LIVE: Updates from Colchester Council meeting to decide if residents who do not recycle should be fined (From Gazette)
Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting GAZETTE NEWS to 80360, or email
LIVE: Updates from Colchester Council meeting to decide if residents who do not recycle should be fined
6:00pm Monday 28th January 2013 in News
MEMBERS of Colchester Council Finance and Audit Scrutiny Panel are due to debate the merits of fining residents who persistently refuse to recycle.
Latest Update Tweets
Gazette has no responsibility or control over the content on external blogging sites, but you can contact us if you have a complaint.
Comments(25)
Reginald47
says...
11:16pm Mon 28 Jan 13
oliver25
says...
2:14am Tue 29 Jan 13
G.Speel
says...
3:47am Tue 29 Jan 13
Say It As It Is OK?
says...
8:22am Tue 29 Jan 13
I recall finding a large bag of builders rubble dumped outside a property I owned in Newtown. The bin men refused to take it. It wasn't my waste. Would I be fined?
Remember the council don't collect rubbish from individual properties, they operate a "kerbside" collection only and rubbish can be left outside the property, on the pavement, from 4pm the day before collection is due. From that point does the resident remain responsible for what has been left outside the boundary of their property?
Surely without the council changing the way they collect household waste (direct from the household) which is not necessary, then the current system is open for others, who don't recycle, to dump their rubbish outside any property.
jammin
says...
8:35am Tue 29 Jan 13
Their the kind of people that need to be fined. Lazy, inconsiderate slobs.
TheCaptain
says...
8:54am Tue 29 Jan 13
oliver25 wrote:No you couldn't be fined if there were no recycling facilities at your property
i would be more than happy to recycle , but living in a communial area, with only one bin allocated for several flats , i find this impossible , i did visit Angel court once to enquire about recycling plans in my area only to have the member of staff shrug her shoulders at me !! , not being a car owner also makes this impossible too ....... surely no fines for this ??
TheCaptain
says...
8:55am Tue 29 Jan 13
Say It As It Is OK? wrote:You need to report that as fly tipping if it's on public land.
Its a scatterbrained idea that frankly would cost too much to enforce as well as, in most cases be impossible to prove.
I recall finding a large bag of builders rubble dumped outside a property I owned in Newtown. The bin men refused to take it. It wasn't my waste. Would I be fined?
Remember the council don't collect rubbish from individual properties, they operate a "kerbside" collection only and rubbish can be left outside the property, on the pavement, from 4pm the day before collection is due. From that point does the resident remain responsible for what has been left outside the boundary of their property?
Surely without the council changing the way they collect household waste (direct from the household) which is not necessary, then the current system is open for others, who don't recycle, to dump their rubbish outside any property.
I assume so investigation would take place. If the bags contains letters with your address on then the rubbish is yours....
romantic
says...
9:58am Tue 29 Jan 13
It would work far better if people were paid for their recycling. Just a nominal amount, but money that can be claimed back every so often. You pay for it by the fact that less landfill space is being used. Do that, and plenty of those who are currently too lazy to recycle, or just do not see the point, will soon sign up to it.
DelA
says...
12:17pm Tue 29 Jan 13
TheCaptain
says...
1:12pm Tue 29 Jan 13
DelA wrote:Generally spilt waste is caused by people not containing things very well or leaving bags out to early.
If they collected every piece instead of leaving some behind ie waste food and sometimes paper and cupboard l, I would do more. They should have some pride in their work.
My road is on the food waste trial and those of us who use this have no problems. However the people who can't be bothered and dump their food waste in black bags always have their backed ripped open by the local cats. Everyone needs to take responsibility for their own rubbish and not blame someone else
DelA
says...
1:17pm Tue 29 Jan 13
JCoe1980
says...
2:44pm Tue 29 Jan 13
wellnow
says...
3:19pm Tue 29 Jan 13
Say It As It Is OK?
says...
3:22pm Tue 29 Jan 13
TheCaptain wrote:The builders rubble was reported by me. After three weeks the council finally removed it from the kerbside. As you say it was on public land, eg; the edge of the pavement.
Say It As It Is OK? wrote:You need to report that as fly tipping if it's on public land.
Its a scatterbrained idea that frankly would cost too much to enforce as well as, in most cases be impossible to prove.
I recall finding a large bag of builders rubble dumped outside a property I owned in Newtown. The bin men refused to take it. It wasn't my waste. Would I be fined?
Remember the council don't collect rubbish from individual properties, they operate a "kerbside" collection only and rubbish can be left outside the property, on the pavement, from 4pm the day before collection is due. From that point does the resident remain responsible for what has been left outside the boundary of their property?
Surely without the council changing the way they collect household waste (direct from the household) which is not necessary, then the current system is open for others, who don't recycle, to dump their rubbish outside any property.
I assume so investigation would take place. If the bags contains letters with your address on then the rubbish is yours....
We do recycle but the crux of the matter is the council has to prove who left the offending material before they can prosecute and just because something is left outside someone's home that is not proof it belongs to that householder.
The issuing of fixed penalties, in most cases, would cost the council more. And anyone who leaves a paper trail of names and addresses deserve to be prosecuted.
zt00013
says...
5:02pm Tue 29 Jan 13
So long as the council makes all the proper provisions for the recycling to be done well, this should not be a problem. I now live in Lambeth and the recycling regime there is brilliant and well ordered. Assuming it is organised well, it is right and proper that ignorant people are punished for their selfish actions.
theequaliser1
says...
10:38pm Tue 29 Jan 13
Next it will be sneezing in the street in public.
How can you prove that you recycle or not.
People will just load up there wares in a supermarket chuck away carrier bag and hide it in a black bin liner, the bin liners are not numbered you will only get caught if you have stuff with your name inside the bag like letters etc.
Better to educate people by debate and interjection, than sending penalty notices in the post.
How about fines for poor council staff and public council representatives who make dodgy and silly decisions
zt00013
says...
12:45pm Wed 30 Jan 13
Education would of course go hand in hand with an efficient policy enforcing good recycling principles
A fine would occur if you repeatedly put all rubbish in one bag rather than taking the time to organise it and thus recycle properly.
TheCaptain
says...
12:14pm Thu 31 Jan 13
Say It As It Is OK? wrote:That's unusual , I've reported fly tipping a few times and it's always gone within 2 or 3 days.
TheCaptain wrote:The builders rubble was reported by me. After three weeks the council finally removed it from the kerbside. As you say it was on public land, eg; the edge of the pavement.
Say It As It Is OK? wrote:You need to report that as fly tipping if it's on public land.
Its a scatterbrained idea that frankly would cost too much to enforce as well as, in most cases be impossible to prove.
I recall finding a large bag of builders rubble dumped outside a property I owned in Newtown. The bin men refused to take it. It wasn't my waste. Would I be fined?
Remember the council don't collect rubbish from individual properties, they operate a "kerbside" collection only and rubbish can be left outside the property, on the pavement, from 4pm the day before collection is due. From that point does the resident remain responsible for what has been left outside the boundary of their property?
Surely without the council changing the way they collect household waste (direct from the household) which is not necessary, then the current system is open for others, who don't recycle, to dump their rubbish outside any property.
I assume so investigation would take place. If the bags contains letters with your address on then the rubbish is yours....
We do recycle but the crux of the matter is the council has to prove who left the offending material before they can prosecute and just because something is left outside someone's home that is not proof it belongs to that householder.
The issuing of fixed penalties, in most cases, would cost the council more. And anyone who leaves a paper trail of names and addresses deserve to be prosecuted.
Yes it will be difficult to prove who has not recycled. Possible just a few fines reported in the press might make other think. I doubt it though.
SOMETHING2SAY
says...
12:23pm Thu 31 Jan 13
wellnow
says...
1:51pm Thu 31 Jan 13
romantic
says...
3:55pm Thu 31 Jan 13
wellnow wrote:Speaking as an atheist and Republican, my understanding is that the Queen sees her role as not just a job called "Queen", but as a commitment made at the Coronation to continue until death, be that a short time or a long time. She sees it as her duty before God, and considers that only God gets to decide when the time is up.
Straying slightly why dosent the queen abdecate in favour of charles.
Chances are this means a series of middle-aged monarchs: guesstimate Charles in 2020, say. He lives to 2035, William (by then in his mid-50s) takes over and lives another 30 years, by which time the currently unborn 3rd in line is in his/her 50s and the year is 2065. Or maybe we atheist Republicans will get our way by then!
Of course, unexpected stuff can happen, but that sequence is pretty much set in stone unless something unforseen happens.
Reginald47
says...
5:14pm Thu 31 Jan 13
wellnow
says...
8:28am Fri 1 Feb 13
John Vencato
says...
2:43pm Sat 2 Feb 13
wellnow wrote:Please come back Gordon Brown all is forgiven.
Straying a bit more slightly.who wishes that gordon brown and his mob had been put back in to sort out the mess and not this bunch of moronic scroungers.
We made mistake or Mr Clegg did?
Fellulah69 says...
8:38pm Mon 28 Jan 13