News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Accident figures suggest speed cameras are not saving lives

Steve and Michelle Bell – their daughter Jordan died after being hit by a car Steve and Michelle Bell – their daughter Jordan died after being hit by a car

SPEED cameras installed to stop accidents are not doing their job, according to national figures.

Serious accidents and fatalities are still being recorded on roads where cameras are positioned around Colchester.

The information came to light this week after the Government, for the first time, released statistics on the number of accidents and fatal crashes at camera sites.

Altogether, 480 accidents resulting in injuries have been recorded at the camera sites since they were introduced.

Mark Andrew, whose son Daniel died after being hit by a car in June 2008 in Greenstead Road, Colchester, said he was disappointed, but not surprised, by the figures.

“I did think at first they would reduce the amount of accidents on the roads,” he said.

“They are meant to be a deterrant and they work to a certain degree.

“But, the problem is people are so aware of them now. Drivers slow down when they see the signs and then, as soon as they go through the road markings, they’re off again. I’m forever seeing people slamming on their brakes to avoid a ticket and then going back to their former speed afterwards.”

Mr Andrew believes other traffic-calming measures need to be brought in to slow down drivers.

“Speed bumps and average speed cameras do work, but they obviously wouldn’t work in the same areas,” he said.

“Traffic-calming measures really need to be tailored to different areas.

“But Essex County Council perhaps needs to consider moving around the cameras we already have, because people are so used to where they are now.

“That way, drivers would need to travel at a slower speed so they aren’t caught out.”

Michelle Bell, of Littlefield Road, Colchester, lost her daughter Jordan, 14, after she was hit by a car in March 2008.

Mrs Bell, who is a driving instructor, said she was constantly reminding people they did not have to drive at the maximum speed limit.

“Just because you are in a 30mph zone, doesn’t mean you have to travel at 30mph,” she said.

“I constantly teach that to my students. We live in a society where everyone is impatient and there are so many distractions on the road.

“The amount of times I have another car behind me pushing me along when I am not doing anything wrong is appalling.

“We need speed cameras. They are not a cash generator for the Government – they are there to save lives.”

“People don’t understand how important speed is until it affects them,” said Mrs Bell.

“If you are going at 35mph in a 30mph zone, you’re likely to kill someone. Where does that 35mph get you? A few feet further up the road.”

Mike Penning, road safety minister, said: “Local residents have a right to expect that, when their council spends money on speed cameras, they publish information to show whether those cameras are helping to reduce accidents or not.”

Comments(10)

micksmercs says...
11:28am Sat 3 Sep 11

I have to agree with Mrs Bell. Speeding is now at epidemic levels. I to was a driving insructor Fifteen years ago and the agression shown by other drivers then was bad enough so it must be frightening now. I was verbally abused by people at junctions banging on my window and shouting at the pupils. I would not do the job now for any amount of money. Speeding is not just something young people do, it is right across the whole age group of drivers. I still see people on mobile phones, not just one or two,loads of them, and can probably see some kind of motoring offence being commited within the first mile of leaving my home. The problem is the arrogance and impatience of the general public as a whole. Good luck Mrs Bell, but it will only get worse in the future if the detterents do not get more harsh.

Sdapeze says...
11:39am Sat 3 Sep 11

The cameras are there to catch selfish car drivers who speed. Where it doesn't do that it slows the idiots down briefly as they pass them. They cannot in any way reduce accidents. The time is coming when all cars will have speed limiters built in so that they cannot speed. Just as long as they don't mess about with motorcycles.

micksmercs says...
12:27pm Sat 3 Sep 11

Sdapeze wrote:
The cameras are there to catch selfish car drivers who speed. Where it doesn't do that it slows the idiots down briefly as they pass them. They cannot in any way reduce accidents. The time is coming when all cars will have speed limiters built in so that they cannot speed. Just as long as they don't mess about with motorcycles.
Oh you mean the motorcycles that most middle age plonkers get on every weekend and try to kill themselves on. You mean the ones that make so much noise while they rev the guts out of them and make everyone elses weekends a complete misery. I believe anyone stupid enough to buy one should take an advanced motorcycle test before being let loose on anything capable of excessive speed. Also heavy fines should be introduced for anyone altering the silencers to make them even more noisy than usual.

cavillas says...
4:15pm Sat 3 Sep 11

The penalties for excessive speed are not harsh enough and these crimes are treated as a minor annoyance rather then the menace they are. People who speed should be looked down on and considered pariahs, it should becomesocially unacceptable, just as drink driving should be.

There is NO excuse or reason to speed and no excuse should be accepted. It should be 12 pints and an automatic 6month ban.

Wicky1 says...
9:54pm Sat 3 Sep 11

micksmercs wrote:
Sdapeze wrote:
The cameras are there to catch selfish car drivers who speed. Where it doesn't do that it slows the idiots down briefly as they pass them. They cannot in any way reduce accidents. The time is coming when all cars will have speed limiters built in so that they cannot speed. Just as long as they don't mess about with motorcycles.
Oh you mean the motorcycles that most middle age plonkers get on every weekend and try to kill themselves on. You mean the ones that make so much noise while they rev the guts out of them and make everyone elses weekends a complete misery. I believe anyone stupid enough to buy one should take an advanced motorcycle test before being let loose on anything capable of excessive speed. Also heavy fines should be introduced for anyone altering the silencers to make them even more noisy than usual.
@ micksmercs: Have you ever ridden a motorcycle?

Suggest you try before spouting off ;-)

PS Noisy exhaust at least give us a chance of being heard by the 'I didn't see you' deaf and myopic car drivers. :-)

Overall the problem to all road users has been the reliance on automated revenue generators while cutting the numbers of traffic police on patrol. Even the mobile cameras aren't necessarily placed at accident hotspots as claimed i.e. Abbots Rd and nr Kent and Blaxill.

micksmercs says...
8:36am Sun 4 Sep 11

Wicky1 wrote:
micksmercs wrote:
Sdapeze wrote:
The cameras are there to catch selfish car drivers who speed. Where it doesn't do that it slows the idiots down briefly as they pass them. They cannot in any way reduce accidents. The time is coming when all cars will have speed limiters built in so that they cannot speed. Just as long as they don't mess about with motorcycles.
Oh you mean the motorcycles that most middle age plonkers get on every weekend and try to kill themselves on. You mean the ones that make so much noise while they rev the guts out of them and make everyone elses weekends a complete misery. I believe anyone stupid enough to buy one should take an advanced motorcycle test before being let loose on anything capable of excessive speed. Also heavy fines should be introduced for anyone altering the silencers to make them even more noisy than usual.
@ micksmercs: Have you ever ridden a motorcycle?

Suggest you try before spouting off ;-)

PS Noisy exhaust at least give us a chance of being heard by the 'I didn't see you' deaf and myopic car drivers. :-)

Overall the problem to all road users has been the reliance on automated revenue generators while cutting the numbers of traffic police on patrol. Even the mobile cameras aren't necessarily placed at accident hotspots as claimed i.e. Abbots Rd and nr Kent and Blaxill.
Yes I have ridden a motorcycle carefully and without the need to bring attention to myself by making a ridiculous racket. Your selfish response is just what I was talking about. The reason most motorcycle accidents occur is because the driver of the bike is using excessive speed. How many bike accidents only involve the bikers themselves because of their inability to control the machine that they are riding. Your selfish response is typical of the bad attitude of the general motoring public with little or no respect for anyone else,and while people like you and many other arrogant motorists exist things will only get worse.Pathetic behavior.

wellnow says...
9:35am Sun 4 Sep 11

erm.the words pot,kettle and black spring to mind.

25414nora says...
11:19am Sun 4 Sep 11

Just an observation.......Ca
n someone please explain to me : Why, or Why, do motorcyclists find it absolutely necessary to pass the car in front of them? regardless of the speed limit, or road conditions. Maybe they should have a mentality test, as part of the usual motorcycle riders test....

Sdapeze says...
11:39am Sun 4 Sep 11

My quip about motorcycles was intended as humour. Clearly failed. As a lifelong motorcyclist I agree wholeheartedly with MixMerx. I hate noisy exhausts and the antics of some that bring bikers into disrepute. But it has to be admitted, our traffic problems are 100% attributable to cars and their selfish drivers. Bikers, buses, cyclists, lorries, etc. all suffer from the chaos that car drivers bring to our roads.

icecoolmark says...
12:13pm Sun 4 Sep 11

The persons above that are arguing like children are missing one vital thing, I grew up on a south London estate where speed cameras were just a thing of the future. Cars would regularly speed past my house which was on just a normal back street. How on earth did I survive? Well, my mother did a great job of educating me about the dangers of crossing a road etc. I can only guess, but I bet the pedestrians killed or injured were in the road at the time and not walking along the pavement. I'm sorry that people have been killed but it's not necessarily always the motorists fault.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree