Mums call for Colchester Leisure World gym classes to be saved

Determined – mums Nicola Smith, Orie Itai, Mandy Schofield, Diane Keeble and Emma Braddock with their children Determined – mums Nicola Smith, Orie Itai, Mandy Schofield, Diane Keeble and Emma Braddock with their children

TWO mums have begged council chiefs not to axe gymnastic classes at Colchester Leisure World.

Nicola Smith and Emma Braddock told councillors the move would leave their seven-year-old daughters without anywhere to go when the sessions end in December.

The council says the classes are not financially viable.

The mums told a Colchester Council cabinet meeting the decision went against the Olympic legacy. Nicola said: “The classes are very popular. “There is a clear demand and there has been a surge during the Olympics. There was a letter stating they are not profitable, but they were 74 per cent full at the time of research and my daughter’s class on Monday was completely full.

“Where are 96 children who will lose out go if the closures go ahead? Where is the Olympic legacy of which we can be proud?

Emma, 37, added: “My daughter wants to improve her gymnastics but how will she be able to? There is a wait of at least a year to get in anywhere else.”

Colchester MP Sir Bob Russell has backed a petition by another mum, Kelly Birchmore, against the class closures.

Annie Feltham, councillor responsible for leisure services, said: “We have had to make some hard decisions. Council staff are continuing to look at ways in which we can carry on providing gymnastic classes, but that has not been possible in the building itself. “We do take your point seriously.”

Comments(5)

vee123 says...
10:56pm Fri 7 Sep 12

what will the council close next at leisureworld?!?

Say It As It Is OK? says...
3:15am Sat 8 Sep 12

Using the "Olympic Legacy" as justification to keep this facility open won't work! Its not acceptable any more for council taxes to be used to subsidise facilities which are not considered an essential service.

The old adage of "use it" or "lose it" comes to mind and if so many people, as they claim, want it to remain open, then it must be commercially viable, and that means either increase prices or increase patronage.

Reginald47 says...
11:30am Sat 8 Sep 12

The problem is that because it is not in a permanent space like the Colchester Gymnastics Club it takes 18 man hours to put the equipment up and take it down for 5 hours of gymnastic classes. Gymnastics needs to take place in a custom space because of all the equipment needed.

Boris says...
1:40am Sun 9 Sep 12

Say It As It Is OK? wrote:
Using the "Olympic Legacy" as justification to keep this facility open won't work! Its not acceptable any more for council taxes to be used to subsidise facilities which are not considered an essential service.

The old adage of "use it" or "lose it" comes to mind and if so many people, as they claim, want it to remain open, then it must be commercially viable, and that means either increase prices or increase patronage.
There are said to be some 780 children on the waiting list for these classes. So, plenty of people who want to use it.

Say It As It Is OK? says...
7:02am Sun 9 Sep 12

If what you say is correct Boris then the classes should remain. Providing all costs for running the classes are covered by the patrons then I don't see the problem.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree