Washington, Friday
THREE men have now been arrested in the case of the attack on skating
champion Nancy Kerrigan.
They include Shawn Eckardt, who was bodyguard to Miss Kerrigan's
rival, Tonya Harding, and Shane Stant who allegedly hit Kerrigan on the
knee with a steel club on January 6.
The purpose of the attack was to put Kerrigan out of the running for
the US Olympic team in Norway. She was the favourite for the women's
figure skating event, and Harding was her closest rival. Eckardt has
reportedly confessed to the plot, telling police that it was hatched by
Harding's former husband, Jeff Gillooly.
Gillooly was not arrested, like the others. He has gone into seclusion
with Harding and police have yet to say whether they will arrest him, or
her, or both.
Police spokesmen in Detroit, where the attack took place, and Oregon,
where the alleged plotters live, have said Harding was not involved in
the plot but other unofficial reports maintain she ordered it.
Harding and Gillooly claim they were divorced by mistake, that they
quarrelled, started divorce proceedings and were then reconciled --
without stopping the divorce, which came through last August. They have
continued to live together, and plan to remarry.
They live in Portland, Oregon, and that was where Eckardt was arrested
yesterday. A second suspect, Derrick Smith, flew in from Phoenix,
Arizona, and was arrested that night and the alleged hit man, Shane
Stant, gave himself up in Los Angeles. Eckardt has reportedly told
police that Stant was recruited by Smith, and was to be paid $100,000
for the deed.
The money would presumably have been paid if Harding won the Olympic
gold medal next month.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article