Police raids to recover stolen rhino horn

Police raid homes searching for rhino horn and museum artefacts

Police raid homes searching for rhino horn and museum artefacts

First published in News
Last updated

NINETEEN people have been arrested across the UK including Essex in connection with raids on museums and auction houses in which artefacts worth millions of pounds were stolen.

Seventeen men and two women are currently in custody awaiting questioning following dawn swoops.

Hundreds of officers from 26 police forces and the Serious Organised Crime Agency (Soca) are involved in the operation and searches are continuing at various locations.

Warrants were executed in London, Sussex, the West Midlands, Cambridgeshire, Essex and Northern Ireland.

Gazette:

The operation follows aspate of crimes which took place at museums and auction houses across England over a four-month period last year.

Chinese artefacts and a rhinoceros horn were stolen in six incidents - three at Durham Museum, one at Gorringes Auction House in East Sussex and one each at Norwich Castle Museum and the Fitzwilliam Museum in Cambridge.

Five men, aged 20, 31, 35, 53 and 54, and two women, aged 28 and 54, were arrested in London.

Four men, aged 24, 41, 44 and 56, were arrested in Cambridgeshire.

Two men, aged 28 and 46, were arrested in Essex.

A 60-year-old man was arrested in Sussex, a 32-year-old man was arrested in the West Midlands and a 67-year-old man was arrested in Nottingham.

Three men have been arrested in Northern Ireland.

Cambridgeshire Police, who are leading the operation, said all of those arrested were being held on suspicion of conspiracy to burgle except the 54-year-old woman, who was arrested on suspicion of perverting the course of justice and assisting an offender.

So far, eight people have been convicted and jailed for their roles in the break-ins.

Much of the stolen property has since been recovered but several valuable items are still missing.

Speaking after a 15-year-old boy and three men were convicted of conspiracy to burgle following the raid on the University of Cambridge's Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridgeshire Police acknowledged they were unlikely to have caught everybody involved.

Eighteen ancient Chinese jade artefacts - which some experts said could be worth £18 million - were stolen after the gang evaded museum security.

Defence counsel told the court "others higher up the chain", who have not been identified, recruited the men to target the jade exhibits.

Gazette:

Cambridge Crown Court heard it was unlikely the men knew the true value of the items, which it is thought were sold to rich Chinese collectors.

Chief Constable Mick Creedon, the Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo) lead for serious organised crime, said: "Today's operation follows a long and complex pan-European investigation involving officers from 26 police forces and the Serious Organised Crime Agency.

"The series of burglaries last year had a profound effect on museums and similar institutions and we are committed to bringing all those who were involved in the conspiracy to justice.

"Many of the stolen Chinese artefacts are still outstanding and a substantial reward remains on offer for information which leads to the safe return of those priceless items."

Acpo has set up a working group to crack down on the emerging issue of heritage crime.

The group brings together police officers, English Heritage and other partners in the arts and museum sector to share intelligence and crime prevention advice.

Comments (87)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

1:59pm Tue 10 Sep 13

Russ13 says...

Conincidence that most of the photos are around caravans? That could be indicative of a particular group's involvement.........
Conincidence that most of the photos are around caravans? That could be indicative of a particular group's involvement......... Russ13
  • Score: 31

2:59pm Tue 10 Sep 13

wearebeingwatched says...

Russ13 wrote:
Conincidence that most of the photos are around caravans? That could be indicative of a particular group's involvement.........
Who, the caravan club?!
[quote][p][bold]Russ13[/bold] wrote: Conincidence that most of the photos are around caravans? That could be indicative of a particular group's involvement.........[/p][/quote]Who, the caravan club?! wearebeingwatched
  • Score: 18

4:23pm Tue 10 Sep 13

bazza 1 says...

Russ13 wrote:
Conincidence that most of the photos are around caravans? That could be indicative of a particular group's involvement.........
Can't be true, what you are insinuating. We all know, and I include Miss Redgrave in this, that they are the best behaved, God fearing, honest, law abiding, hard working members of the community, and they would do nothing to sully their good name.
[quote][p][bold]Russ13[/bold] wrote: Conincidence that most of the photos are around caravans? That could be indicative of a particular group's involvement.........[/p][/quote]Can't be true, what you are insinuating. We all know, and I include Miss Redgrave in this, that they are the best behaved, God fearing, honest, law abiding, hard working members of the community, and they would do nothing to sully their good name. bazza 1
  • Score: 20

4:36pm Tue 10 Sep 13

DogsMessInLeigh says...

Think the echo forgot to lock the comments on this one..maybe the connection wasn't made, just the smart Trousers and shirt thick head of hair tells me whats what so it is, wonder what else they found.
Think the echo forgot to lock the comments on this one..maybe the connection wasn't made, just the smart Trousers and shirt thick head of hair tells me whats what so it is, wonder what else they found. DogsMessInLeigh
  • Score: 18

5:53pm Tue 10 Sep 13

Wiserman77 says...

I just lurve it when the old bill batter down the doors of the ne'er do wells. Give 'em a taste of their own medicine!
I just lurve it when the old bill batter down the doors of the ne'er do wells. Give 'em a taste of their own medicine! Wiserman77
  • Score: 17

6:02pm Tue 10 Sep 13

Wiserman77 says...

Russ13 wrote:
Conincidence that most of the photos are around caravans? That could be indicative of a particular group's involvement.........
Well that is indeed a coincidence, who would have thought that? Wonder how long we will have to wait for the defender of the indefensible.
[quote][p][bold]Russ13[/bold] wrote: Conincidence that most of the photos are around caravans? That could be indicative of a particular group's involvement.........[/p][/quote]Well that is indeed a coincidence, who would have thought that? Wonder how long we will have to wait for the defender of the indefensible. Wiserman77
  • Score: 16

6:40pm Tue 10 Sep 13

whateverhappened says...

smithy fen!
smithy fen! whateverhappened
  • Score: 15

7:49pm Tue 10 Sep 13

SpiffSpaffAndChips says...

I doubt ye olde key of pikes would have known what they were even if you explained it to them, they would have been eating cerial out of the ancient vases and using the rhino horn to scratch their arses
I doubt ye olde key of pikes would have known what they were even if you explained it to them, they would have been eating cerial out of the ancient vases and using the rhino horn to scratch their arses SpiffSpaffAndChips
  • Score: 22

9:08pm Tue 10 Sep 13

DogsMessInLeigh says...

An upstanding community.
An upstanding community. DogsMessInLeigh
  • Score: 18

9:55pm Tue 10 Sep 13

Wiserman77 says...

I didn't realise rhino horn was worth so much, crikey!
I didn't realise rhino horn was worth so much, crikey! Wiserman77
  • Score: 18

10:14pm Tue 10 Sep 13

VanRes says...

Lets hope that sufficient evidence has been found, particularly within the abodes in Essex!
Lets hope that sufficient evidence has been found, particularly within the abodes in Essex! VanRes
  • Score: 20

10:32pm Tue 10 Sep 13

woolstone says...

Another reason Rayleigh does not want a travellers site near them, I hope Rochford District Council makes a note of this latest news about the travellers from Dale Farm, we do not want them coming to the Rayleigh area thank you.
Another reason Rayleigh does not want a travellers site near them, I hope Rochford District Council makes a note of this latest news about the travellers from Dale Farm, we do not want them coming to the Rayleigh area thank you. woolstone
  • Score: 23

10:33pm Tue 10 Sep 13

IHATETOWIE says...

"Well that is indeed a coincidence, who would have thought that? Wonder how long we will have to wait for the defender of the indefensible."

Not long, I hope! Oh, how I love the twisting and turning and ducking and diving of the "defender" as he / she / it struggles to turn fact in to fiction and vice versa. Always makes me laugh even, perhaps, if it isn't the 'last laugh'...

I should imagine that someone with such a deep moral conscious is in Africa saving the rhino as I type - while checking hand baggage allowances and armed with a chainsaw... Come on, we know you are out there Oh Great Defender - give us some entertainment you numpty!
"Well that is indeed a coincidence, who would have thought that? Wonder how long we will have to wait for the defender of the indefensible." Not long, I hope! Oh, how I love the twisting and turning and ducking and diving of the "defender" as he / she / it struggles to turn fact in to fiction and vice versa. Always makes me laugh even, perhaps, if it isn't the 'last laugh'... I should imagine that someone with such a deep moral conscious is in Africa saving the rhino as I type - while checking hand baggage allowances and armed with a chainsaw... Come on, we know you are out there Oh Great Defender - give us some entertainment you numpty! IHATETOWIE
  • Score: 21

9:02am Wed 11 Sep 13

DogsMessInLeigh says...

They have raided homes in Raithkeal also, what i find hard to stomach is the likes of Channel 4 and 5 that glorify them, did they ever stop to think about how they pay for everthing so lavish...nahh just do 8 series on the same thing the gullible love it.
They have raided homes in Raithkeal also, what i find hard to stomach is the likes of Channel 4 and 5 that glorify them, did they ever stop to think about how they pay for everthing so lavish...nahh just do 8 series on the same thing the gullible love it. DogsMessInLeigh
  • Score: 20

9:24am Wed 11 Sep 13

Itsnotmeitsyou says...

Notice when they do mention Dale Farm (above) that comments are not invited.
Notice when they do mention Dale Farm (above) that comments are not invited. Itsnotmeitsyou
  • Score: 17

10:18am Wed 11 Sep 13

Pikeys says...

I'm from rathkeale and I think they will be left out
I'm from rathkeale and I think they will be left out Pikeys
  • Score: 16

1:03pm Wed 11 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

SpiffSpaffAndChips wrote:
I doubt ye olde key of pikes would have known what they were even if you explained it to them, they would have been eating cerial out of the ancient vases and using the rhino horn to scratch their arses
You comment has been saved and WILL be presented to the police in regards to racial abuse and the inciting of.
[quote][p][bold]SpiffSpaffAndChips[/bold] wrote: I doubt ye olde key of pikes would have known what they were even if you explained it to them, they would have been eating cerial out of the ancient vases and using the rhino horn to scratch their arses[/p][/quote]You comment has been saved and WILL be presented to the police in regards to racial abuse and the inciting of. lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -29

1:06pm Wed 11 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

woolstone wrote:
Another reason Rayleigh does not want a travellers site near them, I hope Rochford District Council makes a note of this latest news about the travellers from Dale Farm, we do not want them coming to the Rayleigh area thank you.
Who really cares what you want...do you really think any authority will take the likes of you into consideration when they make decisions? Get real!
[quote][p][bold]woolstone[/bold] wrote: Another reason Rayleigh does not want a travellers site near them, I hope Rochford District Council makes a note of this latest news about the travellers from Dale Farm, we do not want them coming to the Rayleigh area thank you.[/p][/quote]Who really cares what you want...do you really think any authority will take the likes of you into consideration when they make decisions? Get real! lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -26

1:10pm Wed 11 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

DogsMessInLeigh wrote:
They have raided homes in Raithkeal also, what i find hard to stomach is the likes of Channel 4 and 5 that glorify them, did they ever stop to think about how they pay for everthing so lavish...nahh just do 8 series on the same thing the gullible love it.
Your posts often show you to be labouring but ill ask anyway! Are you suggesting every person from the community world wide is responsible for these ALLEGED crimes?

If that is the would not you be responsible for every crime, even the most heinous, committed by members of your community?

Or has that thought never penetrated your skull?
[quote][p][bold]DogsMessInLeigh[/bold] wrote: They have raided homes in Raithkeal also, what i find hard to stomach is the likes of Channel 4 and 5 that glorify them, did they ever stop to think about how they pay for everthing so lavish...nahh just do 8 series on the same thing the gullible love it.[/p][/quote]Your posts often show you to be labouring but ill ask anyway! Are you suggesting every person from the community world wide is responsible for these ALLEGED crimes? If that is the would not you be responsible for every crime, even the most heinous, committed by members of your community? Or has that thought never penetrated your skull? lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -23

1:11pm Wed 11 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

Pikeys wrote:
I'm from rathkeale and I think they will be left out
The name you have picked is a really abusive one as you are fully aware. Your post has been saved and will with the others over a set period of time be presented to the police, serious crime squad, for investigation.
[quote][p][bold]Pikeys[/bold] wrote: I'm from rathkeale and I think they will be left out[/p][/quote]The name you have picked is a really abusive one as you are fully aware. Your post has been saved and will with the others over a set period of time be presented to the police, serious crime squad, for investigation. lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -25

1:41pm Wed 11 Sep 13

Justice79 says...

lastlaugh,. wrote:
woolstone wrote:
Another reason Rayleigh does not want a travellers site near them, I hope Rochford District Council makes a note of this latest news about the travellers from Dale Farm, we do not want them coming to the Rayleigh area thank you.
Who really cares what you want...do you really think any authority will take the likes of you into consideration when they make decisions? Get real!
It would seem you care, get off your high horse.

if you find the post so offensive hit the report button and stop threatening to run to the police like a 5 year old because you read something you didn't like on the internet.
[quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]woolstone[/bold] wrote: Another reason Rayleigh does not want a travellers site near them, I hope Rochford District Council makes a note of this latest news about the travellers from Dale Farm, we do not want them coming to the Rayleigh area thank you.[/p][/quote]Who really cares what you want...do you really think any authority will take the likes of you into consideration when they make decisions? Get real![/p][/quote]It would seem you care, get off your high horse. if you find the post so offensive hit the report button and stop threatening to run to the police like a 5 year old because you read something you didn't like on the internet. Justice79
  • Score: 27

1:46pm Wed 11 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

Justice79 wrote:
lastlaugh,. wrote:
woolstone wrote:
Another reason Rayleigh does not want a travellers site near them, I hope Rochford District Council makes a note of this latest news about the travellers from Dale Farm, we do not want them coming to the Rayleigh area thank you.
Who really cares what you want...do you really think any authority will take the likes of you into consideration when they make decisions? Get real!
It would seem you care, get off your high horse.

if you find the post so offensive hit the report button and stop threatening to run to the police like a 5 year old because you read something you didn't like on the internet.
"seem" can be so very wrong...as on this occasion.

Are you suggesting that people should ignore illegal and unlawful behaviour?

Should people not report crime because it might be deemed childish to do so?

Should racial abuse be condoned because its on the internet?

You do throw up lots of questions with your nonsense!
[quote][p][bold]Justice79[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]woolstone[/bold] wrote: Another reason Rayleigh does not want a travellers site near them, I hope Rochford District Council makes a note of this latest news about the travellers from Dale Farm, we do not want them coming to the Rayleigh area thank you.[/p][/quote]Who really cares what you want...do you really think any authority will take the likes of you into consideration when they make decisions? Get real![/p][/quote]It would seem you care, get off your high horse. if you find the post so offensive hit the report button and stop threatening to run to the police like a 5 year old because you read something you didn't like on the internet.[/p][/quote]"seem" can be so very wrong...as on this occasion. Are you suggesting that people should ignore illegal and unlawful behaviour? Should people not report crime because it might be deemed childish to do so? Should racial abuse be condoned because its on the internet? You do throw up lots of questions with your nonsense! lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -23

2:30pm Wed 11 Sep 13

Wiserman77 says...

lastlaugh,. wrote:
SpiffSpaffAndChips wrote:
I doubt ye olde key of pikes would have known what they were even if you explained it to them, they would have been eating cerial out of the ancient vases and using the rhino horn to scratch their arses
You comment has been saved and WILL be presented to the police in regards to racial abuse and the inciting of.
Oh dear Spiffspaff, you've been 'grabbed', not to worry though, in 'Big Fat Gypsy Wedding' 'grabbing', apparently is part of the 'culture', he's been making threats and 'grabbing' for some time now. By the way LastLaugh., (wonder what the ., is? Were we banned? Lol. On a previous thread which you fled you said that 'children were removed from school for cultural needs'  could you please enlighten us all and provide us with say, three examples of what these 'cultural needs' would be?
[quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]SpiffSpaffAndChips[/bold] wrote: I doubt ye olde key of pikes would have known what they were even if you explained it to them, they would have been eating cerial out of the ancient vases and using the rhino horn to scratch their arses[/p][/quote]You comment has been saved and WILL be presented to the police in regards to racial abuse and the inciting of.[/p][/quote]Oh dear Spiffspaff, you've been 'grabbed', not to worry though, in 'Big Fat Gypsy Wedding' 'grabbing', apparently is part of the 'culture', he's been making threats and 'grabbing' for some time now. By the way LastLaugh., (wonder what the ., is? Were we banned? Lol. On a previous thread which you fled you said that 'children were removed from school for cultural needs'  could you please enlighten us all and provide us with say, three examples of what these 'cultural needs' would be? Wiserman77
  • Score: 18

2:57pm Wed 11 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

Wiserman77 wrote:
lastlaugh,. wrote:
SpiffSpaffAndChips wrote:
I doubt ye olde key of pikes would have known what they were even if you explained it to them, they would have been eating cerial out of the ancient vases and using the rhino horn to scratch their arses
You comment has been saved and WILL be presented to the police in regards to racial abuse and the inciting of.
Oh dear Spiffspaff, you've been 'grabbed', not to worry though, in 'Big Fat Gypsy Wedding' 'grabbing', apparently is part of the 'culture', he's been making threats and 'grabbing' for some time now. By the way LastLaugh., (wonder what the ., is? Were we banned? Lol. On a previous thread which you fled you said that 'children were removed from school for cultural needs'  could you please enlighten us all and provide us with say, three examples of what these 'cultural needs' would be?
'grabbing' is far from part of the culture and is a new fangled thing...bit like saying the behaviour of the people on the Jeramy Kyle show is part of the wider culture of the country.

I of course do not make threats, although you perceive them as such, but give warnings.

You of course have nothing to worry about, while you might try to incite people to break the law with illegal language you dont do it yourself, not as foolish as you seem are you?

Im aware you have indeed been banned in the past, hence your new name.

I have no memory of a thread you feel I 'fled; from..bump the thread and we can see just what it is you are dribbling about.
[quote][p][bold]Wiserman77[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]SpiffSpaffAndChips[/bold] wrote: I doubt ye olde key of pikes would have known what they were even if you explained it to them, they would have been eating cerial out of the ancient vases and using the rhino horn to scratch their arses[/p][/quote]You comment has been saved and WILL be presented to the police in regards to racial abuse and the inciting of.[/p][/quote]Oh dear Spiffspaff, you've been 'grabbed', not to worry though, in 'Big Fat Gypsy Wedding' 'grabbing', apparently is part of the 'culture', he's been making threats and 'grabbing' for some time now. By the way LastLaugh., (wonder what the ., is? Were we banned? Lol. On a previous thread which you fled you said that 'children were removed from school for cultural needs'  could you please enlighten us all and provide us with say, three examples of what these 'cultural needs' would be?[/p][/quote]'grabbing' is far from part of the culture and is a new fangled thing...bit like saying the behaviour of the people on the Jeramy Kyle show is part of the wider culture of the country. I of course do not make threats, although you perceive them as such, but give warnings. You of course have nothing to worry about, while you might try to incite people to break the law with illegal language you dont do it yourself, not as foolish as you seem are you? Im aware you have indeed been banned in the past, hence your new name. I have no memory of a thread you feel I 'fled; from..bump the thread and we can see just what it is you are dribbling about. lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -21

3:10pm Wed 11 Sep 13

Justice79 says...

lastlaugh,. wrote:
Justice79 wrote:
lastlaugh,. wrote:
woolstone wrote: Another reason Rayleigh does not want a travellers site near them, I hope Rochford District Council makes a note of this latest news about the travellers from Dale Farm, we do not want them coming to the Rayleigh area thank you.
Who really cares what you want...do you really think any authority will take the likes of you into consideration when they make decisions? Get real!
It would seem you care, get off your high horse. if you find the post so offensive hit the report button and stop threatening to run to the police like a 5 year old because you read something you didn't like on the internet.
"seem" can be so very wrong...as on this occasion. Are you suggesting that people should ignore illegal and unlawful behaviour? Should people not report crime because it might be deemed childish to do so? Should racial abuse be condoned because its on the internet? You do throw up lots of questions with your nonsense!
Sorry I hadn't realised you were chairman of the smart party why don't you phone the police and report these "crimes" you speak of and then pop back and let us know how you get on.
[quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Justice79[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]woolstone[/bold] wrote: Another reason Rayleigh does not want a travellers site near them, I hope Rochford District Council makes a note of this latest news about the travellers from Dale Farm, we do not want them coming to the Rayleigh area thank you.[/p][/quote]Who really cares what you want...do you really think any authority will take the likes of you into consideration when they make decisions? Get real![/p][/quote]It would seem you care, get off your high horse. if you find the post so offensive hit the report button and stop threatening to run to the police like a 5 year old because you read something you didn't like on the internet.[/p][/quote]"seem" can be so very wrong...as on this occasion. Are you suggesting that people should ignore illegal and unlawful behaviour? Should people not report crime because it might be deemed childish to do so? Should racial abuse be condoned because its on the internet? You do throw up lots of questions with your nonsense![/p][/quote]Sorry I hadn't realised you were chairman of the smart party why don't you phone the police and report these "crimes" you speak of and then pop back and let us know how you get on. Justice79
  • Score: 20

3:19pm Wed 11 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

Justice79 wrote:
lastlaugh,. wrote:
Justice79 wrote:
lastlaugh,. wrote:
woolstone wrote: Another reason Rayleigh does not want a travellers site near them, I hope Rochford District Council makes a note of this latest news about the travellers from Dale Farm, we do not want them coming to the Rayleigh area thank you.
Who really cares what you want...do you really think any authority will take the likes of you into consideration when they make decisions? Get real!
It would seem you care, get off your high horse. if you find the post so offensive hit the report button and stop threatening to run to the police like a 5 year old because you read something you didn't like on the internet.
"seem" can be so very wrong...as on this occasion. Are you suggesting that people should ignore illegal and unlawful behaviour? Should people not report crime because it might be deemed childish to do so? Should racial abuse be condoned because its on the internet? You do throw up lots of questions with your nonsense!
Sorry I hadn't realised you were chairman of the smart party why don't you phone the police and report these "crimes" you speak of and then pop back and let us know how you get on.
You obviously are out of the loop.

Why do you surmise that hasn't already happened?

Do you think the racial abuse against an ethnic minority only started with this thread...are you new here?
[quote][p][bold]Justice79[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Justice79[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]woolstone[/bold] wrote: Another reason Rayleigh does not want a travellers site near them, I hope Rochford District Council makes a note of this latest news about the travellers from Dale Farm, we do not want them coming to the Rayleigh area thank you.[/p][/quote]Who really cares what you want...do you really think any authority will take the likes of you into consideration when they make decisions? Get real![/p][/quote]It would seem you care, get off your high horse. if you find the post so offensive hit the report button and stop threatening to run to the police like a 5 year old because you read something you didn't like on the internet.[/p][/quote]"seem" can be so very wrong...as on this occasion. Are you suggesting that people should ignore illegal and unlawful behaviour? Should people not report crime because it might be deemed childish to do so? Should racial abuse be condoned because its on the internet? You do throw up lots of questions with your nonsense![/p][/quote]Sorry I hadn't realised you were chairman of the smart party why don't you phone the police and report these "crimes" you speak of and then pop back and let us know how you get on.[/p][/quote]You obviously are out of the loop. Why do you surmise that hasn't already happened? Do you think the racial abuse against an ethnic minority only started with this thread...are you new here? lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -22

3:21pm Wed 11 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

Justice79 wrote:
lastlaugh,. wrote:
Justice79 wrote:
lastlaugh,. wrote:
woolstone wrote: Another reason Rayleigh does not want a travellers site near them, I hope Rochford District Council makes a note of this latest news about the travellers from Dale Farm, we do not want them coming to the Rayleigh area thank you.
Who really cares what you want...do you really think any authority will take the likes of you into consideration when they make decisions? Get real!
It would seem you care, get off your high horse. if you find the post so offensive hit the report button and stop threatening to run to the police like a 5 year old because you read something you didn't like on the internet.
"seem" can be so very wrong...as on this occasion. Are you suggesting that people should ignore illegal and unlawful behaviour? Should people not report crime because it might be deemed childish to do so? Should racial abuse be condoned because its on the internet? You do throw up lots of questions with your nonsense!
Sorry I hadn't realised you were chairman of the smart party why don't you phone the police and report these "crimes" you speak of and then pop back and let us know how you get on.
BTW you didn't answer the questions put to you...can you?
[quote][p][bold]Justice79[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Justice79[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]woolstone[/bold] wrote: Another reason Rayleigh does not want a travellers site near them, I hope Rochford District Council makes a note of this latest news about the travellers from Dale Farm, we do not want them coming to the Rayleigh area thank you.[/p][/quote]Who really cares what you want...do you really think any authority will take the likes of you into consideration when they make decisions? Get real![/p][/quote]It would seem you care, get off your high horse. if you find the post so offensive hit the report button and stop threatening to run to the police like a 5 year old because you read something you didn't like on the internet.[/p][/quote]"seem" can be so very wrong...as on this occasion. Are you suggesting that people should ignore illegal and unlawful behaviour? Should people not report crime because it might be deemed childish to do so? Should racial abuse be condoned because its on the internet? You do throw up lots of questions with your nonsense![/p][/quote]Sorry I hadn't realised you were chairman of the smart party why don't you phone the police and report these "crimes" you speak of and then pop back and let us know how you get on.[/p][/quote]BTW you didn't answer the questions put to you...can you? lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -19

4:01pm Wed 11 Sep 13

Steve H says...

lastlaugh,. wrote:
SpiffSpaffAndChips wrote:
I doubt ye olde key of pikes would have known what they were even if you explained it to them, they would have been eating cerial out of the ancient vases and using the rhino horn to scratch their arses
You comment has been saved and WILL be presented to the police in regards to racial abuse and the inciting of.
Lol, that's it lastlaugh, go crying to mummy because someone said a nasty word.

Grow up, Moron,
[quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]SpiffSpaffAndChips[/bold] wrote: I doubt ye olde key of pikes would have known what they were even if you explained it to them, they would have been eating cerial out of the ancient vases and using the rhino horn to scratch their arses[/p][/quote]You comment has been saved and WILL be presented to the police in regards to racial abuse and the inciting of.[/p][/quote]Lol, that's it lastlaugh, go crying to mummy because someone said a nasty word. Grow up, Moron, Steve H
  • Score: 20

4:39pm Wed 11 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

Steve H wrote:
lastlaugh,. wrote:
SpiffSpaffAndChips wrote:
I doubt ye olde key of pikes would have known what they were even if you explained it to them, they would have been eating cerial out of the ancient vases and using the rhino horn to scratch their arses
You comment has been saved and WILL be presented to the police in regards to racial abuse and the inciting of.
Lol, that's it lastlaugh, go crying to mummy because someone said a nasty word.

Grow up, Moron,
Do you think reporting a crime is 'running to mummy'

Isn't that contention moronic?

Do you envision the police force in the UK as a 'mummy' figure?
[quote][p][bold]Steve H[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]SpiffSpaffAndChips[/bold] wrote: I doubt ye olde key of pikes would have known what they were even if you explained it to them, they would have been eating cerial out of the ancient vases and using the rhino horn to scratch their arses[/p][/quote]You comment has been saved and WILL be presented to the police in regards to racial abuse and the inciting of.[/p][/quote]Lol, that's it lastlaugh, go crying to mummy because someone said a nasty word. Grow up, Moron,[/p][/quote]Do you think reporting a crime is 'running to mummy' Isn't that contention moronic? Do you envision the police force in the UK as a 'mummy' figure? lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -23

4:49pm Wed 11 Sep 13

Steve H says...

lastlaugh,. wrote:
Steve H wrote:
lastlaugh,. wrote:
SpiffSpaffAndChips wrote:
I doubt ye olde key of pikes would have known what they were even if you explained it to them, they would have been eating cerial out of the ancient vases and using the rhino horn to scratch their arses
You comment has been saved and WILL be presented to the police in regards to racial abuse and the inciting of.
Lol, that's it lastlaugh, go crying to mummy because someone said a nasty word.

Grow up, Moron,
Do you think reporting a crime is 'running to mummy'

Isn't that contention moronic?

Do you envision the police force in the UK as a 'mummy' figure?
There is reporting a crime and then there is reporting a crime.

Running to the Police because someone put a naughty word on an internet forum is the same as running to your Mummy because someone called you a smelly gippo.
[quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Steve H[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]SpiffSpaffAndChips[/bold] wrote: I doubt ye olde key of pikes would have known what they were even if you explained it to them, they would have been eating cerial out of the ancient vases and using the rhino horn to scratch their arses[/p][/quote]You comment has been saved and WILL be presented to the police in regards to racial abuse and the inciting of.[/p][/quote]Lol, that's it lastlaugh, go crying to mummy because someone said a nasty word. Grow up, Moron,[/p][/quote]Do you think reporting a crime is 'running to mummy' Isn't that contention moronic? Do you envision the police force in the UK as a 'mummy' figure?[/p][/quote]There is reporting a crime and then there is reporting a crime. Running to the Police because someone put a naughty word on an internet forum is the same as running to your Mummy because someone called you a smelly gippo. Steve H
  • Score: 19

5:02pm Wed 11 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

Steve H wrote:
lastlaugh,. wrote:
Steve H wrote:
lastlaugh,. wrote:
SpiffSpaffAndChips wrote:
I doubt ye olde key of pikes would have known what they were even if you explained it to them, they would have been eating cerial out of the ancient vases and using the rhino horn to scratch their arses
You comment has been saved and WILL be presented to the police in regards to racial abuse and the inciting of.
Lol, that's it lastlaugh, go crying to mummy because someone said a nasty word.

Grow up, Moron,
Do you think reporting a crime is 'running to mummy'

Isn't that contention moronic?

Do you envision the police force in the UK as a 'mummy' figure?
There is reporting a crime and then there is reporting a crime.

Running to the Police because someone put a naughty word on an internet forum is the same as running to your Mummy because someone called you a smelly gippo.
The term you use in your post is offensive and racially abusive, as well you know, the post has been saved and will be presented to the relevant people sometime this month.
[quote][p][bold]Steve H[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Steve H[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]SpiffSpaffAndChips[/bold] wrote: I doubt ye olde key of pikes would have known what they were even if you explained it to them, they would have been eating cerial out of the ancient vases and using the rhino horn to scratch their arses[/p][/quote]You comment has been saved and WILL be presented to the police in regards to racial abuse and the inciting of.[/p][/quote]Lol, that's it lastlaugh, go crying to mummy because someone said a nasty word. Grow up, Moron,[/p][/quote]Do you think reporting a crime is 'running to mummy' Isn't that contention moronic? Do you envision the police force in the UK as a 'mummy' figure?[/p][/quote]There is reporting a crime and then there is reporting a crime. Running to the Police because someone put a naughty word on an internet forum is the same as running to your Mummy because someone called you a smelly gippo.[/p][/quote]The term you use in your post is offensive and racially abusive, as well you know, the post has been saved and will be presented to the relevant people sometime this month. lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -17

5:07pm Wed 11 Sep 13

Steve H says...

lastlaugh,. wrote:
Steve H wrote:
lastlaugh,. wrote:
Steve H wrote:
lastlaugh,. wrote:
SpiffSpaffAndChips wrote:
I doubt ye olde key of pikes would have known what they were even if you explained it to them, they would have been eating cerial out of the ancient vases and using the rhino horn to scratch their arses
You comment has been saved and WILL be presented to the police in regards to racial abuse and the inciting of.
Lol, that's it lastlaugh, go crying to mummy because someone said a nasty word.

Grow up, Moron,
Do you think reporting a crime is 'running to mummy'

Isn't that contention moronic?

Do you envision the police force in the UK as a 'mummy' figure?
There is reporting a crime and then there is reporting a crime.

Running to the Police because someone put a naughty word on an internet forum is the same as running to your Mummy because someone called you a smelly gippo.
The term you use in your post is offensive and racially abusive, as well you know, the post has been saved and will be presented to the relevant people sometime this month.
I can't wait.

You really are a delicate little flower aren't you?

lol
[quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Steve H[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Steve H[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]SpiffSpaffAndChips[/bold] wrote: I doubt ye olde key of pikes would have known what they were even if you explained it to them, they would have been eating cerial out of the ancient vases and using the rhino horn to scratch their arses[/p][/quote]You comment has been saved and WILL be presented to the police in regards to racial abuse and the inciting of.[/p][/quote]Lol, that's it lastlaugh, go crying to mummy because someone said a nasty word. Grow up, Moron,[/p][/quote]Do you think reporting a crime is 'running to mummy' Isn't that contention moronic? Do you envision the police force in the UK as a 'mummy' figure?[/p][/quote]There is reporting a crime and then there is reporting a crime. Running to the Police because someone put a naughty word on an internet forum is the same as running to your Mummy because someone called you a smelly gippo.[/p][/quote]The term you use in your post is offensive and racially abusive, as well you know, the post has been saved and will be presented to the relevant people sometime this month.[/p][/quote]I can't wait. You really are a delicate little flower aren't you? lol Steve H
  • Score: 19

5:11pm Wed 11 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

Steve H wrote:
lastlaugh,. wrote:
Steve H wrote:
lastlaugh,. wrote:
Steve H wrote:
lastlaugh,. wrote:
SpiffSpaffAndChips wrote:
I doubt ye olde key of pikes would have known what they were even if you explained it to them, they would have been eating cerial out of the ancient vases and using the rhino horn to scratch their arses
You comment has been saved and WILL be presented to the police in regards to racial abuse and the inciting of.
Lol, that's it lastlaugh, go crying to mummy because someone said a nasty word.

Grow up, Moron,
Do you think reporting a crime is 'running to mummy'

Isn't that contention moronic?

Do you envision the police force in the UK as a 'mummy' figure?
There is reporting a crime and then there is reporting a crime.

Running to the Police because someone put a naughty word on an internet forum is the same as running to your Mummy because someone called you a smelly gippo.
The term you use in your post is offensive and racially abusive, as well you know, the post has been saved and will be presented to the relevant people sometime this month.
I can't wait.

You really are a delicate little flower aren't you?

lol
Good, im sure you will have lots to tell the serious crime squad.

Now as for moronic..

Reporting a crime is just that! IE reporting something that is criminal and unlawful and/or illegal..

The niceties of this might be slightly beyond you... going off your posts.
[quote][p][bold]Steve H[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Steve H[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Steve H[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]SpiffSpaffAndChips[/bold] wrote: I doubt ye olde key of pikes would have known what they were even if you explained it to them, they would have been eating cerial out of the ancient vases and using the rhino horn to scratch their arses[/p][/quote]You comment has been saved and WILL be presented to the police in regards to racial abuse and the inciting of.[/p][/quote]Lol, that's it lastlaugh, go crying to mummy because someone said a nasty word. Grow up, Moron,[/p][/quote]Do you think reporting a crime is 'running to mummy' Isn't that contention moronic? Do you envision the police force in the UK as a 'mummy' figure?[/p][/quote]There is reporting a crime and then there is reporting a crime. Running to the Police because someone put a naughty word on an internet forum is the same as running to your Mummy because someone called you a smelly gippo.[/p][/quote]The term you use in your post is offensive and racially abusive, as well you know, the post has been saved and will be presented to the relevant people sometime this month.[/p][/quote]I can't wait. You really are a delicate little flower aren't you? lol[/p][/quote]Good, im sure you will have lots to tell the serious crime squad. Now as for moronic.. Reporting a crime is just that! IE reporting something that is criminal and unlawful and/or illegal.. The niceties of this might be slightly beyond you... going off your posts. lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -16

5:14pm Wed 11 Sep 13

Wiserman77 says...

Lastlaugh/Mincer/Nig
htnDay/Tackon/Katch2
2/Etypes, still waiting for you to give me some examples of the 'cultural need' for traveller children to be removed from school.
Lastlaugh/Mincer/Nig htnDay/Tackon/Katch2 2/Etypes, still waiting for you to give me some examples of the 'cultural need' for traveller children to be removed from school. Wiserman77
  • Score: 20

5:18pm Wed 11 Sep 13

Steve H says...

You make me laugh Lastlaugh.

Believe it or not I think you are very skilled in the art of debate. However, it is obvious to me, when you cannot defend the people you support and in this case you cannot, you revert to throwing legal threats.

Debate the issue in the article, Police have raided various sites in a operation to recover stolen Rhino horn, these sites happen to be Traveller sites.

What is your take on it?
You make me laugh Lastlaugh. Believe it or not I think you are very skilled in the art of debate. However, it is obvious to me, when you cannot defend the people you support and in this case you cannot, you revert to throwing legal threats. Debate the issue in the article, Police have raided various sites in a operation to recover stolen Rhino horn, these sites happen to be Traveller sites. What is your take on it? Steve H
  • Score: 20

5:23pm Wed 11 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

Wiserman77 wrote:
Lastlaugh/Mincer/Nig

htnDay/Tackon/Katch2

2/Etypes, still waiting for you to give me some examples of the 'cultural need' for traveller children to be removed from school.
well 'wiseman/Wiseman/Wis
eMan etc" rather than 'Wiserman77'..(the former original user names before you were banned and re-surfaced with this one)

You were to bump the thread...why haven't you done that OR is it because it never existed with the comments you attribute to myself?
[quote][p][bold]Wiserman77[/bold] wrote: Lastlaugh/Mincer/Nig htnDay/Tackon/Katch2 2/Etypes, still waiting for you to give me some examples of the 'cultural need' for traveller children to be removed from school.[/p][/quote]well 'wiseman/Wiseman/Wis eMan etc" rather than 'Wiserman77'..(the former original user names before you were banned and re-surfaced with this one) You were to bump the thread...why haven't you done that OR is it because it never existed with the comments you attribute to myself? lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -23

5:30pm Wed 11 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

Steve H wrote:
You make me laugh Lastlaugh.

Believe it or not I think you are very skilled in the art of debate. However, it is obvious to me, when you cannot defend the people you support and in this case you cannot, you revert to throwing legal threats.

Debate the issue in the article, Police have raided various sites in a operation to recover stolen Rhino horn, these sites happen to be Traveller sites.

What is your take on it?
You only think Im skilled in the art of debate when Im debating with you..for the obvious reasons.

Why would I need to defend people in the article? What are they guilty of or charged with to need defending?

I have not thrown any legal threat at you merely pointed out that you have committed a crime by using racially abusive language...if that makes you laugh then thats your prerogative.

if you wanted to debate the article why didn't you from the get-go rather than use racially abusive and offensive terms.

My take is exactly what you have posted.

People have arrested a number of people on suspicion of acting unlawfully.

SUSPICION! Is the operative word.
[quote][p][bold]Steve H[/bold] wrote: You make me laugh Lastlaugh. Believe it or not I think you are very skilled in the art of debate. However, it is obvious to me, when you cannot defend the people you support and in this case you cannot, you revert to throwing legal threats. Debate the issue in the article, Police have raided various sites in a operation to recover stolen Rhino horn, these sites happen to be Traveller sites. What is your take on it?[/p][/quote]You only think Im skilled in the art of debate when Im debating with you..for the obvious reasons. Why would I need to defend people in the article? What are they guilty of or charged with to need defending? I have not thrown any legal threat at you merely pointed out that you have committed a crime by using racially abusive language...if that makes you laugh then thats your prerogative. if you wanted to debate the article why didn't you from the get-go rather than use racially abusive and offensive terms. My take is exactly what you have posted. People have arrested a number of people on suspicion of acting unlawfully. SUSPICION! Is the operative word. lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -20

5:32pm Wed 11 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

lastlaugh,. wrote:
Steve H wrote:
You make me laugh Lastlaugh.

Believe it or not I think you are very skilled in the art of debate. However, it is obvious to me, when you cannot defend the people you support and in this case you cannot, you revert to throwing legal threats.

Debate the issue in the article, Police have raided various sites in a operation to recover stolen Rhino horn, these sites happen to be Traveller sites.

What is your take on it?
You only think Im skilled in the art of debate when Im debating with you..for the obvious reasons.

Why would I need to defend people in the article? What are they guilty of or charged with to need defending?

I have not thrown any legal threat at you merely pointed out that you have committed a crime by using racially abusive language...if that makes you laugh then thats your prerogative.

if you wanted to debate the article why didn't you from the get-go rather than use racially abusive and offensive terms.

My take is exactly what you have posted.

People have arrested a number of people on suspicion of acting unlawfully.

SUSPICION! Is the operative word.
*Police*
[quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Steve H[/bold] wrote: You make me laugh Lastlaugh. Believe it or not I think you are very skilled in the art of debate. However, it is obvious to me, when you cannot defend the people you support and in this case you cannot, you revert to throwing legal threats. Debate the issue in the article, Police have raided various sites in a operation to recover stolen Rhino horn, these sites happen to be Traveller sites. What is your take on it?[/p][/quote]You only think Im skilled in the art of debate when Im debating with you..for the obvious reasons. Why would I need to defend people in the article? What are they guilty of or charged with to need defending? I have not thrown any legal threat at you merely pointed out that you have committed a crime by using racially abusive language...if that makes you laugh then thats your prerogative. if you wanted to debate the article why didn't you from the get-go rather than use racially abusive and offensive terms. My take is exactly what you have posted. People have arrested a number of people on suspicion of acting unlawfully. SUSPICION! Is the operative word.[/p][/quote]*Police* lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -21

5:48pm Wed 11 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

lastlaugh,. wrote:
lastlaugh,. wrote:
Steve H wrote:
You make me laugh Lastlaugh.

Believe it or not I think you are very skilled in the art of debate. However, it is obvious to me, when you cannot defend the people you support and in this case you cannot, you revert to throwing legal threats.

Debate the issue in the article, Police have raided various sites in a operation to recover stolen Rhino horn, these sites happen to be Traveller sites.

What is your take on it?
You only think Im skilled in the art of debate when Im debating with you..for the obvious reasons.

Why would I need to defend people in the article? What are they guilty of or charged with to need defending?

I have not thrown any legal threat at you merely pointed out that you have committed a crime by using racially abusive language...if that makes you laugh then thats your prerogative.

if you wanted to debate the article why didn't you from the get-go rather than use racially abusive and offensive terms.

My take is exactly what you have posted.

People have arrested a number of people on suspicion of acting unlawfully.

SUSPICION! Is the operative word.
*Police*
I correct a typo and 2 idiots give me the thumbs down for doing so! LOL

Come on folks be fair...the mentality of those who did that?
[quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Steve H[/bold] wrote: You make me laugh Lastlaugh. Believe it or not I think you are very skilled in the art of debate. However, it is obvious to me, when you cannot defend the people you support and in this case you cannot, you revert to throwing legal threats. Debate the issue in the article, Police have raided various sites in a operation to recover stolen Rhino horn, these sites happen to be Traveller sites. What is your take on it?[/p][/quote]You only think Im skilled in the art of debate when Im debating with you..for the obvious reasons. Why would I need to defend people in the article? What are they guilty of or charged with to need defending? I have not thrown any legal threat at you merely pointed out that you have committed a crime by using racially abusive language...if that makes you laugh then thats your prerogative. if you wanted to debate the article why didn't you from the get-go rather than use racially abusive and offensive terms. My take is exactly what you have posted. People have arrested a number of people on suspicion of acting unlawfully. SUSPICION! Is the operative word.[/p][/quote]*Police*[/p][/quote]I correct a typo and 2 idiots give me the thumbs down for doing so! LOL Come on folks be fair...the mentality of those who did that? lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -22

6:16pm Wed 11 Sep 13

Wiserman77 says...

lastlaugh,. wrote:
Wiserman77 wrote:
Lastlaugh/Mincer/Nig


htnDay/Tackon/Katch2


2/Etypes, still waiting for you to give me some examples of the 'cultural need' for traveller children to be removed from school.
well 'wiseman/Wiseman/Wis

eMan etc" rather than 'Wiserman77'..(the former original user names before you were banned and re-surfaced with this one)

You were to bump the thread...why haven't you done that OR is it because it never existed with the comments you attribute to myself?
Lastlaugh. Those are your previous names under which you have attempted to stifle debate and been thrown off these threads. Do you really think it 'racist' that a person would not choose to live next door to a traveller site whether it be illegal or legal, well do you dimwit? Do you think it was 'racist' that travellers chose not to accept council houses during the eviction of the former Dale  Farm because they did not want to live among the 'gorgas', well do you dimwit? If you are now retracting your previous comments about traveller children being removed from school for cultural needs, perhaps you can explain to us why Crays Hill School had such high non-attendance figures? Well dimwit, I await your reply.
[quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Wiserman77[/bold] wrote: Lastlaugh/Mincer/Nig htnDay/Tackon/Katch2 2/Etypes, still waiting for you to give me some examples of the 'cultural need' for traveller children to be removed from school.[/p][/quote]well 'wiseman/Wiseman/Wis eMan etc" rather than 'Wiserman77'..(the former original user names before you were banned and re-surfaced with this one) You were to bump the thread...why haven't you done that OR is it because it never existed with the comments you attribute to myself?[/p][/quote]Lastlaugh. Those are your previous names under which you have attempted to stifle debate and been thrown off these threads. Do you really think it 'racist' that a person would not choose to live next door to a traveller site whether it be illegal or legal, well do you dimwit? Do you think it was 'racist' that travellers chose not to accept council houses during the eviction of the former Dale  Farm because they did not want to live among the 'gorgas', well do you dimwit? If you are now retracting your previous comments about traveller children being removed from school for cultural needs, perhaps you can explain to us why Crays Hill School had such high non-attendance figures? Well dimwit, I await your reply. Wiserman77
  • Score: 15

6:28pm Wed 11 Sep 13

Steve H says...

lastlaugh,. wrote:
Steve H wrote:
You make me laugh Lastlaugh.

Believe it or not I think you are very skilled in the art of debate. However, it is obvious to me, when you cannot defend the people you support and in this case you cannot, you revert to throwing legal threats.

Debate the issue in the article, Police have raided various sites in a operation to recover stolen Rhino horn, these sites happen to be Traveller sites.

What is your take on it?
You only think Im skilled in the art of debate when Im debating with you..for the obvious reasons.

Why would I need to defend people in the article? What are they guilty of or charged with to need defending?

I have not thrown any legal threat at you merely pointed out that you have committed a crime by using racially abusive language...if that makes you laugh then thats your prerogative.

if you wanted to debate the article why didn't you from the get-go rather than use racially abusive and offensive terms.

My take is exactly what you have posted.

People have arrested a number of people on suspicion of acting unlawfully.

SUSPICION! Is the operative word.
I would have loved to have debated the article with you, but your first post put you immediately on the defensive;

"You comment has been saved and WILL be presented to the police in regards to racial abuse and the inciting of."

Why did you have to say that? Please don't say it's because it was because a poster said a bad word, that just makes you look like a crybaby, if you want to play with the big boys you will need a thicker skin.
[quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Steve H[/bold] wrote: You make me laugh Lastlaugh. Believe it or not I think you are very skilled in the art of debate. However, it is obvious to me, when you cannot defend the people you support and in this case you cannot, you revert to throwing legal threats. Debate the issue in the article, Police have raided various sites in a operation to recover stolen Rhino horn, these sites happen to be Traveller sites. What is your take on it?[/p][/quote]You only think Im skilled in the art of debate when Im debating with you..for the obvious reasons. Why would I need to defend people in the article? What are they guilty of or charged with to need defending? I have not thrown any legal threat at you merely pointed out that you have committed a crime by using racially abusive language...if that makes you laugh then thats your prerogative. if you wanted to debate the article why didn't you from the get-go rather than use racially abusive and offensive terms. My take is exactly what you have posted. People have arrested a number of people on suspicion of acting unlawfully. SUSPICION! Is the operative word.[/p][/quote]I would have loved to have debated the article with you, but your first post put you immediately on the defensive; "You comment has been saved and WILL be presented to the police in regards to racial abuse and the inciting of." Why did you have to say that? Please don't say it's because it was because a poster said a bad word, that just makes you look like a crybaby, if you want to play with the big boys you will need a thicker skin. Steve H
  • Score: 17

6:37pm Wed 11 Sep 13

Justice79 says...

"Erm hello is that the serious crime squad? Id like to report seeing some rude words on the internet"
"Erm hello is that the serious crime squad? Id like to report seeing some rude words on the internet" Justice79
  • Score: 13

6:39pm Wed 11 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

Wiserman77 wrote:
lastlaugh,. wrote:
Wiserman77 wrote:
Lastlaugh/Mincer/Nig



htnDay/Tackon/Katch2



2/Etypes, still waiting for you to give me some examples of the 'cultural need' for traveller children to be removed from school.
well 'wiseman/Wiseman/Wis


eMan etc" rather than 'Wiserman77'..(the former original user names before you were banned and re-surfaced with this one)

You were to bump the thread...why haven't you done that OR is it because it never existed with the comments you attribute to myself?
Lastlaugh. Those are your previous names under which you have attempted to stifle debate and been thrown off these threads. Do you really think it 'racist' that a person would not choose to live next door to a traveller site whether it be illegal or legal, well do you dimwit? Do you think it was 'racist' that travellers chose not to accept council houses during the eviction of the former Dale  Farm because they did not want to live among the 'gorgas', well do you dimwit? If you are now retracting your previous comments about traveller children being removed from school for cultural needs, perhaps you can explain to us why Crays Hill School had such high non-attendance figures? Well dimwit, I await your reply.
"stifle debate" you are away with the fairies.

Your former names were taken from you because admin felt you were beyond the pale..and probably still are going by some of your stupid question in your post.

People live next door to who they live next door to...they either accept their neighbours, ignore them or move..the choice is theirs

Traveller were not offered houses before, during or after the eviction...if you believe they were then provide proof of that rather than just claiming it...I believe you were asked to do that before...before you were banned.

Im far from a dimwit but the fact you cant see that gives a measure and level of your understanding and reasoning of things around you!

You have yet to bump the thread on which you claim I made such claims...till then you are simply claiming something without evidence. As per.

I do not have access to the records of the school you mention...do you?

Do you often finding yourself needing help from dimwits? Where does that leave you in the 'wit' category when you need such help?
[quote][p][bold]Wiserman77[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Wiserman77[/bold] wrote: Lastlaugh/Mincer/Nig htnDay/Tackon/Katch2 2/Etypes, still waiting for you to give me some examples of the 'cultural need' for traveller children to be removed from school.[/p][/quote]well 'wiseman/Wiseman/Wis eMan etc" rather than 'Wiserman77'..(the former original user names before you were banned and re-surfaced with this one) You were to bump the thread...why haven't you done that OR is it because it never existed with the comments you attribute to myself?[/p][/quote]Lastlaugh. Those are your previous names under which you have attempted to stifle debate and been thrown off these threads. Do you really think it 'racist' that a person would not choose to live next door to a traveller site whether it be illegal or legal, well do you dimwit? Do you think it was 'racist' that travellers chose not to accept council houses during the eviction of the former Dale  Farm because they did not want to live among the 'gorgas', well do you dimwit? If you are now retracting your previous comments about traveller children being removed from school for cultural needs, perhaps you can explain to us why Crays Hill School had such high non-attendance figures? Well dimwit, I await your reply.[/p][/quote]"stifle debate" you are away with the fairies. Your former names were taken from you because admin felt you were beyond the pale..and probably still are going by some of your stupid question in your post. People live next door to who they live next door to...they either accept their neighbours, ignore them or move..the choice is theirs Traveller were not offered houses before, during or after the eviction...if you believe they were then provide proof of that rather than just claiming it...I believe you were asked to do that before...before you were banned. Im far from a dimwit but the fact you cant see that gives a measure and level of your understanding and reasoning of things around you! You have yet to bump the thread on which you claim I made such claims...till then you are simply claiming something without evidence. As per. I do not have access to the records of the school you mention...do you? Do you often finding yourself needing help from dimwits? Where does that leave you in the 'wit' category when you need such help? lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -17

6:44pm Wed 11 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

Steve H wrote:
lastlaugh,. wrote:
Steve H wrote:
You make me laugh Lastlaugh.

Believe it or not I think you are very skilled in the art of debate. However, it is obvious to me, when you cannot defend the people you support and in this case you cannot, you revert to throwing legal threats.

Debate the issue in the article, Police have raided various sites in a operation to recover stolen Rhino horn, these sites happen to be Traveller sites.

What is your take on it?
You only think Im skilled in the art of debate when Im debating with you..for the obvious reasons.

Why would I need to defend people in the article? What are they guilty of or charged with to need defending?

I have not thrown any legal threat at you merely pointed out that you have committed a crime by using racially abusive language...if that makes you laugh then thats your prerogative.

if you wanted to debate the article why didn't you from the get-go rather than use racially abusive and offensive terms.

My take is exactly what you have posted.

People have arrested a number of people on suspicion of acting unlawfully.

SUSPICION! Is the operative word.
I would have loved to have debated the article with you, but your first post put you immediately on the defensive;

"You comment has been saved and WILL be presented to the police in regards to racial abuse and the inciting of."

Why did you have to say that? Please don't say it's because it was because a poster said a bad word, that just makes you look like a crybaby, if you want to play with the big boys you will need a thicker skin.
So what you are saying is; because i gave a warning to someone using a racially abusive and illegal term you felt that you should negate any debate and instead post about mummy's?

The terms are not "bad" words but illegal and racially offensive...very big difference.

Is robbing a bank a 'bad' action not warranting action or is it a illegal and unlawful action.

Racial abuse is considered a serious crime...as well as being 'bad'
[quote][p][bold]Steve H[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Steve H[/bold] wrote: You make me laugh Lastlaugh. Believe it or not I think you are very skilled in the art of debate. However, it is obvious to me, when you cannot defend the people you support and in this case you cannot, you revert to throwing legal threats. Debate the issue in the article, Police have raided various sites in a operation to recover stolen Rhino horn, these sites happen to be Traveller sites. What is your take on it?[/p][/quote]You only think Im skilled in the art of debate when Im debating with you..for the obvious reasons. Why would I need to defend people in the article? What are they guilty of or charged with to need defending? I have not thrown any legal threat at you merely pointed out that you have committed a crime by using racially abusive language...if that makes you laugh then thats your prerogative. if you wanted to debate the article why didn't you from the get-go rather than use racially abusive and offensive terms. My take is exactly what you have posted. People have arrested a number of people on suspicion of acting unlawfully. SUSPICION! Is the operative word.[/p][/quote]I would have loved to have debated the article with you, but your first post put you immediately on the defensive; "You comment has been saved and WILL be presented to the police in regards to racial abuse and the inciting of." Why did you have to say that? Please don't say it's because it was because a poster said a bad word, that just makes you look like a crybaby, if you want to play with the big boys you will need a thicker skin.[/p][/quote]So what you are saying is; because i gave a warning to someone using a racially abusive and illegal term you felt that you should negate any debate and instead post about mummy's? The terms are not "bad" words but illegal and racially offensive...very big difference. Is robbing a bank a 'bad' action not warranting action or is it a illegal and unlawful action. Racial abuse is considered a serious crime...as well as being 'bad' lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -15

6:49pm Wed 11 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

Justice79 wrote:
"Erm hello is that the serious crime squad? Id like to report seeing some rude words on the internet"
its quite clear this is all beyond you when you think racially offensive and illegal words are 'rude words'

Perhaps you should just stick to reading the posts..
[quote][p][bold]Justice79[/bold] wrote: "Erm hello is that the serious crime squad? Id like to report seeing some rude words on the internet"[/p][/quote]its quite clear this is all beyond you when you think racially offensive and illegal words are 'rude words' Perhaps you should just stick to reading the posts.. lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -15

6:58pm Wed 11 Sep 13

Steve H says...

You didn't give a warning, you gave a direct threat to action.

The words **** or Gippo have only recently become offensive terms, when I was at school we used them for general mickey taking and banter.

My late Granddad would quite often say Pa.ki or Nig.ger, yes bad words, but in his time acceptable and not said in derogative ways.

An Irish Traveller will always be known as a **** in our generation, I mean no ill by what I say, it's how I describe that person. Just like my Granddad would of done.

My kids will grow up knowing that **** is a derogatory term, it is what is right.
You didn't give a warning, you gave a direct threat to action. The words **** or Gippo have only recently become offensive terms, when I was at school we used them for general mickey taking and banter. My late Granddad would quite often say Pa.ki or Nig.ger, yes bad words, but in his time acceptable and not said in derogative ways. An Irish Traveller will always be known as a **** in our generation, I mean no ill by what I say, it's how I describe that person. Just like my Granddad would of done. My kids will grow up knowing that **** is a derogatory term, it is what is right. Steve H
  • Score: 13

6:59pm Wed 11 Sep 13

Steve H says...

The **** word is Pi.key
The **** word is Pi.key Steve H
  • Score: 14

7:06pm Wed 11 Sep 13

Wiserman77 says...

lastlaugh,. wrote:
Wiserman77 wrote:
lastlaugh,. wrote:
Wiserman77 wrote:
Lastlaugh/Mincer/Nig




htnDay/Tackon/Katch2




2/Etypes, still waiting for you to give me some examples of the 'cultural need' for traveller children to be removed from school.
well 'wiseman/Wiseman/Wis



eMan etc" rather than 'Wiserman77'..(the former original user names before you were banned and re-surfaced with this one)

You were to bump the thread...why haven't you done that OR is it because it never existed with the comments you attribute to myself?
Lastlaugh. Those are your previous names under which you have attempted to stifle debate and been thrown off these threads. Do you really think it 'racist' that a person would not choose to live next door to a traveller site whether it be illegal or legal, well do you dimwit? Do you think it was 'racist' that travellers chose not to accept council houses during the eviction of the former Dale  Farm because they did not want to live among the 'gorgas', well do you dimwit? If you are now retracting your previous comments about traveller children being removed from school for cultural needs, perhaps you can explain to us why Crays Hill School had such high non-attendance figures? Well dimwit, I await your reply.
"stifle debate" you are away with the fairies.

Your former names were taken from you because admin felt you were beyond the pale..and probably still are going by some of your stupid question in your post.

People live next door to who they live next door to...they either accept their neighbours, ignore them or move..the choice is theirs

Traveller were not offered houses before, during or after the eviction...if you believe they were then provide proof of that rather than just claiming it...I believe you were asked to do that before...before you were banned.

Im far from a dimwit but the fact you cant see that gives a measure and level of your understanding and reasoning of things around you!

You have yet to bump the thread on which you claim I made such claims...till then you are simply claiming something without evidence. As per.

I do not have access to the records of the school you mention...do you?

Do you often finding yourself needing help from dimwits? Where does that leave you in the 'wit' category when you need such help?
Its all out there lastlaugh:
http://dashboard.ofs
ted.gov.uk/dash.php?
urn=114810

The statement you made was actually in response to the attendance record at Crays Hill. Unfortunately I do not sit there obsessively 'grabbing' everything that may upset me, so I cannot find the link to your statement. So what are the cultural needs for traveller children to be removed from school? You know you can't answer the question because there are no cultural needs, to answer the question would make you appear even sillier than you are. Lol
[quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Wiserman77[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Wiserman77[/bold] wrote: Lastlaugh/Mincer/Nig htnDay/Tackon/Katch2 2/Etypes, still waiting for you to give me some examples of the 'cultural need' for traveller children to be removed from school.[/p][/quote]well 'wiseman/Wiseman/Wis eMan etc" rather than 'Wiserman77'..(the former original user names before you were banned and re-surfaced with this one) You were to bump the thread...why haven't you done that OR is it because it never existed with the comments you attribute to myself?[/p][/quote]Lastlaugh. Those are your previous names under which you have attempted to stifle debate and been thrown off these threads. Do you really think it 'racist' that a person would not choose to live next door to a traveller site whether it be illegal or legal, well do you dimwit? Do you think it was 'racist' that travellers chose not to accept council houses during the eviction of the former Dale  Farm because they did not want to live among the 'gorgas', well do you dimwit? If you are now retracting your previous comments about traveller children being removed from school for cultural needs, perhaps you can explain to us why Crays Hill School had such high non-attendance figures? Well dimwit, I await your reply.[/p][/quote]"stifle debate" you are away with the fairies. Your former names were taken from you because admin felt you were beyond the pale..and probably still are going by some of your stupid question in your post. People live next door to who they live next door to...they either accept their neighbours, ignore them or move..the choice is theirs Traveller were not offered houses before, during or after the eviction...if you believe they were then provide proof of that rather than just claiming it...I believe you were asked to do that before...before you were banned. Im far from a dimwit but the fact you cant see that gives a measure and level of your understanding and reasoning of things around you! You have yet to bump the thread on which you claim I made such claims...till then you are simply claiming something without evidence. As per. I do not have access to the records of the school you mention...do you? Do you often finding yourself needing help from dimwits? Where does that leave you in the 'wit' category when you need such help?[/p][/quote]Its all out there lastlaugh: http://dashboard.ofs ted.gov.uk/dash.php? urn=114810 The statement you made was actually in response to the attendance record at Crays Hill. Unfortunately I do not sit there obsessively 'grabbing' everything that may upset me, so I cannot find the link to your statement. So what are the cultural needs for traveller children to be removed from school? You know you can't answer the question because there are no cultural needs, to answer the question would make you appear even sillier than you are. Lol Wiserman77
  • Score: 13

7:24pm Wed 11 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

Steve H wrote:
You didn't give a warning, you gave a direct threat to action.

The words **** or Gippo have only recently become offensive terms, when I was at school we used them for general mickey taking and banter.

My late Granddad would quite often say Pa.ki or Nig.ger, yes bad words, but in his time acceptable and not said in derogative ways.

An Irish Traveller will always be known as a **** in our generation, I mean no ill by what I say, it's how I describe that person. Just like my Granddad would of done.

My kids will grow up knowing that **** is a derogatory term, it is what is right.
So you admit to knowing the terms are offensive and still use them. Noted.

The terms are deemed illegal and people have been convicted of using them.

The fact they were used freely in the past is neither here nor there in the present times.

Advertising Opium for sale was once allowable but isn't now...should people still be able to do advertise it not expecting any consequence because it "once was allowable"

You are an dinosaur living in the past...
[quote][p][bold]Steve H[/bold] wrote: You didn't give a warning, you gave a direct threat to action. The words **** or Gippo have only recently become offensive terms, when I was at school we used them for general mickey taking and banter. My late Granddad would quite often say Pa.ki or Nig.ger, yes bad words, but in his time acceptable and not said in derogative ways. An Irish Traveller will always be known as a **** in our generation, I mean no ill by what I say, it's how I describe that person. Just like my Granddad would of done. My kids will grow up knowing that **** is a derogatory term, it is what is right.[/p][/quote]So you admit to knowing the terms are offensive and still use them. Noted. The terms are deemed illegal and people have been convicted of using them. The fact they were used freely in the past is neither here nor there in the present times. Advertising Opium for sale was once allowable but isn't now...should people still be able to do advertise it not expecting any consequence because it "once was allowable" You are an dinosaur living in the past... lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -15

7:29pm Wed 11 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

Steve H wrote:
The **** word is Pi.key
The term asterisked has been banned from the site and yet you circumvent that ban..And pretend to do so to debate...you are no more than a racist idiot who thinks he is clever than he is.

We will see how clever you are when asked to explain your circumventing the ban,
[quote][p][bold]Steve H[/bold] wrote: The **** word is Pi.key[/p][/quote]The term asterisked has been banned from the site and yet you circumvent that ban..And pretend to do so to debate...you are no more than a racist idiot who thinks he is clever than he is. We will see how clever you are when asked to explain your circumventing the ban, lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -15

7:35pm Wed 11 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

Wiserman77 wrote:
lastlaugh,. wrote:
Wiserman77 wrote:
lastlaugh,. wrote:
Wiserman77 wrote:
Lastlaugh/Mincer/Nig





htnDay/Tackon/Katch2





2/Etypes, still waiting for you to give me some examples of the 'cultural need' for traveller children to be removed from school.
well 'wiseman/Wiseman/Wis




eMan etc" rather than 'Wiserman77'..(the former original user names before you were banned and re-surfaced with this one)

You were to bump the thread...why haven't you done that OR is it because it never existed with the comments you attribute to myself?
Lastlaugh. Those are your previous names under which you have attempted to stifle debate and been thrown off these threads. Do you really think it 'racist' that a person would not choose to live next door to a traveller site whether it be illegal or legal, well do you dimwit? Do you think it was 'racist' that travellers chose not to accept council houses during the eviction of the former Dale  Farm because they did not want to live among the 'gorgas', well do you dimwit? If you are now retracting your previous comments about traveller children being removed from school for cultural needs, perhaps you can explain to us why Crays Hill School had such high non-attendance figures? Well dimwit, I await your reply.
"stifle debate" you are away with the fairies.

Your former names were taken from you because admin felt you were beyond the pale..and probably still are going by some of your stupid question in your post.

People live next door to who they live next door to...they either accept their neighbours, ignore them or move..the choice is theirs

Traveller were not offered houses before, during or after the eviction...if you believe they were then provide proof of that rather than just claiming it...I believe you were asked to do that before...before you were banned.

Im far from a dimwit but the fact you cant see that gives a measure and level of your understanding and reasoning of things around you!

You have yet to bump the thread on which you claim I made such claims...till then you are simply claiming something without evidence. As per.

I do not have access to the records of the school you mention...do you?

Do you often finding yourself needing help from dimwits? Where does that leave you in the 'wit' category when you need such help?
Its all out there lastlaugh:
http://dashboard.ofs

ted.gov.uk/dash.php?

urn=114810

The statement you made was actually in response to the attendance record at Crays Hill. Unfortunately I do not sit there obsessively 'grabbing' everything that may upset me, so I cannot find the link to your statement. So what are the cultural needs for traveller children to be removed from school? You know you can't answer the question because there are no cultural needs, to answer the question would make you appear even sillier than you are. Lol
The 'statement' you claim I made...there is no evidence any such statement ever existed other than you saying it did...is there?

I also dont grab everything that upsets me...I grab only articles containing illegal abuse..

There are of course cultural reasons for children to miss off school, the fact you haven't got the imagination to come up with the obvious does not mean they dont exist.

You seem determined to out dimwit one you accuse of being a dimwit..
[quote][p][bold]Wiserman77[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Wiserman77[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Wiserman77[/bold] wrote: Lastlaugh/Mincer/Nig htnDay/Tackon/Katch2 2/Etypes, still waiting for you to give me some examples of the 'cultural need' for traveller children to be removed from school.[/p][/quote]well 'wiseman/Wiseman/Wis eMan etc" rather than 'Wiserman77'..(the former original user names before you were banned and re-surfaced with this one) You were to bump the thread...why haven't you done that OR is it because it never existed with the comments you attribute to myself?[/p][/quote]Lastlaugh. Those are your previous names under which you have attempted to stifle debate and been thrown off these threads. Do you really think it 'racist' that a person would not choose to live next door to a traveller site whether it be illegal or legal, well do you dimwit? Do you think it was 'racist' that travellers chose not to accept council houses during the eviction of the former Dale  Farm because they did not want to live among the 'gorgas', well do you dimwit? If you are now retracting your previous comments about traveller children being removed from school for cultural needs, perhaps you can explain to us why Crays Hill School had such high non-attendance figures? Well dimwit, I await your reply.[/p][/quote]"stifle debate" you are away with the fairies. Your former names were taken from you because admin felt you were beyond the pale..and probably still are going by some of your stupid question in your post. People live next door to who they live next door to...they either accept their neighbours, ignore them or move..the choice is theirs Traveller were not offered houses before, during or after the eviction...if you believe they were then provide proof of that rather than just claiming it...I believe you were asked to do that before...before you were banned. Im far from a dimwit but the fact you cant see that gives a measure and level of your understanding and reasoning of things around you! You have yet to bump the thread on which you claim I made such claims...till then you are simply claiming something without evidence. As per. I do not have access to the records of the school you mention...do you? Do you often finding yourself needing help from dimwits? Where does that leave you in the 'wit' category when you need such help?[/p][/quote]Its all out there lastlaugh: http://dashboard.ofs ted.gov.uk/dash.php? urn=114810 The statement you made was actually in response to the attendance record at Crays Hill. Unfortunately I do not sit there obsessively 'grabbing' everything that may upset me, so I cannot find the link to your statement. So what are the cultural needs for traveller children to be removed from school? You know you can't answer the question because there are no cultural needs, to answer the question would make you appear even sillier than you are. Lol[/p][/quote]The 'statement' you claim I made...there is no evidence any such statement ever existed other than you saying it did...is there? I also dont grab everything that upsets me...I grab only articles containing illegal abuse.. There are of course cultural reasons for children to miss off school, the fact you haven't got the imagination to come up with the obvious does not mean they dont exist. You seem determined to out dimwit one you accuse of being a dimwit.. lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -15

7:37pm Wed 11 Sep 13

Steve H says...

I can just see you now in your caravan, apoplectic with rage that I dared mention the words.

I dared because I will not be told what I can or can't say.

I know what is right and what is wrong, I don't need to be told.

You said;

"The fact they were used freely in the past is neither here nor there in the present times."

So you admit they were freely used, and as you say, so was Opium, doesn't stop it being offered for sale though?

I bet you hate the film The Dam Busters.
I can just see you now in your caravan, apoplectic with rage that I dared mention the words. I dared because I will not be told what I can or can't say. I know what is right and what is wrong, I don't need to be told. You said; "The fact they were used freely in the past is neither here nor there in the present times." So you admit they were freely used, and as you say, so was Opium, doesn't stop it being offered for sale though? I bet you hate the film The Dam Busters. Steve H
  • Score: 12

7:46pm Wed 11 Sep 13

IHATETOWIE says...

lastlaugh,. wrote:
Steve H wrote:
You didn't give a warning, you gave a direct threat to action.

The words **** or Gippo have only recently become offensive terms, when I was at school we used them for general mickey taking and banter.

My late Granddad would quite often say Pa.ki or Nig.ger, yes bad words, but in his time acceptable and not said in derogative ways.

An Irish Traveller will always be known as a **** in our generation, I mean no ill by what I say, it's how I describe that person. Just like my Granddad would of done.

My kids will grow up knowing that **** is a derogatory term, it is what is right.
So you admit to knowing the terms are offensive and still use them. Noted.

The terms are deemed illegal and people have been convicted of using them.

The fact they were used freely in the past is neither here nor there in the present times.

Advertising Opium for sale was once allowable but isn't now...should people still be able to do advertise it not expecting any consequence because it "once was allowable"

You are an dinosaur living in the past...
HOORAH!!! Just logging in and notice that the Great Entertainer is back. Thank goodness for that as it's been a tough old day and I desperately needed some light entertainment. Keep it up lastlaugh but please don't expect any sane person to laugh with you - just at you.

Just to ring the changes because this whole traveller thing is getting a wee bit dull, let's try to think of some different but equally indefensible subject matter upon which lastlaugh can test his mettle. How about Donald Trump's hairstyle? Jimmy Saville, perhaps? Kim Jong-un's record on human rights? Come on, let's all think of something as equally impossible to defend - suggestions anyone?!
[quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Steve H[/bold] wrote: You didn't give a warning, you gave a direct threat to action. The words **** or Gippo have only recently become offensive terms, when I was at school we used them for general mickey taking and banter. My late Granddad would quite often say Pa.ki or Nig.ger, yes bad words, but in his time acceptable and not said in derogative ways. An Irish Traveller will always be known as a **** in our generation, I mean no ill by what I say, it's how I describe that person. Just like my Granddad would of done. My kids will grow up knowing that **** is a derogatory term, it is what is right.[/p][/quote]So you admit to knowing the terms are offensive and still use them. Noted. The terms are deemed illegal and people have been convicted of using them. The fact they were used freely in the past is neither here nor there in the present times. Advertising Opium for sale was once allowable but isn't now...should people still be able to do advertise it not expecting any consequence because it "once was allowable" You are an dinosaur living in the past...[/p][/quote]HOORAH!!! Just logging in and notice that the Great Entertainer is back. Thank goodness for that as it's been a tough old day and I desperately needed some light entertainment. Keep it up lastlaugh but please don't expect any sane person to laugh with you - just at you. Just to ring the changes because this whole traveller thing is getting a wee bit dull, let's try to think of some different but equally indefensible subject matter upon which lastlaugh can test his mettle. How about Donald Trump's hairstyle? Jimmy Saville, perhaps? Kim Jong-un's record on human rights? Come on, let's all think of something as equally impossible to defend - suggestions anyone?! IHATETOWIE
  • Score: 18

7:59pm Wed 11 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

Steve H wrote:
I can just see you now in your caravan, apoplectic with rage that I dared mention the words.

I dared because I will not be told what I can or can't say.

I know what is right and what is wrong, I don't need to be told.

You said;

"The fact they were used freely in the past is neither here nor there in the present times."

So you admit they were freely used, and as you say, so was Opium, doesn't stop it being offered for sale though?

I bet you hate the film The Dam Busters.
It is not me who made the terms illegal nor my fault you have chosen to ignore that rule!

Thats for you to take up with those who deal with the matter of illegal behaviour.

A criminal is a criminal is a criminal.

Definition of criminal one who commits a crime

Is using illegal terms committing a crime?

Indeed opium is still offered for sale, and those doing so are committing a crime and if caught will bear the consequence of that crime...are you prepared to do that as well for using illegal terms knowing them to be illegal?

You lose the bet.
[quote][p][bold]Steve H[/bold] wrote: I can just see you now in your caravan, apoplectic with rage that I dared mention the words. I dared because I will not be told what I can or can't say. I know what is right and what is wrong, I don't need to be told. You said; "The fact they were used freely in the past is neither here nor there in the present times." So you admit they were freely used, and as you say, so was Opium, doesn't stop it being offered for sale though? I bet you hate the film The Dam Busters.[/p][/quote]It is not me who made the terms illegal nor my fault you have chosen to ignore that rule! Thats for you to take up with those who deal with the matter of illegal behaviour. A criminal is a criminal is a criminal. Definition of criminal one who commits a crime Is using illegal terms committing a crime? Indeed opium is still offered for sale, and those doing so are committing a crime and if caught will bear the consequence of that crime...are you prepared to do that as well for using illegal terms knowing them to be illegal? You lose the bet. lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -17

8:05pm Wed 11 Sep 13

Steve H says...

You completely ignored my last sentence.

In the film The Dam Busters, one of the squadron leaders has a dog, the dog is a black Labrador, the dog's name is Nig.ger.

Are you saying that every time this film is shown on TV the broadcaster is committing an offence? This film is a classic and is shown regularly.

As for a bet, I see you and raise you £10
You completely ignored my last sentence. In the film The Dam Busters, one of the squadron leaders has a dog, the dog is a black Labrador, the dog's name is Nig.ger. Are you saying that every time this film is shown on TV the broadcaster is committing an offence? This film is a classic and is shown regularly. As for a bet, I see you and raise you £10 Steve H
  • Score: 14

8:05pm Wed 11 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

IHATETOWIE wrote:
lastlaugh,. wrote:
Steve H wrote:
You didn't give a warning, you gave a direct threat to action.

The words **** or Gippo have only recently become offensive terms, when I was at school we used them for general mickey taking and banter.

My late Granddad would quite often say Pa.ki or Nig.ger, yes bad words, but in his time acceptable and not said in derogative ways.

An Irish Traveller will always be known as a **** in our generation, I mean no ill by what I say, it's how I describe that person. Just like my Granddad would of done.

My kids will grow up knowing that **** is a derogatory term, it is what is right.
So you admit to knowing the terms are offensive and still use them. Noted.

The terms are deemed illegal and people have been convicted of using them.

The fact they were used freely in the past is neither here nor there in the present times.

Advertising Opium for sale was once allowable but isn't now...should people still be able to do advertise it not expecting any consequence because it "once was allowable"

You are an dinosaur living in the past...
HOORAH!!! Just logging in and notice that the Great Entertainer is back. Thank goodness for that as it's been a tough old day and I desperately needed some light entertainment. Keep it up lastlaugh but please don't expect any sane person to laugh with you - just at you.

Just to ring the changes because this whole traveller thing is getting a wee bit dull, let's try to think of some different but equally indefensible subject matter upon which lastlaugh can test his mettle. How about Donald Trump's hairstyle? Jimmy Saville, perhaps? Kim Jong-un's record on human rights? Come on, let's all think of something as equally impossible to defend - suggestions anyone?!
I see, so you speak for sane people do you?

Did you come to that conclusion yourself or did someone tell you you do in a dream?

If you feel threads about some Travellers are "a wee bit dull" why do you bother to frequent them much less post on them?

Bit like switching the TV on to watch a football match and then demanding they play netball.

What exactly are you stating is impossible to defend?

Have you a clue?

If not go back to the netball.
[quote][p][bold]IHATETOWIE[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Steve H[/bold] wrote: You didn't give a warning, you gave a direct threat to action. The words **** or Gippo have only recently become offensive terms, when I was at school we used them for general mickey taking and banter. My late Granddad would quite often say Pa.ki or Nig.ger, yes bad words, but in his time acceptable and not said in derogative ways. An Irish Traveller will always be known as a **** in our generation, I mean no ill by what I say, it's how I describe that person. Just like my Granddad would of done. My kids will grow up knowing that **** is a derogatory term, it is what is right.[/p][/quote]So you admit to knowing the terms are offensive and still use them. Noted. The terms are deemed illegal and people have been convicted of using them. The fact they were used freely in the past is neither here nor there in the present times. Advertising Opium for sale was once allowable but isn't now...should people still be able to do advertise it not expecting any consequence because it "once was allowable" You are an dinosaur living in the past...[/p][/quote]HOORAH!!! Just logging in and notice that the Great Entertainer is back. Thank goodness for that as it's been a tough old day and I desperately needed some light entertainment. Keep it up lastlaugh but please don't expect any sane person to laugh with you - just at you. Just to ring the changes because this whole traveller thing is getting a wee bit dull, let's try to think of some different but equally indefensible subject matter upon which lastlaugh can test his mettle. How about Donald Trump's hairstyle? Jimmy Saville, perhaps? Kim Jong-un's record on human rights? Come on, let's all think of something as equally impossible to defend - suggestions anyone?![/p][/quote]I see, so you speak for sane people do you? Did you come to that conclusion yourself or did someone tell you you do in a dream? If you feel threads about some Travellers are "a wee bit dull" why do you bother to frequent them much less post on them? Bit like switching the TV on to watch a football match and then demanding they play netball. What exactly are you stating is impossible to defend? Have you a clue? If not go back to the netball. lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -18

8:17pm Wed 11 Sep 13

Justice79 says...

lastlaugh,. wrote:
Justice79 wrote:
"Erm hello is that the serious crime squad? Id like to report seeing some rude words on the internet"
its quite clear this is all beyond you when you think racially offensive and illegal words are 'rude words'

Perhaps you should just stick to reading the posts..
I didn't question the offensiveness of the terms but rather mocked the pathetic and over the top way you have tried to take the moral high ground.

The fact the comments that upset you so still remain suggests you were apparently not offended enough to trouble yourself with pressing the report button before threatening action by the serious crime squad and saving screen grabs as "evidence".
[quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Justice79[/bold] wrote: "Erm hello is that the serious crime squad? Id like to report seeing some rude words on the internet"[/p][/quote]its quite clear this is all beyond you when you think racially offensive and illegal words are 'rude words' Perhaps you should just stick to reading the posts..[/p][/quote]I didn't question the offensiveness of the terms but rather mocked the pathetic and over the top way you have tried to take the moral high ground. The fact the comments that upset you so still remain suggests you were apparently not offended enough to trouble yourself with pressing the report button before threatening action by the serious crime squad and saving screen grabs as "evidence". Justice79
  • Score: 16

8:21pm Wed 11 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

Steve H wrote:
You completely ignored my last sentence.

In the film The Dam Busters, one of the squadron leaders has a dog, the dog is a black Labrador, the dog's name is Nig.ger.

Are you saying that every time this film is shown on TV the broadcaster is committing an offence? This film is a classic and is shown regularly.

As for a bet, I see you and raise you £10
I didn't ignore the last sentence! I made comment on it by stating you lost the bet, which should suggest I didn't 'hate' the film.

The matter of the dogs name is for those who might be offended by the name.
[quote][p][bold]Steve H[/bold] wrote: You completely ignored my last sentence. In the film The Dam Busters, one of the squadron leaders has a dog, the dog is a black Labrador, the dog's name is Nig.ger. Are you saying that every time this film is shown on TV the broadcaster is committing an offence? This film is a classic and is shown regularly. As for a bet, I see you and raise you £10[/p][/quote]I didn't ignore the last sentence! I made comment on it by stating you lost the bet, which should suggest I didn't 'hate' the film. The matter of the dogs name is for those who might be offended by the name. lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -11

8:24pm Wed 11 Sep 13

Steve H says...

lastlaugh,. wrote:
Steve H wrote:
You completely ignored my last sentence.

In the film The Dam Busters, one of the squadron leaders has a dog, the dog is a black Labrador, the dog's name is Nig.ger.

Are you saying that every time this film is shown on TV the broadcaster is committing an offence? This film is a classic and is shown regularly.

As for a bet, I see you and raise you £10
I didn't ignore the last sentence! I made comment on it by stating you lost the bet, which should suggest I didn't 'hate' the film.

The matter of the dogs name is for those who might be offended by the name.
Apologies.

Have you seen the film Snatch?
[quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Steve H[/bold] wrote: You completely ignored my last sentence. In the film The Dam Busters, one of the squadron leaders has a dog, the dog is a black Labrador, the dog's name is Nig.ger. Are you saying that every time this film is shown on TV the broadcaster is committing an offence? This film is a classic and is shown regularly. As for a bet, I see you and raise you £10[/p][/quote]I didn't ignore the last sentence! I made comment on it by stating you lost the bet, which should suggest I didn't 'hate' the film. The matter of the dogs name is for those who might be offended by the name.[/p][/quote]Apologies. Have you seen the film Snatch? Steve H
  • Score: 10

8:25pm Wed 11 Sep 13

IHATETOWIE says...

I'm lovin' it! I knew lastlaugh wouldn't disappoint. Thank you soooo much.

Ps. Should you feel inclined to comment on any subject matter other than traveller related stories (as I do and I am sure you have but I must have blinked), I would remain your loyal follower as I love your work - it's a sort of mash-up of Live at The Apollo, PM's Questions in the Commons (lot's of lovely wriggling, dodging and twisting there) and The Muppets. Can't fault it.

Anyway, must dash as I am meeting friends for a quiet pint but I somehow doubt that you have to deal with such commitments... Do please keep it coming though as I will tune in tomorrow sometime for your next instalment of numptiness. Can't wait.
I'm lovin' it! I knew lastlaugh wouldn't disappoint. Thank you soooo much. Ps. Should you feel inclined to comment on any subject matter other than traveller related stories (as I do and I am sure you have but I must have blinked), I would remain your loyal follower as I love your work - it's a sort of mash-up of Live at The Apollo, PM's Questions in the Commons (lot's of lovely wriggling, dodging and twisting there) and The Muppets. Can't fault it. Anyway, must dash as I am meeting friends for a quiet pint but I somehow doubt that you have to deal with such commitments... Do please keep it coming though as I will tune in tomorrow sometime for your next instalment of numptiness. Can't wait. IHATETOWIE
  • Score: 18

8:26pm Wed 11 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

Justice79 wrote:
lastlaugh,. wrote:
Justice79 wrote:
"Erm hello is that the serious crime squad? Id like to report seeing some rude words on the internet"
its quite clear this is all beyond you when you think racially offensive and illegal words are 'rude words'

Perhaps you should just stick to reading the posts..
I didn't question the offensiveness of the terms but rather mocked the pathetic and over the top way you have tried to take the moral high ground.

The fact the comments that upset you so still remain suggests you were apparently not offended enough to trouble yourself with pressing the report button before threatening action by the serious crime squad and saving screen grabs as "evidence".
There is no subject of "moral high ground" Racial abusive terms are illegal.

Morality doesn't come into that fact.

How do you know I haven't reported the illegal posts?
[quote][p][bold]Justice79[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Justice79[/bold] wrote: "Erm hello is that the serious crime squad? Id like to report seeing some rude words on the internet"[/p][/quote]its quite clear this is all beyond you when you think racially offensive and illegal words are 'rude words' Perhaps you should just stick to reading the posts..[/p][/quote]I didn't question the offensiveness of the terms but rather mocked the pathetic and over the top way you have tried to take the moral high ground. The fact the comments that upset you so still remain suggests you were apparently not offended enough to trouble yourself with pressing the report button before threatening action by the serious crime squad and saving screen grabs as "evidence".[/p][/quote]There is no subject of "moral high ground" Racial abusive terms are illegal. Morality doesn't come into that fact. How do you know I haven't reported the illegal posts? lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -17

8:30pm Wed 11 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

Steve H wrote:
lastlaugh,. wrote:
Steve H wrote:
You completely ignored my last sentence.

In the film The Dam Busters, one of the squadron leaders has a dog, the dog is a black Labrador, the dog's name is Nig.ger.

Are you saying that every time this film is shown on TV the broadcaster is committing an offence? This film is a classic and is shown regularly.

As for a bet, I see you and raise you £10
I didn't ignore the last sentence! I made comment on it by stating you lost the bet, which should suggest I didn't 'hate' the film.

The matter of the dogs name is for those who might be offended by the name.
Apologies.

Have you seen the film Snatch?
I believe such a film would not be made in todays climate.

Anymore than a programme like the Black and White minstrels would be commissioned.

Those days have gone...its a form of social evolution
[quote][p][bold]Steve H[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Steve H[/bold] wrote: You completely ignored my last sentence. In the film The Dam Busters, one of the squadron leaders has a dog, the dog is a black Labrador, the dog's name is Nig.ger. Are you saying that every time this film is shown on TV the broadcaster is committing an offence? This film is a classic and is shown regularly. As for a bet, I see you and raise you £10[/p][/quote]I didn't ignore the last sentence! I made comment on it by stating you lost the bet, which should suggest I didn't 'hate' the film. The matter of the dogs name is for those who might be offended by the name.[/p][/quote]Apologies. Have you seen the film Snatch?[/p][/quote]I believe such a film would not be made in todays climate. Anymore than a programme like the Black and White minstrels would be commissioned. Those days have gone...its a form of social evolution lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -17

8:32pm Wed 11 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

IHATETOWIE wrote:
I'm lovin' it! I knew lastlaugh wouldn't disappoint. Thank you soooo much.

Ps. Should you feel inclined to comment on any subject matter other than traveller related stories (as I do and I am sure you have but I must have blinked), I would remain your loyal follower as I love your work - it's a sort of mash-up of Live at The Apollo, PM's Questions in the Commons (lot's of lovely wriggling, dodging and twisting there) and The Muppets. Can't fault it.

Anyway, must dash as I am meeting friends for a quiet pint but I somehow doubt that you have to deal with such commitments... Do please keep it coming though as I will tune in tomorrow sometime for your next instalment of numptiness. Can't wait.
What is it they say about those easily amused?

Yes go dull your mind with alcohol..you wont need much!
[quote][p][bold]IHATETOWIE[/bold] wrote: I'm lovin' it! I knew lastlaugh wouldn't disappoint. Thank you soooo much. Ps. Should you feel inclined to comment on any subject matter other than traveller related stories (as I do and I am sure you have but I must have blinked), I would remain your loyal follower as I love your work - it's a sort of mash-up of Live at The Apollo, PM's Questions in the Commons (lot's of lovely wriggling, dodging and twisting there) and The Muppets. Can't fault it. Anyway, must dash as I am meeting friends for a quiet pint but I somehow doubt that you have to deal with such commitments... Do please keep it coming though as I will tune in tomorrow sometime for your next instalment of numptiness. Can't wait.[/p][/quote]What is it they say about those easily amused? Yes go dull your mind with alcohol..you wont need much! lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -19

8:34pm Wed 11 Sep 13

Steve H says...

Agreed.

But, is it an offence to show it?

By your logic, every time it is shown on TV the Director General of the station or Guy Ritchie should be arrested?
Agreed. But, is it an offence to show it? By your logic, every time it is shown on TV the Director General of the station or Guy Ritchie should be arrested? Steve H
  • Score: 16

8:35pm Wed 11 Sep 13

Wiserman77 says...

IHATETOWIE wrote:
I'm lovin' it! I knew lastlaugh wouldn't disappoint. Thank you soooo much.

Ps. Should you feel inclined to comment on any subject matter other than traveller related stories (as I do and I am sure you have but I must have blinked), I would remain your loyal follower as I love your work - it's a sort of mash-up of Live at The Apollo, PM's Questions in the Commons (lot's of lovely wriggling, dodging and twisting there) and The Muppets. Can't fault it.

Anyway, must dash as I am meeting friends for a quiet pint but I somehow doubt that you have to deal with such commitments... Do please keep it coming though as I will tune in tomorrow sometime for your next instalment of numptiness. Can't wait.
Lastlaugh (or whatever the user name is this week), the gift that just keeps on giving. Oh how we laughed!
[quote][p][bold]IHATETOWIE[/bold] wrote: I'm lovin' it! I knew lastlaugh wouldn't disappoint. Thank you soooo much. Ps. Should you feel inclined to comment on any subject matter other than traveller related stories (as I do and I am sure you have but I must have blinked), I would remain your loyal follower as I love your work - it's a sort of mash-up of Live at The Apollo, PM's Questions in the Commons (lot's of lovely wriggling, dodging and twisting there) and The Muppets. Can't fault it. Anyway, must dash as I am meeting friends for a quiet pint but I somehow doubt that you have to deal with such commitments... Do please keep it coming though as I will tune in tomorrow sometime for your next instalment of numptiness. Can't wait.[/p][/quote]Lastlaugh (or whatever the user name is this week), the gift that just keeps on giving. Oh how we laughed! Wiserman77
  • Score: 20

8:54pm Wed 11 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

Steve H wrote:
Agreed.

But, is it an offence to show it?

By your logic, every time it is shown on TV the Director General of the station or Guy Ritchie should be arrested?
My logic does not suggest that.

But I agree the showing of it is a bit like showing the christmas edition of the B&W minstrels.

The equality of Travellers, ironically with some in mind, is still far behind other ethnic minorities in this country, but that gap is closing.
[quote][p][bold]Steve H[/bold] wrote: Agreed. But, is it an offence to show it? By your logic, every time it is shown on TV the Director General of the station or Guy Ritchie should be arrested?[/p][/quote]My logic does not suggest that. But I agree the showing of it is a bit like showing the christmas edition of the B&W minstrels. The equality of Travellers, ironically with some in mind, is still far behind other ethnic minorities in this country, but that gap is closing. lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -18

8:57pm Wed 11 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

Wiserman77 wrote:
IHATETOWIE wrote:
I'm lovin' it! I knew lastlaugh wouldn't disappoint. Thank you soooo much.

Ps. Should you feel inclined to comment on any subject matter other than traveller related stories (as I do and I am sure you have but I must have blinked), I would remain your loyal follower as I love your work - it's a sort of mash-up of Live at The Apollo, PM's Questions in the Commons (lot's of lovely wriggling, dodging and twisting there) and The Muppets. Can't fault it.

Anyway, must dash as I am meeting friends for a quiet pint but I somehow doubt that you have to deal with such commitments... Do please keep it coming though as I will tune in tomorrow sometime for your next instalment of numptiness. Can't wait.
Lastlaugh (or whatever the user name is this week), the gift that just keeps on giving. Oh how we laughed!
I'm sure you will keep your user name ...You have learnt your lesson, Im sure.
[quote][p][bold]Wiserman77[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]IHATETOWIE[/bold] wrote: I'm lovin' it! I knew lastlaugh wouldn't disappoint. Thank you soooo much. Ps. Should you feel inclined to comment on any subject matter other than traveller related stories (as I do and I am sure you have but I must have blinked), I would remain your loyal follower as I love your work - it's a sort of mash-up of Live at The Apollo, PM's Questions in the Commons (lot's of lovely wriggling, dodging and twisting there) and The Muppets. Can't fault it. Anyway, must dash as I am meeting friends for a quiet pint but I somehow doubt that you have to deal with such commitments... Do please keep it coming though as I will tune in tomorrow sometime for your next instalment of numptiness. Can't wait.[/p][/quote]Lastlaugh (or whatever the user name is this week), the gift that just keeps on giving. Oh how we laughed![/p][/quote]I'm sure you will keep your user name ...You have learnt your lesson, Im sure. lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -20

9:34pm Wed 11 Sep 13

Ineverknewthat says...

I used to like the Black and White minstrels, it used to give them an honest days pay.
I used to like the Black and White minstrels, it used to give them an honest days pay. Ineverknewthat
  • Score: 13

9:36pm Wed 11 Sep 13

costa-del-blowfly says...

lastlaugh,. wrote:
Justice79 wrote:
"Erm hello is that the serious crime squad? Id like to report seeing some rude words on the internet"
its quite clear this is all beyond you when you think racially offensive and illegal words are 'rude words'

Perhaps you should just stick to reading the posts..
I think you find that no words are 'illegal'. I can't remember a law being passed which outright prohibited the use of any word in the English (or any other) language in the UK.

When language (or words) become 'illegal' is when they cause offence. That itself can be quite subjective - just look at the current debate concerning the use of Tottenham Hotspurs' nickname by a large section of their fans.
[quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Justice79[/bold] wrote: "Erm hello is that the serious crime squad? Id like to report seeing some rude words on the internet"[/p][/quote]its quite clear this is all beyond you when you think racially offensive and illegal words are 'rude words' Perhaps you should just stick to reading the posts..[/p][/quote]I think you find that no words are 'illegal'. I can't remember a law being passed which outright prohibited the use of any word in the English (or any other) language in the UK. When language (or words) become 'illegal' is when they cause offence. That itself can be quite subjective - just look at the current debate concerning the use of Tottenham Hotspurs' nickname by a large section of their fans. costa-del-blowfly
  • Score: 18

9:45pm Wed 11 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

Ineverknewthat wrote:
I used to like the Black and White minstrels, it used to give them an honest days pay.
And others offence!
[quote][p][bold]Ineverknewthat[/bold] wrote: I used to like the Black and White minstrels, it used to give them an honest days pay.[/p][/quote]And others offence! lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -19

9:54pm Wed 11 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

costa-del-blowfly wrote:
lastlaugh,. wrote:
Justice79 wrote:
"Erm hello is that the serious crime squad? Id like to report seeing some rude words on the internet"
its quite clear this is all beyond you when you think racially offensive and illegal words are 'rude words'

Perhaps you should just stick to reading the posts..
I think you find that no words are 'illegal'. I can't remember a law being passed which outright prohibited the use of any word in the English (or any other) language in the UK.

When language (or words) become 'illegal' is when they cause offence. That itself can be quite subjective - just look at the current debate concerning the use of Tottenham Hotspurs' nickname by a large section of their fans.
"When language (or words) become 'illegal' is when they cause offence"

Quite! Which means they are illegal at that time.

Racially abusive terms will cause offence wherever and whenever they are seen by decent minded people...ipso facto they are illegal.
[quote][p][bold]costa-del-blowfly[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Justice79[/bold] wrote: "Erm hello is that the serious crime squad? Id like to report seeing some rude words on the internet"[/p][/quote]its quite clear this is all beyond you when you think racially offensive and illegal words are 'rude words' Perhaps you should just stick to reading the posts..[/p][/quote]I think you find that no words are 'illegal'. I can't remember a law being passed which outright prohibited the use of any word in the English (or any other) language in the UK. When language (or words) become 'illegal' is when they cause offence. That itself can be quite subjective - just look at the current debate concerning the use of Tottenham Hotspurs' nickname by a large section of their fans.[/p][/quote]"When language (or words) become 'illegal' is when they cause offence" Quite! Which means they are illegal at that time. Racially abusive terms will cause offence wherever and whenever they are seen by decent minded people...ipso facto they are illegal. lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -18

11:35pm Wed 11 Sep 13

mr.happy says...

Mr. Sheridan told me he had The Horn just the other week, I just thought Mrs. Sheridan was in for a lively night!
Mr. Sheridan told me he had The Horn just the other week, I just thought Mrs. Sheridan was in for a lively night! mr.happy
  • Score: 19

12:37am Thu 12 Sep 13

costa-del-blowfly says...

lastlaugh,. wrote:
costa-del-blowfly wrote:
lastlaugh,. wrote:
Justice79 wrote:
"Erm hello is that the serious crime squad? Id like to report seeing some rude words on the internet"
its quite clear this is all beyond you when you think racially offensive and illegal words are 'rude words'

Perhaps you should just stick to reading the posts..
I think you find that no words are 'illegal'. I can't remember a law being passed which outright prohibited the use of any word in the English (or any other) language in the UK.

When language (or words) become 'illegal' is when they cause offence. That itself can be quite subjective - just look at the current debate concerning the use of Tottenham Hotspurs' nickname by a large section of their fans.
"When language (or words) become 'illegal' is when they cause offence"

Quite! Which means they are illegal at that time.

Racially abusive terms will cause offence wherever and whenever they are seen by decent minded people...ipso facto they are illegal.
No, not at all. The world according to you would mean that the 'N' on any NWA album would be censored and the previously referred to dog would require a Stalinistic revision to become acceptable?

The fact is that there are no words which are inherently not illegal, that is can never be uttered. Do you accept that?
[quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]costa-del-blowfly[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Justice79[/bold] wrote: "Erm hello is that the serious crime squad? Id like to report seeing some rude words on the internet"[/p][/quote]its quite clear this is all beyond you when you think racially offensive and illegal words are 'rude words' Perhaps you should just stick to reading the posts..[/p][/quote]I think you find that no words are 'illegal'. I can't remember a law being passed which outright prohibited the use of any word in the English (or any other) language in the UK. When language (or words) become 'illegal' is when they cause offence. That itself can be quite subjective - just look at the current debate concerning the use of Tottenham Hotspurs' nickname by a large section of their fans.[/p][/quote]"When language (or words) become 'illegal' is when they cause offence" Quite! Which means they are illegal at that time. Racially abusive terms will cause offence wherever and whenever they are seen by decent minded people...ipso facto they are illegal.[/p][/quote]No, not at all. The world according to you would mean that the 'N' on any NWA album would be censored and the previously referred to dog would require a Stalinistic revision to become acceptable? The fact is that there are no words which are inherently not illegal, that is can never be uttered. Do you accept that? costa-del-blowfly
  • Score: 15

7:09am Thu 12 Sep 13

Justice79 says...

lastlaugh,. wrote:
costa-del-blowfly wrote:
lastlaugh,. wrote:
Justice79 wrote:
"Erm hello is that the serious crime squad? Id like to report seeing some rude words on the internet"
its quite clear this is all beyond you when you think racially offensive and illegal words are 'rude words'

Perhaps you should just stick to reading the posts..
I think you find that no words are 'illegal'. I can't remember a law being passed which outright prohibited the use of any word in the English (or any other) language in the UK.

When language (or words) become 'illegal' is when they cause offence. That itself can be quite subjective - just look at the current debate concerning the use of Tottenham Hotspurs' nickname by a large section of their fans.
"When language (or words) become 'illegal' is when they cause offence"

Quite! Which means they are illegal at that time.

Racially abusive terms will cause offence wherever and whenever they are seen by decent minded people...ipso facto they are illegal.
Give it a rest you may think yourself clever but after the best part of a day of your huffing and puffing the comments still remain on this site or will they be taken down once the serious crime squad step in?
[quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]costa-del-blowfly[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Justice79[/bold] wrote: "Erm hello is that the serious crime squad? Id like to report seeing some rude words on the internet"[/p][/quote]its quite clear this is all beyond you when you think racially offensive and illegal words are 'rude words' Perhaps you should just stick to reading the posts..[/p][/quote]I think you find that no words are 'illegal'. I can't remember a law being passed which outright prohibited the use of any word in the English (or any other) language in the UK. When language (or words) become 'illegal' is when they cause offence. That itself can be quite subjective - just look at the current debate concerning the use of Tottenham Hotspurs' nickname by a large section of their fans.[/p][/quote]"When language (or words) become 'illegal' is when they cause offence" Quite! Which means they are illegal at that time. Racially abusive terms will cause offence wherever and whenever they are seen by decent minded people...ipso facto they are illegal.[/p][/quote]Give it a rest you may think yourself clever but after the best part of a day of your huffing and puffing the comments still remain on this site or will they be taken down once the serious crime squad step in? Justice79
  • Score: 15

7:37am Thu 12 Sep 13

Wiserman77 says...

Lastlaugh. You stated at 7.35pm on Wednesday: 'There are of course cultural reasons for children to miss off school, the fact you haven't got the imagination to come up with the obvious does not mean they dont exist.'

Well the only one I can think of is young girls being removed from school to do the skivvying and cleaning the caravan, but I would hardly call that 'cultural', would you? You have now stated there are indeed 'cultural' reasons for the removal of children from school, so could you please enlighten us all and give us some examples.
Lastlaugh. You stated at 7.35pm on Wednesday: 'There are of course cultural reasons for children to miss off school, the fact you haven't got the imagination to come up with the obvious does not mean they dont exist.' Well the only one I can think of is young girls being removed from school to do the skivvying and cleaning the caravan, but I would hardly call that 'cultural', would you? You have now stated there are indeed 'cultural' reasons for the removal of children from school, so could you please enlighten us all and give us some examples. Wiserman77
  • Score: 15

8:51am Thu 12 Sep 13

friday_woods says...

D'ya like dawgs?
D'ya like dawgs? friday_woods
  • Score: 15

2:07pm Thu 12 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

costa-del-blowfly wrote:
lastlaugh,. wrote:
costa-del-blowfly wrote:
lastlaugh,. wrote:
Justice79 wrote:
"Erm hello is that the serious crime squad? Id like to report seeing some rude words on the internet"
its quite clear this is all beyond you when you think racially offensive and illegal words are 'rude words'

Perhaps you should just stick to reading the posts..
I think you find that no words are 'illegal'. I can't remember a law being passed which outright prohibited the use of any word in the English (or any other) language in the UK.

When language (or words) become 'illegal' is when they cause offence. That itself can be quite subjective - just look at the current debate concerning the use of Tottenham Hotspurs' nickname by a large section of their fans.
"When language (or words) become 'illegal' is when they cause offence"

Quite! Which means they are illegal at that time.

Racially abusive terms will cause offence wherever and whenever they are seen by decent minded people...ipso facto they are illegal.
No, not at all. The world according to you would mean that the 'N' on any NWA album would be censored and the previously referred to dog would require a Stalinistic revision to become acceptable?

The fact is that there are no words which are inherently not illegal, that is can never be uttered. Do you accept that?
illegal
adj
1. forbidden by law; unlawful; illicit
2. unauthorized or prohibited by a code of official or accepted rules

The latter definition would seem to cover your contention adequately.
[quote][p][bold]costa-del-blowfly[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]costa-del-blowfly[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Justice79[/bold] wrote: "Erm hello is that the serious crime squad? Id like to report seeing some rude words on the internet"[/p][/quote]its quite clear this is all beyond you when you think racially offensive and illegal words are 'rude words' Perhaps you should just stick to reading the posts..[/p][/quote]I think you find that no words are 'illegal'. I can't remember a law being passed which outright prohibited the use of any word in the English (or any other) language in the UK. When language (or words) become 'illegal' is when they cause offence. That itself can be quite subjective - just look at the current debate concerning the use of Tottenham Hotspurs' nickname by a large section of their fans.[/p][/quote]"When language (or words) become 'illegal' is when they cause offence" Quite! Which means they are illegal at that time. Racially abusive terms will cause offence wherever and whenever they are seen by decent minded people...ipso facto they are illegal.[/p][/quote]No, not at all. The world according to you would mean that the 'N' on any NWA album would be censored and the previously referred to dog would require a Stalinistic revision to become acceptable? The fact is that there are no words which are inherently not illegal, that is can never be uttered. Do you accept that?[/p][/quote]illegal [ɪˈliːgəl] adj 1. forbidden by law; unlawful; illicit 2. unauthorized or prohibited by a code of official or accepted rules The latter definition would seem to cover your contention adequately. lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -16

2:09pm Thu 12 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

Justice79 wrote:
lastlaugh,. wrote:
costa-del-blowfly wrote:
lastlaugh,. wrote:
Justice79 wrote:
"Erm hello is that the serious crime squad? Id like to report seeing some rude words on the internet"
its quite clear this is all beyond you when you think racially offensive and illegal words are 'rude words'

Perhaps you should just stick to reading the posts..
I think you find that no words are 'illegal'. I can't remember a law being passed which outright prohibited the use of any word in the English (or any other) language in the UK.

When language (or words) become 'illegal' is when they cause offence. That itself can be quite subjective - just look at the current debate concerning the use of Tottenham Hotspurs' nickname by a large section of their fans.
"When language (or words) become 'illegal' is when they cause offence"

Quite! Which means they are illegal at that time.

Racially abusive terms will cause offence wherever and whenever they are seen by decent minded people...ipso facto they are illegal.
Give it a rest you may think yourself clever but after the best part of a day of your huffing and puffing the comments still remain on this site or will they be taken down once the serious crime squad step in?
You obviously dont understand the implications and nonce's within some statements.

Your question about the action of the SCS is not for me to answer.
[quote][p][bold]Justice79[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]costa-del-blowfly[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Justice79[/bold] wrote: "Erm hello is that the serious crime squad? Id like to report seeing some rude words on the internet"[/p][/quote]its quite clear this is all beyond you when you think racially offensive and illegal words are 'rude words' Perhaps you should just stick to reading the posts..[/p][/quote]I think you find that no words are 'illegal'. I can't remember a law being passed which outright prohibited the use of any word in the English (or any other) language in the UK. When language (or words) become 'illegal' is when they cause offence. That itself can be quite subjective - just look at the current debate concerning the use of Tottenham Hotspurs' nickname by a large section of their fans.[/p][/quote]"When language (or words) become 'illegal' is when they cause offence" Quite! Which means they are illegal at that time. Racially abusive terms will cause offence wherever and whenever they are seen by decent minded people...ipso facto they are illegal.[/p][/quote]Give it a rest you may think yourself clever but after the best part of a day of your huffing and puffing the comments still remain on this site or will they be taken down once the serious crime squad step in?[/p][/quote]You obviously dont understand the implications and nonce's within some statements. Your question about the action of the SCS is not for me to answer. lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -16

2:16pm Thu 12 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

Wiserman77 wrote:
Lastlaugh. You stated at 7.35pm on Wednesday: 'There are of course cultural reasons for children to miss off school, the fact you haven't got the imagination to come up with the obvious does not mean they dont exist.'

Well the only one I can think of is young girls being removed from school to do the skivvying and cleaning the caravan, but I would hardly call that 'cultural', would you? You have now stated there are indeed 'cultural' reasons for the removal of children from school, so could you please enlighten us all and give us some examples.
You keep making this claim about some statement i made some time ago on some thread in some universe and when asked to produce evidence of the claim you reiterate you claim.. as if thats the evidence..you dont seem to be firing on all cylinders..try to concentrate on the issue at hand.

The only thing your imagination can come up with shows clearly you are a person of little imagination, perhaps stymied by lack of intelligence?

BUT you have come up with one reason, albeit a rather strange one, thereby providing proof to your own question.

Do you need to see more than one fly in the soup to believe there is a fly in your soup?
[quote][p][bold]Wiserman77[/bold] wrote: Lastlaugh. You stated at 7.35pm on Wednesday: 'There are of course cultural reasons for children to miss off school, the fact you haven't got the imagination to come up with the obvious does not mean they dont exist.' Well the only one I can think of is young girls being removed from school to do the skivvying and cleaning the caravan, but I would hardly call that 'cultural', would you? You have now stated there are indeed 'cultural' reasons for the removal of children from school, so could you please enlighten us all and give us some examples.[/p][/quote]You keep making this claim about some statement i made some time ago on some thread in some universe and when asked to produce evidence of the claim you reiterate you claim.. as if thats the evidence..you dont seem to be firing on all cylinders..try to concentrate on the issue at hand. The only thing your imagination can come up with shows clearly you are a person of little imagination, perhaps stymied by lack of intelligence? BUT you have come up with one reason, albeit a rather strange one, thereby providing proof to your own question. Do you need to see more than one fly in the soup to believe there is a fly in your soup? lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -18

2:17pm Thu 12 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

friday_woods wrote:
D'ya like dawgs?
Travellers, in the main, rarely attend school because of logistic reasons and so might be a little limited in spelling...whats your excuse?
[quote][p][bold]friday_woods[/bold] wrote: D'ya like dawgs?[/p][/quote]Travellers, in the main, rarely attend school because of logistic reasons and so might be a little limited in spelling...whats your excuse? lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -16

2:51pm Thu 12 Sep 13

Wiserman77 says...

lastlaugh,. wrote:
Wiserman77 wrote:
Lastlaugh. You stated at 7.35pm on Wednesday: 'There are of course cultural reasons for children to miss off school, the fact you haven't got the imagination to come up with the obvious does not mean they dont exist.'

Well the only one I can think of is young girls being removed from school to do the skivvying and cleaning the caravan, but I would hardly call that 'cultural', would you? You have now stated there are indeed 'cultural' reasons for the removal of children from school, so could you please enlighten us all and give us some examples.
You keep making this claim about some statement i made some time ago on some thread in some universe and when asked to produce evidence of the claim you reiterate you claim.. as if thats the evidence..you dont seem to be firing on all cylinders..try to concentrate on the issue at hand.

The only thing your imagination can come up with shows clearly you are a person of little imagination, perhaps stymied by lack of intelligence?

BUT you have come up with one reason, albeit a rather strange one, thereby providing proof to your own question.

Do you need to see more than one fly in the soup to believe there is a fly in your soup?
Lastlaugh.,,. (lol), disregard the statement you made previously, which I cannot find the link to. Re-read your statement you made yesterday at 7.35pm yesterday, you clearly stated there are cultural reasons for removing traveller children from school. Never mind the fly in the soup bull---, just give us some 'cultural' reasons. I won't be holding my breath 'cos I know you can't give one. Lol, hoisted by your own petard.
[quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Wiserman77[/bold] wrote: Lastlaugh. You stated at 7.35pm on Wednesday: 'There are of course cultural reasons for children to miss off school, the fact you haven't got the imagination to come up with the obvious does not mean they dont exist.' Well the only one I can think of is young girls being removed from school to do the skivvying and cleaning the caravan, but I would hardly call that 'cultural', would you? You have now stated there are indeed 'cultural' reasons for the removal of children from school, so could you please enlighten us all and give us some examples.[/p][/quote]You keep making this claim about some statement i made some time ago on some thread in some universe and when asked to produce evidence of the claim you reiterate you claim.. as if thats the evidence..you dont seem to be firing on all cylinders..try to concentrate on the issue at hand. The only thing your imagination can come up with shows clearly you are a person of little imagination, perhaps stymied by lack of intelligence? BUT you have come up with one reason, albeit a rather strange one, thereby providing proof to your own question. Do you need to see more than one fly in the soup to believe there is a fly in your soup?[/p][/quote]Lastlaugh.,,. (lol), disregard the statement you made previously, which I cannot find the link to. Re-read your statement you made yesterday at 7.35pm yesterday, you clearly stated there are cultural reasons for removing traveller children from school. Never mind the fly in the soup bull---, just give us some 'cultural' reasons. I won't be holding my breath 'cos I know you can't give one. Lol, hoisted by your own petard. Wiserman77
  • Score: 19

6:14pm Thu 12 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

Wiserman77 wrote:
lastlaugh,. wrote:
Wiserman77 wrote:
Lastlaugh. You stated at 7.35pm on Wednesday: 'There are of course cultural reasons for children to miss off school, the fact you haven't got the imagination to come up with the obvious does not mean they dont exist.'

Well the only one I can think of is young girls being removed from school to do the skivvying and cleaning the caravan, but I would hardly call that 'cultural', would you? You have now stated there are indeed 'cultural' reasons for the removal of children from school, so could you please enlighten us all and give us some examples.
You keep making this claim about some statement i made some time ago on some thread in some universe and when asked to produce evidence of the claim you reiterate you claim.. as if thats the evidence..you dont seem to be firing on all cylinders..try to concentrate on the issue at hand.

The only thing your imagination can come up with shows clearly you are a person of little imagination, perhaps stymied by lack of intelligence?

BUT you have come up with one reason, albeit a rather strange one, thereby providing proof to your own question.

Do you need to see more than one fly in the soup to believe there is a fly in your soup?
Lastlaugh.,,. (lol), disregard the statement you made previously, which I cannot find the link to. Re-read your statement you made yesterday at 7.35pm yesterday, you clearly stated there are cultural reasons for removing traveller children from school. Never mind the fly in the soup bull---, just give us some 'cultural' reasons. I won't be holding my breath 'cos I know you can't give one. Lol, hoisted by your own petard.
Oh, so you cannot find something you says exists and which I say doesn't...which, following the rules of probabilities would suggest it didn't!

Do you often think things exist that dont? How often? Always?

Err, shall we look at what I said in regards to children missing school?

"There are of course cultural reasons for children to miss off school"

No specific ethnicity there...is there?

Again you seeing things that dont exist!

How you struggle...oh how I laugh last
[quote][p][bold]Wiserman77[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lastlaugh,.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Wiserman77[/bold] wrote: Lastlaugh. You stated at 7.35pm on Wednesday: 'There are of course cultural reasons for children to miss off school, the fact you haven't got the imagination to come up with the obvious does not mean they dont exist.' Well the only one I can think of is young girls being removed from school to do the skivvying and cleaning the caravan, but I would hardly call that 'cultural', would you? You have now stated there are indeed 'cultural' reasons for the removal of children from school, so could you please enlighten us all and give us some examples.[/p][/quote]You keep making this claim about some statement i made some time ago on some thread in some universe and when asked to produce evidence of the claim you reiterate you claim.. as if thats the evidence..you dont seem to be firing on all cylinders..try to concentrate on the issue at hand. The only thing your imagination can come up with shows clearly you are a person of little imagination, perhaps stymied by lack of intelligence? BUT you have come up with one reason, albeit a rather strange one, thereby providing proof to your own question. Do you need to see more than one fly in the soup to believe there is a fly in your soup?[/p][/quote]Lastlaugh.,,. (lol), disregard the statement you made previously, which I cannot find the link to. Re-read your statement you made yesterday at 7.35pm yesterday, you clearly stated there are cultural reasons for removing traveller children from school. Never mind the fly in the soup bull---, just give us some 'cultural' reasons. I won't be holding my breath 'cos I know you can't give one. Lol, hoisted by your own petard.[/p][/quote]Oh, so you cannot find something you says exists and which I say doesn't...which, following the rules of probabilities would suggest it didn't! Do you often think things exist that dont? How often? Always? Err, shall we look at what I said in regards to children missing school? "There are of course cultural reasons for children to miss off school" No specific ethnicity there...is there? Again you seeing things that dont exist! How you struggle...oh how I laugh last lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -18

9:50am Fri 13 Sep 13

Wiserman77 says...

As I suspected Lastlaugh..,, you are unable to respond, because to do so would make you look even more of a simpleton than you already are. So to deflect from your ignorance you have to now pretend that you are an 'expert' in all cultures but your own. Oh how we laughed!
As I suspected Lastlaugh..,, you are unable to respond, because to do so would make you look even more of a simpleton than you already are. So to deflect from your ignorance you have to now pretend that you are an 'expert' in all cultures but your own. Oh how we laughed! Wiserman77
  • Score: 14

5:13pm Fri 13 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

Wiserman77 wrote:
As I suspected Lastlaugh..,, you are unable to respond, because to do so would make you look even more of a simpleton than you already are. So to deflect from your ignorance you have to now pretend that you are an 'expert' in all cultures but your own. Oh how we laughed!
Er...can i just nudge this post into your view (it was above your last one and actually was a response,but hey ho you missed it)


"Oh, so you cannot find something you says exists and which I say doesn't...which, following the rules of probabilities would suggest it didn't!

Do you often think things exist that dont? How often? Always?

Err, shall we look at what I said in regards to children missing school?

"There are of course cultural reasons for children to miss off school"

No specific ethnicity there...is there?

Again you seeing things that dont exist!

How you struggle...oh how I laugh last"

See, a response that with with your last but one post.

Oh how i laugh wondering how you missed the post that preceded your one...

But how you feel i have no expertise into my own culture is...well curious...how did you come to that conclusion?
[quote][p][bold]Wiserman77[/bold] wrote: As I suspected Lastlaugh..,, you are unable to respond, because to do so would make you look even more of a simpleton than you already are. So to deflect from your ignorance you have to now pretend that you are an 'expert' in all cultures but your own. Oh how we laughed![/p][/quote]Er...can i just nudge this post into your view (it was above your last one and actually was a response,but hey ho you missed it) "Oh, so you cannot find something you says exists and which I say doesn't...which, following the rules of probabilities would suggest it didn't! Do you often think things exist that dont? How often? Always? Err, shall we look at what I said in regards to children missing school? "There are of course cultural reasons for children to miss off school" No specific ethnicity there...is there? Again you seeing things that dont exist! How you struggle...oh how I laugh last" See, a response that with with your last but one post. Oh how i laugh wondering how you missed the post that preceded your one... But how you feel i have no expertise into my own culture is...well curious...how did you come to that conclusion? lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -10

11:10am Mon 16 Sep 13

sandgronun64 says...

… and it was ever thus; as the world debated the issues of race and crime, the rhinos of the world, (animals that had occupied the planet for many millions of years prior to the appearance of ‘Humanity’) slowly and inevitably slipped toward extinction.

Once it happened, those same people began another debate, as to why it had been 'allowed' to happen and who was to blame.

Meanwhile, conspiracy theorists variously debated whether the rhino was truly extinct (citing that there was evidence that they had all been moved to “area 52” and were in fact now being genetically modified) or whether they had indeed ever existed; citing them as having been merely a ‘ruse’ to get unsuspecting western tourists over to poor African or Asian countries.

And whilst all this was taking place, the World’s biodiversity slowly diminished, along with all hope of the continuance of what had become known at that time as ‘modern culture.’

RIP to all of them. Only the Rhino will yet be missed

Epitaph for the Rhino Circa 2100AD
… and it was ever thus; as the world debated the issues of race and crime, the rhinos of the world, (animals that had occupied the planet for many millions of years prior to the appearance of ‘Humanity’) slowly and inevitably slipped toward extinction. Once it happened, those same people began another debate, as to why it had been 'allowed' to happen and who was to blame. Meanwhile, conspiracy theorists variously debated whether the rhino was truly extinct (citing that there was evidence that they had all been moved to “area 52” and were in fact now being genetically modified) or whether they had indeed ever existed; citing them as having been merely a ‘ruse’ to get unsuspecting western tourists over to poor African or Asian countries. And whilst all this was taking place, the World’s biodiversity slowly diminished, along with all hope of the continuance of what had become known at that time as ‘modern culture.’ RIP to all of them. Only the Rhino will yet be missed Epitaph for the Rhino Circa 2100AD sandgronun64
  • Score: -1

9:47pm Mon 16 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

Mankind, the most vicious animal on the planet..
Mankind, the most vicious animal on the planet.. lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -1

8:15pm Tue 17 Sep 13

lastlaugh,. says...

Wiserman77 wrote:
As I suspected Lastlaugh..,, you are unable to respond, because to do so would make you look even more of a simpleton than you already are. So to deflect from your ignorance you have to now pretend that you are an 'expert' in all cultures but your own. Oh how we laughed!
Still no reply to my reply to your questions...locked you in the attic have they?
[quote][p][bold]Wiserman77[/bold] wrote: As I suspected Lastlaugh..,, you are unable to respond, because to do so would make you look even more of a simpleton than you already are. So to deflect from your ignorance you have to now pretend that you are an 'expert' in all cultures but your own. Oh how we laughed![/p][/quote]Still no reply to my reply to your questions...locked you in the attic have they? lastlaugh,.
  • Score: -2

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree