News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Army defeats residents in ‘battle of the fence’

Shot down – councillor Dave Harris with campaigners Chick and Beryl Cox at the public inquiry at Colchester Town Hall Shot down – councillor Dave Harris with campaigners Chick and Beryl Cox at the public inquiry at Colchester Town Hall

A THREE-YEAR fight to stop the Army fencing off part of a well-loved green space in Colchester has been lost.

Residents battled to prevent a fence going up around the rifle ranges on Middlewick, which the Army claims is plagued by vandals, flytipping and people using the area during live-firing exercises.

The defeat came yesterday, with a planning inspector ruling Colchester Council can divert a footpath to allow the fence to go up.

The changes will cut off 100 acres of the 207-acre site with an eight-foot chain fence.

It is not yet known if access to the remaining 107 open acres will be allowed when military training is taking place.

Chick Cox, chairman of Monkwick Residents’ Association, said he was “bitterly disappointed” at the decision.

“This is a very sad loss of access to an area of beautiful green space,” the Queen Elizabeth Way resident said.

“People who have enjoyed playing and walking on this area for their entire lives will now find a fence in their way.

“While there still is a lot of Middlewick available, this is the most used part and it is what people in the Willows and Birch Glen estates see as their open space.

“I feel the inspector has discounted our fears that people will find themselves trapped against this fence, with little or no route to escape from perceived dangers, such as grass fires and dangerous dogs.”

Mr Cox was critical of a lack of backing for efforts to defeat the fence.

“I think that as the fence goes up people will realise what they have lost and there will be screeches of indignation, but it is too late now,” he said.

“I do feel that if more people had made more noise, then perhaps there would have been a different outcome.”

Berechurch councillor Dave Harris said he was “gutted” at the decision, but it was one he feared was inevitable.

“I was hoping we would be able to work with the Army to tackle the antisocial behaviour that is causing them problems, but the planning inspector did not think that was workable,” he said.

“The Army has been pleasant about it, and offered to move the fence a touch so the made-up footpath will still be accessible, but it doesn’t change the overall picture.”

At a public inquiry in January, the Army said that during 2009 it had lost 333 man training days to vandalism and 18 people had walked on to the ranges, off Mersea Road, during live firing.

Repairing damage caused by vandals has cost £25,500 since 2006.

Defence Estates spokesman, Tony Moran, said: “While public safety is of paramount importance, it is vital our armed forces can train without interruption.

“Diverting this footpath allows us to build fencing which will help protect members of the public from inadvertently straying into danger.

“Making the ranges more secure will also help reduce the threat of vandalism and disruption to troops training at this location.”

Colchester Council said it had yet to receive official notification of the decision and declined to comment.

The Army allows the public access to a total of 793 acres of its land in Colchester when it is not using the land for training at the time.

Comments(10)

ykoops says...
10:08pm Tue 27 Apr 10

Repairing damage caused by vandals has cost £25,500 since 2006.

Blame the vandals not the Army or Council for the fence going up!!!

South colchester resident says...
10:41pm Tue 27 Apr 10

I wonder if the Army when fencing off the Ranges will do anything about all the houses in Queensland Drive and Cairns Road whose gardens back onto the Wick, that over the years have claimed for thier own use the 'safety strip' of land off the army and removed their bottom fences and built sheds, patios, new fencing, vegetable patches etc on the land that belongs to the Army. Or will the Army continue to turn a blind eye to this? Look at Google Earth and it can be clearly seen the amount of houses that have done this. I thought the strip of land was supposed to act as a safety barrier of no go land but perhaps i am wrong. Does anyone know? (or care? )

RitchieHicks says...
8:24am Wed 28 Apr 10

I can't quite understand why people would want to prevent the army doing this. There are plenty of other areas around Colchester where people can exercise their right to roam without the risk of being shot.

cavillas says...
10:09am Wed 28 Apr 10

What do somwe people expect in a historical garrison town? Stop all vandalism then things might get better. Supposing the army had armed patrols that fired on sight if someone was seen vandalising, wouldn't that be great. :)

cavillas says...
10:09am Wed 28 Apr 10

What do somwe people expect in a historical garrison town? Stop all vandalism then things might get better. Supposing the army had armed patrols that fired on sight if someone was seen vandalising, wouldn't that be great. :)

crosby says...
11:36am Wed 28 Apr 10

Nothing on here from Cllr Harris? He's not usually this slow!

Voter99 says...
1:17pm Wed 28 Apr 10

The army need the firing range for national security.
.
National security is more important than people's right to roam.
.
The vandalism is another example of how modern British life has gone bad under Communist Labour. I can't wait to see the back of them.

Sdapeze says...
4:40pm Wed 28 Apr 10

They have brought this upon themselves. If you cannot respect private property then you should not be allowed on it. Once again, the few have ruined it for the majority.

romantic says...
5:16pm Wed 28 Apr 10

voter99, you really are quite obsessed with this whole Labour being the cause of all ills things. I do hope that you're not disappointed to find that vandalism and crime will still go on under Cameron, Clegg or whoever gets in. The key to stopping it is education and grass-roots action, so that kids see that it has an impact, it's not just a bit of fun that doesn't really hurt anybody. Most kids do a bit of petty vandalism at some stage; most stop when they're caught, or nearly caught. Those who do get caught need to be punished, yes, but in a way that makes them see the impact. A small fine which can be paid off at a quid a fortnight doesn't do that

oldheath10 says...
7:13pm Wed 28 Apr 10

chic,beryl and councillor dave harris gave it a good go,myself and others supported them at the beginning,sadly business commitments meant i could no longer give their campaign any more time,this area has been enjoyed by residents for years,i walk my own dogs daily on the ranges,the fence will be unsightly,years back the army patrolled the area we had no vandalism,surely it would be good training for young inexperienced soldiers to gaurd the area before they have to face up to going to war and face a more fearsome dangerous challenge than that of the odd moron causing damage,though dave harris is not my ward councillor(i am on the other side of the wick) nor am i a labour supporter,i do thank him for the work he has done on this to try and benefit everyone,chic and beryl used to live opposite me,i would also like to thank them for their efforts in this battle,DS old heath colchester.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree