screaming from the rooftops to anyone that will listen? Why was an appeal not lodged a month ago (as you stated was going to happen) when she was found guilty before sentencing took place last Friday?

Instead the 3 musketeers choose to represent her on here and other media websites by being rude, using bully-boy tactics and just generally showing themselves up.

Leanne was found guilty by a jury that wasn't bullied, that saw enough evidence to agree on her guilt, was not influenced by a minor TV celebrity or his cash and no letter was passed around a courtroom and then subsequently ignored.

Come on people, as much as you want to believe she is innocent, it really is obvious from anyone on the outside looking in that she isn't. It can't be nice, but you also can't blame everyone else for the position she has put herself in.

Leanne is now facing 2.5 years in prison, away from her children. Miss Walsh's life will have changed forever. This is a no-win situation for both of them - glassing incidents always are sadly.
And there was me thinking this had all been laid to rest at last! If Leanne was completely innocent, then why hasn't she asked local and national newspapers to print her side of the story? Why hasn't she been screaming from the rooftops to anyone that will listen? Why was an appeal not lodged a month ago (as you stated was going to happen) when she was found guilty before sentencing took place last Friday? Instead the 3 musketeers choose to represent her on here and other media websites by being rude, using bully-boy tactics and just generally showing themselves up. Leanne was found guilty by a jury that wasn't bullied, that saw enough evidence to agree on her guilt, was not influenced by a minor TV celebrity or his cash and no letter was passed around a courtroom and then subsequently ignored. Come on people, as much as you want to believe she is innocent, it really is obvious from anyone on the outside looking in that she isn't. It can't be nice, but you also can't blame everyone else for the position she has put herself in. Leanne is now facing 2.5 years in prison, away from her children. Miss Walsh's life will have changed forever. This is a no-win situation for both of them - glassing incidents always are sadly. karen f
  • Score: 4

10:48pm Fri 14 Feb 14

Assimilation says...

If, I had been on that jury, I would have only had have to have seen what she text-ed to know she had done what she had done. It would not have mattered who started it, what was said or what it was about, only the end result, which was not nice to put it mildly. The few on here want to be very careful with what they say when they start accusing everyone and the courts with serious slanderous accusation's. They can and will track you down.
If, I had been on that jury, I would have only had have to have seen what she text-ed to know she had done what she had done. It would not have mattered who started it, what was said or what it was about, only the end result, which was not nice to put it mildly. The few on here want to be very careful with what they say when they start accusing everyone and the courts with serious slanderous accusation's. They can and will track you down. Assimilation
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree