Council sets aside £350,000 to pay for taxi refunds

COUNCILLORS have been kept in the dark over a legal challenge which could cost the council up to £350,000.

Sue Lissimore, borough shadow cabinet member for taxi licensing, is calling for answers from licensing bosses at Colchester Council after an administrative blunder led to taxi drivers being owed up to £1,000 each.

“We have been kept in the dark over this matter,” Mrs Lissimore said.

“It’s strange we have found out about it through the newspaper rather than through our colleagues in the coalition.

“It seems this is something they did not want to come out, which is worrying.”

The council has allocated the money to pay for the refunds, due to about 300 drivers and operators, because licence fee increases for the last six years were not properly advertised and have been ruled to be have been unlawful.

In July, licensing bosses said they were committed to reimbursing cabbies who apply for the refund.

A Colchester Council spokeswoman said: “This doesn’t mean that the full amount is set aside to be shared amongst the town’s taxi drivers.

“They will be getting different amounts or nothing depending on what they qualify for.”

Across the borough, there are more than 1,300 registered taxis.

Comments(6)

Boris says...
11:40pm Tue 2 Oct 12

"More than 1,000 taxi drivers being owed thousands of pounds each" means the cost to CBC could be way over a million pounds.
Has Colchester really got more than 1000 taxis?

TheCaptain says...
9:01am Wed 3 Oct 12

The report as usual is full of nonsense. This applies to vehicle and operator licences not drivers. So an operator can have several vehicles so can be owed a few thousand. I believe the average per claim is expected to be about £150.

The report states that is due to incorrectly advertised fare increases. What rubbish this would mean the public paying to much to drivers. It's licence charges that were advertised wrong.

I don't know how many taxi there are but this includes the whole borough and covers 5 years.

concernedrefuture says...
11:18am Wed 3 Oct 12

The councillors who were responsible for this '****-up' should be obliged to pay this from their own pockets.

TheCaptain says...
12:23pm Wed 3 Oct 12

My sources advise that the mistake was not by councillors by by an officer, who may no longer be employed.

What is scary is that the Council is obliged to advertise the increase via the local press. Internet adverts etc etc aren't not good enough. How quaint

Reginald47 says...
2:04pm Wed 3 Oct 12

The 'mistake' was made over 10 years ago so I guess you'd have trouble finding them now.

wellnow says...
4:00pm Wed 3 Oct 12

another load of bureaucratic nonsense that the rate payers foot the bill for.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree