CONTROVERSIAL plans to build eight homes on land once home to a kitchen retailer have been given the go-ahead despite previously being thrown out.

The proposals for the residential development in Old Heath Road in Colchester were first submitted to Colchester Council in 2022. 

Panson Homes initially wanted to build 16 homes on the land once belonging to a Magnet store, which has since been renovated as a Starry Mart depot.

New plans, however, outlined a decrease in the number of homes earmarked for the site, from 16 to eight.

After the initial plans were put in residents and councillors raised concerns, particularly with regards to the potential for traffic congestion and parking problems.

Colchester Council refused the plans last September, saying they “would be out of character with the prevailing rhythm and pattern of the area”.

“The proposal would not offer satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers, resulting in a poor living environment and would offer a poor outdoor environment”, the council added.

However, the developers launched an appeal, which has now seen the plans be approved.

Gazette: Site - the building used to be home to MagnetSite - the building used to be home to Magnet (Image: Google)

Inspector David Cross said in his report: “In respect of outlook, the indicative layout shows dwellings to the rear of the site would look onto a shared parking and circulation area.

“But this arrangement is not unusual in suburban development and a suitable outlook from main habitable rooms could be provided onto rear gardens.

“The dwellings to the front would look onto the busy highway, but suitable outlook could also be provided onto enclosed rear gardens.”

In reference to concerns over “unsatisfactory outdoor amenity space”, the report said “plans show external garden areas could be provided of a suitable extent and which would provide appropriate amenity for residents”.

Mr Cross said the proposal would provide “suitable living conditions”.

Concerns had also previously been raised over flooding issues and highway safety and capacity.

However, the inspector ruled the proposal would be “acceptable” in respect of highway safety and transport issues, and that “suitable evidence” was provided in respect of flood risk.

Mr Cross concluded the appeal should be allowed.