COUNCIL bosses have threatened "enforcement" action if a crime-fighting fence dubbed “the Great Wall of Colchester” is not torn down within the next six months.

The fence, built between John Castle Way and Bourne Court as part of a new development, was put up in a bid to deter anti-social behaviour - and issue which is said to have long plagued the area.

The resident responsible for putting the fence up previously claimed they were told they did not need planning permission, before Colchester Council said they did. 

A retrospective planning application was subsequently submitted, which has now been refused by planning bosses.

During the meeting, at which chairman Mike Lilley jokingly described the fence as the "Great Wall of Colchester", residents spoke both for and against the fence.

Gazette: The fence was put up to stop reported antisocial behaviourThe fence was put up to stop reported antisocial behaviour (Image: Newsquest)

One supporter said their family had been “living in fear” due to anti-social behaviour, experiencing problems with drug dealing, dirty needles and loud music, with police called “on multiple occasions”.

The resident also said they have suffered nearly £1,000 of damage due to stones being thrown at their home and their tyres being slashed.

Other residents who want the fence removed, however, said it blocks a much-used route, while concerns have previously been raised about homeowners being isolated and cut-off.

Dave Harris, ward councillor for Berechurch, spoke on behalf of both sides during the meeting.

He said: “I have had many complaints about antisocial behaviour and abuse, about damage to property, cars, theft and bad behaviour.

Gazette: Colchester councillor Dave HarrisColchester councillor Dave Harris (Image: Newsquest)

“On the other side of the coin, I have had many local people contact me as well, missing the walk through.

“Property managers were originally told putting the fence was allowed under permitted development, and they were told wrongly, they put it up because they thought allowed to, and they were misled.

“The committee must balance the rights and wishes on both sides of the argument.”

Following the refusal, the applicants have now been given six months to remove the fence and explore alternative ways of tackling anti-social behaviour, be it through CCTV or increased lighting.

A spokesman for Colchester Council added: “We request the applicant’s cooperation in removing the fencing following the Planning Committee’s decision to refuse the application.

“If they do not appeal, or if their appeal is subsequently dismissed, and they fail to cooperate in removing the fencing within a reasonable timeframe, we will be forced to employ statutory enforcement powers.”