COURTAULDS Textiles, has joined the lengthening list of companies
disappointing the market after warning that 1993 profits will fall short
of 1992's #39m. As happened to GEC shares last week, the warning from
the group brought a sharp fall in Courtaulds Textiles shares, which lost
54p to 489p.
It also sent a shock wave through the textile sector as a whole, with
Coats Viyella falling, though it later rallied with the market to close
slightly ahead, and even Marks & Spencer, which sells a lot of
Courtaulds' clothes, lost ground.
The string of companies reporting results in line with or below
analysts' expectations has been quite marked in recent weeks. The table
of profits outturns against analysts' forecasts compiled by BZW shows
that analysts have rarely been so out of line.
Dividend payments have also disappointed and earnings forecasts are
being progressively downgraded. All this suggests the stock market has
run ahead of itself -- and yet it continues blithely on to post new
highs almost daily and yesterday ended 40 points up.
While a reaction certainly cannot be ruled out, the market is clearly
more inclined to go higher than lower, whatever is happening in the real
world.
Sentiment is focused firmly on the earnings bounce that is still
expected next year, led by an rise in investment rather than a major
increase in consumer spending, which looks improbable given the
depressed housing market, little if any real growth in incomes and now
the tax rises in the Budget.
Some improvement in consumer confidence may result in less money being
put into savings and more spent in the shops, but fear of unemployment
remains in evidence.
Those looking for an investment-led recovery fed by strong balance
sheets point to the US, where the well established economic recovery has
been led by the capital sector.
Only recently have the economic data, in general, been pointing
consistently toward the US recovery and there have been upsets on the
corporate as well as statistical fronts.
The bull market has wobbled but never really faltered and there is
good reason to believe the UK market will follow Wall Street's example.
Even the sharp fall in bonds on the belief that the next move in
interest rates would be upward did not shake the US market. This
suggests that bonds and equities will be able to move in different
directions, the former slipping on fears that inflation will gradually
pick up and the latter staying strong on expectations of rapid earnings
growth.
If the US example is followed, then the UK market will see relative
weakness in consumer sectors as manufacturing takes up the running. It
certainly could not be leaner and fitter than it is now.
But Courtaulds Textiles has put the wind up the textiles sector, which
promises to be one of the losers from GATT.
The group's comments that the level of activity in the UK in the early
autumn has not been maintained does not augur well for the Christmas
trade on which so much of the consumer sector depends.
First-half profit was 16% lower at #13.7m and it spoke when these were
reported in early September of difficult trading conditions, though
there was some recovery at home. However, observers had predicted a good
recovery in the second half, which will not materialise.
Fortunately for chairman and chief executive Martin Taylor, he will
not be around to report annual results, as he will be installed at
Barclays Bank, where he becomes chief executive on January 1.
The real disappointment has come across the Channel, where trading in
October and November deteriorated from the already difficult conditions
in the first half, when Courtaulds Textiles' operations there barely
broke even on sales of #60m.
However, the group retains its faith in an upturn next year. After the
rationalisation of the Taylor years, it is in a good state to see strong
earnings growth when demand improves.
Courtaulds Textiles' confidence for 1994 is reflected in a forecast of
a higher final dividend. The interim rose 7%.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article